Colorectal cancer rates following a barium enema or colonoscopy

Introduction Colonoscopy and removal of adenomatous polyps has been shown to reduce subsequent cancer risk. In Canada, Rabeneck et al found that over a 14 year period, a negative colonoscopy was associated with a reduced incidence of subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) in the distal colon; but little...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2011-04, Vol.60 (Suppl 1), p.A69-A70
Hauptverfasser: Maheswaran, T, Tighe, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A70
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A69
container_title Gut
container_volume 60
creator Maheswaran, T
Tighe, R
description Introduction Colonoscopy and removal of adenomatous polyps has been shown to reduce subsequent cancer risk. In Canada, Rabeneck et al found that over a 14 year period, a negative colonoscopy was associated with a reduced incidence of subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) in the distal colon; but little reduction in the incidence of proximal CRC at least for the first 7 years after the colonoscopy.1 With this in mind we reviewed the incidence and distribution of CRC in our population following colonic evaluation. Our unit is the third largest colorectal cancer unit in the UK. Between 2005 and 2010 there were 2611 cases of CRC, during this period 17 263 colonoscopies and 13 767 barium enemas were performed. Table 1 PTU-013 The location of a CRC in those patients who had had a previous colonoscopy or barium enema Location All CRC (2611) Prior colonoscopy (13) Prior barium enema (96) Left 62% (1619) 46.2% (6) 42.5% (45) Right 38% (992) 53.8% (7) 48.1% (51) Methods By interrogating the patient administration system of our hospital we were able to identify those patients who had had a colonoscopy or barium enema done over 12 months prior to their CRC diagnosis being made, we collected data from the last 10 years. We chose this 12 month period to avoid those patients who had had an examination that led to a diagnosis of CRC. Results 106 patients had a barium enema between 12 and 118 months before a diagnosis of colorectal cancer was made. 48.1% (51) were located in the right side of the colon, 42.5% (45) were located in the left side of the colon. In the remaining 9.4% (10) the location was unknown. These missed cancers were most frequently located in the caecum 23.5% (25), sigmoid 16.9% (18) and ascending colon 13.2% (14). 13 patients had a colonoscopy between 25 and 116 months prior to a diagnosis of colorectal cancer being made. 53.8% (7) of these were located in the right side of the colon and 46.2% (6) of these were located in the left side of the colon. These tumours were most frequently located in the caecum 30.7% (4), transverse colon 23.0% (3) and rectum 23.0% (3). Conclusion There was significantly more right sided cancers in the prior colonoscopy and barium enema groups (chi squared = 11.29, p < 0.001) consistent with earlier data from Canada. There was a ten fold increased miss rate with barium enema over colonoscopy and this would support the service moving away from barium enemas to colonoscopy.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gut.2011.239301.141
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753456175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1753456175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2771-ce81bb2af1c28ae3bf29b50de22ed5c6d335ff0cb06d298f0492fb125bc40bb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQQC0EEqXwC1gisbAk-Ow4diaECpQvwVIQYrFs10YpSVzsRMC_J1UQAxPTLe_dnR5Ch4AzAFqcvPZdRjBARmhJMWSQwxaaQF6IlBIhttEEY-Ap43m5i_ZiXGGMhShhgk5nvvbBmk7ViVGtsSEJqrMxcb6u_UfVviYq0SpUfZPY1jYq8SExg9P6aPz6ax_tOFVHe_Azp-jx8mIxu0rvHubXs7O7VBPOITVWgNZEOTBEKEu1I6VmeGkJsUtmiiWlzDlsNC6WpBQO5yVxGgjTJsdal3SKjse96-Dfexs72VTR2LpWrfV9lMAZzVmxGVN09Add-T60w3eSYCo4w4KRgaIjZYKPMVgn16FqVPiSgOUmqhyiyk1UOUaVQ9TBSkerip39_FVUeJMFp5zJ-6eZvGELfj5_vpUvA5-NvG5W_zrwDXK9h8Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038750852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colorectal cancer rates following a barium enema or colonoscopy</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Maheswaran, T ; Tighe, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Maheswaran, T ; Tighe, R</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Colonoscopy and removal of adenomatous polyps has been shown to reduce subsequent cancer risk. In Canada, Rabeneck et al found that over a 14 year period, a negative colonoscopy was associated with a reduced incidence of subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) in the distal colon; but little reduction in the incidence of proximal CRC at least for the first 7 years after the colonoscopy.1 With this in mind we reviewed the incidence and distribution of CRC in our population following colonic evaluation. Our unit is the third largest colorectal cancer unit in the UK. Between 2005 and 2010 there were 2611 cases of CRC, during this period 17 263 colonoscopies and 13 767 barium enemas were performed. Table 1 PTU-013 The location of a CRC in those patients who had had a previous colonoscopy