Eliminating the phrase “elective abortion”: why language matters
Abstract The phrase “elective abortion” is often used to describe induced abortions performed for reasons other than a direct, immediate threat to maternal physical health. We argue that the term “elective abortion” is variably defined, misrepresents the complexity and multiplicity of indications fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contraception (Stoneham) 2016-02, Vol.93 (2), p.89-92 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 92 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Contraception (Stoneham) |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Janiak, Elizabeth Goldberg, Alisa B |
description | Abstract The phrase “elective abortion” is often used to describe induced abortions performed for reasons other than a direct, immediate threat to maternal physical health. We argue that the term “elective abortion” is variably defined, misrepresents the complexity and multiplicity of indications for abortion and perpetuates stigma. In practice, restricting access to abortion at the legal, regulatory or institutional level based on subjective perceptions of patient need constrains health care providers’ ability to act according to their best clinical judgments and limits patient access to care. The phrase “elective abortion” should be eliminated from scientific and medical discourse to prevent further damage to the public understanding of the variety of indications for which women require expeditious and equitable access to induced abortion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1754521586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0010782415006241</els_id><sourcerecordid>1754521586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-4461537ccf735cab77c83cb0c6873954829ac433d7dced074d46f875b2e732553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxq0KRJfCK1SRuHDJMo7t2AEJqWoXqFSph5az5Tizu17yZ7GdVnvrg8DL9UnqaFukcuppDvN98838hpAPFOYUaPlpM7dDH72xuI1u6OcFUJE6cwB1QGZUySoHQdUrMgOgkEtV8EPyNoQNAMhKyDfksCi5AqWqGTlbtK5zvYmuX2Vxjdl27U3A7P7uD7Zoo7vBzNSDn5Lu7_5-zm7Xu6w1_Wo0K8w6EyP68I68Xpo24PvHekR-fltcn_7ILy6_n5-eXORWgIo55yUVTFq7lExYU0tpFbM12FJJVgmuispYzlgjG4sNSN7wcqmkqAuUrBCCHZGP-7lbP_weMUTduWCxTfvgMAZNpeCioEKVSfplL7V-CMHjUm-964zfaQp6wqg3-hlGPWGcmgljch8_Bo11h80_7xO3JFjsBZjOvXHodbAO-7S284mabgb3wqCv_82xreudNe0v3GHYDKPvE1FNdSg06Kvpo9NDqQAoU2EPSeWiAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1754521586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eliminating the phrase “elective abortion”: why language matters</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Janiak, Elizabeth ; Goldberg, Alisa B</creator><creatorcontrib>Janiak, Elizabeth ; Goldberg, Alisa B</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The phrase “elective abortion” is often used to describe induced abortions performed for reasons other than a direct, immediate threat to maternal physical health. We argue that the term “elective abortion” is variably defined, misrepresents the complexity and multiplicity of indications for abortion and perpetuates stigma. In practice, restricting access to abortion at the legal, regulatory or institutional level based on subjective perceptions of patient need constrains health care providers’ ability to act according to their best clinical judgments and limits patient access to care. The phrase “elective abortion” should be eliminated from scientific and medical discourse to prevent further damage to the public understanding of the variety of indications for which women require expeditious and equitable access to induced abortion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-7824</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26480889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abortion, Induced - psychology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Female ; Humans ; Language ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Social Stigma ; Terminology as Topic ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Contraception (Stoneham), 2016-02, Vol.93 (2), p.89-92</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-4461537ccf735cab77c83cb0c6873954829ac433d7dced074d46f875b2e732553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-4461537ccf735cab77c83cb0c6873954829ac433d7dced074d46f875b2e732553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782415006241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26480889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janiak, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Alisa B</creatorcontrib><title>Eliminating the phrase “elective abortion”: why language matters</title><title>Contraception (Stoneham)</title><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><description>Abstract The phrase “elective abortion” is often used to describe induced abortions performed for reasons other than a direct, immediate threat to maternal physical health. We argue that the term “elective abortion” is variably defined, misrepresents the complexity and multiplicity of indications for abortion and perpetuates stigma. In practice, restricting access to abortion at the legal, regulatory or institutional level based on subjective perceptions of patient need constrains health care providers’ ability to act according to their best clinical judgments and limits patient access to care. The phrase “elective abortion” should be eliminated from scientific and medical discourse to prevent further damage to the public understanding of the variety of indications for which women require expeditious and equitable access to induced abortion.</description><subject>Abortion, Induced - psychology</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0010-7824</issn><issn>1879-0518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxq0KRJfCK1SRuHDJMo7t2AEJqWoXqFSph5az5Tizu17yZ7GdVnvrg8DL9UnqaFukcuppDvN98838hpAPFOYUaPlpM7dDH72xuI1u6OcFUJE6cwB1QGZUySoHQdUrMgOgkEtV8EPyNoQNAMhKyDfksCi5AqWqGTlbtK5zvYmuX2Vxjdl27U3A7P7uD7Zoo7vBzNSDn5Lu7_5-zm7Xu6w1_Wo0K8w6EyP68I68Xpo24PvHekR-fltcn_7ILy6_n5-eXORWgIo55yUVTFq7lExYU0tpFbM12FJJVgmuispYzlgjG4sNSN7wcqmkqAuUrBCCHZGP-7lbP_weMUTduWCxTfvgMAZNpeCioEKVSfplL7V-CMHjUm-964zfaQp6wqg3-hlGPWGcmgljch8_Bo11h80_7xO3JFjsBZjOvXHodbAO-7S284mabgb3wqCv_82xreudNe0v3GHYDKPvE1FNdSg06Kvpo9NDqQAoU2EPSeWiAg</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Janiak, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Goldberg, Alisa B</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Eliminating the phrase “elective abortion”: why language matters</title><author>Janiak, Elizabeth ; Goldberg, Alisa B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-4461537ccf735cab77c83cb0c6873954829ac433d7dced074d46f875b2e732553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Induced - psychology</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janiak, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Alisa B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janiak, Elizabeth</au><au>Goldberg, Alisa B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eliminating the phrase “elective abortion”: why language matters</atitle><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>89-92</pages><issn>0010-7824</issn><eissn>1879-0518</eissn><abstract>Abstract The phrase “elective abortion” is often used to describe induced abortions performed for reasons other than a direct, immediate threat to maternal physical health. We argue that the term “elective abortion” is variably defined, misrepresents the complexity and multiplicity of indications for abortion and perpetuates stigma. In practice, restricting access to abortion at the legal, regulatory or institutional level based on subjective perceptions of patient need constrains health care providers’ ability to act according to their best clinical judgments and limits patient access to care. The phrase “elective abortion” should be eliminated from scientific and medical discourse to prevent further damage to the public understanding of the variety of indications for which women require expeditious and equitable access to induced abortion.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26480889</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.008</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-7824 |
ispartof | Contraception (Stoneham), 2016-02, Vol.93 (2), p.89-92 |
issn | 0010-7824 1879-0518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1754521586 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Abortion, Induced - psychology Adolescent Adult Attitude of Health Personnel Female Humans Language Obstetrics and Gynecology Pregnancy Social Stigma Terminology as Topic Young Adult |
title | Eliminating the phrase “elective abortion”: why language matters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A00%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eliminating%20the%20phrase%20%E2%80%9Celective%20abortion%E2%80%9D:%20why%20language%20matters&rft.jtitle=Contraception%20(Stoneham)&rft.au=Janiak,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=89-92&rft.issn=0010-7824&rft.eissn=1879-0518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1754521586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1754521586&rft_id=info:pmid/26480889&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0010782415006241&rfr_iscdi=true |