Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records

The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is appli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997) England : 1997), 2013-09, Vol.62, p.86-95
Hauptverfasser: Vallejos, J.A., McKinnon, S.D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue
container_start_page 86
container_title International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997)
container_volume 62
creator Vallejos, J.A.
McKinnon, S.D.
description The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is applied to mining seismicity from two mines in Ontario, Canada, and compared based on an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve as well as a number of performance metrics related to the contingency matrix. The logistic and neural network models presented excellent performance for identifying blasts, seismic events and reported events in the training and testing datasets for both mining seismicity catalogues. Operated under their respective optimal decision threshold values, the logistic and neural network models, accuracy was higher than 95% for classification of seismic records. In general, the logistic regression and neural network methods had close overall classification accuracies. The ability of the models to reproduce the frequency-magnitude distribution of the testing dataset was used as a signature of classification quality. The logistic and neural network models reproduced the reference distribution in a satisfactory manner. The advantages and limitations pertaining to the two classifiers are discussed. •Approach for labelling seismic records (blasts, events, rockbursts) automatically.•Three models reviewed: current approach, logistic regression and neural networks.•Current approach presented accuracies lower than 90%.•Logistic and neural network models presented accuracies higher than 95%.•Logistic and neural network models outperformed the currently used approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753554414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1365160913000816</els_id><sourcerecordid>1448714561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a491t-2978899a7a2951acc3a6a3a3933927ca1af5209e20a674abc1cec389f846279a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoso-PkPPPQieGnN5LO5CCLqCgte9BzGbCpZ20YzXcV_b9cVj-ppAvO8M0yeojgGVgMDfbas4zL3PdWcgaiZrBlTW8UeNEZUUkm1Pb2FVhVoZneLfaIlY0xzbfaK2Tw9RRqjL3N4yoEopqHEYVEOYZWxm8r4nvJz6Tucem30OK6J1JYUIvVfOZ_ygg6LnRY7Ckff9aB4uL66v5xV87ub28uLeYXSwlhxa5rGWjTIrQL0XqBGgcIKYbnxCNgqzmzgDLWR-OjBBy8a2zZSc2NRHBSnm7kvOb2uAo2uj-RD1-EQ0oocGCWUkhLk_1DBpWZ_owqEFAY0_xuVsjEglYYJlRvU50SUQ-tecuwxfzhgbm3OLd3GnFubc0y6ydwUO_negOSxazMOPtJPlhsNTaPW951vuDD991sM2ZGPYfBhEScpo1uk-PuiT8wyryo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448714561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vallejos, J.A. ; McKinnon, S.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vallejos, J.A. ; McKinnon, S.D.</creatorcontrib><description>The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is applied to mining seismicity from two mines in Ontario, Canada, and compared based on an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve as well as a number of performance metrics related to the contingency matrix. The logistic and neural network models presented excellent performance for identifying blasts, seismic events and reported events in the training and testing datasets for both mining seismicity catalogues. Operated under their respective optimal decision threshold values, the logistic and neural network models, accuracy was higher than 95% for classification of seismic records. In general, the logistic regression and neural network methods had close overall classification accuracies. The ability of the models to reproduce the frequency-magnitude distribution of the testing dataset was used as a signature of classification quality. The logistic and neural network models reproduced the reference distribution in a satisfactory manner. The advantages and limitations pertaining to the two classifiers are discussed. •Approach for labelling seismic records (blasts, events, rockbursts) automatically.•Three models reviewed: current approach, logistic regression and neural networks.•Current approach presented accuracies lower than 90%.•Logistic and neural network models presented accuracies higher than 95%.•Logistic and neural network models outperformed the currently used approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1365-1609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Applied sciences ; Blast ; Buildings. Public works ; Classification ; Classification of seismic records ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geotechnics ; Internal geophysics ; Logistics ; Measurements. Technique of testing ; Mine safety ; Mines ; Mining ; Mining seismicity ; Miscellaneous ; Neural networks ; Re-entry protocol ; Regression ; Rockbursts ; Seismicity ; Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><ispartof>International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997), 2013-09, Vol.62, p.86-95</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a491t-2978899a7a2951acc3a6a3a3933927ca1af5209e20a674abc1cec389f846279a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a491t-2978899a7a2951acc3a6a3a3933927ca1af5209e20a674abc1cec389f846279a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160913000816$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27618854$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vallejos, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, S.D.</creatorcontrib><title>Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records</title><title>International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997)</title><description>The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is applied to mining seismicity from two mines in Ontario, Canada, and compared based on an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve as well as a number of performance metrics related to the contingency matrix. The logistic and neural network models presented excellent performance for identifying blasts, seismic events and reported events in the training and testing datasets for both mining seismicity catalogues. Operated under their respective optimal decision threshold values, the logistic and neural network models, accuracy was higher than 95% for classification of seismic records. In general, the logistic regression and neural network methods had close overall classification accuracies. The ability of the models to reproduce the frequency-magnitude distribution of the testing dataset was used as a signature of classification quality. The logistic and neural network models reproduced the reference distribution in a satisfactory manner. The advantages and limitations pertaining to the two classifiers are discussed. •Approach for labelling seismic records (blasts, events, rockbursts) automatically.