Coexistence in a subtidal habitat in southern Chile: the effects of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera overgrowth on the slipper limpet Crepipatella fecunda

In many coastal areas substrate is the limiting resource for benthic organisms. Some sessile species can be used as secondary substrate, reducing competition and increasing coexistence. In southern Chile, annual populations of Macrocystis pyrifera recruit and grow on the shells of Crepipatella fecun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015-02, Vol.95 (1), p.25-33
Hauptverfasser: Díaz, Francisco J., Pereda, Sandra V., Buschmann, Alejandro H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 33
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
container_volume 95
creator Díaz, Francisco J.
Pereda, Sandra V.
Buschmann, Alejandro H.
description In many coastal areas substrate is the limiting resource for benthic organisms. Some sessile species can be used as secondary substrate, reducing competition and increasing coexistence. In southern Chile, annual populations of Macrocystis pyrifera recruit and grow on the shells of Crepipatella fecunda. This study describes ecological interactions between the kelp and the slipper limpet over an annual cycle. The degree of kelp overgrowth was established by collecting sporophytes and through in situ submarine photography over a 10 month period (starting when kelp recruits became visible and ending when sporophytes were no longer present). Changes in the biochemical composition of the limpet tissue were also recorded by chemical analyses, to evaluate the potential effects (positive/neutral/negative) of kelp on C. fecunda nutritional condition. The results indicate that both species coexist, although kelp overgrowth may cause a decrease in carbohydrates in C. fecunda tissues, restricted to the period when the kelp forest reaches its maximum biomass. Individually, the short duration of the maximum overgrowth period and the size reached by C. fecunda females (up to 65 mm shell length) may enable rapid limpet recovery, avoiding competitive exclusion. On a population level, the M. pyrifera annual cycle generates the needed ‘break’ for C. fecunda populations, reducing the effects of kelp overgrowth. Thus, in the view of the neutral effect of kelp overgrowth, together with the positive effect of C. fecunda on M. pyrifera recruitment described somewhere else, this ecological interaction can be categorized as commensalism.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0025315414000228
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753469369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0025315414000228</cupid><sourcerecordid>3558803131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-112b02544c5bcfbcbc1ed3909ccd2fbc50b5c00469ec06897e15f290a06a412f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxi1EJZalD8BtpF64pLUTO9n0VkVAK4F6oD1HjjPe9ZKNXdsp7KPwtjhlDwhUyZI9nu_3af4Qcs7oZ0ZZ9eWO0lwUTHDGaXrmqyOyYLyss6oq62OymNPZnD8hpyFsk4aV1WpBnhqLjyZEHBWCGUFCmLpoejnARnYmyjj_BjvFDfoRmo0Z8CukAFBrVDGA1bA2coxwj4ODW6m8VfsQTQC390ajl2D_ol97-xA3YMd_cBiMc-hhMDuHERqPzjgZcRgkJNtp7OUZ-aDlEPDj4V6S31eXv5rv2c3P6x_Nt5tM8ZzGjLG8S71xrkSndKc6xbAvalor1ecpFrQTitI0ClS0XNUVMqHzmkpaSs5yXSzJxYuv8_bPhCG2OxPUXMmIdgotq0SR6CKdJfn0Rrq1kx9TdS0ruaj4ShRFUrEXVZpECB5167zZSb9vGW3nZbXvlpWY4sDIXedNv8ZX1v-lngEhi5il</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1645748533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coexistence in a subtidal habitat in southern Chile: the effects of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera overgrowth on the slipper limpet Crepipatella fecunda</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Díaz, Francisco J. ; Pereda, Sandra V. ; Buschmann, Alejandro H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Díaz, Francisco J. ; Pereda, Sandra V. ; Buschmann, Alejandro H.</creatorcontrib><description>In many coastal areas substrate is the limiting resource for benthic organisms. Some sessile species can be used as secondary substrate, reducing competition and increasing coexistence. In southern Chile, annual populations of Macrocystis pyrifera recruit and grow on the shells of Crepipatella fecunda. This study describes ecological interactions between the kelp and the slipper limpet over an annual cycle. The degree of kelp overgrowth was established by collecting sporophytes and through in situ submarine photography over a 10 month period (starting when kelp recruits became visible and ending when sporophytes were no longer present). Changes in the biochemical composition of the limpet tissue were also recorded by chemical analyses, to evaluate the potential effects (positive/neutral/negative) of kelp on C. fecunda nutritional condition. The results indicate that both species coexist, although kelp overgrowth may cause a decrease in carbohydrates in C. fecunda tissues, restricted to the period when the kelp forest reaches its maximum biomass. Individually, the short duration of the maximum overgrowth period and the size reached by C. fecunda females (up to 65 mm shell length) may enable rapid limpet recovery, avoiding competitive exclusion. On a population level, the M. pyrifera annual cycle generates the needed ‘break’ for C. fecunda populations, reducing the effects of kelp overgrowth. Thus, in the view of the neutral effect of kelp overgrowth, together with the positive effect of C. fecunda on M. pyrifera recruitment described somewhere else, this ecological interaction can be categorized as commensalism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3154</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0025315414000228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biochemical composition ; Carbohydrates ; Coastal zone ; Coexistence ; Commensalism ; Competition ; Crepipatella ; Macrocystis pyrifera ; Marine</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2015-02, Vol.95 (1), p.25-33</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014</rights><rights>Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-112b02544c5bcfbcbc1ed3909ccd2fbc50b5c00469ec06897e15f290a06a412f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-112b02544c5bcfbcbc1ed3909ccd2fbc50b5c00469ec06897e15f290a06a412f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0025315414000228/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Díaz, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereda, Sandra V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buschmann, Alejandro H.</creatorcontrib><title>Coexistence in a subtidal habitat in southern Chile: the effects of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera overgrowth on the slipper limpet Crepipatella fecunda</title><title>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</title><addtitle>J. Mar. Biol. Ass</addtitle><description>In many coastal areas substrate is the limiting resource for benthic organisms. Some sessile species can be used as secondary substrate, reducing competition and increasing coexistence. In southern Chile, annual populations of Macrocystis pyrifera recruit and grow on the shells of Crepipatella fecunda. This study describes ecological interactions between the kelp and the slipper limpet over an annual cycle. The degree of kelp overgrowth was established by collecting sporophytes and through in situ submarine photography over a 10 month period (starting when kelp recruits became visible and ending when sporophytes were no longer present). Changes in the biochemical composition of the limpet tissue were also recorded by chemical analyses, to evaluate the potential effects (positive/neutral/negative) of kelp on C. fecunda nutritional condition. The results indicate that both species coexist, although kelp overgrowth may cause a decrease in carbohydrates in C. fecunda tissues, restricted to the period when the kelp forest reaches its maximum biomass. Individually, the short duration of the maximum overgrowth period and the size reached by C. fecunda females (up to 65 mm shell length) may enable rapid limpet recovery, avoiding competitive exclusion. On a population level, the M. pyrifera annual cycle generates the needed ‘break’ for C. fecunda populations, reducing the effects of kelp overgrowth. Thus, in the view of the neutral effect of kelp overgrowth, together with the positive effect of C. fecunda on M. pyrifera recruitment described somewhere else, this ecological interaction can be categorized as commensalism.</description><subject>Biochemical composition</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Commensalism</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Crepipatella</subject><subject>Macrocystis pyrifera</subject><subject>Marine</subject><issn>0025-3154</issn><issn>1469-7769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxi1EJZalD8BtpF64pLUTO9n0VkVAK4F6oD1HjjPe9ZKNXdsp7KPwtjhlDwhUyZI9nu_3af4Qcs7oZ0ZZ9eWO0lwUTHDGaXrmqyOyYLyss6oq62OymNPZnD8hpyFsk4aV1WpBnhqLjyZEHBWCGUFCmLpoejnARnYmyjj_BjvFDfoRmo0Z8CukAFBrVDGA1bA2coxwj4ODW6m8VfsQTQC390ajl2D_ol97-xA3YMd_cBiMc-hhMDuHERqPzjgZcRgkJNtp7OUZ-aDlEPDj4V6S31eXv5rv2c3P6x_Nt5tM8ZzGjLG8S71xrkSndKc6xbAvalor1ecpFrQTitI0ClS0XNUVMqHzmkpaSs5yXSzJxYuv8_bPhCG2OxPUXMmIdgotq0SR6CKdJfn0Rrq1kx9TdS0ruaj4ShRFUrEXVZpECB5167zZSb9vGW3nZbXvlpWY4sDIXedNv8ZX1v-lngEhi5il</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Díaz, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Pereda, Sandra V.