The genesis of the northern Kettle Moraine, Wisconsin
Interpreting past glacial dynamics from the glacial record requires that the depositional environments of glacial sediments and landforms be understood. In the case of interlobate deposits, models that incorporate various components of pro, supra and subglacial deposition have been developed and tes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2005-04, Vol.67 (3), p.365-374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 365 |
container_title | Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Carlson, A.E. Mickelson, D.M. Principato, S.M. Chapel, D.M. |
description | Interpreting past glacial dynamics from the glacial record requires that the depositional environments of glacial sediments and landforms be understood. In the case of interlobate deposits, models that incorporate various components of pro, supra and subglacial deposition have been developed and tested in the northern Kettle Moraine (nKM), Wisconsin; a large interlobate deposit that formed between the Green Bay and Lake Michigan lobes of the Laurentide Ice Sheet during the last deglaciation. In this paper, we interpret a new genesis for the nKM using sediment analysis and distribution along with landform distribution. In Sheboygan County, the nKM consists of two steep-sided, high-relief, hummocky ridges separated by a low elevation and low-relief central axis. Gravel in the bounding hummocky ridges is well-sorted and well-rounded. Some bedding is collapsed. Large, isolated moulin kames are restricted to the axis area and composed of relatively poorly sorted, more angular gravel and diamicton. The distribution of these different sediments and landforms are explained by the accumulation of supraglacial debris that insulated the ice below the axis of the nKM, while the melting of cleaner ice on either side formed channels on the ice surface. As deglaciation proceeded, a substantial thickness of well-rounded, stream-deposited sand and gravel accumulated on ice in the bounding channels. Eventual collapse of this sediment formed the two hummocky ridges. Poorly sorted debris along the axis fell and slid into moulins and larger collapse areas in the ice. Thus, differential debris insulation and ice ablation controlled the mainly supraglacial deposition of this part of the nKM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.11.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17565209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169555X04002636</els_id><sourcerecordid>17565209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-b235bd56f46617e14c61e4200548f45c1e0931933d86fb48735a91a0a613f83c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwF1AucCLBGz-S3ECIlyjiUkRvlutuWlepXewUiX-PqxZx5DRa6duZ3SHkHGgBFOT1spijX_mwXhQlpbwAKChlB2QAdVXmshGTQzJIYJMLISbH5CTGJU1g1dABEeMFZnN0GG3MfJv1aXQ-JAkue8G-7zB79UFbh1fZh43Gu2jdKTlqdRfxbK9D8v5wP757ykdvj893t6Ncs0b2-bRkYjoTsuVSQoXAjQTk6UjB65YLA0gbBg1js1q2U15XTOgGNNUSWFszw4bkcue7Dv5zg7FXq3QCdp126DdRQSWkKJPJkMgdaIKPMWCr1sGudPhWQNW2JbVUvy2pbUsKQKWW0uLFPkFHo7s2aGds_NuWlaC8rBJ3s-MwvftlMahoLDqDMxvQ9Grm7X9RP1gxfz8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17565209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The genesis of the northern Kettle Moraine, Wisconsin</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Carlson, A.E. ; Mickelson, D.M. ; Principato, S.M. ; Chapel, D.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carlson, A.E. ; Mickelson, D.M. ; Principato, S.M. ; Chapel, D.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Interpreting past glacial dynamics from the glacial record requires that the depositional environments of glacial sediments and landforms be understood. In the case of interlobate deposits, models that incorporate various components of pro, supra and subglacial deposition have been developed and tested in the northern Kettle Moraine (nKM), Wisconsin; a large interlobate deposit that formed between the Green Bay and Lake Michigan lobes of the Laurentide Ice Sheet during the last deglaciation. In this paper, we interpret a new genesis for the nKM using sediment analysis and distribution along with landform distribution. In Sheboygan County, the nKM consists of two steep-sided, high-relief, hummocky ridges separated by a low elevation and low-relief central axis. Gravel in the bounding hummocky ridges is well-sorted and well-rounded. Some bedding is collapsed. Large, isolated moulin kames are restricted to the axis area and composed of relatively poorly sorted, more angular gravel and diamicton. The distribution of these different sediments and landforms are explained by the accumulation of supraglacial debris that insulated the ice below the axis of the nKM, while the melting of cleaner ice on either side formed channels on the ice surface. As deglaciation proceeded, a substantial thickness of well-rounded, stream-deposited sand and gravel accumulated on ice in the bounding channels. Eventual collapse of this sediment formed the two hummocky ridges. Poorly sorted debris along the axis fell and slid into moulins and larger collapse areas in the ice. Thus, differential debris insulation and ice ablation controlled the mainly supraglacial deposition of this part of the nKM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-555X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.11.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geomorphology ; Geomorphology, landform evolution ; Glacial geology ; Glaciofluvial environment ; Glaciofluvial sedimentation ; Marine and continental quaternary ; Meltwater ; Surficial geology ; Wisconsin</subject><ispartof>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2005-04, Vol.67 (3), p.365-374</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-b235bd56f46617e14c61e4200548f45c1e0931933d86fb48735a91a0a613f83c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-b235bd56f46617e14c61e4200548f45c1e0931933d86fb48735a91a0a613f83c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X04002636$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16750427$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carlson, A.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mickelson, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Principato, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapel, D.M.