Caltrans structural control for bridges in high-seismic zones
The California Department of Transportation has nearly completed a $5.5 billion seismic retrofit program to retrofit strengthen over 2200 bridges on the state highway systems so they conform to the latest seismic hazard and performance criteria. Various unique solutions were developed and implemente...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics 2005-04, Vol.34 (4-5), p.449-470 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 470 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4-5 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Roberts, James E. |
description | The California Department of Transportation has nearly completed a $5.5 billion seismic retrofit program to retrofit strengthen over 2200 bridges on the state highway systems so they conform to the latest seismic hazard and performance criteria. Various unique solutions were developed and implemented to achieve the goals of the program. These techniques included the use of conventional steel and reinforced concrete jackets on bridge columns, advanced fiberglass and carbon fiber composite jackets, seismic isolation bearings and dampers, and seismic isolation silos. All of these techniques were designed to control the performance of a bridge by modifying or tuning its structural characteristics. This is much easier to achieve on a new bridge than on the retrofit of an existing bridge. Ideally a bridge should be designed with no deck joints and no bearings, with monolithic columns to superstructure framing, and with all columns the same length. While this ideal design is not achievable on many bridges, there are modifications that can reduce the vulnerability to damage during an earthquake.
The structural control techniques illustrated are: hinge restrainer cables and extenders; fewer deck joints; column and foundation design to control the location of plastic hinge zones; conservative shear key design; pier rocking; steel jackets and carbon shells for external confinements; seismic isolation silos; shock transmission dampers; rubber–lead core isolation bearings; and inverted pendulum isolation bearings. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eqe.439 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17576836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17576836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-eb615c8267e9fa81623377d4c953431d9af6f7f48588a4f5d24a4210e7f79ca43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1LwzAcxvEgCs4p_gs96UE6kybNy8GDjDmVoQi-4SVkaTKjXbvl16Lzr7dS8ebpuXx4Dl-EDgkeEYyzU7d2I0bVFhoQrHiqJMu30QBjJVMpmdhFewBvGGPKsRigs7Epm2gqSKCJrW3aaMrE1lUT6zLxdUzmMRQLB0mokteweE3BBVgGm3zVlYN9tONNCe7gd4fo4WJyP75MZ7fTq_H5LLWUYpW6OSe5lRkXTnkjCc8oFaJgVuWUUVIo47kXnslcSsN8XmTMsIxgJ7xQ1jA6REf97yrW69ZBo5cBrCtLU7m6BU1ELrikvIPHPbSxBojO61UMSxM3mmD9k0d3eXSXp5MnvfwIpdv8x_TkbtLrtNcBGvf5p01811xQkeunm6m-Jo9YMvWsX-g3Keh0Ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17576836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Caltrans structural control for bridges in high-seismic zones</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Roberts, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roberts, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>The California Department of Transportation has nearly completed a $5.5 billion seismic retrofit program to retrofit strengthen over 2200 bridges on the state highway systems so they conform to the latest seismic hazard and performance criteria. Various unique solutions were developed and implemented to achieve the goals of the program. These techniques included the use of conventional steel and reinforced concrete jackets on bridge columns, advanced fiberglass and carbon fiber composite jackets, seismic isolation bearings and dampers, and seismic isolation silos. All of these techniques were designed to control the performance of a bridge by modifying or tuning its structural characteristics. This is much easier to achieve on a new bridge than on the retrofit of an existing bridge. Ideally a bridge should be designed with no deck joints and no bearings, with monolithic columns to superstructure framing, and with all columns the same length. While this ideal design is not achievable on many bridges, there are modifications that can reduce the vulnerability to damage during an earthquake.
The structural control techniques illustrated are: hinge restrainer cables and extenders; fewer deck joints; column and foundation design to control the location of plastic hinge zones; conservative shear key design; pier rocking; steel jackets and carbon shells for external confinements; seismic isolation silos; shock transmission dampers; rubber–lead core isolation bearings; and inverted pendulum isolation bearings. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eqe.439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>bridges ; Caltrans practice ; design ductility</subject><ispartof>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2005-04, Vol.34 (4-5), p.449-470</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-eb615c8267e9fa81623377d4c953431d9af6f7f48588a4f5d24a4210e7f79ca43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feqe.439$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feqe.439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roberts, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Caltrans structural control for bridges in high-seismic zones</title><title>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</title><addtitle>Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn</addtitle><description>The California Department of Transportation has nearly completed a $5.5 billion seismic retrofit program to retrofit strengthen over 2200 bridges on the state highway systems so they conform to the latest seismic hazard and performance criteria. Various unique solutions were developed and implemented to achieve the goals of the program. These techniques included the use of conventional steel and reinforced concrete jackets on bridge columns, advanced fiberglass and carbon fiber composite jackets, seismic isolation bearings and dampers, and seismic isolation silos. All of these techniques were designed to control the performance of a bridge by modifying or tuning its structural characteristics. This is much easier to achieve on a new bridge than on the retrofit of an existing bridge. Ideally a bridge should be designed with no deck joints and no bearings, with monolithic columns to superstructure framing, and with all columns the same length. While this ideal design is not achievable on many bridges, there are modifications that can reduce the vulnerability to damage during an earthquake.
