How flatbed scanners upset accurate film dosimetry

Film is an excellent dosimeter for verification of dose distributions due to its high spatial resolution. Irradiated film can be digitized with low-cost, transmission, flatbed scanners. However, a disadvantage is their lateral scan effect (LSE): a scanner readout change over its lateral scan axis. A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2016-01, Vol.61 (2), p.625-649
Hauptverfasser: van Battum, L J, Huizenga, H, Verdaasdonk, R M, Heukelom, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 649
container_issue 2
container_start_page 625
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 61
creator van Battum, L J
Huizenga, H
Verdaasdonk, R M
Heukelom, S
description Film is an excellent dosimeter for verification of dose distributions due to its high spatial resolution. Irradiated film can be digitized with low-cost, transmission, flatbed scanners. However, a disadvantage is their lateral scan effect (LSE): a scanner readout change over its lateral scan axis. Although anisotropic light scattering was presented as the origin of the LSE, this paper presents an alternative cause. Hereto, LSE for two flatbed scanners (Epson 1680 Expression Pro and Epson 10000XL), and Gafchromic film (EBT, EBT2, EBT3) was investigated, focused on three effects: cross talk, optical path length and polarization. Cross talk was examined using triangular sheets of various optical densities. The optical path length effect was studied using absorptive and reflective neutral density filters with well-defined optical characteristics (OD range 0.2-2.0). Linear polarizer sheets were used to investigate light polarization on the CCD signal in absence and presence of (un)irradiated Gafchromic film. Film dose values ranged between 0.2 to 9 Gy, i.e. an optical density range between 0.25 to 1.1. Measurements were performed in the scanner's transmission mode, with red-green-blue channels. LSE was found to depend on scanner construction and film type. Its magnitude depends on dose: for 9 Gy increasing up to 14% at maximum lateral position. Cross talk was only significant in high contrast regions, up to 2% for very small fields. The optical path length effect introduced by film on the scanner causes 3% for pixels in the extreme lateral position. Light polarization due to film and the scanner's optical mirror system is the main contributor, different in magnitude for the red, green and blue channel. We concluded that any Gafchromic EBT type film scanned with a flatbed scanner will face these optical effects. Accurate dosimetry requires correction of LSE, therefore, determination of the LSE per color channel and dose delivered to the film.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/625
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760859868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760859868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-8a5641891dac07bdc38da3b3bd4ff695bb35374d234bf57d056e00985a907a8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EoqXwBxhQBgaWNH527NgjqoAiVWKB2fKnlCppgp0I9d-TqtAJMb3l3Hv1DkK3gJeAhSgwppBLYKzgUJCCE3aG5kA55JxxfI7mJ2CGrlLaYgwgSHmJZoRzISUnc0TW3VcWGj0Y77Jk9W7nY8rGPvkh09aOUQ8-C3XTZq5LdeuHuL9GF0E3yd_83AX6eH56X63zzdvL6-pxk1tawZALzXgJQoLTFlfGWSqcpoYaV4bAJTOGMlqVjtDSBFY5zLjHWAqmJa600HSBHo69few-R58G1dbJ-qbRO9-NSUHFsWBScDGh5Ija2KUUfVB9rFsd9wqwOrhSBxXqoEJxUERNrqbQ3U__aFrvTpFfORNwfwTqrlfbboy76V3Vt-bUoXoXJmz5B_bP8DcU_X3C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760859868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How flatbed scanners upset accurate film dosimetry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>van Battum, L J ; Huizenga, H ; Verdaasdonk, R M ; Heukelom, S</creator><creatorcontrib>van Battum, L J ; Huizenga, H ; Verdaasdonk, R M ; Heukelom, S</creatorcontrib><description>Film is an excellent dosimeter for verification of dose distributions due to its high spatial resolution. Irradiated film can be digitized with low-cost, transmission, flatbed scanners. However, a disadvantage is their lateral scan effect (LSE): a scanner readout change over its lateral scan axis. Although anisotropic light scattering was presented as the origin of the LSE, this paper presents an alternative cause. Hereto, LSE for two flatbed scanners (Epson 1680 Expression Pro and Epson 10000XL), and Gafchromic film (EBT, EBT2, EBT3) was investigated, focused on three effects: cross talk, optical path length and polarization. Cross talk was examined using triangular sheets of various optical densities. The optical path length effect was studied using absorptive and reflective neutral density filters with well-defined optical characteristics (OD range 0.2-2.0). Linear polarizer sheets were used to investigate light polarization on the CCD signal in absence and presence of (un)irradiated Gafchromic film. Film dose values ranged between 0.2 to 9 Gy, i.e. an optical density range between 0.25 to 1.1. Measurements were performed in the scanner's transmission mode, with red-green-blue channels. LSE was found to depend on scanner construction and film type. Its magnitude depends on dose: for 9 Gy increasing up to 14% at maximum lateral position. Cross talk was only significant in high contrast regions, up to 2% for very small fields. The optical path length effect introduced by film on the scanner causes 3% for pixels in the extreme lateral position. Light polarization due to film and the scanner's optical mirror system is the main contributor, different in magnitude for the red, green and blue channel. We concluded that any Gafchromic EBT type film scanned with a flatbed scanner will face these optical effects. Accurate dosimetry requires correction of LSE, therefore, determination of the LSE per color channel and dose delivered to the film.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/625</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26689962</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Anisotropy ; EBT ; EBT2 ; EBT3 ; film dosimetry ; Film Dosimetry - instrumentation ; Film Dosimetry - standards ; flatbed scanners ; Gafchromic ; lateral correction ; polarization ; X-Rays</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2016-01, Vol.61 (2), p.625-649</ispartof><rights>2016 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-8a5641891dac07bdc38da3b3bd4ff695bb35374d234bf57d056e00985a907a8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-8a5641891dac07bdc38da3b3bd4ff695bb35374d234bf57d056e00985a907a8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/625/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,53827,53874</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689962$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Battum, L J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huizenga, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdaasdonk, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heukelom, S</creatorcontrib><title>How flatbed scanners upset accurate film dosimetry</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>PMB</addtitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><description>Film is an excellent dosimeter for verification of dose distributions due to its high spatial resolution. Irradiated film can be digitized with low-cost, transmission, flatbed scanners. However, a disadvantage is their lateral scan effect (LSE): a scanner readout change over its lateral scan axis. Although anisotropic light scattering was presented as the origin of the LSE, this paper presents an alternative cause. Hereto, LSE for two flatbed scanners (Epson 1680 Expression Pro and Epson 10000XL), and Gafchromic film (EBT, EBT2, EBT3) was investigated, focused on three effects: cross talk, optical path length and polarization. Cross talk was examined using triangular sheets of various optical densities. The optical path length effect was studied using absorptive and reflective neutral density filters with well-defined optical characteristics (OD range 0.2-2.0). Linear polarizer sheets were used to investigate light polarization on the CCD signal in absence and presence of (un)irradiated Gafchromic film. Film dose values ranged between 0.2 to 9 Gy, i.e. an optical density range between 0.25 to 1.1. Measurements were performed in the scanner's transmission mode, with red-green-blue channels. LSE was found to depend on scanner construction and film type. Its magnitude depends on dose: for 9 Gy increasing up to 14% at maximum lateral position. Cross talk was only significant in high contrast regions, up to 2% for very small fields. The optical path length effect introduced by film on the scanner causes 3% for pixels in the extreme lateral position. Light polarization due to film and the scanner's optical mirror system is the main contributor, different in magnitude for the red, green and blue channel. We concluded that any Gafchromic EBT type film scanned with a flatbed scanner will face these optical effects. Accurate dosimetry requires correction of LSE, therefore, determination of the LSE per color channel and dose delivered to the film.