or barium enema Location All CRC (2611) Prior colonoscopy (13) Prior barium enema (96) Left 62% (1619) 46.2% (6) 42.5% (45) Right 38% (992) 53.8% (7) 48.1% (51) Methods By interrogating the patient administration system of our hospital we were able to identify those patients who had had a colonoscopy or barium enema done over 12 months prior to their CRC diagnosis being made, we collected data from the last 10 years. We chose this 12 month period to avoid those patients who had had an examination that led to a diagnosis of CRC. Results 106 patients had a barium enema between 12 and 118 months before a diagnosis of colorectal cancer was made. 48.1% (51) were located in the right side of the colon, 42.5% (45) were located in the left side of the colon. In the remaining 9.4% (10) the location was unknown. These missed cancers were most frequently located in the caecum 23.5% (25), sigmoid 16.9% (18) and ascending colon 13.2% (14). 13 patients had a colonoscopy between 25 and 116 months prior to a diagnosis of colorectal cancer being made. 53.8% (7) of these were located in the right side of the colon and 46.2% (6) of these were located in the left side of the colon. These tumours were most frequently located in the caecum 30.7% (4), transverse colon 23.0% (3) and rectum 23.0% (3). Conclusion There was significantly more right sided cancers in the prior colonoscopy and barium enema groups (chi squared = 11.29, p &lt; 0.001) consistent with earlier data from Canada. There was a ten fold increased miss rate with barium enema over colonoscopy and this would support the service moving away from barium enemas to colonoscopy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gut.2011.239301.141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Barium ; barium enema ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Diagnosis ; missed cancer ; Polyps ; Rectum ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2011-04, Vol.60 (Suppl 1), p.A69-A70</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2771-ce81bb2af1c28ae3bf29b50de22ed5c6d335ff0cb06d298f0492fb125bc40bb93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/60/Suppl_1/A69.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://gut.bmj.com/content/60/Suppl_1/A69.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,315,781,785,3197,23575,27928,27929,77604,77635</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maheswaran, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tighe, R</creatorcontrib><title>Colorectal cancer rates following a barium enema or colonoscopy</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>Introduction Colonoscopy and removal of adenomatous polyps has been shown to reduce subsequent cancer risk. In Canada, Rabeneck et al found that over a 14 year period, a negative colonoscopy was associated with a reduced incidence of subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) in the distal colon; but little reduction in the incidence of proximal CRC at least for the first 7 years after the colonoscopy.1 With this in mind we reviewed the incidence and distribution of CRC in our population following colonic evaluation. Our unit is the third largest colorectal cancer unit in the UK. Between 2005 and 2010 there were 2611 cases of CRC, during this period 17 263 colonoscopies and 13 767 barium enemas were performed. Table 1 PTU-013 The location of a CRC in those patients who had had a previous colonoscopy or barium enema Location All CRC (2611) Prior colonoscopy (13) Prior barium enema (96) Left 62% (1619) 46.2% (6) 42.5% (45) Right 38% (992) 53.8% (7) 48.1% (51) Methods By interrogating the patient administration system of our hospital we were able to identify those patients who had had a colonoscopy or barium enema done over 12 months prior to their CRC diagnosis being made, we collected data from the last 10 years. We chose this 12 month period to avoid those patients who had had an examination that led to a diagnosis of CRC. Results 106 patients had a barium enema between 12 and 118 months before a diagnosis of colorectal cancer was made. 48.1% (51) were located in the right side of the colon, 42.5% (45) were located in the left side of the colon. In the remaining 9.4% (10) the location was unknown. These missed cancers were most frequently located in the caecum 23.5% (25), sigmoid 16.9% (18) and ascending colon 13.2% (14). 13 patients had a colonoscopy between 25 and 116 months prior to a diagnosis of colorectal cancer being made. 53.8% (7) of these were located in the right side of the colon and 46.2% (6) of these were located in the left side of the colon. These tumours were most frequently located in the caecum 30.7% (4), transverse colon 23.0% (3) and rectum 23.0% (3). Conclusion There was significantly more right sided cancers in the prior colonoscopy and barium enema groups (chi squared = 11.29, p &lt; 0.001) consistent with earlier data from Canada. There was a ten fold increased miss rate with barium enema over colonoscopy and this would support the service moving away from barium enemas to colonoscopy.