Coping Responses Among Hospice Family Caregivers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Abstract Context Hospice family caregivers must often cope with significant stressors. Research into the ways caregivers attempt to cope with these stressors has been challenged by pronounced difficulties conceptualizing, measuring, and categorizing caregiver coping. Objectives The purpose of this s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pain and symptom management 2015-12, Vol.50 (6), p.867-873
Hauptverfasser: Washington, Karla T., PhD, Rakes, Christopher R., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 873
container_issue 6
container_start_page 867
container_title Journal of pain and symptom management
container_volume 50
creator Washington, Karla T., PhD
Rakes, Christopher R., PhD
description Abstract Context Hospice family caregivers must often cope with significant stressors. Research into the ways caregivers attempt to cope with these stressors has been challenged by pronounced difficulties conceptualizing, measuring, and categorizing caregiver coping. Objectives The purpose of this study was to begin addressing these challenges by determining the structure of coping among hospice family caregivers. Methods Hospice family caregivers ( n  = 223) residing in the midsouthern U.S. completed the Ways of Coping Questionnaire as part of a cross-sectional survey. To examine the validity of various coping response factor structures, researchers conducted multiple confirmatory factor analyses. Results Although individual coping behaviors were able to be sorted into broader “ways of coping” (i.e., first-order factors), data did not support the further grouping of ways of coping into more general “families of coping” (i.e., second-order factors). Folkman and Lazarus's proposed structure of coping, which comprises eight first-order factors or subscales, better fit the data than the tested alternatives. Conclusion Despite its broad appeal, grouping ways of coping responses into families of coping based on the presupposed nature of the responses (e.g., positive or negative) lacked empirical support for this sample of hospice family caregivers, which suggests that relying on families of coping may oversimplify complex responses from caregivers. Rather than trying to characterize coping responses into broader families, hospice support for caregiver coping strategies may be more effective when based on individualized assessments of each caregiver's ways of coping and the consequences of those coping responses on their quality of life.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.07.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1755538917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S088539241500336X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1738481304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-96c5c908621dfe14b90056fae06ab09f6ba46c4bf5ad0e53c8bfc1bc76307f933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuL1TAUgIMoznX0L0jduWk9aZo0dSFciuMIA4oPcBfS9HRIbZuac-9A_7253FHE1awOge-8vhzGXnEoOHD1ZizG1fqFtnm2S1EClwXUBUD5iO24rkWuJBeP2Q60lrloyuqCPSMaAUAKJZ6yi1KVHERV79jnNqx-uc2-IK1hIaRsP4f0vg60eofZlZ39tGWtjXjr7zDS22yftWEZfJztIcQtES7FbL_YaSNPz9mTwU6EL-7jJft-9f5be53ffPrwsd3f5E5qdcgb5aRrQKdB-gF51TVpODVYBGU7aAbV2Uq5qhuk7QGlcLobHO9crQTUQyPEJXt9rrvG8OuIdDCzJ4fTZBcMRzK8llIK3fD6AajQleYCqoQ2Z9TFQBRxMGv0s42b4WBO7s1o_nFvTu4N1Ca5T7kv79scuxn7v5l_ZCegPQOYvNx5jIacx8Vh7yO6g-mDf1Cbd_9VcZNfvLPTT9yQxnCM6SvSVoZKA-br6QhON8AlgBDqh_gNB5CwXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1738481304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coping Responses Among Hospice Family Caregivers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Washington, Karla T., PhD ; Rakes, Christopher R., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Washington, Karla T., PhD ; Rakes, Christopher R., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Context Hospice family caregivers must often cope with significant stressors. Research into the ways caregivers attempt to cope with these stressors has been challenged by pronounced difficulties conceptualizing, measuring, and categorizing caregiver coping. Objectives The purpose of this study was to begin addressing these challenges by determining the structure of coping among hospice family caregivers. Methods Hospice family caregivers ( n  = 223) residing in the midsouthern U.S. completed the Ways of Coping Questionnaire as part of a cross-sectional survey. To examine the validity of various coping response factor structures, researchers conducted multiple confirmatory factor analyses. Results Although individual coping behaviors were able to be sorted into broader “ways of coping” (i.e., first-order factors), data did not support the further grouping of ways of coping into more general “families of coping” (i.e., second-order factors). Folkman and Lazarus's proposed structure of coping, which comprises eight first-order factors or subscales, better fit the data than the tested alternatives. Conclusion Despite its broad appeal, grouping ways of coping responses into families of coping based on the presupposed nature of the responses (e.g., positive or negative) lacked empirical support for this sample of hospice family caregivers, which suggests that relying on families of coping may oversimplify complex responses from caregivers. Rather than trying to characterize coping responses into broader families, hospice support for caregiver coping strategies may be more effective when based on individualized assessments of each caregiver's ways of coping and the consequences of those coping responses on their quality of life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.07.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26210347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care ; caregiver ; Caregivers - psychology ; coping ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; family ; Family - psychology ; Hospice ; Hospice Care - psychology ; Hospices ; Humans ; Pain Medicine ; stress ; Stress, Psychological ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2015-12, Vol.50 (6), p.867-873</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine</rights><rights>2015 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-96c5c908621dfe14b90056fae06ab09f6ba46c4bf5ad0e53c8bfc1bc76307f933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-96c5c908621dfe14b90056fae06ab09f6ba46c4bf5ad0e53c8bfc1bc76307f933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.07.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26210347$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Washington, Karla T., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakes, Christopher R., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Coping Responses Among Hospice Family Caregivers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>Abstract Context Hospice family caregivers must often cope with significant stressors. Research into the ways caregivers attempt to cope with these stressors has been challenged by pronounced difficulties conceptualizing, measuring, and categorizing caregiver coping. Objectives The purpose of this study was to begin addressing these challenges by determining the structure of coping among hospice family caregivers. Methods Hospice family caregivers ( n  = 223) residing in the midsouthern U.S. completed the Ways of Coping Questionnaire as part of a cross-sectional survey. To examine the validity of various coping response factor structures, researchers conducted multiple confirmatory factor analyses. Results Although individual coping behaviors were able to be sorted into broader “ways of coping” (i.e., first-order factors), data did not support the further grouping of ways of coping into more general “families of coping” (i.e., second-order factors). Folkman and Lazarus's proposed structure of coping, which comprises eight first-order factors or subscales, better fit the data than the tested alternatives. Conclusion Despite its broad appeal, grouping ways of coping responses into families of coping based on the presupposed nature of the responses (e.g., positive or negative) lacked empirical support for this sample of hospice family caregivers, which suggests that relying on families of coping may oversimplify complex responses from caregivers. Rather than trying to characterize coping responses into broader families, hospice support for caregiver coping strategies may be more effective when based on individualized assessments of each caregiver's ways of coping and the consequences of those coping responses on their quality of life.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</subject><subject>caregiver</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>coping</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>family</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Hospice</subject><subject>Hospice Care - psychology</subject><subject>Hospices</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuL1TAUgIMoznX0L0jduWk9aZo0dSFciuMIA4oPcBfS9HRIbZuac-9A_7253FHE1awOge-8vhzGXnEoOHD1ZizG1fqFtnm2S1EClwXUBUD5iO24rkWuJBeP2Q60lrloyuqCPSMaAUAKJZ6yi1KVHERV79jnNqx-uc2-IK1hIaRsP4f0vg60eofZlZ39tGWtjXjr7zDS22yftWEZfJztIcQtES7FbL_YaSNPz9mTwU6EL-7jJft-9f5be53ffPrwsd3f5E5qdcgb5aRrQKdB-gF51TVpODVYBGU7aAbV2Uq5qhuk7QGlcLobHO9crQTUQyPEJXt9rrvG8OuIdDCzJ4fTZBcMRzK8llIK3fD6AajQleYCqoQ2Z9TFQBRxMGv0s42b4WBO7s1o_nFvTu4N1Ca5T7kv79scuxn7v5l_ZCegPQOYvNx5jIacx8Vh7yO6g-mDf1Cbd_9VcZNfvLPTT9yQxnCM6SvSVoZKA-br6QhON8AlgBDqh_gNB5CwXg</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Washington, Karla T., PhD</creator><creator>Rakes, Christopher R., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Coping Responses Among Hospice Family Caregivers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis</title><author>Washington, Karla T., PhD ; Rakes, Christopher R., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-96c5c908621dfe14b90056fae06ab09f6ba46c4bf5ad0e53c8bfc1bc76307f933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</topic><topic>caregiver</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>coping</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>family</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Hospice</topic><topic>Hospice Care - psychology</topic><topic>Hospices</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Washington, Karla T., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakes, Christopher R., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Washington, Karla T., PhD</au><au>Rakes, Christopher R., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coping Responses Among Hospice Family Caregivers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>867</spage><epage>873</epage><pages>867-873</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>Abstract Context Hospice family caregivers must often cope with significant stressors. Research into the ways caregivers attempt to cope with these stressors has been challenged by pronounced difficulties conceptualizing, measuring, and categorizing caregiver coping. Objectives The purpose of this study was to begin addressing these challenges by determining the structure of coping among hospice family caregivers. Methods Hospice family caregivers ( n  = 223) residing in the midsouthern U.S. completed the Ways of Coping Questionnaire as part of a cross-sectional survey. To examine the validity of various coping response factor structures, researchers conducted multiple confirmatory factor analyses. Results Although individual coping behaviors were able to be sorted into broader “ways of coping” (i.e., first-order factors), data did not support the further grouping of ways of coping into more general “families of coping” (i.e., second-order factors). Folkman and Lazarus's proposed structure of coping, which comprises eight first-order factors or subscales, better fit the data than the tested alternatives. Conclusion Despite its broad appeal, grouping ways of coping responses into families of coping based on the presupposed nature of the responses (e.g., positive or negative) lacked empirical support for this sample of hospice family caregivers, which suggests that relying on families of coping may oversimplify complex responses from caregivers. Rather than trying to characterize coping responses into broader families, hospice support for caregiver coping strategies may be more effective when based on individualized assessments of each caregiver's ways of coping and the consequences of those coping responses on their quality of life.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26210347</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.07.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-3924
ispartof Journal of pain and symptom management, 2015-12, Vol.50 (6), p.867-873
issn 0885-3924
1873-6513
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1755538917
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
caregiver
Caregivers - psychology
coping
Cross-Sectional Studies
Factor Analysis, Statistical
family
Family - psychology
Hospice
Hospice Care - psychology
Hospices
Humans
Pain Medicine
stress
Stress, Psychological
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
title Coping Responses Among Hospice Family Caregivers: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A27%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coping%20Responses%20Among%20Hospice%20Family%20Caregivers:%20A%20Confirmatory%20Factor%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Washington,%20Karla%20T.,%20PhD&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=867&rft.epage=873&rft.pages=867-873&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1738481304%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1738481304&rft_id=info:pmid/26210347&rft_els_id=S088539241500336X&rfr_iscdi=true