</description><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>EBT</subject><subject>EBT2</subject><subject>EBT3</subject><subject>film dosimetry</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - standards</subject><subject>flatbed scanners</subject><subject>Gafchromic</subject><subject>lateral correction</subject><subject>polarization</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EoqXwBxhQBgaWNH527NgjqoAiVWKB2fKnlCppgp0I9d-TqtAJMb3l3Hv1DkK3gJeAhSgwppBLYKzgUJCCE3aG5kA55JxxfI7mJ2CGrlLaYgwgSHmJZoRzISUnc0TW3VcWGj0Y77Jk9W7nY8rGPvkh09aOUQ8-C3XTZq5LdeuHuL9GF0E3yd_83AX6eH56X63zzdvL6-pxk1tawZALzXgJQoLTFlfGWSqcpoYaV4bAJTOGMlqVjtDSBFY5zLjHWAqmJa600HSBHo69few-R58G1dbJ-qbRO9-NSUHFsWBScDGh5Ija2KUUfVB9rFsd9wqwOrhSBxXqoEJxUERNrqbQ3U__aFrvTpFfORNwfwTqrlfbboy76V3Vt-bUoXoXJmz5B_bP8DcU_X3C</recordid><startdate>20160121</startdate><enddate>20160121</enddate><creator>van Battum, L J</creator><creator>Huizenga, H</creator><creator>Verdaasdonk, R M</creator><creator>Heukelom, S</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160121</creationdate><title>How flatbed scanners upset accurate film dosimetry</title><author>van Battum, L J ; Huizenga, H ; Verdaasdonk, R M ; Heukelom, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-8a5641891dac07bdc38da3b3bd4ff695bb35374d234bf57d056e00985a907a8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>EBT</topic><topic>EBT2</topic><topic>EBT3</topic><topic>film dosimetry</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - standards</topic><topic>flatbed scanners</topic><topic>Gafchromic</topic><topic>lateral correction</topic><topic>polarization</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Battum, L J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huizenga, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdaasdonk, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heukelom, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Battum, L J</au><au>Huizenga, H</au><au>Verdaasdonk, R M</au><au>Heukelom, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How flatbed scanners upset accurate film dosimetry</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><stitle>PMB</stitle><addtitle>Phys. Med. Biol</addtitle><date>2016-01-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>649</epage><pages>625-649</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>Film is an excellent dosimeter for verification of dose distributions due to its high spatial resolution. Irradiated film can be digitized with low-cost, transmission, flatbed scanners. However, a disadvantage is their lateral scan effect (LSE): a scanner readout change over its lateral scan axis. Although anisotropic light scattering was presented as the origin of the LSE, this paper presents an alternative cause. Hereto, LSE for two flatbed scanners (Epson 1680 Expression Pro and Epson 10000XL), and Gafchromic film (EBT, EBT2, EBT3) was investigated, focused on three effects: cross talk, optical path length and polarization. Cross talk was examined using triangular sheets of various optical densities. The optical path length effect was studied using absorptive and reflective neutral density filters with well-defined optical characteristics (OD range 0.2-2.0). Linear polarizer sheets were used to investigate light polarization on the CCD signal in absence and presence of (un)irradiated Gafchromic film. Film dose values ranged between 0.2 to 9 Gy, i.e. an optical density range between 0.25 to 1.1. Measurements were performed in the scanner's transmission mode, with red-green-blue channels. LSE was found to depend on scanner construction and film type. Its magnitude depends on dose: for 9 Gy increasing up to 14% at maximum lateral position. Cross talk was only significant in high contrast regions, up to 2% for very small fields. The optical path length effect introduced by film on the scanner causes 3% for pixels in the extreme lateral position. Light polarization due to film and the scanner's optical mirror system is the main contributor, different in magnitude for the red, green and blue channel. We concluded that any Gafchromic EBT type film scanned with a flatbed scanner will face these optical effects. Accurate dosimetry requires correction of LSE, therefore, determination of the LSE per color channel and dose delivered to the film.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>26689962</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/625</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2016-01, Vol.61 (2), p.625-649
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760859868
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Anisotropy
EBT
EBT2
EBT3
film dosimetry
Film Dosimetry - instrumentation
Film Dosimetry - standards
flatbed scanners
Gafchromic
lateral correction
polarization
X-Rays
title How flatbed scanners upset accurate film dosimetry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A16%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20flatbed%20scanners%20upset%20accurate%20film%20dosimetry&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=van%20Battum,%20L%20J&rft.date=2016-01-21&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=649&rft.pages=625-649&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/625&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760859868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760859868&rft_id=info:pmid/26689962&rfr_iscdi=true