The structural control techniques illustrated are: hinge restrainer cables and extenders; fewer deck joints; column and foundation design to control the location of plastic hinge zones; conservative shear key design; pier rocking; steel jackets and carbon shells for external confinements; seismic isolation silos; shock transmission dampers; rubber–lead core isolation bearings; and inverted pendulum isolation bearings. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>bridges</subject><subject>Caltrans practice</subject><subject>design ductility</subject><issn>0098-8847</issn><issn>1096-9845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M1LwzAcxvEgCs4p_gs96UE6kybNy8GDjDmVoQi-4SVkaTKjXbvl16Lzr7dS8ebpuXx4Dl-EDgkeEYyzU7d2I0bVFhoQrHiqJMu30QBjJVMpmdhFewBvGGPKsRigs7Epm2gqSKCJrW3aaMrE1lUT6zLxdUzmMRQLB0mokteweE3BBVgGm3zVlYN9tONNCe7gd4fo4WJyP75MZ7fTq_H5LLWUYpW6OSe5lRkXTnkjCc8oFaJgVuWUUVIo47kXnslcSsN8XmTMsIxgJ7xQ1jA6REf97yrW69ZBo5cBrCtLU7m6BU1ELrikvIPHPbSxBojO61UMSxM3mmD9k0d3eXSXp5MnvfwIpdv8x_TkbtLrtNcBGvf5p01811xQkeunm6m-Jo9YMvWsX-g3Keh0Ow</recordid><startdate>20050410</startdate><enddate>20050410</enddate><creator>Roberts, James E.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050410</creationdate><title>Caltrans structural control for bridges in high-seismic zones</title><author>Roberts, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-eb615c8267e9fa81623377d4c953431d9af6f7f48588a4f5d24a4210e7f79ca43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>bridges</topic><topic>Caltrans practice</topic><topic>design ductility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Caltrans structural control for bridges in high-seismic zones</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn</addtitle><date>2005-04-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4-5</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>449-470</pages><issn>0098-8847</issn><eissn>1096-9845</eissn><abstract>The California Department of Transportation has nearly completed a $5.5 billion seismic retrofit program to retrofit strengthen over 2200 bridges on the state highway systems so they conform to the latest seismic hazard and performance criteria. Various unique solutions were developed and implemented to achieve the goals of the program. These techniques included the use of conventional steel and reinforced concrete jackets on bridge columns, advanced fiberglass and carbon fiber composite jackets, seismic isolation bearings and dampers, and seismic isolation silos. All of these techniques were designed to control the performance of a bridge by modifying or tuning its structural characteristics. This is much easier to achieve on a new bridge than on the retrofit of an existing bridge. Ideally a bridge should be designed with no deck joints and no bearings, with monolithic columns to superstructure framing, and with all columns the same length. While this ideal design is not achievable on many bridges, there are modifications that can reduce the vulnerability to damage during an earthquake.
The structural control techniques illustrated are: hinge restrainer cables and extenders; fewer deck joints; column and foundation design to control the location of plastic hinge zones; conservative shear key design; pier rocking; steel jackets and carbon shells for external confinements; seismic isolation silos; shock transmission dampers; rubber–lead core isolation bearings; and inverted pendulum isolation bearings. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/eqe.439</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-8847 |
ispartof | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2005-04, Vol.34 (4-5), p.449-470 |
issn | 0098-8847 1096-9845 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17576836 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | bridges Caltrans practice design ductility |
title | Caltrans structural control for bridges in high-seismic zones |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T11%3A05%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Caltrans%20structural%20control%20for%20bridges%20in%20high-seismic%20zones&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20engineering%20&%20structural%20dynamics&rft.au=Roberts,%20James%20E.&rft.date=2005-04-10&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4-5&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=449-470&rft.issn=0098-8847&rft.eissn=1096-9845&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eqe.439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17576836%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17576836&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |