Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness

In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of Eur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain research 2000-06, Vol.868 (2), p.176-190
Hauptverfasser: Andjus, R.K., Konjević, D., Damjanović, I., Gačić, Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 2
container_start_page 176
container_title Brain research
container_volume 868
creator Andjus, R.K.
Konjević, D.
Damjanović, I.
Gačić, Z.
description In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of European eels, particularly suitable for long-lasting experiments. The drug exerted profound but reversible modifications of ERG records: (1) a dose-dependent increase of the amplitude and duration of the chemically isolated late receptor potential (LRP), (2) a partial unmasking of LRP, (3) a strong potentiation of the LRP-unmasking effect of low temperature, (4) a potentiation of light adaptation effects, and (5) a strong potentiation of the post-illumination hyperexcitability. The effects were explicable as due to a strong phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibiting, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) promoting, action of the drug. The effects were considerably stronger, or even of opposite sign, in comparison to those of the chemically related theophylline. PPF did not seriously affect the ERG c-wave originating in the pigment epithelium. The results suggested that the effects of PPF on vision may not seriously hamper the therapeutic use of the drug. They indicated, on the other hand, that PPF was a retinoactive drug of potential usefulness in the exploration of the complex biochemical events underlying visual transduction.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02328-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17598099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006899300023283</els_id><sourcerecordid>17598099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b459a0cf261fc583817143c05f24c3c6b222751c3db7b6663c1a858c1b5ecf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCKCeEBwKTtKk6QmhaQOkSRyAc9SmDgvq2pJ0E7w93TohbpwsW99vyx8h5xRuKFB5-wIAMlZZxq8AroFxpmJ-QMZUpSyWLIFDMv5FRuQkhI--5TyDYzKioEQiUhiT-cxaNF2IGht95XW3dDVGJXq3yTu3wX5eR1j1hG88dq5u3n3eLp2JPIa2qUPP1BjCKTmyeRXwbF8n5G0-e50-xovnh6fp_SI2PGNdLItEZDkYyyS1RiiuaEoTbkBYlhhuZMEYSwU1vCzSQkrJDc2VUIYWAo3N-IRcDntb33yuMXR65YLBqsprbNZB01RkCrItKAbQ-CYEj1a33q1y_60p6K1AvROot3Y0gN4J1LzPXewPrIsVln9Sg7EeuBsA7N_cOPQ6GIe1wdL5XpMuG_fPiR-1p4CF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17598099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Andjus, R.K. ; Konjević, D. ; Damjanović, I. ; Gačić, Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andjus, R.K. ; Konjević, D. ; Damjanović, I. ; Gačić, Z.</creatorcontrib><description>In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of European eels, particularly suitable for long-lasting experiments. The drug exerted profound but reversible modifications of ERG records: (1) a dose-dependent increase of the amplitude and duration of the chemically isolated late receptor potential (LRP), (2) a partial unmasking of LRP, (3) a strong potentiation of the LRP-unmasking effect of low temperature, (4) a potentiation of light adaptation effects, and (5) a strong potentiation of the post-illumination hyperexcitability. The effects were explicable as due to a strong phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibiting, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) promoting, action of the drug. The effects were considerably stronger, or even of opposite sign, in comparison to those of the chemically related theophylline. PPF did not seriously affect the ERG c-wave originating in the pigment epithelium. The results suggested that the effects of PPF on vision may not seriously hamper the therapeutic use of the drug. They indicated, on the other hand, that PPF was a retinoactive drug of potential usefulness in the exploration of the complex biochemical events underlying visual transduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02328-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10854570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Ocular - physiology ; Anguilla ; Animals ; Body Temperature - physiology ; Dogfish ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Electroretinography ; Electroretinography (ERG) ; In Vitro Techniques ; Neuroprotective Agents - adverse effects ; Photic Stimulation ; Photoreceptor Cells - drug effects ; Photoreceptor Cells - physiology ; Propentofylline ; Retina - cytology ; Retina - drug effects ; Retina - physiology ; Theophylline ; Theophylline - adverse effects ; Vision ; Xanthines ; Xanthines - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 2000-06, Vol.868 (2), p.176-190</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b459a0cf261fc583817143c05f24c3c6b222751c3db7b6663c1a858c1b5ecf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b459a0cf261fc583817143c05f24c3c6b222751c3db7b6663c1a858c1b5ecf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899300023283$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10854570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andjus, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konjević, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damjanović, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gačić, Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of European eels, particularly suitable for long-lasting experiments. The drug exerted profound but reversible modifications of ERG records: (1) a dose-dependent increase of the amplitude and duration of the chemically isolated late receptor potential (LRP), (2) a partial unmasking of LRP, (3) a strong potentiation of the LRP-unmasking effect of low temperature, (4) a potentiation of light adaptation effects, and (5) a strong potentiation of the post-illumination hyperexcitability. The effects were explicable as due to a strong phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibiting, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) promoting, action of the drug. The effects were considerably stronger, or even of opposite sign, in comparison to those of the chemically related theophylline. PPF did not seriously affect the ERG c-wave originating in the pigment epithelium. The results suggested that the effects of PPF on vision may not seriously hamper the therapeutic use of the drug. They indicated, on the other hand, that PPF was a retinoactive drug of potential usefulness in the exploration of the complex biochemical events underlying visual transduction.