Comparison of Two Bioassay Methods for Determining Deltamethrin Resistance in German Cockroaches (Blattodea: Blattellidae)

Susceptibility to deltamethrin of 10 strains of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.), trapped in hotel kitchens in Singapore was determined. Two resistance detection bioassay methods (topical application and World Health Organization glass jar method) were compared. Resistance ratios based...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic entomology 2000-06, Vol.93 (3), p.905-910
Hauptverfasser: Choo, Lionel Ee Wi, Tang, Choon Siang, Pang, Fung Yin, Ho, Shuit Hung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 910
container_issue 3
container_start_page 905
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 93
creator Choo, Lionel Ee Wi
Tang, Choon Siang
Pang, Fung Yin
Ho, Shuit Hung
description Susceptibility to deltamethrin of 10 strains of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.), trapped in hotel kitchens in Singapore was determined. Two resistance detection bioassay methods (topical application and World Health Organization glass jar method) were compared. Resistance ratios based on 50% knockdown, obtained by comparison with the S strain, ranged from 17.7 to 4,235 for topical application and from 2.2 to 22 for the glass jar method. A field strain, with consistently low resistance ratios (topical method = 17.7, glass jar method = 2.2), was identified as a potential field strain to be used as a baseline for comparison with other field strains. Resistance ratios for the other field strains obtained by comparison with the R5 strain ranged from 24.5 to 239 for topical application and from 1.2 to 9.8 for the glass jar method. The results of our study demonstrate that deltamethrin-resistant German cockroaches are numerous in Singapore. Comparison between the two bioassay methods showed that there was significant correlation between KD sub(50) and KT sub(50) values. The glass jar method is similar to field situations but topical application is sensitive enough to define the magnitude of resistance. Differences between the two detection bioassays and the factors governing the choice of bioassay in monitoring resistance in German cockroaches are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1043/0022-0493(2000)093(0905:COTBMF)2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17563172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17563172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_175631723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyj1PwzAQxnEPIFFevoMn1AxNz05f1LIlUFiqSih7dUou1JD4is8Vgk-PhRAz0_1Pz0-pqYHcwKyYAlg7gdmqGFsAyCAFrGC-rnZ1ud1kNoe82t3ZMzX6kxfqUuQVwCysgZH6qng4YnDCXnOn6w_WpWMUwU-9pXjgVnTHQd9TpDA47_xL6j7ikMbgvH4mcRLRN6TT95gQel1x8xYYmwOJHpc9xsgt4Vr_JPW9a5Gya3XeYS9083uv1O3moa6eJsfA7yeSuB-cNEmjJz7J3izni8IsbfFv-A0Kr1rd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17563172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Bioassay Methods for Determining Deltamethrin Resistance in German Cockroaches (Blattodea: Blattellidae)</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Choo, Lionel Ee Wi ; Tang, Choon Siang ; Pang, Fung Yin ; Ho, Shuit Hung</creator><creatorcontrib>Choo, Lionel Ee Wi ; Tang, Choon Siang ; Pang, Fung Yin ; Ho, Shuit Hung</creatorcontrib><description>Susceptibility to deltamethrin of 10 strains of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.), trapped in hotel kitchens in Singapore was determined. Two resistance detection bioassay methods (topical application and World Health Organization glass jar method) were compared. Resistance ratios based on 50% knockdown, obtained by comparison with the S strain, ranged from 17.7 to 4,235 for topical application and from 2.2 to 22 for the glass jar method. A field strain, with consistently low resistance ratios (topical method = 17.7, glass jar method = 2.2), was identified as a potential field strain to be used as a baseline for comparison with other field strains. Resistance ratios for the other field strains obtained by comparison with the R5 strain ranged from 24.5 to 239 for topical application and from 1.2 to 9.8 for the glass jar method. The results of our study demonstrate that deltamethrin-resistant German cockroaches are numerous in Singapore. Comparison between the two bioassay methods showed that there was significant correlation between KD sub(50) and KT sub(50) values. The glass jar method is similar to field situations but topical application is sensitive enough to define the magnitude of resistance. Differences between the two detection bioassays and the factors governing the choice of bioassay in monitoring resistance in German cockroaches are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1043/0022-0493(2000)093(0905:COTBMF)2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Blattella germanica ; deltamethrin</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2000-06, Vol.93 (3), p.905-910</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choo, Lionel Ee Wi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Choon Siang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Fung Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Shuit Hung</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Bioassay Methods for Determining Deltamethrin Resistance in German Cockroaches (Blattodea: Blattellidae)</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><description>Susceptibility to deltamethrin of 10 strains of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.), trapped in hotel kitchens in Singapore was determined. Two resistance detection