Fatwas and their controversy: The case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI)
This article discusses a different side of two controversial fatwas — one against Muslims participating in Christmas celebrations and the other against pluralism, liberalism and secularism — issued by the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI, Council of Indonesian Ulama). Most studies on MUI have emphasised...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Southeast Asian studies (Singapore) 2013-02, Vol.44 (1), p.100-117 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | Journal of Southeast Asian studies (Singapore) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Sirry, Mun'im |
description | This article discusses a different side of two controversial fatwas — one against Muslims participating in Christmas celebrations and the other against pluralism, liberalism and secularism — issued by the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI, Council of Indonesian Ulama). Most studies on MUI have emphasised the role that the Council's fatwas have played in inciting sectarian violence in Indonesia. Without denying the connections between violence and the MUI fatwas, this article argues that these controversial fatwas have also opened up room for more fruitful and constructive discussions among different religious groups in Indonesia. This article asks: What were the roots of the controversy over these intolerant fatwas? How did the state respond to them? And what does the controversy over these fatwas tell us about the nature of public debate on Islam in Indonesia? By answering these questions this article will shed light on aspects of contemporary Indonesian public debates about Islam that have been overlooked in current scholarship. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022463412000641 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1752993796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022463412000641</cupid><galeid>A316071536</galeid><jstor_id>23321692</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A316071536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c681t-f3dc4ef02c4f14f857d85894a9863c7db4357d7447fb6e38916e289e2ef7ac973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEEmXwA7hAioSQtosMf9VOuBsVK5U6erFVXFquc9ylcuzNToD9exy1YhQKqnxh-bzP-ZDPm2WvMTrHCIv31wgRwjhlmCCEOMNPshFmghWIl-hpNhrkYtCfZy9i3AwM52yULS5V913FXLk6726hCbn2rgv-G4T48CG_uYVcqwi5N4OcT3zvdGOH58zV3kFslMuXVrUqP71azs5eZs-MshFe7e6TbHn56WbyuZgvprPJxbzQvMRdYWitGRhENDOYmXIs6nJcVkxVJada1CtGU0gwJsyKAy0rzIGUFRAwQulK0JPsdFv3Lvj7HmIn2yZqsFY58H2UWIxJVVFR8YS-_QPd-D64NJ3EqWbqy_hv1FpZkI0zvgtKD0XlBcUcCTymA1UcoNbgICibvsM0KbzHnx_g06mhbfTBhLO9hGEb8KNbqz5GObv-cjx79fV49uP0aLaczv_3ITtWe2thDTLtfLLY5_GW18HHGMDIu9C0KjxIjOTgZPmXk1POu90CVdTKmqCSB-OvRCIowgSXiXuz5Tax8-FRp5RgXpGk011v1a5CU6f5Hp3wz-4_AcANARs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1289858466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fatwas and their controversy: The case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI)</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Sirry, Mun'im</creator><creatorcontrib>Sirry, Mun'im</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses a different side of two controversial fatwas — one against Muslims participating in Christmas celebrations and the other against pluralism, liberalism and secularism — issued by the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI, Council of Indonesian Ulama). Most studies on MUI have emphasised the role that the Council's fatwas have played in inciting sectarian violence in Indonesia. Without denying the connections between violence and the MUI fatwas, this article argues that these controversial fatwas have also opened up room for more fruitful and constructive discussions among different religious groups in Indonesia. This article asks: What were the roots of the controversy over these intolerant fatwas? How did the state respond to them? And what does the controversy over these fatwas tell us about the nature of public debate on Islam in Indonesia? By answering these questions this article will shed light on aspects of contemporary Indonesian public debates about Islam that have been overlooked in current scholarship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4634</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022463412000641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Asia ; Celebrations ; Christianity ; Christmas ; Controversy ; Councils ; Disputes ; Ethnology ; Generalities ; Indonesia ; Islam ; Liberalism ; Marriage ; Muslims ; Pluralism ; Pluralist school ; Political debate ; Political parties ; Religion ; Religion, magic, witchcraft ; Religions, beliefs, worships ; Rites, ceremonies and celebrations ; Secularism ; Violence ; Wahid, Abdurrahman</subject><ispartof>Journal of Southeast Asian studies (Singapore), 2013-02, Vol.44 (1), p.100-117</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The National University of Singapore 2013</rights><rights>The National University of Singapore 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c681t-f3dc4ef02c4f14f857d85894a9863c7db4357d7447fb6e38916e289e2ef7ac973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c681t-f3dc4ef02c4f14f857d85894a9863c7db4357d7447fb6e38916e289e2ef7ac973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23321692$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022463412000641/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12845,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27301218$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sirry, Mun'im</creatorcontrib><title>Fatwas and their controversy: The case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI)</title><title>Journal of Southeast Asian studies (Singapore)</title><addtitle>J. Southeast Asian stud</addtitle><description>This article discusses a different side of two controversial fatwas — one against Muslims participating in Christmas celebrations and the other against pluralism, liberalism and secularism — issued by the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI, Council of Indonesian Ulama). Most studies on MUI have emphasised the role that the Council's fatwas have played in inciting sectarian violence in Indonesia. Without denying the connections between violence and the MUI fatwas, this article argues that these controversial fatwas have also opened up room for more fruitful and constructive discussions among different religious groups in Indonesia. This article asks: What were the roots of the controversy over these intolerant fatwas? How did the state respond to them? And what does the controversy over these fatwas tell us about the nature of public debate on Islam in Indonesia? By answering these questions this article will shed light on aspects of contemporary Indonesian public debates about Islam that have been overlooked in current scholarship.