</description><subject>Barium</subject><subject>barium enema</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>missed cancer</subject><subject>Polyps</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQQC0EEqXwC1gisbAk-Ow4diaECpQvwVIQYrFs10YpSVzsRMC_J1UQAxPTLe_dnR5Ch4AzAFqcvPZdRjBARmhJMWSQwxaaQF6IlBIhttEEY-Ap43m5i_ZiXGGMhShhgk5nvvbBmk7ViVGtsSEJqrMxcb6u_UfVviYq0SpUfZPY1jYq8SExg9P6aPz6ax_tOFVHe_Azp-jx8mIxu0rvHubXs7O7VBPOITVWgNZEOTBEKEu1I6VmeGkJsUtmiiWlzDlsNC6WpBQO5yVxGgjTJsdal3SKjse96-Dfexs72VTR2LpWrfV9lMAZzVmxGVN09Add-T60w3eSYCo4w4KRgaIjZYKPMVgn16FqVPiSgOUmqhyiyk1UOUaVQ9TBSkerip39_FVUeJMFp5zJ-6eZvGELfj5_vpUvA5-NvG5W_zrwDXK9h8Y</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Maheswaran, T</creator><creator>Tighe, R</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Colorectal cancer rates following a barium enema or colonoscopy</title><author>Maheswaran, T ; Tighe, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2771-ce81bb2af1c28ae3bf29b50de22ed5c6d335ff0cb06d298f0492fb125bc40bb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Barium</topic><topic>barium enema</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>missed cancer</topic><topic>Polyps</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maheswaran, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tighe, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maheswaran, T</au><au>Tighe, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colorectal cancer rates following a barium enema or colonoscopy</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A69</spage><epage>A70</epage><pages>A69-A70</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract>Introduction Colonoscopy and removal of adenomatous polyps has been shown to reduce subsequent cancer risk. In Canada, Rabeneck et al found that over a 14 year period, a negative colonoscopy was associated with a reduced incidence of subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) in the distal colon; but little reduction in the incidence of proximal CRC at least for the first 7 years after the colonoscopy.1 With this in mind we reviewed the incidence and distribution of CRC in our population following colonic evaluation. Our unit is the third largest colorectal cancer unit in the UK. Between 2005 and 2010 there were 2611 cases of CRC, during this period 17 263 colonoscopies and 13 767 barium enemas were performed. Table 1 PTU-013 The location of a CRC in those patients who had had a previous colonoscopy or barium enema Location All CRC (2611) Prior colonoscopy (13) Prior barium enema (96) Left 62% (1619) 46.2% (6) 42.5% (45) Right 38% (992) 53.8% (7) 48.1% (51) Methods By interrogating the patient administration system of our hospital we were able to identify those patients who had had a colonoscopy or barium enema done over 12 months prior to their CRC diagnosis being made, we collected data from the last 10 years. We chose this 12 month period to avoid those patients who had had an examination that led to a diagnosis of CRC. Results 106 patients had a barium enema between 12 and 118 months before a diagnosis of colorectal cancer was made. 48.1% (51) were located in the right side of the colon, 42.5% (45) were located in the left side of the colon. In the remaining 9.4% (10) the location was unknown. These missed cancers were most frequently located in the caecum 23.5% (25), sigmoid 16.9% (18) and ascending colon 13.2% (14). 13 patients had a colonoscopy between 25 and 116 months prior to a diagnosis of colorectal cancer being made. 53.8% (7) of these were located in the right side of the colon and 46.2% (6) of these were located in the left side of the colon. These tumours were most frequently located in the caecum 30.7% (4), transverse colon 23.0% (3) and rectum 23.0% (3). Conclusion There was significantly more right sided cancers in the prior colonoscopy and barium enema groups (chi squared = 11.29, p &lt; 0.001) consistent with earlier data from Canada. There was a ten fold increased miss rate with barium enema over colonoscopy and this would support the service moving away from barium enemas to colonoscopy.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><doi>10.1136/gut.2011.239301.141</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2011-04, Vol.60 (Suppl 1), p.A69-A70
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753456175
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central
subjects Barium
barium enema
Colonoscopy
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Diagnosis
missed cancer
Polyps
Rectum
Tumors
title Colorectal cancer rates following a barium enema or colonoscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T20%3A00%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colorectal%20cancer%20rates%20following%20a%20barium%20enema%20or%20colonoscopy&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Maheswaran,%20T&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A69&rft.epage=A70&rft.pages=A69-A70&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gut.2011.239301.141&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1753456175%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038750852&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true