Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness
In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of Eur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain research 2000-06, Vol.868 (2), p.176-190 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 190 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | Brain research |
container_volume | 868 |
creator | Andjus, R.K. Konjević, D. Damjanović, I. Gačić, Z. |
description | In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of European eels, particularly suitable for long-lasting experiments. The drug exerted profound but reversible modifications of ERG records: (1) a dose-dependent increase of the amplitude and duration of the chemically isolated late receptor potential (LRP), (2) a partial unmasking of LRP, (3) a strong potentiation of the LRP-unmasking effect of low temperature, (4) a potentiation of light adaptation effects, and (5) a strong potentiation of the post-illumination hyperexcitability. The effects were explicable as due to a strong phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibiting, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) promoting, action of the drug. The effects were considerably stronger, or even of opposite sign, in comparison to those of the chemically related theophylline. PPF did not seriously affect the ERG c-wave originating in the pigment epithelium. The results suggested that the effects of PPF on vision may not seriously hamper the therapeutic use of the drug. They indicated, on the other hand, that PPF was a retinoactive drug of potential usefulness in the exploration of the complex biochemical events underlying visual transduction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02328-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17598099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006899300023283</els_id><sourcerecordid>17598099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b459a0cf261fc583817143c05f24c3c6b222751c3db7b6663c1a858c1b5ecf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCKCeEBwKTtKk6QmhaQOkSRyAc9SmDgvq2pJ0E7w93TohbpwsW99vyx8h5xRuKFB5-wIAMlZZxq8AroFxpmJ-QMZUpSyWLIFDMv5FRuQkhI--5TyDYzKioEQiUhiT-cxaNF2IGht95XW3dDVGJXq3yTu3wX5eR1j1hG88dq5u3n3eLp2JPIa2qUPP1BjCKTmyeRXwbF8n5G0-e50-xovnh6fp_SI2PGNdLItEZDkYyyS1RiiuaEoTbkBYlhhuZMEYSwU1vCzSQkrJDc2VUIYWAo3N-IRcDntb33yuMXR65YLBqsprbNZB01RkCrItKAbQ-CYEj1a33q1y_60p6K1AvROot3Y0gN4J1LzPXewPrIsVln9Sg7EeuBsA7N_cOPQ6GIe1wdL5XpMuG_fPiR-1p4CF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17598099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Andjus, R.K. ; Konjević, D. ; Damjanović, I. ; Gačić, Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andjus, R.K. ; Konjević, D. ; Damjanović, I. ; Gačić, Z.</creatorcontrib><description>In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of European eels, particularly suitable for long-lasting experiments. The drug exerted profound but reversible modifications of ERG records: (1) a dose-dependent increase of the amplitude and duration of the chemically isolated late receptor potential (LRP), (2) a partial unmasking of LRP, (3) a strong potentiation of the LRP-unmasking effect of low temperature, (4) a potentiation of light adaptation effects, and (5) a strong potentiation of the post-illumination hyperexcitability. The effects were explicable as due to a strong phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibiting, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) promoting, action of the drug. The effects were considerably stronger, or even of opposite sign, in comparison to those of the chemically related theophylline. PPF did not seriously affect the ERG c-wave originating in the pigment epithelium. The results suggested that the effects of PPF on vision may not seriously hamper the therapeutic use of the drug. They indicated, on the other hand, that PPF was a retinoactive drug of potential usefulness in the exploration of the complex biochemical events underlying visual transduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02328-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10854570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Ocular - physiology ; Anguilla ; Animals ; Body Temperature - physiology ; Dogfish ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Electroretinography ; Electroretinography (ERG) ; In Vitro Techniques ; Neuroprotective Agents - adverse effects ; Photic Stimulation ; Photoreceptor Cells - drug effects ; Photoreceptor Cells - physiology ; Propentofylline ; Retina - cytology ; Retina - drug effects ; Retina - physiology ; Theophylline ; Theophylline - adverse effects ; Vision ; Xanthines ; Xanthines - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 2000-06, Vol.868 (2), p.176-190</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b459a0cf261fc583817143c05f24c3c6b222751c3db7b6663c1a858c1b5ecf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b459a0cf261fc583817143c05f24c3c6b222751c3db7b6663c1a858c1b5ecf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899300023283$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10854570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andjus, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konjević, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damjanović, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gačić, Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of European eels, particularly suitable for long-lasting experiments. The drug exerted profound but reversible modifications of ERG records: (1) a dose-dependent increase of the amplitude and duration of the chemically isolated late receptor potential (LRP), (2) a partial unmasking of LRP, (3) a strong potentiation of the LRP-unmasking effect of low temperature, (4) a potentiation of light adaptation effects, and (5) a strong potentiation of the post-illumination hyperexcitability. The effects were explicable as due to a strong phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibiting, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) promoting, action of the drug. The effects were considerably stronger, or even of opposite sign, in comparison to those of the chemically related theophylline. PPF did not seriously affect the ERG c-wave originating in the pigment epithelium. The results suggested that the effects of PPF on vision may not seriously hamper the therapeutic use of the drug. They indicated, on the other hand, that PPF was a retinoactive drug of potential usefulness in the exploration of the complex biochemical events underlying visual transduction.