</description><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Celebrations</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Christmas</subject><subject>Controversy</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Pluralism</subject><subject>Pluralist school</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion, magic, witchcraft</subject><subject>Religions, beliefs, worships</subject><subject>Rites, ceremonies and celebrations</subject><subject>Secularism</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Wahid, Abdurrahman</subject><issn>0022-4634</issn><issn>1474-0680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEEmXwA7hAioSQtosMf9VOuBsVK5U6erFVXFquc9ylcuzNToD9exy1YhQKqnxh-bzP-ZDPm2WvMTrHCIv31wgRwjhlmCCEOMNPshFmghWIl-hpNhrkYtCfZy9i3AwM52yULS5V913FXLk6726hCbn2rgv-G4T48CG_uYVcqwi5N4OcT3zvdGOH58zV3kFslMuXVrUqP71azs5eZs-MshFe7e6TbHn56WbyuZgvprPJxbzQvMRdYWitGRhENDOYmXIs6nJcVkxVJada1CtGU0gwJsyKAy0rzIGUFRAwQulK0JPsdFv3Lvj7HmIn2yZqsFY58H2UWIxJVVFR8YS-_QPd-D64NJ3EqWbqy_hv1FpZkI0zvgtKD0XlBcUcCTymA1UcoNbgICibvsM0KbzHnx_g06mhbfTBhLO9hGEb8KNbqz5GObv-cjx79fV49uP0aLaczv_3ITtWe2thDTLtfLLY5_GW18HHGMDIu9C0KjxIjOTgZPmXk1POu90CVdTKmqCSB-OvRCIowgSXiXuz5Tax8-FRp5RgXpGk011v1a5CU6f5Hp3wz-4_AcANARs</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Sirry, Mun'im</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IMW</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>Fatwas and their controversy: The case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI)</title><author>Sirry, Mun'im</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c681t-f3dc4ef02c4f14f857d85894a9863c7db4357d7447fb6e38916e289e2ef7ac973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Celebrations</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Christmas</topic><topic>Controversy</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Pluralism</topic><topic>Pluralist school</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion, magic, witchcraft</topic><topic>Religions, beliefs, worships</topic><topic>Rites, ceremonies and celebrations</topic><topic>Secularism</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Wahid, Abdurrahman</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sirry, Mun'im</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: World History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of Southeast Asian studies (Singapore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sirry, Mun'im</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fatwas and their controversy: The case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Southeast Asian studies (Singapore)</jtitle><addtitle>J. Southeast Asian stud</addtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>100-117</pages><issn>0022-4634</issn><eissn>1474-0680</eissn><abstract>This article discusses a different side of two controversial fatwas — one against Muslims participating in Christmas celebrations and the other against pluralism, liberalism and secularism — issued by the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI, Council of Indonesian Ulama). Most studies on MUI have emphasised the role that the Council's fatwas have played in inciting sectarian violence in Indonesia. Without denying the connections between violence and the MUI fatwas, this article argues that these controversial fatwas have also opened up room for more fruitful and constructive discussions among different religious groups in Indonesia. This article asks: What were the roots of the controversy over these intolerant fatwas? How did the state respond to them? And what does the controversy over these fatwas tell us about the nature of public debate on Islam in Indonesia? By answering these questions this article will shed light on aspects of contemporary Indonesian public debates about Islam that have been overlooked in current scholarship.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022463412000641</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4634 |
ispartof | Journal of Southeast Asian studies (Singapore), 2013-02, Vol.44 (1), p.100-117 |
issn | 0022-4634 1474-0680 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1752993796 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Asia Celebrations Christianity Christmas Controversy Councils Disputes Ethnology Generalities Indonesia Islam Liberalism Marriage Muslims Pluralism Pluralist school Political debate Political parties Religion Religion, magic, witchcraft Religions, beliefs, worships Rites, ceremonies and celebrations Secularism Violence Wahid, Abdurrahman |
title | Fatwas and their controversy: The case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A08%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fatwas%20and%20their%20controversy:%20The%20case%20of%20the%20Council%20of%20Indonesian%20Ulama%20(MUI)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Southeast%20Asian%20studies%20(Singapore)&rft.au=Sirry,%20Mun'im&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=100-117&rft.issn=0022-4634&rft.eissn=1474-0680&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022463412000641&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA316071536%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1289858466&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A316071536&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022463412000641&rft_jstor_id=23321692&rfr_iscdi=true |