</creator><creator>Buschmann, Alejandro H.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Coexistence in a subtidal habitat in southern Chile: the effects of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera overgrowth on the slipper limpet Crepipatella fecunda</title><author>Díaz, Francisco J. ; Pereda, Sandra V. ; Buschmann, Alejandro H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-112b02544c5bcfbcbc1ed3909ccd2fbc50b5c00469ec06897e15f290a06a412f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biochemical composition</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Commensalism</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Crepipatella</topic><topic>Macrocystis pyrifera</topic><topic>Marine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Díaz, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereda, Sandra V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buschmann, Alejandro H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Díaz, Francisco J.</au><au>Pereda, Sandra V.</au><au>Buschmann, Alejandro H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coexistence in a subtidal habitat in southern Chile: the effects of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera overgrowth on the slipper limpet Crepipatella fecunda</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</jtitle><addtitle>J. Mar. Biol. Ass</addtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>25-33</pages><issn>0025-3154</issn><eissn>1469-7769</eissn><abstract>In many coastal areas substrate is the limiting resource for benthic organisms. Some sessile species can be used as secondary substrate, reducing competition and increasing coexistence. In southern Chile, annual populations of Macrocystis pyrifera recruit and grow on the shells of Crepipatella fecunda. This study describes ecological interactions between the kelp and the slipper limpet over an annual cycle. The degree of kelp overgrowth was established by collecting sporophytes and through in situ submarine photography over a 10 month period (starting when kelp recruits became visible and ending when sporophytes were no longer present). Changes in the biochemical composition of the limpet tissue were also recorded by chemical analyses, to evaluate the potential effects (positive/neutral/negative) of kelp on C. fecunda nutritional condition. The results indicate that both species coexist, although kelp overgrowth may cause a decrease in carbohydrates in C. fecunda tissues, restricted to the period when the kelp forest reaches its maximum biomass. Individually, the short duration of the maximum overgrowth period and the size reached by C. fecunda females (up to 65 mm shell length) may enable rapid limpet recovery, avoiding competitive exclusion. On a population level, the M. pyrifera annual cycle generates the needed ‘break’ for C. fecunda populations, reducing the effects of kelp overgrowth. Thus, in the view of the neutral effect of kelp overgrowth, together with the positive effect of C. fecunda on M. pyrifera recruitment described somewhere else, this ecological interaction can be categorized as commensalism.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0025315414000228</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-3154
ispartof Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2015-02, Vol.95 (1), p.25-33
issn 0025-3154
1469-7769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753469369
source Cambridge Journals
subjects Biochemical composition
Carbohydrates
Coastal zone
Coexistence
Commensalism
Competition
Crepipatella
Macrocystis pyrifera
Marine
title Coexistence in a subtidal habitat in southern Chile: the effects of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera overgrowth on the slipper limpet Crepipatella fecunda
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T12%3A44%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coexistence%20in%20a%20subtidal%20habitat%20in%20southern%20Chile:%20the%20effects%20of%20giant%20kelp%20Macrocystis%20pyrifera%20overgrowth%20on%20the%20slipper%20limpet%20Crepipatella%20fecunda&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Marine%20Biological%20Association%20of%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.au=D%C3%ADaz,%20Francisco%20J.&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=25-33&rft.issn=0025-3154&rft.eissn=1469-7769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0025315414000228&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3558803131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1645748533&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0025315414000228&rfr_iscdi=true