novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens
Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to dem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Parasitology research (1987) 2015-02, Vol.114 (2), p.495-500 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 500 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 495 |
container_title | Parasitology research (1987) |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Dogruman-Al, Funda Turk, Songul Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan Hananel, Amit Levi, Lital Kopelowitz, June Babai, Oded Gross, Shimon Greenberg, Zvi Herschkovitz, Yoav Mumcuoglu, Ipek |
description | Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of a newly introduced ELISA test for the detection of Blastocystis antigens in stool samples (CoproELISAᵀᴹBlastocystis, Savyon Diagnostics) as a proper alternative to currently used methods, especially microscopy. A cohort of 179 fresh/frozen clinical stool samples was tested by the ELISA test, and results were compared to consensus methods comprised of microscopic examination of Lugol’s iodine staining, culture, and immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The new ELISA test was able to detect fewer than 10³cells, recognized subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (comprising >95 % of human Blastocystis infections), and exhibited similar reactivity when comparing formalin-preserved samples to fresh/frozen samples. The test demonstrated 92 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 89 % accuracy when culture, and IFA or microscopy consensus results were taken as reference. When the consensus was comprised of culture and IFA, the test demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82, 86, and 84 %, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity of Lugol staining microscopy was only 18 %. This work presents a unique ELISA test that provides an alternative to the use of microscopy, currently most widely used method. The test enables high-throughput screening and diagnosis of Blastocystis, adaptation to automatic procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753498643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A407669895</galeid><sourcerecordid>A407669895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-65fb2b6127f1b64e299940e0be8dc2f74d33410569eacdc2a89ad1d20aa996ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPpA7ABS2zYZLj-TbwcqgKVRmJRKpaWk9iDq8Qe7AQpb49HKZWQqiIvbB9_5-r6HoTeENgSgPpjBuBMVkB4xSk01fIMbQhntCJKiOdoA6qcgRB2hl7lfAdAasn5S3RGBVOEq2aDfoT42w74an99s8OTzRN2MeHBtDGZKaYF994cQsw-4-jwp8HkKXZLnso9H49b7AP-OY8m4KLHoWi286MN-TV64cyQ7cX9fo5uP199v_xa7b99ub7c7atOsGaqpHAtbSWhtSOt5JYqpThYaG3Td9TVvGeMExBSWdMVxTTK9KSnYIxS0lh2jj6sdY8p_ppL_3r0ubPDYIKNc9akFqx8VHL2f1QKWsbI2Al9v6IHM1jtg4tTMt0J1zsOtZSqUaJQ20eosno7-i4G63zR_zGQ1dClmHOyTh-TH01aNAF9SlSvieqSqD4lqpfieXvf9dyOtn9w_I2wAHQFcnkKB5v0XZxTKEN_suq71eRM1OaQfNa3NxSIAICmEaxmfwDnXLOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652420333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Dogruman-Al, Funda ; Turk, Songul ; Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan ; Hananel, Amit ; Levi, Lital ; Kopelowitz, June ; Babai, Oded ; Gross, Shimon ; Greenberg, Zvi ; Herschkovitz, Yoav ; Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creator><creatorcontrib>Dogruman-Al, Funda ; Turk, Songul ; Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan ; Hananel, Amit ; Levi, Lital ; Kopelowitz, June ; Babai, Oded ; Gross, Shimon ; Greenberg, Zvi ; Herschkovitz, Yoav ; Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creatorcontrib><description>Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of a newly introduced ELISA test for the detection of Blastocystis antigens in stool samples (CoproELISAᵀᴹBlastocystis, Savyon Diagnostics) as a proper alternative to currently used methods, especially microscopy. A cohort of 179 fresh/frozen clinical stool samples was tested by the ELISA test, and results were compared to consensus methods comprised of microscopic examination of Lugol’s iodine staining, culture, and immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The new ELISA test was able to detect fewer than 10³cells, recognized subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (comprising >95 % of human Blastocystis infections), and exhibited similar reactivity when comparing formalin-preserved samples to fresh/frozen samples. The test demonstrated 92 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 89 % accuracy when culture, and IFA or microscopy consensus results were taken as reference. When the consensus was comprised of culture and IFA, the test demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82, 86, and 84 %, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity of Lugol staining microscopy was only 18 %. This work presents a unique ELISA test that provides an alternative to the use of microscopy, currently most widely used method. The test enables high-throughput screening and diagnosis of Blastocystis, adaptation to automatic procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25391498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>antigens ; Antigens, Protozoan - isolation & purification ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Blastocystis ; Blastocystis - immunology ; Blastocystis - isolation & purification ; Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis ; Blastocystis Infections - parasitology ; Cohort Studies ; diagnostic techniques ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; ethyl acetate ; feces ; Feces - parasitology ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; Health aspects ; human resources ; Humans ; Immunology ; Medical Microbiology ; Methods ; Microbiology ; Microscopy ; Original Paper ; Protozoa ; screening ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Parasitology research (1987), 2015-02, Vol.114 (2), p.495-500</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-65fb2b6127f1b64e299940e0be8dc2f74d33410569eacdc2a89ad1d20aa996ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-65fb2b6127f1b64e299940e0be8dc2f74d33410569eacdc2a89ad1d20aa996ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25391498$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dogruman-Al, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hananel, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Lital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopelowitz, June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babai, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Shimon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herschkovitz, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creatorcontrib><title>novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens</title><title>Parasitology research (1987)</title><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><description>Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of a newly introduced ELISA test for the detection of Blastocystis antigens in stool samples (CoproELISAᵀᴹBlastocystis, Savyon Diagnostics) as a proper alternative to currently used methods, especially microscopy. A cohort of 179 fresh/frozen clinical stool samples was tested by the ELISA test, and results were compared to consensus methods comprised of microscopic examination of Lugol’s iodine staining, culture, and immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The new ELISA test was able to detect fewer than 10³cells, recognized subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (comprising >95 % of human Blastocystis infections), and exhibited similar reactivity when comparing formalin-preserved samples to fresh/frozen samples. The test demonstrated 92 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 89 % accuracy when culture, and IFA or microscopy consensus results were taken as reference. When the consensus was comprised of culture and IFA, the test demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82, 86, and 84 %, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity of Lugol staining microscopy was only 18 %. This work presents a unique ELISA test that provides an alternative to the use of microscopy, currently most widely used method. The test enables high-throughput screening and diagnosis of Blastocystis, adaptation to automatic procedures.</description><subject>antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Protozoan - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Blastocystis</subject><subject>Blastocystis - immunology</subject><subject>Blastocystis - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Blastocystis Infections - parasitology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>diagnostic techniques</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>ethyl acetate</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>human resources</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0932-0113</issn><issn>1432-1955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPpA7ABS2zYZLj-TbwcqgKVRmJRKpaWk9iDq8Qe7AQpb49HKZWQqiIvbB9_5-r6HoTeENgSgPpjBuBMVkB4xSk01fIMbQhntCJKiOdoA6qcgRB2hl7lfAdAasn5S3RGBVOEq2aDfoT42w74an99s8OTzRN2MeHBtDGZKaYF994cQsw-4-jwp8HkKXZLnso9H49b7AP-OY8m4KLHoWi286MN-TV64cyQ7cX9fo5uP199v_xa7b99ub7c7atOsGaqpHAtbSWhtSOt5JYqpThYaG3Td9TVvGeMExBSWdMVxTTK9KSnYIxS0lh2jj6sdY8p_ppL_3r0ubPDYIKNc9akFqx8VHL2f1QKWsbI2Al9v6IHM1jtg4tTMt0J1zsOtZSqUaJQ20eosno7-i4G63zR_zGQ1dClmHOyTh-TH01aNAF9SlSvieqSqD4lqpfieXvf9dyOtn9w_I2wAHQFcnkKB5v0XZxTKEN_suq71eRM1OaQfNa3NxSIAICmEaxmfwDnXLOA</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Dogruman-Al, Funda</creator><creator>Turk, Songul</creator><creator>Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan</creator><creator>Hananel, Amit</creator><creator>Levi, Lital</creator><creator>Kopelowitz, June</creator><creator>Babai, Oded</creator><creator>Gross, Shimon</creator><creator>Greenberg, Zvi</creator><creator>Herschkovitz, Yoav</creator><creator>Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens</title><author>Dogruman-Al, Funda ; Turk, Songul ; Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan ; Hananel, Amit ; Levi, Lital ; Kopelowitz, June ; Babai, Oded ; Gross, Shimon ; Greenberg, Zvi ; Herschkovitz, Yoav ; Mumcuoglu, Ipek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-65fb2b6127f1b64e299940e0be8dc2f74d33410569eacdc2a89ad1d20aa996ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Protozoan - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Blastocystis</topic><topic>Blastocystis - immunology</topic><topic>Blastocystis - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Blastocystis Infections - parasitology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>diagnostic techniques</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>ethyl acetate</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>human resources</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dogruman-Al, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hananel, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Lital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopelowitz, June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babai, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Shimon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herschkovitz, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dogruman-Al, Funda</au><au>Turk, Songul</au><au>Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan</au><au>Hananel, Amit</au><au>Levi, Lital</au><au>Kopelowitz, June</au><au>Babai, Oded</au><au>Gross, Shimon</au><au>Greenberg, Zvi</au><au>Herschkovitz, Yoav</au><au>Mumcuoglu, Ipek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens</atitle><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle><stitle>Parasitol Res</stitle><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>495</spage><epage>500</epage><pages>495-500</pages><issn>0932-0113</issn><eissn>1432-1955</eissn><abstract>Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of a newly introduced ELISA test for the detection of Blastocystis antigens in stool samples (CoproELISAᵀᴹBlastocystis, Savyon Diagnostics) as a proper alternative to currently used methods, especially microscopy. A cohort of 179 fresh/frozen clinical stool samples was tested by the ELISA test, and results were compared to consensus methods comprised of microscopic examination of Lugol’s iodine staining, culture, and immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The new ELISA test was able to detect fewer than 10³cells, recognized subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (comprising >95 % of human Blastocystis infections), and exhibited similar reactivity when comparing formalin-preserved samples to fresh/frozen samples. The test demonstrated 92 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 89 % accuracy when culture, and IFA or microscopy consensus results were taken as reference. When the consensus was comprised of culture and IFA, the test demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82, 86, and 84 %, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity of Lugol staining microscopy was only 18 %. This work presents a unique ELISA test that provides an alternative to the use of microscopy, currently most widely used method. The test enables high-throughput screening and diagnosis of Blastocystis, adaptation to automatic procedures.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>25391498</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0932-0113 |
ispartof | Parasitology research (1987), 2015-02, Vol.114 (2), p.495-500 |
issn | 0932-0113 1432-1955 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753498643 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | antigens Antigens, Protozoan - isolation & purification Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Blastocystis Blastocystis - immunology Blastocystis - isolation & purification Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis Blastocystis Infections - parasitology Cohort Studies diagnostic techniques Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ethyl acetate feces Feces - parasitology Fluorescent Antibody Technique Health aspects human resources Humans Immunology Medical Microbiology Methods Microbiology Microscopy Original Paper Protozoa screening Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A15%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=novel%20ELISA%20test%20for%20laboratory%20diagnosis%20of%20Blastocystis%20spp.%20in%20human%20stool%20specimens&rft.jtitle=Parasitology%20research%20(1987)&rft.au=Dogruman-Al,%20Funda&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=495&rft.epage=500&rft.pages=495-500&rft.issn=0932-0113&rft.eissn=1432-1955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA407669895%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652420333&rft_id=info:pmid/25391498&rft_galeid=A407669895&rfr_iscdi=true |