Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, and ESRD in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study

Background The association between waist circumference and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains poorly explored. Study Design Longitudinal population-based cohort. Setting & Participants Participants in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study (n = 30,239) wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of kidney diseases 2016-01, Vol.67 (1), p.62-69
Hauptverfasser: Kramer, Holly, MD, MPH, Gutiérrez, Orlando M., MD, MMSc, Judd, Suzanne E., PhD, Muntner, Paul, PhD, Warnock, David G., MD, Tanner, Rikki M., MPH, Panwar, Bhupesh, MD, Shoham, David A., PhD, McClellan, William, MD, MPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 62
container_title American journal of kidney diseases
container_volume 67
creator Kramer, Holly, MD, MPH
Gutiérrez, Orlando M., MD, MMSc
Judd, Suzanne E., PhD
Muntner, Paul, PhD
Warnock, David G., MD
Tanner, Rikki M., MPH
Panwar, Bhupesh, MD
Shoham, David A., PhD
McClellan, William, MD, MPH
description Background The association between waist circumference and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains poorly explored. Study Design Longitudinal population-based cohort. Setting & Participants Participants in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study (n = 30,239) with information for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, spot urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; n = 26,960). Predictor Elevated waist circumference or BMI. Outcomes & Measurements Incident cases of ESRD were identified through linkage of REGARDS participants with the US Renal Data System. Results Mean baseline age was 64.8 years, 45.8% were men, and 40.3% were black. Overall, 297 (1.1%) individuals developed ESRD during a median of 6.3 years. After adjustment for all covariates including waist circumference, no significant association was noted between BMI categories and ESRD incidence compared to BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 (referent). Higher waist circumference categories showed significantly increased hazard rates of ESRD, with waist circumference ≥ 108 cm in women and ≥122 cm in men (highest category) showing a 3.97-fold higher hazard rate (95% CI, 2.10-6.86) for ESRD compared to waist circumference 
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1752353251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0272638615008550</els_id><sourcerecordid>1752353251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-fba380996347407bcac25b34f5a966984819923b941d25c7bc6880404720f8ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCH-CAfFykTfFH7DgSQlraUlZahJSCOFquM2GdpnGxE0QP_HccWjhwQBppLs_7SvMMQs8pmVMi-Kt2btpdPWeEijlJw_gDNKOC8Uwqrh6iGWEFyyRX8gI9ibElhJRcysfogkmqirygM_Tzi3FxwAsX7LhvIEBv4Rq_9fURfzAx4tu-hh_X2PQ1Xm2qJXY9Hu4BV6v1TbXc4KsKTPR9xI0PeA3-azCHe2d_85WxznR46Zpzb5zSmyH4HbxMe6yPT9GjxnQRnp33Jfr8bvVp8T67-7i-XdzcZVYwMWTN1nBFylLyvMhJsbXGMrHleSNMKWWpckXLkvFtmdOaCZsAqRTJSV4w0qgUvkRXp95D8N9GiIPeu2ih60wPfoyaFsma4EzQhLITaoOPMUCjD8HtTThqSvSkXbd60q4n7ZqkYTyFXpz7x-0e6r-RP54T8PoEQLryu4Ogo3WTk9oFsIOuvft__5t_4rZzvbOm28ERYuvH0Cd_murINNGb6fHT36kgRAlB-C8L-KV9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1752353251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, and ESRD in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kramer, Holly, MD, MPH ; Gutiérrez, Orlando M., MD, MMSc ; Judd, Suzanne E., PhD ; Muntner, Paul, PhD ; Warnock, David G., MD ; Tanner, Rikki M., MPH ; Panwar, Bhupesh, MD ; Shoham, David A., PhD ; McClellan, William, MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Holly, MD, MPH ; Gutiérrez, Orlando M., MD, MMSc ; Judd, Suzanne E., PhD ; Muntner, Paul, PhD ; Warnock, David G., MD ; Tanner, Rikki M., MPH ; Panwar, Bhupesh, MD ; Shoham, David A., PhD ; McClellan, William, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Background The association between waist circumference and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains poorly explored. Study Design Longitudinal population-based cohort. Setting &amp; Participants Participants in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study (n = 30,239) with information for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, spot urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; n = 26,960). Predictor Elevated waist circumference or BMI. Outcomes &amp; Measurements Incident cases of ESRD were identified through linkage of REGARDS participants with the US Renal Data System. Results Mean baseline age was 64.8 years, 45.8% were men, and 40.3% were black. Overall, 297 (1.1%) individuals developed ESRD during a median of 6.3 years. After adjustment for all covariates including waist circumference, no significant association was noted between BMI categories and ESRD incidence compared to BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 (referent). Higher waist circumference categories showed significantly increased hazard rates of ESRD, with waist circumference ≥ 108 cm in women and ≥122 cm in men (highest category) showing a 3.97-fold higher hazard rate (95% CI, 2.10-6.86) for ESRD compared to waist circumference &lt; 80 cm in women and &lt;94 cm in men (referent) after adjusting for demographic factors and BMI. However, no significant association was noted between any waist circumference category and ESRD incidence after adjustment for obesity-associated comorbid conditions and baseline ACR and eGFR. Limitations Short follow-up period (6.3 years) to assess ESRD risk among adults with eGFRs &gt; 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conclusions In this cohort of older adults, obesity as measured by waist circumference is associated with higher ESRD risk even with adjustment for BMI, whereas obesity as measured by BMI is not associated with higher ESRD risk after adjustment for waist circumference. However, no significant association is noted between increased waist circumference and ESRD risk after adjustment for obesity-related