Clinical and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the LARS™ system at a minimum follow-up of 10 years

Abstract Background Since the 1980's several artificial ligaments were used for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) serving different complications. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction using the Ligament Augme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The knee 2015-12, Vol.22 (6), p.565-568
Hauptverfasser: Tiefenboeck, Thomas M, Thurmaier, Elisabeth, Tiefenboeck, Michael M, Ostermann, Roman C, Joestl, Julian, Winnisch, Markus, Schurz, Mark, Hajdu, Stefan, Hofbauer, Marcus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 568
container_issue 6
container_start_page 565
container_title The knee
container_volume 22
creator Tiefenboeck, Thomas M
Thurmaier, Elisabeth
Tiefenboeck, Michael M
Ostermann, Roman C
Joestl, Julian
Winnisch, Markus
Schurz, Mark
Hajdu, Stefan
Hofbauer, Marcus
description Abstract Background Since the 1980's several artificial ligaments were used for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) serving different complications. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction using the Ligament Augmentation Reconstruction System (LARS™) with a minimum follow-up of 10-years. The LARS™ presents a synthetic material consisting of non-absorbing polyethylene terephthalate fibres used for ligament reconstruction. Methods Outcomes of 18 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using the LARS™ system between 2000 and 2004 with a minimum follow-up of 10 years were observed. The International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Lysholm score, and Tegner Activity Scale were assessed. Clinical assessment was performed by Lachman testing, assessment of side-to-side difference on KT-2000 testing and plain radiography evaluation of osteoarthritis. Results There were seven males and 11 females, mean age 29 years (range, 18 to 44 years) and a mean follow-up of 151.5 months. Five patients (27.8%) sustained a re-rupture of the LARS™ system and underwent revision surgery after a mean time of 23 months and four patients (22.2%) presented with a re-rupture. The average IKDC score was 76.60 ± 18.18, the average Lysholm score was 88.00 ± 10.07 and the average Tegner activity score was five at final follow-up. Conclusion Our results indicate that the LARS™ system should currently not be suggested as a potential graft for primary reconstruction of the ACL. In special cases, however, the LARS™ system can serve as an alternative graft. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.knee.2015.06.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1752350999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0968016015001313</els_id><sourcerecordid>1752350999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e336t-ab4dd22d0a117e7e343f3d38730b93907b589cdcd1fee622c27991693bcdeed73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kc1u1DAQxy0EokvhBTggH7kkjO2NE1-QqlWhSCtVauEcOfakeJvEiz-K9t5b34JH40nwqstlRjP-zYf_Q8h7BjUDJj_t6vsFsebAmhpkDSBekBXrWlE1HcBLsgIlu6qQcEbexLgDAKnWzWtyxiXjXMpuRZ42k1uc0RPVi6VjXkxyfimhz8n4GakeE4byWKzzgZqQjdMJ6eTu9IxLogGNX2Iq-WMlzdEtdzT9RLq9uLn9-_iHxkNMOFOdqKZzGTbnmY5-mvzvKu-pHykDekAd4lvyatRTxHcnf05-fLn8vrmqttdfv20uthUKIVOlh7W1nFvQjLXYoliLUVhR_g2DEgraoemUscayEVFybnirFJNKDMYi2lack4_PfffB_8oYUz-7aHCa9II-x561DRcNKKUK-uGE5mFG2--Dm3U49P8FLMDnZwDLwg8OQ29Ogt7jAePO51DULD37yHvob48nOV6ENQBMMCH-AfdRi6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1752350999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the LARS™ system at a minimum follow-up of 10 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tiefenboeck, Thomas M ; Thurmaier, Elisabeth ; Tiefenboeck, Michael M ; Ostermann, Roman C ; Joestl, Julian ; Winnisch, Markus ; Schurz, Mark ; Hajdu, Stefan ; Hofbauer, Marcus</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiefenboeck, Thomas M ; Thurmaier, Elisabeth ; Tiefenboeck, Michael M ; Ostermann, Roman C ; Joestl, Julian ; Winnisch, Markus ; Schurz, Mark ; Hajdu, Stefan ; Hofbauer, Marcus</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Since the 1980's several artificial ligaments were used for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) serving different complications. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction using the Ligament Augmentation Reconstruction System (LARS™) with a minimum follow-up of 10-years. The LARS™ presents a synthetic material consisting of non-absorbing polyethylene terephthalate fibres used for ligament reconstruction. Methods Outcomes of 18 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using the LARS™ system between 2000 and 2004 with a minimum follow-up of 10 years were observed. The International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Lysholm score, and Tegner Activity Scale were assessed. Clinical assessment was performed by Lachman testing, assessment of side-to-side difference on KT-2000 testing and plain radiography evaluation of osteoarthritis. Results There were seven males and 11 females, mean age 29 years (range, 18 to 44 years) and a mean follow-up of 151.5 months. Five patients (27.8%) sustained a re-rupture of the LARS™ system and underwent revision surgery after a mean time of 23 months and four patients (22.2%) presented with a re-rupture. The average IKDC score was 76.60 ± 18.18, the average Lysholm score was 88.00 ± 10.07 and the average Tegner activity score was five at final follow-up. Conclusion Our results indicate that the LARS™ system should currently not be suggested as a potential graft for primary reconstruction of the ACL. In special cases, however, the LARS™ system can serve as an alternative graft. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.06.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26122668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Forecasting ; Humans ; Knee Injuries - physiopathology ; Knee Injuries - surgery ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Lysholm Knee Score ; Male ; Orthopedics ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Rupture ; Tendons - transplantation ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2015-12, Vol.22 (6), p.565-568</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26122668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiefenboeck, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurmaier, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiefenboeck, Michael M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostermann, Roman C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joestl, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winnisch, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurz, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajdu, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofbauer, Marcus</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the LARS™ system at a minimum follow-up of 10 years</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Since the 1980's several artificial ligaments were used for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) serving different complications. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction using the Ligament Augmentation Reconstruction System (LARS™) with a minimum follow-up of 10-years. The LARS™ presents a synthetic material consisting of non-absorbing polyethylene terephthalate fibres used for ligament reconstruction. Methods Outcomes of 18 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using the LARS™ system between 2000 and 2004 with a minimum follow-up of 10 years were observed. The International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Lysholm score, and Tegner Activity Scale were assessed. Clinical assessment was performed by Lachman testing, assessment of side-to-side difference on KT-2000 testing and plain radiography evaluation of osteoarthritis. Results There were seven males and 11 females, mean age 29 years (range, 18 to 44 years) and a mean follow-up of 151.5 months. Five patients (27.8%) sustained a re-rupture of the LARS™ system and underwent revision surgery after a mean time of 23 months and four patients (22.2%) presented with a re-rupture. The average IKDC score was 76.60 ± 18.18, the average Lysholm score was 88.00 ± 10.07 and the average Tegner activity score was five at final follow-up. Conclusion Our results indicate that the LARS™ system should currently not be suggested as a potential graft for primary reconstruction of the ACL. In special cases, however, the LARS™ system can serve as an alternative graft. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective study.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Lysholm Knee Score</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Tendons - transplantation</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kc1u1DAQxy0EokvhBTggH7kkjO2NE1-QqlWhSCtVauEcOfakeJvEiz-K9t5b34JH40nwqstlRjP-zYf_Q8h7BjUDJj_t6vsFsebAmhpkDSBekBXrWlE1HcBLsgIlu6qQcEbexLgDAKnWzWtyxiXjXMpuRZ42k1uc0RPVi6VjXkxyfimhz8n4GakeE4byWKzzgZqQjdMJ6eTu9IxLogGNX2Iq-WMlzdEtdzT9RLq9uLn9-_iHxkNMOFOdqKZzGTbnmY5-mvzvKu-pHykDekAd4lvyatRTxHcnf05-fLn8vrmqttdfv20uthUKIVOlh7W1nFvQjLXYoliLUVhR_g2DEgraoemUscayEVFybnirFJNKDMYi2lack4_PfffB_8oYUz-7aHCa9II-x561DRcNKKUK-uGE5mFG2--Dm3U49P8FLMDnZwDLwg8OQ29Ogt7jAePO51DULD37yHvob48nOV6ENQBMMCH-AfdRi6Y</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Tiefenboeck, Thomas M</creator><creator>Thurmaier, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Tiefenboeck, Michael M</creator><creator>Ostermann, Roman C</creator><creator>Joestl, Julian</creator><creator>Winnisch, Markus</creator><creator>Schurz, Mark</creator><creator>Hajdu, Stefan</creator><creator>Hofbauer, Marcus</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Clinical and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the