</creatorcontrib><title>The genesis of the northern Kettle Moraine, Wisconsin</title><title>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title><description>Interpreting past glacial dynamics from the glacial record requires that the depositional environments of glacial sediments and landforms be understood. In the case of interlobate deposits, models that incorporate various components of pro, supra and subglacial deposition have been developed and tested in the northern Kettle Moraine (nKM), Wisconsin; a large interlobate deposit that formed between the Green Bay and Lake Michigan lobes of the Laurentide Ice Sheet during the last deglaciation. In this paper, we interpret a new genesis for the nKM using sediment analysis and distribution along with landform distribution. In Sheboygan County, the nKM consists of two steep-sided, high-relief, hummocky ridges separated by a low elevation and low-relief central axis. Gravel in the bounding hummocky ridges is well-sorted and well-rounded. Some bedding is collapsed. Large, isolated moulin kames are restricted to the axis area and composed of relatively poorly sorted, more angular gravel and diamicton. The distribution of these different sediments and landforms are explained by the accumulation of supraglacial debris that insulated the ice below the axis of the nKM, while the melting of cleaner ice on either side formed channels on the ice surface. As deglaciation proceeded, a substantial thickness of well-rounded, stream-deposited sand and gravel accumulated on ice in the bounding channels. Eventual collapse of this sediment formed the two hummocky ridges. Poorly sorted debris along the axis fell and slid into moulins and larger collapse areas in the ice. Thus, differential debris insulation and ice ablation controlled the mainly supraglacial deposition of this part of the nKM.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Geomorphology, landform evolution</subject><subject>Glacial geology</subject><subject>Glaciofluvial environment</subject><subject>Glaciofluvial sedimentation</subject><subject>Marine and continental quaternary</subject><subject>Meltwater</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Wisconsin</subject><issn>0169-555X</issn><issn>1872-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwF1AucCLBGz-S3ECIlyjiUkRvlutuWlepXewUiX-PqxZx5DRa6duZ3SHkHGgBFOT1spijX_mwXhQlpbwAKChlB2QAdVXmshGTQzJIYJMLISbH5CTGJU1g1dABEeMFZnN0GG3MfJv1aXQ-JAkue8G-7zB79UFbh1fZh43Gu2jdKTlqdRfxbK9D8v5wP757ykdvj893t6Ncs0b2-bRkYjoTsuVSQoXAjQTk6UjB65YLA0gbBg1js1q2U15XTOgGNNUSWFszw4bkcue7Dv5zg7FXq3QCdp126DdRQSWkKJPJkMgdaIKPMWCr1sGudPhWQNW2JbVUvy2pbUsKQKWW0uLFPkFHo7s2aGds_NuWlaC8rBJ3s-MwvftlMahoLDqDMxvQ9Grm7X9RP1gxfz8</recordid><startdate>20050430</startdate><enddate>20050430</enddate><creator>Carlson, A.E.</creator><creator>Mickelson, D.M.</creator><creator>Principato, S.M.</creator><creator>Chapel, D.M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050430</creationdate><title>The genesis of the northern Kettle Moraine, Wisconsin</title><author>Carlson, A.E. ; Mickelson, D.M. ; Principato, S.M. ; Chapel, D.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a396t-b235bd56f46617e14c61e4200548f45c1e0931933d86fb48735a91a0a613f83c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Geomorphology, landform evolution</topic><topic>Glacial geology</topic><topic>Glaciofluvial environment</topic><topic>Glaciofluvial sedimentation</topic><topic>Marine and continental quaternary</topic><topic>Meltwater</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Wisconsin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carlson, A.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mickelson, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Principato, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapel, D.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carlson, A.E.</au><au>Mickelson, D.M.</au><au>Principato, S.M.</au><au>Chapel, D.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The genesis of the northern Kettle Moraine, Wisconsin</atitle><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle><date>2005-04-30</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>365-374</pages><issn>0169-555X</issn><eissn>1872-695X</eissn><abstract>Interpreting past glacial dynamics from the glacial record requires that the depositional environments of glacial sediments and landforms be understood. In the case of interlobate deposits, models that incorporate various components of pro, supra and subglacial deposition have been developed and tested in the northern Kettle Moraine (nKM), Wisconsin; a large interlobate deposit that formed between the Green Bay and Lake Michigan lobes of the Laurentide Ice Sheet during the last deglaciation. In this paper, we interpret a new genesis for the nKM using sediment analysis and distribution along with landform distribution. In Sheboygan County, the nKM consists of two steep-sided, high-relief, hummocky ridges separated by a low elevation and low-relief central axis. Gravel in the bounding hummocky ridges is well-sorted and well-rounded. Some bedding is collapsed. Large, isolated moulin kames are restricted to the axis area and composed of relatively poorly sorted, more angular gravel and diamicton. The distribution of these different sediments and landforms are explained by the accumulation of supraglacial debris that insulated the ice below the axis of the nKM, while the melting of cleaner ice on either side formed channels on the ice surface. As deglaciation proceeded, a substantial thickness of well-rounded, stream-deposited sand and gravel accumulated on ice in the bounding channels. Eventual collapse of this sediment formed the two hummocky ridges. Poorly sorted debris along the axis fell and slid into moulins and larger collapse areas in the ice. Thus, differential debris insulation and ice ablation controlled the mainly supraglacial deposition of this part of the nKM.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.11.003</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-555X |
ispartof | Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2005-04, Vol.67 (3), p.365-374 |
issn | 0169-555X 1872-695X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17565209 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Geomorphology Geomorphology, landform evolution Glacial geology Glaciofluvial environment Glaciofluvial sedimentation Marine and continental quaternary Meltwater Surficial geology Wisconsin |
title | The genesis of the northern Kettle Moraine, Wisconsin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A02%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20genesis%20of%20the%20northern%20Kettle%20Moraine,%20Wisconsin&rft.jtitle=Geomorphology%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Carlson,%20A.E.&rft.date=2005-04-30&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=365-374&rft.issn=0169-555X&rft.eissn=1872-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17565209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17565209&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169555X04002636&rfr_iscdi=true |