comorbid conditions, eGFR, and ACR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-6386</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-6838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26187471</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adiposity ; Aged ; Body Mass Index ; body mass index (BMI) ; chronic kidney disease (CKD) ; chronic renal failure ; dialysis ; end-stage renal disease (ESRD) ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - complications ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; obesity ; Obesity - complications ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Racial Groups ; renal failure ; Stroke - complications ; Stroke - epidemiology ; US Renal Data System (USRDS) ; Waist Circumference</subject><ispartof>American journal of kidney diseases, 2016-01, Vol.67 (1), p.62-69</ispartof><rights>National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2016 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-fba380996347407bcac25b34f5a966984819923b941d25c7bc6880404720f8ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-fba380996347407bcac25b34f5a966984819923b941d25c7bc6880404720f8ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26187471$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Holly, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Orlando M., MD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Suzanne E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muntner, Paul, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnock, David G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, Rikki M., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panwar, Bhupesh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoham, David A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClellan, William, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, and ESRD in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study</title><title>American journal of kidney diseases</title><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><description>Background The association between waist circumference and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains poorly explored. Study Design Longitudinal population-based cohort. Setting &amp; Participants Participants in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study (n = 30,239) with information for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, spot urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; n = 26,960). Predictor Elevated waist circumference or BMI. Outcomes &amp; Measurements Incident cases of ESRD were identified through linkage of REGARDS participants with the US Renal Data System. Results Mean baseline age was 64.8 years, 45.8% were men, and 40.3% were black. Overall, 297 (1.1%) individuals developed ESRD during a median of 6.3 years. After adjustment for all covariates including waist circumference, no significant association was noted between BMI categories and ESRD incidence compared to BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 (referent). Higher waist circumference categories showed significantly increased hazard rates of ESRD, with waist circumference ≥ 108 cm in women and ≥122 cm in men (highest category) showing a 3.97-fold higher hazard rate (95% CI, 2.10-6.86) for ESRD compared to waist circumference &lt; 80 cm in women and &lt;94 cm in men (referent) after adjusting for demographic factors and BMI. However, no significant association was noted between any waist circumference category and ESRD incidence after adjustment for obesity-associated comorbid conditions and baseline ACR and eGFR. Limitations Short follow-up period (6.3 years) to assess ESRD risk among adults with eGFRs &gt; 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conclusions In this cohort of older adults, obesity as measured by waist circumference is associated with higher ESRD risk even with adjustment for BMI, whereas obesity as measured by BMI is not associated with higher ESRD risk after adjustment for waist circumference. However, no significant association is noted between increased waist circumference and ESRD risk after adjustment for obesity-related comorbid conditions, eGFR, and ACR.</description><subject>Adiposity</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>body mass index (BMI)</subject><subject>chronic kidney disease (CKD)</subject><subject>chronic renal failure</subject><subject>dialysis</subject><subject>end-stage renal disease (ESRD)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - complications</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - complications</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Racial Groups</subject><subject>renal failure</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><subject>Stroke - epidemiology</subject><subject>US Renal Data System (USRDS)</subject><subject>Waist Circumference</subject><issn>0272-6386</issn><issn>1523-6838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCH-CAfFykTfFH7DgSQlraUlZahJSCOFquM2GdpnGxE0QP_HccWjhwQBppLs_7SvMMQs8pmVMi-Kt2btpdPWeEijlJw_gDNKOC8Uwqrh6iGWEFyyRX8gI9ibElhJRcysfogkmqirygM_Tzi3FxwAsX7LhvIEBv4Rq_9fURfzAx4tu-hh_X2PQ1Xm2qJXY9Hu4BV6v1TbXc4KsKTPR9xI0PeA3-azCHe2d_85WxznR46Zpzb5zSmyH4HbxMe6yPT9GjxnQRnp33Jfr8bvVp8T67-7i-XdzcZVYwMWTN1nBFylLyvMhJsbXGMrHleSNMKWWpckXLkvFtmdOaCZsAqRTJSV4w0qgUvkRXp95D8N9GiIPeu2ih60wPfoyaFsma4EzQhLITaoOPMUCjD8HtTThqSvSkXbd60q4n7ZqkYTyFXpz7x-0e6r-RP54T8PoEQLryu4Ogo3WTk9oFsIOuvft__5t_4rZzvbOm28ERYuvH0Cd_murINNGb6fHT36kgRAlB-C8L-KV9</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Kramer, Holly, MD, MPH</creator><creator>Gutiérrez, Orlando M., MD, MMSc</creator><creator>Judd, Suzanne E., PhD</creator><creator>Muntner, Paul, PhD</creator><creator>Warnock, David G., MD</creator><creator>Tanner, Rikki M., MPH</creator><creator>Panwar, Bhupesh, MD</creator><creator>Shoham, David A., PhD</creator><creator>McClellan, William, MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, and ESRD in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study</title><author>Kramer, Holly, MD, MPH ; Gutiérrez, Orlando M., MD, MMSc ; Judd, Suzanne E., PhD ; Muntner, Paul, PhD ; Warnock, David G., MD ; Tanner, Rikki M., MPH ; Panwar, Bhupesh, MD ; Shoham, David A., PhD ; McClellan, William, MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-fba380996347407bcac25b34f5a966984819923b941d25c7bc6880404720f8ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adiposity</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>body mass index (BMI)</topic><topic>chronic kidney disease (CKD)</topic><topic>chronic renal failure</topic><topic>dialysis</topic><topic>end-stage renal disease (ESRD)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - complications</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - complications</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Racial Groups</topic><topic>renal failure</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><topic>Stroke - epidemiology</topic><topic>US Renal Data System (USRDS)</topic><topic>Waist Circumference</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Holly, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Orlando M., MD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Suzanne E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muntner, Paul, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnock, David G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, Rikki M., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panwar, Bhupesh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoham, David A., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClellan, William, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kramer, Holly, MD, MPH</au><au>Gutiérrez, Orlando M., MD, MMSc</au><au>Judd, Suzanne E., PhD</au><au>Muntner, Paul, PhD</au><au>Warnock, David G., MD</au><au>Tanner, Rikki M., MPH</au><au>Panwar, Bhupesh, MD</au><au>Shoham, David A., PhD</au><au>McClellan, William, MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, and ESRD in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of kidney diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Kidney Dis</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>62-69</pages><issn>0272-6386</issn><eissn>1523-6838</eissn><abstract>Background The association between waist circumference and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains poorly explored. Study Design Longitudinal population-based cohort. Setting &amp; Participants Participants in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study (n = 30,239) with information for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, spot urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; n = 26,960). Predictor Elevated waist circumference or BMI. Outcomes &amp; Measurements Incident cases of ESRD were identified through linkage of REGARDS participants with the US Renal Data System. Results Mean baseline age was 64.8 years, 45.8% were men, and 40.3% were black. Overall, 297 (1.1%) individuals developed ESRD during a median of 6.3 years. After adjustment for all covariates including waist circumference, no significant association was noted between BMI categories and ESRD incidence compared to BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 (referent). Higher waist circumference categories showed significantly increased hazard rates of ESRD, with waist circumference ≥ 108 cm in women and ≥122 cm in men (highest category) showing a 3.97-fold higher hazard rate (95% CI, 2.10-6.86) for ESRD compared to waist circumference &lt; 80 cm in women and &lt;94 cm in men (referent) after adjusting for demographic factors and BMI. However, no significant association was noted between any waist circumference category and ESRD incidence after adjustment for obesity-associated comorbid conditions and baseline ACR and eGFR. Limitations Short follow-up period (6.3 years) to assess ESRD risk among adults with eGFRs &gt; 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conclusions In this cohort of older adults, obesity as measured by waist circumference is associated with higher ESRD risk even with adjustment for BMI, whereas obesity as measured by BMI is not associated with higher ESRD risk after adjustment for waist circumference. However, no significant association is noted between increased waist circumference and ESRD risk after adjustment for obesity-related comorbid conditions, eGFR, and ACR.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26187471</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.023</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-6386
ispartof American journal of kidney diseases, 2016-01, Vol.67 (1), p.62-69
issn 0272-6386
1523-6838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1752353251
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adiposity
Aged
Body Mass Index
body mass index (BMI)
chronic kidney disease (CKD)
chronic renal failure
dialysis
end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
Female
Humans
Incidence
Kidney Failure, Chronic - complications
Kidney Failure, Chronic - epidemiology
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrology
obesity
Obesity - complications
Obesity - epidemiology
Racial Groups
renal failure
Stroke - complications
Stroke - epidemiology
US Renal Data System (USRDS)
Waist Circumference
title Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, and ESRD in the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A05%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Waist%20Circumference,%20Body%20Mass%20Index,%20and%20ESRD%20in%20the%20REGARDS%20(Reasons%20for%20Geographic%20and%20Racial%20Differences%20in%20Stroke)%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20kidney%20diseases&rft.au=Kramer,%20Holly,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=62-69&rft.issn=0272-6386&rft.eissn=1523-6838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1752353251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1752353251&rft_id=info:pmid/26187471&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0272638615008550&rfr_iscdi=true