Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records
The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is appli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997) England : 1997), 2013-09, Vol.62, p.86-95 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 86 |
container_title | International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997) |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Vallejos, J.A. McKinnon, S.D. |
description | The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is applied to mining seismicity from two mines in Ontario, Canada, and compared based on an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve as well as a number of performance metrics related to the contingency matrix. The logistic and neural network models presented excellent performance for identifying blasts, seismic events and reported events in the training and testing datasets for both mining seismicity catalogues. Operated under their respective optimal decision threshold values, the logistic and neural network models, accuracy was higher than 95% for classification of seismic records. In general, the logistic regression and neural network methods had close overall classification accuracies. The ability of the models to reproduce the frequency-magnitude distribution of the testing dataset was used as a signature of classification quality. The logistic and neural network models reproduced the reference distribution in a satisfactory manner. The advantages and limitations pertaining to the two classifiers are discussed.
•Approach for labelling seismic records (blasts, events, rockbursts) automatically.•Three models reviewed: current approach, logistic regression and neural networks.•Current approach presented accuracies lower than 90%.•Logistic and neural network models presented accuracies higher than 95%.•Logistic and neural network models outperformed the currently used approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753554414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1365160913000816</els_id><sourcerecordid>1448714561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a491t-2978899a7a2951acc3a6a3a3933927ca1af5209e20a674abc1cec389f846279a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoso-PkPPPQieGnN5LO5CCLqCgte9BzGbCpZ20YzXcV_b9cVj-ppAvO8M0yeojgGVgMDfbas4zL3PdWcgaiZrBlTW8UeNEZUUkm1Pb2FVhVoZneLfaIlY0xzbfaK2Tw9RRqjL3N4yoEopqHEYVEOYZWxm8r4nvJz6Tucem30OK6J1JYUIvVfOZ_ygg6LnRY7Ckff9aB4uL66v5xV87ub28uLeYXSwlhxa5rGWjTIrQL0XqBGgcIKYbnxCNgqzmzgDLWR-OjBBy8a2zZSc2NRHBSnm7kvOb2uAo2uj-RD1-EQ0oocGCWUkhLk_1DBpWZ_owqEFAY0_xuVsjEglYYJlRvU50SUQ-tecuwxfzhgbm3OLd3GnFubc0y6ydwUO_negOSxazMOPtJPlhsNTaPW951vuDD991sM2ZGPYfBhEScpo1uk-PuiT8wyryo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1448714561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vallejos, J.A. ; McKinnon, S.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vallejos, J.A. ; McKinnon, S.D.</creatorcontrib><description>The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is applied to mining seismicity from two mines in Ontario, Canada, and compared based on an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve as well as a number of performance metrics related to the contingency matrix. The logistic and neural network models presented excellent performance for identifying blasts, seismic events and reported events in the training and testing datasets for both mining seismicity catalogues. Operated under their respective optimal decision threshold values, the logistic and neural network models, accuracy was higher than 95% for classification of seismic records. In general, the logistic regression and neural network methods had close overall classification accuracies. The ability of the models to reproduce the frequency-magnitude distribution of the testing dataset was used as a signature of classification quality. The logistic and neural network models reproduced the reference distribution in a satisfactory manner. The advantages and limitations pertaining to the two classifiers are discussed.
•Approach for labelling seismic records (blasts, events, rockbursts) automatically.•Three models reviewed: current approach, logistic regression and neural networks.•Current approach presented accuracies lower than 90%.•Logistic and neural network models presented accuracies higher than 95%.•Logistic and neural network models outperformed the currently used approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1365-1609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Applied sciences ; Blast ; Buildings. Public works ; Classification ; Classification of seismic records ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geotechnics ; Internal geophysics ; Logistics ; Measurements. Technique of testing ; Mine safety ; Mines ; Mining ; Mining seismicity ; Miscellaneous ; Neural networks ; Re-entry protocol ; Regression ; Rockbursts ; Seismicity ; Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><ispartof>International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997), 2013-09, Vol.62, p.86-95</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a491t-2978899a7a2951acc3a6a3a3933927ca1af5209e20a674abc1cec389f846279a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a491t-2978899a7a2951acc3a6a3a3933927ca1af5209e20a674abc1cec389f846279a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160913000816$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27618854$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vallejos, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, S.D.</creatorcontrib><title>Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records</title><title>International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997)</title><description>The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is applied to mining seismicity from two mines in Ontario, Canada, and compared based on an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve as well as a number of performance metrics related to the contingency matrix. The logistic and neural network models presented excellent performance for identifying blasts, seismic events and reported events in the training and testing datasets for both mining seismicity catalogues. Operated under their respective optimal decision threshold values, the logistic and neural network models, accuracy was higher than 95% for classification of seismic records. In general, the logistic regression and neural network methods had close overall classification accuracies. The ability of the models to reproduce the frequency-magnitude distribution of the testing dataset was used as a signature of classification quality. The logistic and neural network models reproduced the reference distribution in a satisfactory manner. The advantages and limitations pertaining to the two classifiers are discussed.
