Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies

As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' whi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of human resource management 2016-01, Vol.27 (1), p.88-108
Hauptverfasser: Ehnert, Ina, Parsa, Sepideh, Roper, Ian, Wagner, Marcus, Muller-Camen, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 108
container_issue 1
container_start_page 88
container_title International journal of human resource management
container_volume 27
creator Ehnert, Ina
Parsa, Sepideh
Roper, Ian
Wagner, Marcus
Muller-Camen, Michael
description As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRM aspects of sustainability within these reports in comparison to environmental aspects of sustainable management and whether organisational attributes - principally country-of-origin - influences the reporting of such practices. A focus in this article is the extent to which the reporting of various aspects of sustainability may reflect dominant models of corporate governance in the country in which a company is headquartered. The findings suggest, first and against expectations, that the overall disclosure on HRM-related performance is not lower than that on environmental performance. Second, companies report more on their internal workforce compared to their external workforce. Finally, international differences, in particular those between companies headquartered in liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, are not as apparent as expected.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1758941967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3922988251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-847874b9a0a446b5c4e30c408e403533ad740ba1efa81742a2188a4e1f82abf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgCl6rP0EIuKibaZPJySTTlVLsB1SEoutwJjdTU-Ym0ySjzMq_7kxv20UX4ioQnvOSnJeQ95wdcabZMWullrytj2rG5XJVA5fqBdlwaJoKRNu-JJvVVCt6Td7kfMsYF1LrDflz7caYig83NAaap1zQB-z84MtMMWzpxfXXE4rUxt2ICYv_5Wgu03amsX_O01PUmNAWb12m3UzLT0d_xzRsDzMdMN24XPZxwbv8lrzqccju3cN5QH6cffl-elFdfTu_PP18VVnQdak0KK2ga5EhQNNJC04wC0w7YEIKgVsFrEPuetRcQY011xrB8V7X2PVSHJCP-9wxxbtpeYLZ-WzdMGBwccqGq0a20CyL_A8qdQu8bdRCPzyjt3FKYfnIqlQNQimxKLlXNsWck-vNmPwO02w4M2uD5rFBszZoHhpc5j7t53zoY9rh_RJNwXmIqU8YrM9G_DviL-Xqozc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757243773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ehnert, Ina ; Parsa, Sepideh ; Roper, Ian ; Wagner, Marcus ; Muller-Camen, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Ehnert, Ina ; Parsa, Sepideh ; Roper, Ian ; Wagner, Marcus ; Muller-Camen, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRM aspects of sustainability within these reports in comparison to environmental aspects of sustainable management and whether organisational attributes - principally country-of-origin - influences the reporting of such practices. A focus in this article is the extent to which the reporting of various aspects of sustainability may reflect dominant models of corporate governance in the country in which a company is headquartered. The findings suggest, first and against expectations, that the overall disclosure on HRM-related performance is not lower than that on environmental performance. Second, companies report more on their internal workforce compared to their external workforce. Finally, international differences, in particular those between companies headquartered in liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, are not as apparent as expected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-5192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>comparative HRM ; Corporate governance ; Environmental aspects ; global reporting initiative ; Human resource management ; Management theory ; Market economies ; Personnel management ; Studies ; Sustainability reporting ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable HRM</subject><ispartof>International journal of human resource management, 2016-01, Vol.27 (1), p.88-108</ispartof><rights>2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor &amp; Francis. 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-847874b9a0a446b5c4e30c408e403533ad740ba1efa81742a2188a4e1f82abf53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-847874b9a0a446b5c4e30c408e403533ad740ba1efa81742a2188a4e1f82abf53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ehnert, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsa, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roper, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller-Camen, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies</title><title>International journal of human resource management</title><description>As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRM aspects of sustainability within these reports in comparison to environmental aspects of sustainable management and whether organisational attributes - principally country-of-origin - influences the reporting of such practices. A focus in this article is the extent to which the reporting of various aspects of sustainability may reflect dominant models of corporate governance in the country in which a company is headquartered. The findings suggest, first and against expectations, that the overall disclosure on HRM-related performance is not lower than that on environmental performance. Second, companies report more on their internal workforce compared to their external workforce. Finally, international differences, in particular those between companies headquartered in liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, are not as apparent as expected.