</description><subject>Adaptation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Anguilla</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body Temperature - physiology</subject><subject>Dogfish</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Electroretinography</subject><subject>Electroretinography (ERG)</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Neuroprotective Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Photoreceptor Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>Photoreceptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Propentofylline</subject><subject>Retina - cytology</subject><subject>Retina - drug effects</subject><subject>Retina - physiology</subject><subject>Theophylline</subject><subject>Theophylline - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Xanthines</subject><subject>Xanthines - adverse effects</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwCKCeEBwKTtKk6QmhaQOkSRyAc9SmDgvq2pJ0E7w93TohbpwsW99vyx8h5xRuKFB5-wIAMlZZxq8AroFxpmJ-QMZUpSyWLIFDMv5FRuQkhI--5TyDYzKioEQiUhiT-cxaNF2IGht95XW3dDVGJXq3yTu3wX5eR1j1hG88dq5u3n3eLp2JPIa2qUPP1BjCKTmyeRXwbF8n5G0-e50-xovnh6fp_SI2PGNdLItEZDkYyyS1RiiuaEoTbkBYlhhuZMEYSwU1vCzSQkrJDc2VUIYWAo3N-IRcDntb33yuMXR65YLBqsprbNZB01RkCrItKAbQ-CYEj1a33q1y_60p6K1AvROot3Y0gN4J1LzPXewPrIsVln9Sg7EeuBsA7N_cOPQ6GIe1wdL5XpMuG_fPiR-1p4CF</recordid><startdate>20000623</startdate><enddate>20000623</enddate><creator>Andjus, R.K.</creator><creator>Konjević, D.</creator><creator>Damjanović, I.</creator><creator>Gačić, Z.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000623</creationdate><title>Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness</title><author>Andjus, R.K. ; Konjević, D. ; Damjanović, I. ; Gačić, Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-6b459a0cf261fc583817143c05f24c3c6b222751c3db7b6663c1a858c1b5ecf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Anguilla</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body Temperature - physiology</topic><topic>Dogfish</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Electroretinography</topic><topic>Electroretinography (ERG)</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Neuroprotective Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Photoreceptor Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>Photoreceptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Propentofylline</topic><topic>Retina - cytology</topic><topic>Retina - drug effects</topic><topic>Retina - physiology</topic><topic>Theophylline</topic><topic>Theophylline - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Xanthines</topic><topic>Xanthines - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andjus, R.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konjević, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damjanović, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gačić, Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andjus, R.K.</au><au>Konjević, D.</au><au>Damjanović, I.</au><au>Gačić, Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>2000-06-23</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>868</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>176-190</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><abstract>In view of the use of synthetic propentofylline (PPF) as a protective agent in brain ischemia, its possible side effects on vision capacities have been explored by electroretinography in comparative experiments with theophylline. We used eyecup preparations of small-spotted dogfish sharks and of European eels, particularly suitable for long-lasting experiments. The drug exerted profound but reversible modifications of ERG records: (1) a dose-dependent increase of the amplitude and duration of the chemically isolated late receptor potential (LRP), (2) a partial unmasking of LRP, (3) a strong potentiation of the LRP-unmasking effect of low temperature, (4) a potentiation of light adaptation effects, and (5) a strong potentiation of the post-illumination hyperexcitability. The effects were explicable as due to a strong phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibiting, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) promoting, action of the drug. The effects were considerably stronger, or even of opposite sign, in comparison to those of the chemically related theophylline. PPF did not seriously affect the ERG c-wave originating in the pigment epithelium. The results suggested that the effects of PPF on vision may not seriously hamper the therapeutic use of the drug. They indicated, on the other hand, that PPF was a retinoactive drug of potential usefulness in the exploration of the complex biochemical events underlying visual transduction.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10854570</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02328-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8993
ispartof Brain research, 2000-06, Vol.868 (2), p.176-190
issn 0006-8993
1872-6240
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17598099
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adaptation, Ocular - physiology
Anguilla
Animals
Body Temperature - physiology
Dogfish
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Electroretinography
Electroretinography (ERG)
In Vitro Techniques
Neuroprotective Agents - adverse effects
Photic Stimulation
Photoreceptor Cells - drug effects
Photoreceptor Cells - physiology
Propentofylline
Retina - cytology
Retina - drug effects
Retina - physiology
Theophylline
Theophylline - adverse effects
Vision
Xanthines
Xanthines - adverse effects
title Effects of xanthine derivatives on electroretinographic responsiveness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A45%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20xanthine%20derivatives%20on%20electroretinographic%20responsiveness&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=Andjus,%20R.K.&rft.date=2000-06-23&rft.volume=868&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=176-190&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02328-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17598099%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17598099&rft_id=info:pmid/10854570&rft_els_id=S0006899300023283&rfr_iscdi=true