Cumulative effects of noise and odour annoyances on environmental and health related quality of life
Noise and odour annoyances are important considerations in research on health effects of air pollution and traffic noise. Cumulative exposures can occur via several chemical hazards or a combination of chemical and stressor-based hazards, and related health outcomes can be generalized as manifestati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2015-12, Vol.146, p.191-203 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 203 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Oiamo, Tor H. Luginaah, Isaac N. Baxter, Jamie |
description | Noise and odour annoyances are important considerations in research on health effects of air pollution and traffic noise. Cumulative exposures can occur via several chemical hazards or a combination of chemical and stressor-based hazards, and related health outcomes can be generalized as manifestations of physiological and/or psychological stress responses. A major research challenge in this field is to understand the combined health effects of physiological and psychological responses to exposure. The SF-12 Health Survey is a health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed for the assessment of functional mental and physical health in clinical practice and therefore well suited to research on physiological health outcomes of exposure. However, previous research has not assessed its sensitivity to psychological stress as measured by noise annoyance and odour annoyance. The current study validated and tested this application of the SF-12 Health Survey in a cross-sectional study (n = 603) that included exposure assessment for traffic noise and air pollution in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. The results indicated that SF-12 scores in Windsor were lower than Canadian normative data. A structural equation model demonstrated that this was partially due to noise and odour annoyances, which were associated with covarying exposures to ambient nitrogen dioxide and traffic noise. More specifically, noise annoyance had a significant and negative effect on both mental and physical health factors of the SF-12 and there was a significant covariance between noise annoyance and odour annoyance. The study confirmed a significant effect of psychological responses to cumulative exposures on HRQoL. The SF-12 Health Survey shows promise with respect to assessing the cumulative health effects of outdoor air pollution and traffic noise.
•Noise and odour annoyances proposed as indicators of coping with ambient stressors.•Confirm air pollution and traffic noise interaction effect on annoyances.•Demonstrate cumulative effects of annoyances on functional health and wellbeing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.043 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753467917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953615301829</els_id><sourcerecordid>1732600689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1f48b112d4c7d8fc677da18ee5c84ac816ef354a531c94f37bcebbfcd618f14e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL0AkLlyyeOKv5Fit-JIqcYGz5dhj1avEbu1kpf33OGzLgQucbHmeeUeeh5B3QPdAQX487kuyxYYZ3b6jIOrrnnL2jOygV6wVjKvnZEc7pdpBMHlFXpVypJQC7dlLctVJAYOkfEfcYZ3XySzhhA16j3YpTfJNTKFgY6JrkktrrreYziZarNXYYDyFnOKMcTHTb-oOzbTcNRlrFLrmYTVTWM5b0hQ8viYvvJkKvnk8r8nPz59-HL62t9-_fDvc3LaWs25pwfN-BOgct8r13kqlnIEeUdieG9uDRM8EN4KBHbhnarQ4jt46Cb0HjuyafLjk3uf0sGJZ9ByKxWkyEdNaNKi6GKkGUP-Bsk5SKvuhou__Qo91JbF-ZKME7QQIWil1oWxOpWT0-j6H2eSzBqo3Z_qo_zjTm7OtUJ3VzreP-eu41Z76niRV4OYCYN3dKWDWNQWrDBdyFaZdCv8c8guX4K0D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735025150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cumulative effects of noise and odour annoyances on environmental and health related quality of life</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Oiamo, Tor H. ; Luginaah, Isaac N. ; Baxter, Jamie</creator><creatorcontrib>Oiamo, Tor H. ; Luginaah, Isaac N. ; Baxter, Jamie</creatorcontrib><description>Noise and odour annoyances are important considerations in research on health effects of air pollution and traffic noise. Cumulative exposures can occur via several chemical hazards or a combination of chemical and stressor-based hazards, and related health outcomes can be generalized as manifestations of physiological and/or psychological stress responses. A major research challenge in this field is to understand the combined health effects of physiological and psychological responses to exposure. The SF-12 Health Survey is a health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed for the assessment of functional mental and physical health in clinical practice and therefore well suited to research on physiological health outcomes of exposure. However, previous research has not assessed its sensitivity to psychological stress as measured by noise annoyance and odour annoyance. The current study validated and tested this application of the SF-12 Health Survey in a cross-sectional study (n = 603) that included exposure assessment for traffic noise and air pollution in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. The results indicated that SF-12 scores in Windsor were lower than Canadian normative data. A structural equation model demonstrated that this was partially due to noise and odour annoyances, which were associated with covarying exposures to ambient nitrogen dioxide and traffic noise. More specifically, noise annoyance had a significant and negative effect on both mental and physical health factors of the SF-12 and there was a significant covariance between noise annoyance and odour annoyance. The study confirmed a significant effect of psychological responses to cumulative exposures on HRQoL. The SF-12 Health Survey shows promise with respect to assessing the cumulative health effects of outdoor air pollution and traffic noise.
•Noise and odour annoyances proposed as indicators of coping with ambient stressors.•Confirm air pollution and traffic noise interaction effect on annoyances.•Demonstrate cumulative effects of annoyances on functional health and wellbeing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26519604</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Air pollution ; Air Pollution - adverse effects ; Ambient stressors ; Canada ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects ; Environmental health ; Female ; Health related quality of life ; Health Surveys ; Human exposure ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nitrogen dioxide ; Nitrogen Dioxide - adverse effects ; Noise ; Noise - adverse effects ; Noise annoyance ; Odorants ; Odour annoyance ; Ontario ; Quality of Life ; Stress ; Stress, Psychological - complications ; Structural equation modelling ; Traffic noise</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2015-12, Vol.146, p.191-203</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Dec 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1f48b112d4c7d8fc677da18ee5c84ac816ef354a531c94f37bcebbfcd618f14e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1f48b112d4c7d8fc677da18ee5c84ac816ef354a531c94f37bcebbfcd618f14e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,33774,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26519604$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oiamo, Tor H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luginaah, Isaac N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Jamie</creatorcontrib><title>Cumulative effects of noise and odour annoyances on environmental and health related quality of life</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Noise and odour annoyances are important considerations in research on health effects of air pollution and traffic noise. Cumulative exposures can occur via several chemical hazards or a combination of chemical and stressor-based hazards, and related health outcomes can be generalized as manifestations of physiological and/or psychological stress responses. A major research challenge in this field is to understand the combined health effects of physiological and psychological responses to exposure. The SF-12 Health Survey is a health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed for the assessment of functional mental and physical health in clinical practice and therefore well suited to research on physiological health outcomes of exposure. However, previous research has not assessed its sensitivity to psychological stress as measured by noise annoyance and odour annoyance. The current study validated and tested this application of the SF-12 Health Survey in a cross-sectional study (n = 603) that included exposure assessment for traffic noise and air pollution in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. The results indicated that SF-12 scores in Windsor were lower than Canadian normative data. A structural equation model demonstrated that this was partially due to noise and odour annoyances, which were associated with covarying exposures to ambient nitrogen dioxide and traffic noise. More specifically, noise annoyance had a significant and negative effect on both mental and physical health factors of the SF-12 and there was a significant covariance between noise annoyance and odour annoyance. The study confirmed a significant effect of psychological responses to cumulative exposures on HRQoL. The SF-12 Health Survey shows promise with respect to assessing the cumulative health effects of outdoor air pollution and traffic noise.
