Miscible Displacement of Zinc in Soil Columns: Linear and Nonlinear Modeling

Miscible displacement column experiments were performed to investigate the mobility of Zn in two different soils, Windsor (mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamment) and Webster (fine‐loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquoll). In the Webster soil, strong Zn retention was observed due to a higher perce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2013-03, Vol.77 (2), p.391-402
Hauptverfasser: Selim, H. M., Elbana, Tamer A., Zhao, Keli, Xu, Jianming, Fergusson, Eric L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 402
container_issue 2
container_start_page 391
container_title Soil Science Society of America journal
container_volume 77
creator Selim, H. M.
Elbana, Tamer A.
Zhao, Keli
Xu, Jianming
Fergusson, Eric L.
description Miscible displacement column experiments were performed to investigate the mobility of Zn in two different soils, Windsor (mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamment) and Webster (fine‐loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquoll). In the Webster soil, strong Zn retention was observed due to a higher percentage of clay, organic matter, amorphous Fe and Al, and the presence of carbonates compared with Windsor soil. Observed Zn breakthrough curves (BTCs) were asymmetric and exhibited extensive retardation and slow desorption. The Webster soil exhibited limited Zn mobility, with only 14% recovery of Zn in the effluent solution, whereas considerable mobility was exhibited by Windsor, with 59% recovery. The Zn distribution with depth in the soil column showed that, for Windsor, Zn was retained within the surface layer and decreased with depth, whereas for Webster, a concentration maximum was observed below the soil surface. The presence of P in the Zn pulse solution increased the amount of Zn sorbed for the Windsor soil, whereas the opposite was observed for the Webster soil. Measured BTCs for P indicated higher P sorption for Windsor, with P recovery of 67%, than for Webster, with recovery of 85%. Simulations using a linear model with a first‐order irreversible reaction provided inadequate predictions of Zn BTCs. Therefore, the linear model is not recommended. Improved Zn predictions of the BTC were obtained when a multireaction and transport model (MRTM) was used. Nevertheless, the MRTM model, which accounted for nonlinear kinetic reversible and irreversible retention reactions, provided inadequate Zn BTC predictions for the Webster soil. There is a need for an improved MRTM model that accounts for the various retention mechanisms governing adsorption–desorption reactions during transport in soils.
doi_str_mv 10.2136/sssaj2012.0329
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753502968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3046691281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3809-a4d8482b8e7d77e35c36ec9e196dd68eefdb21fd13b194debf78ff95ee7d2fa33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLAzEUhYMoWB9b1wE3bqbmMclMBBdS37S6qG7chMzkRlLSpE5axH_v1IoLN93cF9-5cDgInVAyZJTL85yzmTFC2ZBwpnbQgJZcFERKuosGhEtaCKXEPjrIeUYIFYqQARpPfG59EwBf-7wIpoU5xCVODr_52GIf8TT5gEcprOYxX-Cxj2A6bKLFTymGzTZJFvrx_QjtORMyHP_2Q_R6e_Myui_Gz3cPo6txYXhNVGFKW5c1a2qobFUBFy2X0CqgSlorawBnG0adpbyhqrTQuKp2TgnoeeYM54fobPN30aWPFeSlnvcuIAQTIa2yppXggjAl6-2opFTySkjRo6f_0FladbE3omnJSl4KJmRPDTdU26WcO3B60fm56b40JXqdg_7LQa9z6AWXG8GnD_C1hdbTq0c2na5rf_rRfwO6xY2n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1424345256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Miscible Displacement of Zinc in Soil Columns: Linear and Nonlinear Modeling</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Selim, H. M. ; Elbana, Tamer A. ; Zhao, Keli ; Xu, Jianming ; Fergusson, Eric L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Selim, H. M. ; Elbana, Tamer A. ; Zhao, Keli ; Xu, Jianming ; Fergusson, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><description>Miscible displacement column experiments were performed to investigate the mobility of Zn in two different soils, Windsor (mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamment) and Webster (fine‐loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquoll). In the Webster soil, strong Zn retention was observed due to a higher percentage of clay, organic matter, amorphous Fe and Al, and the presence of carbonates compared with Windsor soil. Observed Zn breakthrough curves (BTCs) were asymmetric and exhibited extensive retardation and slow desorption. The Webster soil exhibited limited Zn mobility, with only 14% recovery of Zn in the effluent solution, whereas considerable mobility was exhibited by Windsor, with 59% recovery. The Zn distribution with