</description><subject>comparative HRM</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>global reporting initiative</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Market economies</subject><subject>Personnel management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability reporting</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable HRM</subject><issn>0958-5192</issn><issn>1466-4399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgCl6rP0EIuKibaZPJySTTlVLsB1SEoutwJjdTU-Ym0ySjzMq_7kxv20UX4ioQnvOSnJeQ95wdcabZMWullrytj2rG5XJVA5fqBdlwaJoKRNu-JJvVVCt6Td7kfMsYF1LrDflz7caYig83NAaap1zQB-z84MtMMWzpxfXXE4rUxt2ICYv_5Wgu03amsX_O01PUmNAWb12m3UzLT0d_xzRsDzMdMN24XPZxwbv8lrzqccju3cN5QH6cffl-elFdfTu_PP18VVnQdak0KK2ga5EhQNNJC04wC0w7YEIKgVsFrEPuetRcQY011xrB8V7X2PVSHJCP-9wxxbtpeYLZ-WzdMGBwccqGq0a20CyL_A8qdQu8bdRCPzyjt3FKYfnIqlQNQimxKLlXNsWck-vNmPwO02w4M2uD5rFBszZoHhpc5j7t53zoY9rh_RJNwXmIqU8YrM9G_DviL-Xqozc</recordid><startdate>20160102</startdate><enddate>20160102</enddate><creator>Ehnert, Ina</creator><creator>Parsa, Sepideh</creator><creator>Roper, Ian</creator><creator>Wagner, Marcus</creator><creator>Muller-Camen, Michael</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160102</creationdate><title>Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies</title><author>Ehnert, Ina ; Parsa, Sepideh ; Roper, Ian ; Wagner, Marcus ; Muller-Camen, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-847874b9a0a446b5c4e30c408e403533ad740ba1efa81742a2188a4e1f82abf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>comparative HRM</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>global reporting initiative</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Market economies</topic><topic>Personnel management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability reporting</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable HRM</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ehnert, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsa, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roper, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller-Camen, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>International journal of human resource management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ehnert, Ina</au><au>Parsa, Sepideh</au><au>Roper, Ian</au><au>Wagner, Marcus</au><au>Muller-Camen, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies</atitle><jtitle>International journal of human resource management</jtitle><date>2016-01-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>88-108</pages><issn>0958-5192</issn><eissn>1466-4399</eissn><abstract>As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of 'Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRM aspects of sustainability within these reports in comparison to environmental aspects of sustainable management and whether organisational attributes - principally country-of-origin - influences the reporting of such practices. A focus in this article is the extent to which the reporting of various aspects of sustainability may reflect dominant models of corporate governance in the country in which a company is headquartered. The findings suggest, first and against expectations, that the overall disclosure on HRM-related performance is not lower than that on environmental performance. Second, companies report more on their internal workforce compared to their external workforce. Finally, international differences, in particular those between companies headquartered in liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, are not as apparent as expected.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-5192
ispartof International journal of human resource management, 2016-01, Vol.27 (1), p.88-108
issn 0958-5192
1466-4399
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1758941967
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects comparative HRM
Corporate governance
Environmental aspects
global reporting initiative
Human resource management
Management theory
Market economies
Personnel management
Studies
Sustainability reporting
Sustainable development
Sustainable HRM
title Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A15%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reporting%20on%20sustainability%20and%20HRM:%20a%20comparative%20study%20of%20sustainability%20reporting%20practices%20by%20the%20world's%20largest%20companies&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20human%20resource%20management&rft.au=Ehnert,%20Ina&rft.date=2016-01-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=88-108&rft.issn=0958-5192&rft.eissn=1466-4399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3922988251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757243773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true