bioassay methods (topical application and World Health Organization glass jar method) were compared. Resistance ratios based on 50% knockdown, obtained by comparison with the S strain, ranged from 17.7 to 4,235 for topical application and from 2.2 to 22 for the glass jar method. A field strain, with consistently low resistance ratios (topical method = 17.7, glass jar method = 2.2), was identified as a potential field strain to be used as a baseline for comparison with other field strains. Resistance ratios for the other field strains obtained by comparison with the R5 strain ranged from 24.5 to 239 for topical application and from 1.2 to 9.8 for the glass jar method. The results of our study demonstrate that deltamethrin-resistant German cockroaches are numerous in Singapore. Comparison between the two bioassay methods showed that there was significant correlation between KD sub(50) and KT sub(50) values. The glass jar method is similar to field situations but topical application is sensitive enough to define the magnitude of resistance. Differences between the two detection bioassays and the factors governing the choice of bioassay in monitoring resistance in German cockroaches are discussed.</description><subject>Blattella germanica</subject><subject>deltamethrin</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyj1PwzAQxnEPIFFevoMn1AxNz05f1LIlUFiqSih7dUou1JD4is8Vgk-PhRAz0_1Pz0-pqYHcwKyYAlg7gdmqGFsAyCAFrGC-rnZ1ud1kNoe82t3ZMzX6kxfqUuQVwCysgZH6qng4YnDCXnOn6w_WpWMUwU-9pXjgVnTHQd9TpDA47_xL6j7ikMbgvH4mcRLRN6TT95gQel1x8xYYmwOJHpc9xsgt4Vr_JPW9a5Gya3XeYS9083uv1O3moa6eJsfA7yeSuB-cNEmjJz7J3izni8IsbfFv-A0Kr1rd</recordid><startdate>20000601</startdate><enddate>20000601</enddate><creator>Choo, Lionel Ee Wi</creator><creator>Tang, Choon Siang</creator><creator>Pang, Fung Yin</creator><creator>Ho, Shuit Hung</creator><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000601</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Bioassay Methods for Determining Deltamethrin Resistance in German Cockroaches (Blattodea: Blattellidae)</title><author>Choo, Lionel Ee Wi ; Tang, Choon Siang ; Pang, Fung Yin ; Ho, Shuit Hung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_175631723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Blattella germanica</topic><topic>deltamethrin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choo, Lionel Ee Wi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Choon Siang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Fung Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Shuit Hung</creatorcontrib><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choo, Lionel Ee Wi</au><au>Tang, Choon Siang</au><au>Pang, Fung Yin</au><au>Ho, Shuit Hung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Bioassay Methods for Determining Deltamethrin Resistance in German Cockroaches (Blattodea: Blattellidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><date>2000-06-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>905</spage><epage>910</epage><pages>905-910</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><abstract>Susceptibility to deltamethrin of 10 strains of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.), trapped in hotel kitchens in Singapore was determined. Two resistance detection bioassay methods (topical application and World Health Organization glass jar method) were compared. Resistance ratios based on 50% knockdown, obtained by comparison with the S strain, ranged from 17.7 to 4,235 for topical application and from 2.2 to 22 for the glass jar method. A field strain, with consistently low resistance ratios (topical method = 17.7, glass jar method = 2.2), was identified as a potential field strain to be used as a baseline for comparison with other field strains. Resistance ratios for the other field strains obtained by comparison with the R5 strain ranged from 24.5 to 239 for topical application and from 1.2 to 9.8 for the glass jar method. The results of our study demonstrate that deltamethrin-resistant German cockroaches are numerous in Singapore. Comparison between the two bioassay methods showed that there was significant correlation between KD sub(50) and KT sub(50) values. The glass jar method is similar to field situations but topical application is sensitive enough to define the magnitude of resistance. Differences between the two detection bioassays and the factors governing the choice of bioassay in monitoring resistance in German cockroaches are discussed.</abstract><doi>10.1043/0022-0493(2000)093(0905:COTBMF)2.0.CO;2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2000-06, Vol.93 (3), p.905-910
issn 0022-0493
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17563172
source BioOne Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Blattella germanica
deltamethrin
title Comparison of Two Bioassay Methods for Determining Deltamethrin Resistance in German Cockroaches (Blattodea: Blattellidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A33%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Bioassay%20Methods%20for%20Determining%20Deltamethrin%20Resistance%20in%20German%20Cockroaches%20(Blattodea:%20Blattellidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Choo,%20Lionel%20Ee%20Wi&rft.date=2000-06-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=905&rft.epage=910&rft.pages=905-910&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft_id=info:doi/10.1043/0022-0493(2000)093(0905:COTBMF)2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E17563172%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17563172&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true