depth in the soil column showed that, for Windsor, Zn was retained within the surface layer and decreased with depth, whereas for Webster, a concentration maximum was observed below the soil surface. The presence of P in the Zn pulse solution increased the amount of Zn sorbed for the Windsor soil, whereas the opposite was observed for the Webster soil. Measured BTCs for P indicated higher P sorption for Windsor, with P recovery of 67%, than for Webster, with recovery of 85%. Simulations using a linear model with a first‐order irreversible reaction provided inadequate predictions of Zn BTCs. Therefore, the linear model is not recommended. Improved Zn predictions of the BTC were obtained when a multireaction and transport model (MRTM) was used. Nevertheless, the MRTM model, which accounted for nonlinear kinetic reversible and irreversible retention reactions, provided inadequate Zn BTC predictions for the Webster soil. There is a need for an improved MRTM model that accounts for the various retention mechanisms governing adsorption–desorption reactions during transport in soils.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2012.0329</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSSJD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Carbonates ; Computer simulation ; Confidence intervals ; Desorption ; Displacement ; Mathematical models ; Nonlinearity ; Organic matter ; Recovery ; Retention ; Soil (material) ; Soil columns ; Soil surfaces ; Soils ; Studies ; Transport ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2013-03, Vol.77 (2), p.391-402</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3809-a4d8482b8e7d77e35c36ec9e196dd68eefdb21fd13b194debf78ff95ee7d2fa33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3809-a4d8482b8e7d77e35c36ec9e196dd68eefdb21fd13b194debf78ff95ee7d2fa33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2136%2Fsssaj2012.0329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136%2Fsssaj2012.0329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Selim, H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbana, Tamer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Keli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergusson, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><title>Miscible Displacement of Zinc in Soil Columns: Linear and Nonlinear Modeling</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Miscible displacement column experiments were performed to investigate the mobility of Zn in two different soils, Windsor (mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamment) and Webster (fine‐loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquoll). In the Webster soil, strong Zn retention was observed due to a higher percentage of clay, organic matter, amorphous Fe and Al, and the presence of carbonates compared with Windsor soil. Observed Zn breakthrough curves (BTCs) were asymmetric and exhibited extensive retardation and slow desorption. The Webster soil exhibited limited Zn mobility, with only 14% recovery of Zn in the effluent solution, whereas considerable mobility was exhibited by Windsor, with 59% recovery. The Zn distribution with depth in the soil column showed that, for Windsor, Zn was retained within the surface layer and decreased with depth, whereas for Webster, a concentration maximum was observed below the soil surface. The presence of P in the Zn pulse solution increased the amount of Zn sorbed for the Windsor soil, whereas the opposite was observed for the Webster soil. Measured BTCs for P indicated higher P sorption for Windsor, with P recovery of 67%, than for Webster, with recovery of 85%. Simulations using a linear model with a first‐order irreversible reaction provided inadequate predictions of Zn BTCs. Therefore, the linear model is not recommended. Improved Zn predictions of the BTC were obtained when a multireaction and transport model (MRTM) was used. Nevertheless, the MRTM model, which accounted for nonlinear kinetic reversible and irreversible retention reactions, provided inadequate Zn BTC predictions for the Webster soil. There is a need for an improved MRTM model that accounts for the various retention mechanisms governing adsorption–desorption reactions during transport in soils.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Desorption</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Soil columns</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLAzEUhYMoWB9b1wE3bqbmMclMBBdS37S6qG7chMzkRlLSpE5axH_v1IoLN93cF9-5cDgInVAyZJTL85yzmTFC2ZBwpnbQgJZcFERKuosGhEtaCKXEPjrIeUYIFYqQARpPfG59EwBf-7wIpoU5xCVODr_52GIf8TT5gEcprOYxX-Cxj2A6bKLFTymGzTZJFvrx_QjtORMyHP_2Q_R6e_Myui_Gz3cPo6txYXhNVGFKW5c1a2qobFUBFy2X0CqgSlorawBnG0adpbyhqrTQuKp2TgnoeeYM54fobPN30aWPFeSlnvcuIAQTIa2yppXggjAl6-2opFTySkjRo6f_0FladbE3omnJSl4KJmRPDTdU26WcO3B60fm56b40JXqdg_7LQa9z6AWXG8GnD_C1hdbTq0c2na5rf_rRfwO6xY2n</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Selim, H. M.</creator><creator>Elbana, Tamer A.</creator><creator>Zhao, Keli</creator><creator>Xu, Jianming</creator><creator>Fergusson, Eric L.</creator><general>The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Miscible Displacement of Zinc in Soil Columns: Linear and Nonlinear Modeling</title><author>Selim, H. M. ; Elbana, Tamer A. ; Zhao, Keli ; Xu, Jianming ; Fergusson, Eric L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3809-a4d8482b8e7d77e35c36ec9e196dd68eefdb21fd13b194debf78ff95ee7d2fa33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Desorption</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Soil columns</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Selim, H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbana, Tamer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Keli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergusson, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Selim, H. M.</au><au>Elbana, Tamer A.</au><au>Zhao, Keli</au><au>Xu, Jianming</au><au>Fergusson, Eric L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Miscible Displacement of Zinc in Soil Columns: Linear and Nonlinear Modeling</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>402</epage><pages>391-402</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><coden>SSSJD4</coden><abstract>Miscible displacement column experiments were performed to investigate the mobility of Zn in two different soils, Windsor (mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamment) and Webster (fine‐loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Endoaquoll). In the Webster soil, strong Zn retention was observed due to a higher percentage of clay, organic matter, amorphous Fe and Al, and the presence of carbonates compared with Windsor soil. Observed Zn breakthrough curves (BTCs) were asymmetric and exhibited extensive retardation and slow desorption. The Webster soil exhibited limited Zn mobility, with only 14% recovery of Zn in the effluent solution, whereas considerable mobility was exhibited by Windsor, with 59% recovery. The Zn distribution with depth in the soil column showed that, for Windsor, Zn was retained within the surface layer and decreased with depth, whereas for Webster, a concentration maximum was observed below the soil surface. The presence of P in the Zn pulse solution increased the amount of Zn sorbed for the Windsor soil, whereas the opposite was observed for the Webster soil. Measured BTCs for P indicated higher P sorption for Windsor, with P recovery of 67%, than for Webster, with recovery of 85%. Simulations using a linear model with a first‐order irreversible reaction provided inadequate predictions of Zn BTCs. Therefore, the linear model is not recommended. Improved Zn predictions of the BTC were obtained when a multireaction and transport model (MRTM) was used. Nevertheless, the MRTM model, which accounted for nonlinear kinetic reversible and irreversible retention reactions, provided inadequate Zn BTC predictions for the Webster soil. There is a need for an improved MRTM model that accounts for the various retention mechanisms governing adsorption–desorption reactions during transport in soils.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>The Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2136/sssaj2012.0329</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-5995
ispartof Soil Science Society of America journal, 2013-03, Vol.77 (2), p.391-402
issn 0361-5995
1435-0661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753502968
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adsorption
Carbonates
Computer simulation
Confidence intervals
Desorption
Displacement
Mathematical models
Nonlinearity
Organic matter
Recovery
Retention
Soil (material)
Soil columns
Soil surfaces
Soils
Studies
Transport
Zinc
title Miscible Displacement of Zinc in Soil Columns: Linear and Nonlinear Modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T03%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Miscible%20Displacement%20of%20Zinc%20in%20Soil%20Columns:%20Linear%20and%20Nonlinear%20Modeling&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Selim,%20H.%20M.&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=402&rft.pages=391-402&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft.coden=SSSJD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2136/sssaj2012.0329&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3046691281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1424345256&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true