LARS™ system at a minimum follow-up of 10 years</title><author>Tiefenboeck, Thomas M ; Thurmaier, Elisabeth ; Tiefenboeck, Michael M ; Ostermann, Roman C ; Joestl, Julian ; Winnisch, Markus ; Schurz, Mark ; Hajdu, Stefan ; Hofbauer, Marcus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e336t-ab4dd22d0a117e7e343f3d38730b93907b589cdcd1fee622c27991693bcdeed73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Lysholm Knee Score</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Tendons - transplantation</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiefenboeck, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurmaier, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiefenboeck, Michael M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostermann, Roman C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joestl, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winnisch, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurz, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajdu, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofbauer, Marcus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiefenboeck, Thomas M</au><au>Thurmaier, Elisabeth</au><au>Tiefenboeck, Michael M</au><au>Ostermann, Roman C</au><au>Joestl, Julian</au><au>Winnisch, Markus</au><au>Schurz, Mark</au><au>Hajdu, Stefan</au><au>Hofbauer, Marcus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the LARS™ system at a minimum follow-up of 10 years</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>565-568</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Since the 1980's several artificial ligaments were used for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) serving different complications. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction using the Ligament Augmentation Reconstruction System (LARS™) with a minimum follow-up of 10-years. The LARS™ presents a synthetic material consisting of non-absorbing polyethylene terephthalate fibres used for ligament reconstruction. Methods Outcomes of 18 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using the LARS™ system between 2000 and 2004 with a minimum follow-up of 10 years were observed. The International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Lysholm score, and Tegner Activity Scale were assessed. Clinical assessment was performed by Lachman testing, assessment of side-to-side difference on KT-2000 testing and plain radiography evaluation of osteoarthritis. Results There were seven males and 11 females, mean age 29 years (range, 18 to 44 years) and a mean follow-up of 151.5 months. Five patients (27.8%) sustained a re-rupture of the LARS™ system and underwent revision surgery after a mean time of 23 months and four patients (22.2%) presented with a re-rupture. The average IKDC score was 76.60 ± 18.18, the average Lysholm score was 88.00 ± 10.07 and the average Tegner activity score was five at final follow-up. Conclusion Our results indicate that the LARS™ system should currently not be suggested as a potential graft for primary reconstruction of the ACL. In special cases, however, the LARS™ system can serve as an alternative graft. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective study.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>26122668</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2015.06.003</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0160
ispartof The knee, 2015-12, Vol.22 (6), p.565-568
issn 0968-0160
1873-5800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1752350999
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - physiopathology
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation
Equipment Design
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Forecasting
Humans
Knee Injuries - physiopathology
Knee Injuries - surgery
Knee Joint - physiopathology
Knee Joint - surgery
Lysholm Knee Score
Male
Orthopedics
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Retrospective Studies
Rupture
Tendons - transplantation
Transplantation, Autologous
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Clinical and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the LARS™ system at a minimum follow-up of 10 years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A44%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20and%20functional%20outcome%20after%20anterior%20cruciate%20ligament%20reconstruction%20using%20the%20LARS%E2%84%A2%20system%20at%20a%20minimum%20follow-up%20of%2010%20years&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Tiefenboeck,%20Thomas%20M&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=565-568&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2015.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1752350999%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1752350999&rft_id=info:pmid/26122668&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0968016015001313&rfr_iscdi=true