Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies
As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' whi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of human resource management 2016-01, Vol.27 (1), p.88-108 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 108 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 88 |
container_title | International journal of human resource management |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Ehnert, Ina Parsa, Sepideh Roper, Ian Wagner, Marcus Muller-Camen, Michael |
description | As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRM aspects of sustainability within these reports in comparison to environmental aspects of sustainable management and whether organisational attributes - principally country-of-origin - influences the reporting of such practices. A focus in this article is the extent to which the reporting of various aspects of sustainability may reflect dominant models of corporate governance in the country in which a company is headquartered. The findings suggest, first and against expectations, that the overall disclosure on HRM-related performance is not lower than that on environmental performance. Second, companies report more on their internal workforce compared to their external workforce. Finally, international differences, in particular those between companies headquartered in liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, are not as apparent as expected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1758941967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3922988251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-847874b9a0a446b5c4e30c408e403533ad740ba1efa81742a2188a4e1f82abf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgCl6rP0EIuKibaZPJySTTlVLsB1SEoutwJjdTU-Ym0ySjzMq_7kxv20UX4ioQnvOSnJeQ95wdcabZMWullrytj2rG5XJVA5fqBdlwaJoKRNu-JJvVVCt6Td7kfMsYF1LrDflz7caYig83NAaap1zQB-z84MtMMWzpxfXXE4rUxt2ICYv_5Wgu03amsX_O01PUmNAWb12m3UzLT0d_xzRsDzMdMN24XPZxwbv8lrzqccju3cN5QH6cffl-elFdfTu_PP18VVnQdak0KK2ga5EhQNNJC04wC0w7YEIKgVsFrEPuetRcQY011xrB8V7X2PVSHJCP-9wxxbtpeYLZ-WzdMGBwccqGq0a20CyL_A8qdQu8bdRCPzyjt3FKYfnIqlQNQimxKLlXNsWck-vNmPwO02w4M2uD5rFBszZoHhpc5j7t53zoY9rh_RJNwXmIqU8YrM9G_DviL-Xqozc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757243773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ehnert, Ina ; Parsa, Sepideh ; Roper, Ian ; Wagner, Marcus ; Muller-Camen, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Ehnert, Ina ; Parsa, Sepideh ; Roper, Ian ; Wagner, Marcus ; Muller-Camen, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRM aspects of sustainability within these reports in comparison to environmental aspects of sustainable management and whether organisational attributes - principally country-of-origin - influences the reporting of such practices. A focus in this article is the extent to which the reporting of various aspects of sustainability may reflect dominant models of corporate governance in the country in which a company is headquartered. The findings suggest, first and against expectations, that the overall disclosure on HRM-related performance is not lower than that on environmental performance. Second, companies report more on their internal workforce compared to their external workforce. Finally, international differences, in particular those between companies headquartered in liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, are not as apparent as expected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-5192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>comparative HRM ; Corporate governance ; Environmental aspects ; global reporting initiative ; Human resource management ; Management theory ; Market economies ; Personnel management ; Studies ; Sustainability reporting ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable HRM</subject><ispartof>International journal of human resource management, 2016-01, Vol.27 (1), p.88-108</ispartof><rights>2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-847874b9a0a446b5c4e30c408e403533ad740ba1efa81742a2188a4e1f82abf53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-847874b9a0a446b5c4e30c408e403533ad740ba1efa81742a2188a4e1f82abf53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ehnert, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsa, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roper, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller-Camen, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies</title><title>International journal of human resource management</title><description>As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRM aspects of sustainability within these reports in comparison to environmental aspects of sustainable management and whether organisational attributes - principally country-of-origin - influences the reporting of such practices. A focus in this article is the extent to which the reporting of various aspects of sustainability may reflect dominant models of corporate governance in the country in which a company is headquartered. The findings suggest, first and against expectations, that the overall disclosure on HRM-related performance is not lower than that on environmental performance. Second, companies report more on their internal workforce compared to their external workforce. Finally, international differences, in particular those between companies headquartered in liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, are not as apparent as expected.</description><subject>comparative HRM</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>global reporting initiative</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Market economies</subject><subject>Personnel management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability reporting</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable HRM</subject><issn>0958-5192</issn><issn>1466-4399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgCl6rP0EIuKibaZPJySTTlVLsB1SEoutwJjdTU-Ym0ySjzMq_7kxv20UX4ioQnvOSnJeQ95wdcabZMWullrytj2rG5XJVA5fqBdlwaJoKRNu-JJvVVCt6Td7kfMsYF1LrDflz7caYig83NAaap1zQB-z84MtMMWzpxfXXE4rUxt2ICYv_5Wgu03amsX_O01PUmNAWb12m3UzLT0d_xzRsDzMdMN24XPZxwbv8lrzqccju3cN5QH6cffl-elFdfTu_PP18VVnQdak0KK2ga5EhQNNJC04wC0w7YEIKgVsFrEPuetRcQY011xrB8V7X2PVSHJCP-9wxxbtpeYLZ-WzdMGBwccqGq0a20CyL_A8qdQu8bdRCPzyjt3FKYfnIqlQNQimxKLlXNsWck-vNmPwO02w4M2uD5rFBszZoHhpc5j7t53zoY9rh_RJNwXmIqU8YrM9G_DviL-Xqozc</recordid><startdate>20160102</startdate><enddate>20160102</enddate><creator>Ehnert, Ina</creator><creator>Parsa, Sepideh</creator><creator>Roper, Ian</creator><creator>Wagner, Marcus</creator><creator>Muller-Camen, Michael</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160102</creationdate><title>Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies</title><author>Ehnert, Ina ; Parsa, Sepideh ; Roper, Ian ; Wagner, Marcus ; Muller-Camen, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-847874b9a0a446b5c4e30c408e403533ad740ba1efa81742a2188a4e1f82abf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>comparative HRM</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>global reporting initiative</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Market economies</topic><topic>Personnel management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability reporting</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable HRM</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ehnert, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsa, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roper, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller-Camen, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>International journal of human resource management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ehnert, Ina</au><au>Parsa, Sepideh</au><au>Roper, Ian</au><au>Wagner, Marcus</au><au>Muller-Camen, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human resource management</jtitle><date>2016-01-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>88-108</pages><issn>0958-5192</issn><eissn>1466-4399</eissn><abstract>As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRM aspects of sustainability within these reports in comparison to environmental aspects of sustainable management and whether organisational attributes - principally country-of-origin - influences the reporting of such practices. A focus in this article is the extent to which the reporting of various aspects of sustainability may reflect dominant models of corporate governance in the country in which a company is headquartered. The findings suggest, first and against expectations, that the overall disclosure on HRM-related performance is not lower than that on environmental performance. Second, companies report more on their internal workforce compared to their external workforce. Finally, international differences, in particular those between companies headquartered in liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, are not as apparent as expected.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-5192 |
ispartof | International journal of human resource management, 2016-01, Vol.27 (1), p.88-108 |
issn | 0958-5192 1466-4399 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1758941967 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | comparative HRM Corporate governance Environmental aspects global reporting initiative Human resource management Management theory Market economies Personnel management Studies Sustainability reporting Sustainable development Sustainable HRM |
title | Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reporting%20on%20sustainability%20and%20HRM:%20a%20comparative%20study%20of%20sustainability%20reporting%20practices%20by%20the%20world's%20largest%20companies&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human%20resource%20management&rft.au=Ehnert,%20Ina&rft.date=2016-01-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=88-108&rft.issn=0958-5192&rft.eissn=1466-4399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3922988251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757243773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |