novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens

Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to dem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Parasitology research (1987) 2015-02, Vol.114 (2), p.495-500
Hauptverfasser: Dogruman-Al, Funda, Turk, Songul, Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan, Hananel, Amit, Levi, Lital, Kopelowitz, June, Babai, Oded, Gross, Shimon, Greenberg, Zvi, Herschkovitz, Yoav, Mumcuoglu, Ipek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 500
container_issue 2
container_start_page 495
container_title Parasitology research (1987)
container_volume 114
creator Dogruman-Al, Funda
Turk, Songul
Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan
Hananel, Amit
Levi, Lital
Kopelowitz, June
Babai, Oded
Gross, Shimon
Greenberg, Zvi
Herschkovitz, Yoav
Mumcuoglu, Ipek
description Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of a newly introduced ELISA test for the detection of Blastocystis antigens in stool samples (CoproELISAᵀᴹBlastocystis, Savyon Diagnostics) as a proper alternative to currently used methods, especially microscopy. A cohort of 179 fresh/frozen clinical stool samples was tested by the ELISA test, and results were compared to consensus methods comprised of microscopic examination of Lugol’s iodine staining, culture, and immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The new ELISA test was able to detect fewer than 10³cells, recognized subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (comprising >95 % of human Blastocystis infections), and exhibited similar reactivity when comparing formalin-preserved samples to fresh/frozen samples. The test demonstrated 92 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 89 % accuracy when culture, and IFA or microscopy consensus results were taken as reference. When the consensus was comprised of culture and IFA, the test demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82, 86, and 84 %, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity of Lugol staining microscopy was only 18 %. This work presents a unique ELISA test that provides an alternative to the use of microscopy, currently most widely used method. The test enables high-throughput screening and diagnosis of Blastocystis, adaptation to automatic procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753498643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A407669895</galeid><sourcerecordid>A407669895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-65fb2b6127f1b64e299940e0be8dc2f74d33410569eacdc2a89ad1d20aa996ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPpA7ABS2zYZLj-TbwcqgKVRmJRKpaWk9iDq8Qe7AQpb49HKZWQqiIvbB9_5-r6HoTeENgSgPpjBuBMVkB4xSk01fIMbQhntCJKiOdoA6qcgRB2hl7lfAdAasn5S3RGBVOEq2aDfoT42w74an99s8OTzRN2MeHBtDGZKaYF994cQsw-4-jwp8HkKXZLnso9H49b7AP-OY8m4KLHoWi286MN-TV64cyQ7cX9fo5uP199v_xa7b99ub7c7atOsGaqpHAtbSWhtSOt5JYqpThYaG3Td9TVvGeMExBSWdMVxTTK9KSnYIxS0lh2jj6sdY8p_ppL_3r0ubPDYIKNc9akFqx8VHL2f1QKWsbI2Al9v6IHM1jtg4tTMt0J1zsOtZSqUaJQ20eosno7-i4G63zR_zGQ1dClmHOyTh-TH01aNAF9SlSvieqSqD4lqpfieXvf9dyOtn9w_I2wAHQFcnkKB5v0XZxTKEN_suq71eRM1OaQfNa3NxSIAICmEaxmfwDnXLOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652420333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Dogruman-Al, Funda ; Turk, Songul ; Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan ; Hananel, Amit ; Levi, Lital ; Kopelowitz, June ; Babai, Oded ; Gross, Shimon ; Greenberg, Zvi ; Herschkovitz, Yoav ; Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creator><creatorcontrib>Dogruman-Al, Funda ; Turk, Songul ; Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan ; Hananel, Amit ; Levi, Lital ; Kopelowitz, June ; Babai, Oded ; Gross, Shimon ; Greenberg, Zvi ; Herschkovitz, Yoav ; Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creatorcontrib><description>Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of a newly introduced ELISA test for the detection of Blastocystis antigens in stool samples (CoproELISAᵀᴹBlastocystis, Savyon Diagnostics) as a proper alternative to currently used methods, especially microscopy. A cohort of 179 fresh/frozen clinical stool samples was tested by the ELISA test, and results were compared to consensus methods comprised of microscopic examination of Lugol’s iodine staining, culture, and immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The new ELISA test was able to detect fewer than 10³cells, recognized subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (comprising &gt;95 % of human Blastocystis infections), and exhibited similar reactivity when comparing formalin-preserved samples to fresh/frozen samples. The test demonstrated 92 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 89 % accuracy when culture, and IFA or microscopy consensus results were taken as reference. When the consensus was comprised of culture and IFA, the test demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82, 86, and 84 %, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity of Lugol staining microscopy was only 18 %. This work presents a unique ELISA test that provides an alternative to the use of microscopy, currently most widely used method. The