•Approach for labelling seismic records (blasts, events, rockbursts) automatically.•Three models reviewed: current approach, logistic regression and neural networks.•Current approach presented accuracies lower than 90%.•Logistic and neural network models presented accuracies higher than 95%.•Logistic and neural network models outperformed the currently used approach.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Blast</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification of seismic records</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Measurements. Technique of testing</subject><subject>Mine safety</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Mining seismicity</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Re-entry protocol</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Rockbursts</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><issn>1365-1609</issn><issn>1873-4545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoso-PkPPPQieGnN5LO5CCLqCgte9BzGbCpZ20YzXcV_b9cVj-ppAvO8M0yeojgGVgMDfbas4zL3PdWcgaiZrBlTW8UeNEZUUkm1Pb2FVhVoZneLfaIlY0xzbfaK2Tw9RRqjL3N4yoEopqHEYVEOYZWxm8r4nvJz6Tucem30OK6J1JYUIvVfOZ_ygg6LnRY7Ckff9aB4uL66v5xV87ub28uLeYXSwlhxa5rGWjTIrQL0XqBGgcIKYbnxCNgqzmzgDLWR-OjBBy8a2zZSc2NRHBSnm7kvOb2uAo2uj-RD1-EQ0oocGCWUkhLk_1DBpWZ_owqEFAY0_xuVsjEglYYJlRvU50SUQ-tecuwxfzhgbm3OLd3GnFubc0y6ydwUO_negOSxazMOPtJPlhsNTaPW951vuDD991sM2ZGPYfBhEScpo1uk-PuiT8wyryo</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Vallejos, J.A.</creator><creator>McKinnon, S.D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records</title><author>Vallejos, J.A. ; McKinnon, S.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a491t-2978899a7a2951acc3a6a3a3933927ca1af5209e20a674abc1cec389f846279a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Blast</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification of seismic records</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Measurements. Technique of testing</topic><topic>Mine safety</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Mining seismicity</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Re-entry protocol</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Rockbursts</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vallejos, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinnon, S.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vallejos, J.A.</au><au>McKinnon, S.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records</atitle><jtitle>International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997)</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>62</volume><spage>86</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>86-95</pages><issn>1365-1609</issn><eissn>1873-4545</eissn><abstract>The identification of seismic records in seismically active mines is examined by considering logistic regression and neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology is presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records. The proposed procedure is applied to mining seismicity from two mines in Ontario, Canada, and compared based on an analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve as well as a number of performance metrics related to the contingency matrix. The logistic and neural network models presented excellent performance for identifying blasts, seismic events and reported events in the training and testing datasets for both mining seismicity catalogues. Operated under their respective optimal decision threshold values, the logistic and neural network models, accuracy was higher than 95% for classification of seismic records. In general, the logistic regression and neural network methods had close overall classification accuracies. The ability of the models to reproduce the frequency-magnitude distribution of the testing dataset was used as a signature of classification quality. The logistic and neural network models reproduced the reference distribution in a satisfactory manner. The advantages and limitations pertaining to the two classifiers are discussed.
•Approach for labelling seismic records (blasts, events, rockbursts) automatically.•Three models reviewed: current approach, logistic regression and neural networks.•Current approach presented accuracies lower than 90%.•Logistic and neural network models presented accuracies higher than 95%.•Logistic and neural network models outperformed the currently used approach.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1365-1609 |
ispartof | International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997), 2013-09, Vol.62, p.86-95 |
issn | 1365-1609 1873-4545 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753554414 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Applied sciences Blast Buildings. Public works Classification Classification of seismic records Computation methods. Tables. Charts Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Earthquakes, seismology Exact sciences and technology Geotechnics Internal geophysics Logistics Measurements. Technique of testing Mine safety Mines Mining Mining seismicity Miscellaneous Neural networks Re-entry protocol Regression Rockbursts Seismicity Structural analysis. Stresses |
title | Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T19%3A16%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Logistic%20regression%20and%20neural%20network%20classification%20of%20seismic%20records&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20rock%20mechanics%20and%20mining%20sciences%20(Oxford,%20England%20:%201997)&rft.au=Vallejos,%20J.A.&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=62&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=86-95&rft.issn=1365-1609&rft.eissn=1873-4545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1448714561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1448714561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1365160913000816&rfr_iscdi=true |