A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct

Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events aft...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2016-01, Vol.83 (1), p.151-157
Hauptverfasser: Othman, Mohamed O., MD, Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH, Elhanafi, Sherif, MD, Davis, Brian, MD, Hernandez, Jesus, MD, Houle, Jennifer, RN, Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS, Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD, Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 157
container_issue 1
container_start_page 151
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 83
creator Othman, Mohamed O., MD
Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH
Elhanafi, Sherif, MD
Davis, Brian, MD
Hernandez, Jesus, MD
Houle, Jennifer, RN
Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS
Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD
Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG
description Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events after ERCP with cholangioscopy. Methods This prospective nonrandomized study performed in a single tertiary referral center included adult patients who were undergoing ERCP with cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Blood cultures were drawn from patients before the procedure and 5 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Antibiotics were not given before or after the procedure. Patients were followed up after 24 hours and 1 week after the procedure for infectious adverse events. The primary outcome was bacteremia rate, and secondary outcomes were cholangitis rate and adverse events. Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study with 60 procedures performed. The first procedure from each patient was considered in the analysis, and thus we included 57 patients with 57 procedures in this study analysis. Postprocedure bacteremia was seen in 5 of 57 procedures (8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9%-19.3%). Four patients were readmitted with cholangitis (7.0%). Bacteremia was more common in patients who had cholangioscopy with biopsy sampling compared with patients who had cholangioscopy without biopsy sampling ( P  = .011). Cholangitis was significantly more common in patients with bacteremia than in those patients with a negative blood culture ( P  = .035). Conclusion ERCP with cholangioscopy is associated with a bacteremia rate of 8.8% and a cholangitis rate of 7.0%. Preprocedural antibiotics may be considered before cholangioscopy, especially if tissue acquisition with biopsy sampling is expected. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01673269 .)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1751992780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510715024372</els_id><sourcerecordid>1751992780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-846bfd7768e0f11951b7f6b1e2ac5647a2d13d65a7c22a8573abb467a55788a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaTZpf0AvRcdevNXI1ocpFEJom0Igh6RnIUvjRBvb2kp26P77ymzSQw-BAUnwzIvmGUI-ANsCA_l5t70LuOUMxJaVAv2KbIC1qpJKta_JhhWoEsDUCTnNeccY07yGt-SESwDZyHZDxnO6TzHv0c3hEWmeF3-gsafzPdIU8sN676ybMeEYLA0T9SEVGD1193Gw012I2cV9cBT_2DFMdg5xek5wcRzLqwsDUr-4-R1509sh4_un84z8-v7t9uKyurr-8fPi_KpyjdJzpRvZ9V4pqZH1AK2ATvWyA-TWCdkoyz3UXgqrHOdWC1XbrmukskIora2sz8inY26Z7feCeTZjyA6H8l-MSzagBLQtV5oVFI6oKxpywt7sUxhtOhhgZrVsdqZYNqtlw0qBLj0fn-KXbkT_r-NZawG-HAEsQz4GTCa7gJPDozzjY3gx_ut_3W4IU3B2eMAD5l1c0lTsGTCZG2Zu1jWvWwbBeFMrXv8FYCWihQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1751992780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Othman, Mohamed O., MD ; Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH ; Elhanafi, Sherif, MD ; Davis, Brian, MD ; Hernandez, Jesus, MD ; Houle, Jennifer, RN ; Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS ; Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD ; Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creator><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohamed O., MD ; Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH ; Elhanafi, Sherif, MD ; Davis, Brian, MD ; Hernandez, Jesus, MD ; Houle, Jennifer, RN ; Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS ; Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD ; Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events after ERCP with cholangioscopy. Methods This prospective nonrandomized study performed in a single tertiary referral center included adult patients who were undergoing ERCP with cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Blood cultures were drawn from patients before the procedure and 5 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Antibiotics were not given before or after the procedure. Patients were followed up after 24 hours and 1 week after the procedure for infectious adverse events. The primary outcome was bacteremia rate, and secondary outcomes were cholangitis rate and adverse events. Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study with 60 procedures performed. The first procedure from each patient was considered in the analysis, and thus we included 57 patients with 57 procedures in this study analysis. Postprocedure bacteremia was seen in 5 of 57 procedures (8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9%-19.3%). Four patients were readmitted with cholangitis (7.0%). Bacteremia was more common in patients who had cholangioscopy with biopsy sampling compared with patients who had cholangioscopy without biopsy sampling ( P  = .011). Cholangitis was significantly more common in patients with bacteremia than in those patients with a negative blood culture ( P  = .035). Conclusion ERCP with cholangioscopy is associated with a bacteremia rate of 8.8% and a cholangitis rate of 7.0%. Preprocedural antibiotics may be considered before cholangioscopy, especially if tissue acquisition with biopsy sampling is expected. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01673269 .)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26116469</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bacteremia - epidemiology ; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures ; Biopsy - utilization ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholangitis - epidemiology ; Common Bile Duct - pathology ; Common Bile Duct - surgery ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pilot Projects ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016-01, Vol.83 (1), p.151-157</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-846bfd7768e0f11951b7f6b1e2ac5647a2d13d65a7c22a8573abb467a55788a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-846bfd7768e0f11951b7f6b1e2ac5647a2d13d65a7c22a8573abb467a55788a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4137-5728</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510715024372$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26116469$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohamed O., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhanafi, Sherif, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Jesus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houle, Jennifer, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events after ERCP with cholangioscopy. Methods This prospective nonrandomized study performed in a single tertiary referral center included adult patients who were undergoing ERCP with cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Blood cultures were drawn from patients before the procedure and 5 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Antibiotics were not given before or after the procedure. Patients were followed up after 24 hours and 1 week after the procedure for infectious adverse events. The primary outcome was bacteremia rate, and secondary outcomes were cholangitis rate and adverse events. Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study with 60 procedures performed. The first procedure from each patient was considered in the analysis, and thus we included 57 patients with 57 procedures in this study analysis. Postprocedure bacteremia was seen in 5 of 57 procedures (8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9%-19.3%). Four patients were readmitted with cholangitis (7.0%). Bacteremia was more common in patients who had cholangioscopy with biopsy sampling compared with patients who had cholangioscopy without biopsy sampling ( P  = .011). Cholangitis was significantly more common in patients with bacteremia than in those patients with a negative blood culture ( P  = .035). Conclusion ERCP with cholangioscopy is associated with a bacteremia rate of 8.8% and a cholangitis rate of 7.0%. Preprocedural antibiotics may be considered before cholangioscopy, especially if tissue acquisition with biopsy sampling is expected. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01673269 .)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bacteremia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Biopsy - utilization</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</subject><subject>Cholangitis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct - pathology</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct - surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Digestive System</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaTZpf0AvRcdevNXI1ocpFEJom0Igh6RnIUvjRBvb2kp26P77ymzSQw-BAUnwzIvmGUI-ANsCA_l5t70LuOUMxJaVAv2KbIC1qpJKta_JhhWoEsDUCTnNeccY07yGt-SESwDZyHZDxnO6TzHv0c3hEWmeF3-gsafzPdIU8sN676ybMeEYLA0T9SEVGD1193Gw012I2cV9cBT_2DFMdg5xek5wcRzLqwsDUr-4-R1509sh4_un84z8-v7t9uKyurr-8fPi_KpyjdJzpRvZ9V4pqZH1AK2ATvWyA-TWCdkoyz3UXgqrHOdWC1XbrmukskIora2sz8inY26Z7feCeTZjyA6H8l-MSzagBLQtV5oVFI6oKxpywt7sUxhtOhhgZrVsdqZYNqtlw0qBLj0fn-KXbkT_r-NZawG-HAEsQz4GTCa7gJPDozzjY3gx_ut_3W4IU3B2eMAD5l1c0lTsGTCZG2Zu1jWvWwbBeFMrXv8FYCWihQ</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Othman, Mohamed O., MD</creator><creator>Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH</creator><creator>Elhanafi, Sherif, MD</creator><creator>Davis, Brian, MD</creator><creator>Hernandez, Jesus, MD</creator><creator>Houle, Jennifer, RN</creator><creator>Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS</creator><creator>Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD</creator><creator>Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4137-5728</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct</title><author>Othman, Mohamed O., MD ; Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH ; Elhanafi, Sherif, MD ; Davis, Brian, MD ; Hernandez, Jesus, MD ; Houle, Jennifer, RN ; Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS ; Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD ; Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-846bfd7768e0f11951b7f6b1e2ac5647a2d13d65a7c22a8573abb467a55788a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bacteremia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Biopsy - utilization</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</topic><topic>Cholangitis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct - pathology</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct - surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Digestive System</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohamed O., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhanafi, Sherif, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Jesus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houle, Jennifer, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Othman, Mohamed O., MD</au><au>Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH</au><au>Elhanafi, Sherif, MD</au><au>Davis, Brian, MD</au><au>Hernandez, Jesus, MD</au><au>Houle, Jennifer, RN</au><au>Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS</au><au>Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD</au><au>Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>151-157</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events after ERCP with cholangioscopy. Methods This prospective nonrandomized study performed in a single tertiary referral center included adult patients who were undergoing ERCP with cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Blood cultures were drawn from patients before the procedure and 5 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Antibiotics were not given before or after the procedure. Patients were followed up after 24 hours and 1 week after the procedure for infectious adverse events. The primary outcome was bacteremia rate, and secondary outcomes were cholangitis rate and adverse events. Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study with 60 procedures performed. The first procedure from each patient was considered in the analysis, and thus we included 57 patients with 57 procedures in this study analysis. Postprocedure bacteremia was seen in 5 of 57 procedures (8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9%-19.3%). Four patients were readmitted with cholangitis (7.0%). Bacteremia was more common in patients who had cholangioscopy with biopsy sampling compared with patients who had cholangioscopy without biopsy sampling ( P  = .011). Cholangitis was significantly more common in patients with bacteremia than in those patients with a negative blood culture ( P  = .035). Conclusion ERCP with cholangioscopy is associated with a bacteremia rate of 8.8% and a cholangitis rate of 7.0%. Preprocedural antibiotics may be considered before cholangioscopy, especially if tissue acquisition with biopsy sampling is expected. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01673269 .)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26116469</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4137-5728</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016-01, Vol.83 (1), p.151-157
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1751992780
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Bacteremia - epidemiology
Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures
Biopsy - utilization
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
Cholangitis - epidemiology
Common Bile Duct - pathology
Common Bile Duct - surgery
Endoscopy, Digestive System
Female
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pilot Projects
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Prospective Studies
title A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20study%20of%20the%20risk%20of%20bacteremia%20in%20directed%20cholangioscopic%20examination%20of%20the%20common%20bile%20duct&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Othman,%20Mohamed%20O.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=151-157&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1751992780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1751992780&rft_id=info:pmid/26116469&rft_els_id=S0016510715024372&rfr_iscdi=true