</description><subject>Adaptation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Anguilla</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body Temperature - physiology</subject><subject>Dogfish</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Electroretinography</subject><subject>Electroretinography (ERG)</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Neuroprotective Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Photoreceptor Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>Photoreceptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Propentofylline</subject><subject>Retina - cytology</subject><subject>Retina - drug effects</subject><subject>Retina - physiology</subject><subject>Theophylline</subject><subject>Theophylline - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Xanthines</subject><subject>Xanthines - adverse effects</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCKCeEBwKTtKk6QmhaQOkSRyAc9SmDgvq2pJ0E7w93TohbpwsW99vyx8h5xRuKFB5-wIAMlZZxq8AroFxpmJ-QMZUpSyWLIFDMv5FRuQkhI--5TyDYzKioEQiUhiT-cxaNF2IGht95XW3dDVGJXq3yTu3wX5eR1j1hG88dq5u3n3eLp2JPIa2qUPP1BjCKTmyeRXwbF8n5G0-e50-xovnh6fp_SI2PGNdLItEZDkYyyS1RiiuaEoTbkBYlhhuZMEYSwU1vCzSQkrJDc2VUIYWAo3N-IRcDntb33yuMXR65YLBqsprbNZB01RkCrItKAbQ-CYEj1a33q1y_60p6K1AvROot3Y0gN4J1LzPXewPrIsVln9Sg7EeuBsA7N_cOPQ6GIe1wdL5XpMuG_fPiR-1p4CF</recordid><startdate>20000623</startdate><enddate>20000623</enddate><creator>Andjus, R.K.</creator><creator>Konjević, D.</creator><creator>Damjanović, I.</creator><creator>Gačić, Z.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000623</creationdate><title>Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness</title><author>Andjus, R.K. ; Konjević, D. ; Damjanović, I. ; Gačić, Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b459a0cf261fc583817143c05f24c3c6b222751c3db7b6663c1a858c1b5ecf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Anguilla</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body Temperature - physiology</topic><topic>Dogfish</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Electroretinography</topic><topic>Electroretinography (ERG)</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Neuroprotective Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Photoreceptor Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>Photoreceptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Propentofylline</topic><topic>Retina - cytology</topic><topic>Retina - drug effects</topic><topic>Retina - physiology</topic><topic>Theophylline</topic><topic>Theophylline - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Xanthines</topic><topic>Xanthines - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andjus, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konjević, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damjanović, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gačić, Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andjus, R.K.</au><au>Konjević, D.</au><au>Damjanović, I.</au><au>Gačić, Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>2000-06-23</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>868</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>176-190</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><abstract>In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of European eels, particularly suitable for long-lasting experiments. The drug exerted profound but reversible modifications of ERG records: (1) a dose-dependent increase of the amplitude and duration of the chemically isolated late receptor potential (LRP), (2) a partial unmasking of LRP, (3) a strong potentiation of the LRP-unmasking effect of low temperature, (4) a potentiation of light adaptation effects, and (5) a strong potentiation of the post-illumination hyperexcitability. The effects were explicable as due to a strong phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibiting, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) promoting, action of the drug. The effects were considerably stronger, or even of opposite sign, in comparison to those of the chemically related theophylline. PPF did not seriously affect the ERG c-wave originating in the pigment epithelium. The results suggested that the effects of PPF on vision may not seriously hamper the therapeutic use of the drug. They indicated, on the other hand, that PPF was a retinoactive drug of potential usefulness in the exploration of the complex biochemical events underlying visual transduction.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10854570</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02328-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-8993 |
ispartof | Brain research, 2000-06, Vol.868 (2), p.176-190 |
issn | 0006-8993 1872-6240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17598099 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adaptation, Ocular - physiology Anguilla Animals Body Temperature - physiology Dogfish Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Electroretinography Electroretinography (ERG) In Vitro Techniques Neuroprotective Agents - adverse effects Photic Stimulation Photoreceptor Cells - drug effects Photoreceptor Cells - physiology Propentofylline Retina - cytology Retina - drug effects Retina - physiology Theophylline Theophylline - adverse effects Vision Xanthines Xanthines - adverse effects |
title | Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A45%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20xanthine%20derivatives%20on%20electroretinographic%20responsiveness&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=Andjus,%20R.K.&rft.date=2000-06-23&rft.volume=868&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=176-190&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02328-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17598099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17598099&rft_id=info:pmid/10854570&rft_els_id=S0006899300023283&rfr_iscdi=true |