•Three models reviewed: current approach, logistic regression and neural networks.•Current approach presented accuracies lower than 90%.•Logistic and neural network models presented accuracies higher than 95%.•Logistic and neural network models outperformed the currently used approach.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Blast</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification of seismic records</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Measurements. Technique of testing</subject><subject>Mine safety</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Mining seismicity</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Re-entry protocol</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Rockbursts</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><issn>1365-1609</issn><issn>1873-4545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoso-PkPPPQieGnN5LO5CCLqCgte9BzGbCpZ20YzXcV_b9cVj-ppAvO8M0yeojgGVgMDfbas4zL3PdWcgaiZrBlTW8UeNEZUUkm1Pb2FVhVoZneLfaIlY0xzbfaK2Tw9RRqjL3N4yoEopqHEYVEOYZWxm8r4nvJz6Tucem30OK6J1JYUIvVfOZ_ygg6LnRY7Ckff9aB4uL66v5xV87ub28uLeYXSwlhxa5rGWjTIrQL0XqBGgcIKYbnxCNgqzmzgDLWR-OjBBy8a2zZSc2NRHBSnm7kvOb2uAo2uj-RD1-EQ0oocGCWUkhLk_1DBpWZ_owqEFAY0_xuVsjEglYYJlRvU50SUQ-tecuwxfzhgbm3OLd3GnFubc0y6ydwUO_negOSxazMOPtJPlhsNTaPW951vuDD991sM2ZGPYfBhEScpo1uk-PuiT8wyryo</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Vallejos, J.A.</creator><creator>McKinnon, S.D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records</title><author>Vallejos, J.A. ; McKinnon, S.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a491t-2978899a7a2951acc3a6a3a3933927ca1af5209e20a674abc1cec389f846279a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Blast</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification of seismic records</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Measurements. Technique of testing</topic><topic>Mine safety</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Mining seismicity</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Re-entry protocol</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Rockbursts</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vallejos, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, S.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vallejos, J.A.</au><au>McKinnon, S.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records</atitle><jtitle>International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997)</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>62</volume><spage>86</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>86-95</pages><issn>1365-1609</issn><eissn>1873-4545</eissn><abstract>The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is applied to mining seismicity from two mines in Ontario, Canada, and compared based on an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve as well as a number of performance metrics related to the contingency matrix. The logistic and neural network models presented excellent performance for identifying blasts, seismic events and reported events in the training and testing datasets for both mining seismicity catalogues. Operated under their respective optimal decision threshold values, the logistic and neural network models, accuracy was higher than 95% for classification of seismic records. In general, the logistic regression and neural network methods had close overall classification accuracies. The ability of the models to reproduce the frequency-magnitude distribution of the testing dataset was used as a signature of classification quality. The logistic and neural network models reproduced the reference distribution in a satisfactory manner. The advantages and limitations pertaining to the two classifiers are discussed. •Approach for labelling seismic records (blasts, events, rockbursts) automatically.•Three models reviewed: current approach, logistic regression and neural networks.•Current approach presented accuracies lower than 90%.•Logistic and neural network models presented accuracies higher than 95%.•Logistic and neural network models outperformed the currently used approach.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1365-1609
ispartof International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997), 2013-09, Vol.62, p.86-95
issn 1365-1609
1873-4545
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753554414
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accuracy
Applied sciences
Blast
Buildings. Public works
Classification
Classification of seismic records
Computation methods. Tables. Charts
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Earthquakes, seismology
Exact sciences and technology
Geotechnics
Internal geophysics
Logistics
Measurements. Technique of testing
Mine safety
Mines
Mining
Mining seismicity
Miscellaneous
Neural networks
Re-entry protocol
Regression
Rockbursts
Seismicity
Structural analysis. Stresses
title Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T19%3A16%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Logistic%20regression%20and%20neural%20network%20classification%20of%20seismic%20records&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20rock%20mechanics%20and%20mining%20sciences%20(Oxford,%20England%20:%201997)&rft.au=Vallejos,%20J.A.&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=62&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=86-95&rft.issn=1365-1609&rft.eissn=1873-4545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1448714561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448714561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1365160913000816&rfr_iscdi=true