•Noise and odour annoyances proposed as indicators of coping with ambient stressors.•Confirm air pollution and traffic noise interaction effect on annoyances.•Demonstrate cumulative effects of annoyances on functional health and wellbeing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air Pollution - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ambient stressors</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health related quality of life</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Human exposure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nitrogen dioxide</subject><subject>Nitrogen Dioxide - adverse effects</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise - adverse effects</subject><subject>Noise annoyance</subject><subject>Odorants</subject><subject>Odour annoyance</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - complications</subject><subject>Structural equation modelling</subject><subject>Traffic noise</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL0AkLlyyeOKv5Fit-JIqcYGz5dhj1avEbu1kpf33OGzLgQucbHmeeUeeh5B3QPdAQX487kuyxYYZ3b6jIOrrnnL2jOygV6wVjKvnZEc7pdpBMHlFXpVypJQC7dlLctVJAYOkfEfcYZ3XySzhhA16j3YpTfJNTKFgY6JrkktrrreYziZarNXYYDyFnOKMcTHTb-oOzbTcNRlrFLrmYTVTWM5b0hQ8viYvvJkKvnk8r8nPz59-HL62t9-_fDvc3LaWs25pwfN-BOgct8r13kqlnIEeUdieG9uDRM8EN4KBHbhnarQ4jt46Cb0HjuyafLjk3uf0sGJZ9ByKxWkyEdNaNKi6GKkGUP-Bsk5SKvuhou__Qo91JbF-ZKME7QQIWil1oWxOpWT0-j6H2eSzBqo3Z_qo_zjTm7OtUJ3VzreP-eu41Z76niRV4OYCYN3dKWDWNQWrDBdyFaZdCv8c8guX4K0D</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Oiamo, Tor H.</creator><creator>Luginaah, Isaac N.</creator><creator>Baxter, Jamie</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Cumulative effects of noise and odour annoyances on environmental and health related quality of life</title><author>Oiamo, Tor H. ; Luginaah, Isaac N. ; Baxter, Jamie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-1f48b112d4c7d8fc677da18ee5c84ac816ef354a531c94f37bcebbfcd618f14e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air Pollution - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ambient stressors</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health related quality of life</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Human exposure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nitrogen dioxide</topic><topic>Nitrogen Dioxide - adverse effects</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise - adverse effects</topic><topic>Noise annoyance</topic><topic>Odorants</topic><topic>Odour annoyance</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - complications</topic><topic>Structural equation modelling</topic><topic>Traffic noise</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oiamo, Tor H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luginaah, Isaac N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Jamie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oiamo, Tor H.</au><au>Luginaah, Isaac N.</au><au>Baxter, Jamie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cumulative effects of noise and odour annoyances on environmental and health related quality of life</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>146</volume><spage>191</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>191-203</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>Noise and odour annoyances are important considerations in research on health effects of air pollution and traffic noise. Cumulative exposures can occur via several chemical hazards or a combination of chemical and stressor-based hazards, and related health outcomes can be generalized as manifestations of physiological and/or psychological stress responses. A major research challenge in this field is to understand the combined health effects of physiological and psychological responses to exposure. The SF-12 Health Survey is a health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed for the assessment of functional mental and physical health in clinical practice and therefore well suited to research on physiological health outcomes of exposure. However, previous research has not assessed its sensitivity to psychological stress as measured by noise annoyance and odour annoyance. The current study validated and tested this application of the SF-12 Health Survey in a cross-sectional study (n = 603) that included exposure assessment for traffic noise and air pollution in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. The results indicated that SF-12 scores in Windsor were lower than Canadian normative data. A structural equation model demonstrated that this was partially due to noise and odour annoyances, which were associated with covarying exposures to ambient nitrogen dioxide and traffic noise. More specifically, noise annoyance had a significant and negative effect on both mental and physical health factors of the SF-12 and there was a significant covariance between noise annoyance and odour annoyance. The study confirmed a significant effect of psychological responses to cumulative exposures on HRQoL. The SF-12 Health Survey shows promise with respect to assessing the cumulative health effects of outdoor air pollution and traffic noise.
•Noise and odour annoyances proposed as indicators of coping with ambient stressors.•Confirm air pollution and traffic noise interaction effect on annoyances.•Demonstrate cumulative effects of annoyances on functional health and wellbeing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26519604</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.043</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2015-12, Vol.146, p.191-203 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753467917 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adult Aged Air pollution Air Pollution - adverse effects Ambient stressors Canada Cross-Sectional Studies Environmental Exposure - adverse effects Environmental health Female Health related quality of life Health Surveys Human exposure Humans Male Middle Aged Nitrogen dioxide Nitrogen Dioxide - adverse effects Noise Noise - adverse effects Noise annoyance Odorants Odour annoyance Ontario Quality of Life Stress Stress, Psychological - complications Structural equation modelling Traffic noise |
title | Cumulative effects of noise and odour annoyances on environmental and health related quality of life |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A16%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cumulative%20effects%20of%20noise%20and%20odour%20annoyances%20on%20environmental%20and%20health%20related%20quality%20of%20life&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Oiamo,%20Tor%20H.&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=146&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=191-203&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1732600689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735025150&rft_id=info:pmid/26519604&rft_els_id=S0277953615301829&rfr_iscdi=true |