test enables high-throughput screening and diagnosis of Blastocystis, adaptation to automatic procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25391498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>antigens ; Antigens, Protozoan - isolation &amp; purification ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Blastocystis ; Blastocystis - immunology ; Blastocystis - isolation &amp; purification ; Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis ; Blastocystis Infections - parasitology ; Cohort Studies ; diagnostic techniques ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; ethyl acetate ; feces ; Feces - parasitology ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; Health aspects ; human resources ; Humans ; Immunology ; Medical Microbiology ; Methods ; Microbiology ; Microscopy ; Original Paper ; Protozoa ; screening ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Parasitology research (1987), 2015-02, Vol.114 (2), p.495-500</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-65fb2b6127f1b64e299940e0be8dc2f74d33410569eacdc2a89ad1d20aa996ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-65fb2b6127f1b64e299940e0be8dc2f74d33410569eacdc2a89ad1d20aa996ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25391498$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dogruman-Al, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hananel, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Lital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopelowitz, June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babai, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Shimon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herschkovitz, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creatorcontrib><title>novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens</title><title>Parasitology research (1987)</title><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><description>Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of a newly introduced ELISA test for the detection of Blastocystis antigens in stool samples (CoproELISAᵀᴹBlastocystis, Savyon Diagnostics) as a proper alternative to currently used methods, especially microscopy. A cohort of 179 fresh/frozen clinical stool samples was tested by the ELISA test, and results were compared to consensus methods comprised of microscopic examination of Lugol’s iodine staining, culture, and immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The new ELISA test was able to detect fewer than 10³cells, recognized subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (comprising &gt;95 % of human Blastocystis infections), and exhibited similar reactivity when comparing formalin-preserved samples to fresh/frozen samples. The test demonstrated 92 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 89 % accuracy when culture, and IFA or microscopy consensus results were taken as reference. When the consensus was comprised of culture and IFA, the test demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82, 86, and 84 %, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity of Lugol staining microscopy was only 18 %. This work presents a unique ELISA test that provides an alternative to the use of microscopy, currently most widely used method. The test enables high-throughput screening and diagnosis of Blastocystis, adaptation to automatic procedures.</description><subject>antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Protozoan - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Blastocystis</subject><subject>Blastocystis - immunology</subject><subject>Blastocystis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Blastocystis Infections - parasitology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>diagnostic techniques</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>ethyl acetate</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>human resources</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Protozoa</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0932-0113</issn><issn>1432-1955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPpA7ABS2zYZLj-TbwcqgKVRmJRKpaWk9iDq8Qe7AQpb49HKZWQqiIvbB9_5-r6HoTeENgSgPpjBuBMVkB4xSk01fIMbQhntCJKiOdoA6qcgRB2hl7lfAdAasn5S3RGBVOEq2aDfoT42w74an99s8OTzRN2MeHBtDGZKaYF994cQsw-4-jwp8HkKXZLnso9H49b7AP-OY8m4KLHoWi286MN-TV64cyQ7cX9fo5uP199v_xa7b99ub7c7atOsGaqpHAtbSWhtSOt5JYqpThYaG3Td9TVvGeMExBSWdMVxTTK9KSnYIxS0lh2jj6sdY8p_ppL_3r0ubPDYIKNc9akFqx8VHL2f1QKWsbI2Al9v6IHM1jtg4tTMt0J1zsOtZSqUaJQ20eosno7-i4G63zR_zGQ1dClmHOyTh-TH01aNAF9SlSvieqSqD4lqpfieXvf9dyOtn9w_I2wAHQFcnkKB5v0XZxTKEN_suq71eRM1OaQfNa3NxSIAICmEaxmfwDnXLOA</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Dogruman-Al, Funda</creator><creator>Turk, Songul</creator><creator>Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan</creator><creator>Hananel, Amit</creator><creator>Levi, Lital</creator><creator>Kopelowitz, June</creator><creator>Babai, Oded</creator><creator>Gross, Shimon</creator><creator>Greenberg, Zvi</creator><creator>Herschkovitz, Yoav</creator><creator>Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens</title><author>Dogruman-Al, Funda ; Turk, Songul ; Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan ; Hananel, Amit ; Levi, Lital ; Kopelowitz, June ; Babai, Oded ; Gross, Shimon ; Greenberg, Zvi ; Herschkovitz, Yoav ; Mumcuoglu, Ipek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-65fb2b6127f1b64e299940e0be8dc2f74d33410569eacdc2a89ad1d20aa996ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Protozoan - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Blastocystis</topic><topic>Blastocystis - immunology</topic><topic>Blastocystis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Blastocystis Infections - parasitology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>diagnostic techniques</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>ethyl acetate</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>human resources</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Protozoa</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dogruman-Al, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hananel, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Lital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopelowitz, June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babai, Oded</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Shimon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Zvi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herschkovitz, Yoav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumcuoglu, Ipek</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dogruman-Al, Funda</au><au>Turk, Songul</au><au>Adiyaman-Korkmaz, Gulcan</au><au>Hananel, Amit</au><au>Levi, Lital</au><au>Kopelowitz, June</au><au>Babai, Oded</au><au>Gross, Shimon</au><au>Greenberg, Zvi</au><au>Herschkovitz, Yoav</au><au>Mumcuoglu, Ipek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens</atitle><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle><stitle>Parasitol Res</stitle><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>495</spage><epage>500</epage><pages>495-500</pages><issn>0932-0113</issn><eissn>1432-1955</eissn><abstract>Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of a newly introduced ELISA test for the detection of Blastocystis antigens in stool samples (CoproELISAᵀᴹBlastocystis, Savyon Diagnostics) as a proper alternative to currently used methods, especially microscopy. A cohort of 179 fresh/frozen clinical stool samples was tested by the ELISA test, and results were compared to consensus methods comprised of microscopic examination of Lugol’s iodine staining, culture, and immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The new ELISA test was able to detect fewer than 10³cells, recognized subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (comprising &gt;95 % of human Blastocystis infections), and exhibited similar reactivity when comparing formalin-preserved samples to fresh/frozen samples. The test demonstrated 92 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 89 % accuracy when culture, and IFA or microscopy consensus results were taken as reference. When the consensus was comprised of culture and IFA, the test demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82, 86, and 84 %, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity of Lugol staining microscopy was only 18 %. This work presents a unique ELISA test that provides an alternative to the use of microscopy, currently most widely used method. The test enables high-throughput screening and diagnosis of Blastocystis, adaptation to automatic procedures.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>25391498</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0932-0113
ispartof Parasitology research (1987), 2015-02, Vol.114 (2), p.495-500
issn 0932-0113
1432-1955
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753498643
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects antigens
Antigens, Protozoan - isolation & purification
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Blastocystis
Blastocystis - immunology
Blastocystis - isolation & purification
Blastocystis Infections - diagnosis
Blastocystis Infections - parasitology
Cohort Studies
diagnostic techniques
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods
ethyl acetate
feces
Feces - parasitology
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Health aspects
human resources
Humans
Immunology
Medical Microbiology
Methods
Microbiology
Microscopy
Original Paper
Protozoa
screening
Sensitivity and Specificity
title novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A15%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=novel%20ELISA%20test%20for%20laboratory%20diagnosis%20of%20Blastocystis%20spp.%20in%20human%20stool%20specimens&rft.jtitle=Parasitology%20research%20(1987)&rft.au=Dogruman-Al,%20Funda&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=495&rft.epage=500&rft.pages=495-500&rft.issn=0932-0113&rft.eissn=1432-1955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00436-014-4208-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA407669895%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652420333&rft_id=info:pmid/25391498&rft_galeid=A407669895&rfr_iscdi=true