A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct
Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events aft...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2016-01, Vol.83 (1), p.151-157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 157 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Othman, Mohamed O., MD Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH Elhanafi, Sherif, MD Davis, Brian, MD Hernandez, Jesus, MD Houle, Jennifer, RN Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG |
description | Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events after ERCP with cholangioscopy. Methods This prospective nonrandomized study performed in a single tertiary referral center included adult patients who were undergoing ERCP with cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Blood cultures were drawn from patients before the procedure and 5 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Antibiotics were not given before or after the procedure. Patients were followed up after 24 hours and 1 week after the procedure for infectious adverse events. The primary outcome was bacteremia rate, and secondary outcomes were cholangitis rate and adverse events. Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study with 60 procedures performed. The first procedure from each patient was considered in the analysis, and thus we included 57 patients with 57 procedures in this study analysis. Postprocedure bacteremia was seen in 5 of 57 procedures (8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9%-19.3%). Four patients were readmitted with cholangitis (7.0%). Bacteremia was more common in patients who had cholangioscopy with biopsy sampling compared with patients who had cholangioscopy without biopsy sampling ( P = .011). Cholangitis was significantly more common in patients with bacteremia than in those patients with a negative blood culture ( P = .035). Conclusion ERCP with cholangioscopy is associated with a bacteremia rate of 8.8% and a cholangitis rate of 7.0%. Preprocedural antibiotics may be considered before cholangioscopy, especially if tissue acquisition with biopsy sampling is expected. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01673269 .) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1751992780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510715024372</els_id><sourcerecordid>1751992780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-846bfd7768e0f11951b7f6b1e2ac5647a2d13d65a7c22a8573abb467a55788a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaTZpf0AvRcdevNXI1ocpFEJom0Igh6RnIUvjRBvb2kp26P77ymzSQw-BAUnwzIvmGUI-ANsCA_l5t70LuOUMxJaVAv2KbIC1qpJKta_JhhWoEsDUCTnNeccY07yGt-SESwDZyHZDxnO6TzHv0c3hEWmeF3-gsafzPdIU8sN676ybMeEYLA0T9SEVGD1193Gw012I2cV9cBT_2DFMdg5xek5wcRzLqwsDUr-4-R1509sh4_un84z8-v7t9uKyurr-8fPi_KpyjdJzpRvZ9V4pqZH1AK2ATvWyA-TWCdkoyz3UXgqrHOdWC1XbrmukskIora2sz8inY26Z7feCeTZjyA6H8l-MSzagBLQtV5oVFI6oKxpywt7sUxhtOhhgZrVsdqZYNqtlw0qBLj0fn-KXbkT_r-NZawG-HAEsQz4GTCa7gJPDozzjY3gx_ut_3W4IU3B2eMAD5l1c0lTsGTCZG2Zu1jWvWwbBeFMrXv8FYCWihQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1751992780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Othman, Mohamed O., MD ; Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH ; Elhanafi, Sherif, MD ; Davis, Brian, MD ; Hernandez, Jesus, MD ; Houle, Jennifer, RN ; Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS ; Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD ; Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creator><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohamed O., MD ; Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH ; Elhanafi, Sherif, MD ; Davis, Brian, MD ; Hernandez, Jesus, MD ; Houle, Jennifer, RN ; Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS ; Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD ; Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events after ERCP with cholangioscopy. Methods This prospective nonrandomized study performed in a single tertiary referral center included adult patients who were undergoing ERCP with cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Blood cultures were drawn from patients before the procedure and 5 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Antibiotics were not given before or after the procedure. Patients were followed up after 24 hours and 1 week after the procedure for infectious adverse events. The primary outcome was bacteremia rate, and secondary outcomes were cholangitis rate and adverse events. Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study with 60 procedures performed. The first procedure from each patient was considered in the analysis, and thus we included 57 patients with 57 procedures in this study analysis. Postprocedure bacteremia was seen in 5 of 57 procedures (8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9%-19.3%). Four patients were readmitted with cholangitis (7.0%). Bacteremia was more common in patients who had cholangioscopy with biopsy sampling compared with patients who had cholangioscopy without biopsy sampling ( P = .011). Cholangitis was significantly more common in patients with bacteremia than in those patients with a negative blood culture ( P = .035). Conclusion ERCP with cholangioscopy is associated with a bacteremia rate of 8.8% and a cholangitis rate of 7.0%. Preprocedural antibiotics may be considered before cholangioscopy, especially if tissue acquisition with biopsy sampling is expected. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01673269 .)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26116469</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bacteremia - epidemiology ; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures ; Biopsy - utilization ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholangitis - epidemiology ; Common Bile Duct - pathology ; Common Bile Duct - surgery ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pilot Projects ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016-01, Vol.83 (1), p.151-157</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-846bfd7768e0f11951b7f6b1e2ac5647a2d13d65a7c22a8573abb467a55788a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-846bfd7768e0f11951b7f6b1e2ac5647a2d13d65a7c22a8573abb467a55788a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4137-5728</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510715024372$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26116469$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohamed O., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhanafi, Sherif, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Jesus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houle, Jennifer, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events after ERCP with cholangioscopy. Methods This prospective nonrandomized study performed in a single tertiary referral center included adult patients who were undergoing ERCP with cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Blood cultures were drawn from patients before the procedure and 5 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Antibiotics were not given before or after the procedure. Patients were followed up after 24 hours and 1 week after the procedure for infectious adverse events. The primary outcome was bacteremia rate, and secondary outcomes were cholangitis rate and adverse events. Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study with 60 procedures performed. The first procedure from each patient was considered in the analysis, and thus we included 57 patients with 57 procedures in this study analysis. Postprocedure bacteremia was seen in 5 of 57 procedures (8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9%-19.3%). Four patients were readmitted with cholangitis (7.0%). Bacteremia was more common in patients who had cholangioscopy with biopsy sampling compared with patients who had cholangioscopy without biopsy sampling ( P = .011). Cholangitis was significantly more common in patients with bacteremia than in those patients with a negative blood culture ( P = .035). Conclusion ERCP with cholangioscopy is associated with a bacteremia rate of 8.8% and a cholangitis rate of 7.0%. Preprocedural antibiotics may be considered before cholangioscopy, especially if tissue acquisition with biopsy sampling is expected. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01673269 .)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bacteremia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Biopsy - utilization</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</subject><subject>Cholangitis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct - pathology</subject><subject>Common Bile Duct - surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Digestive System</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpaTZpf0AvRcdevNXI1ocpFEJom0Igh6RnIUvjRBvb2kp26P77ymzSQw-BAUnwzIvmGUI-ANsCA_l5t70LuOUMxJaVAv2KbIC1qpJKta_JhhWoEsDUCTnNeccY07yGt-SESwDZyHZDxnO6TzHv0c3hEWmeF3-gsafzPdIU8sN676ybMeEYLA0T9SEVGD1193Gw012I2cV9cBT_2DFMdg5xek5wcRzLqwsDUr-4-R1509sh4_un84z8-v7t9uKyurr-8fPi_KpyjdJzpRvZ9V4pqZH1AK2ATvWyA-TWCdkoyz3UXgqrHOdWC1XbrmukskIora2sz8inY26Z7feCeTZjyA6H8l-MSzagBLQtV5oVFI6oKxpywt7sUxhtOhhgZrVsdqZYNqtlw0qBLj0fn-KXbkT_r-NZawG-HAEsQz4GTCa7gJPDozzjY3gx_ut_3W4IU3B2eMAD5l1c0lTsGTCZG2Zu1jWvWwbBeFMrXv8FYCWihQ</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Othman, Mohamed O., MD</creator><creator>Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH</creator><creator>Elhanafi, Sherif, MD</creator><creator>Davis, Brian, MD</creator><creator>Hernandez, Jesus, MD</creator><creator>Houle, Jennifer, RN</creator><creator>Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS</creator><creator>Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD</creator><creator>Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4137-5728</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct</title><author>Othman, Mohamed O., MD ; Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH ; Elhanafi, Sherif, MD ; Davis, Brian, MD ; Hernandez, Jesus, MD ; Houle, Jennifer, RN ; Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS ; Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD ; Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-846bfd7768e0f11951b7f6b1e2ac5647a2d13d65a7c22a8573abb467a55788a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bacteremia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Biopsy - utilization</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</topic><topic>Cholangitis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct - pathology</topic><topic>Common Bile Duct - surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Digestive System</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Othman, Mohamed O., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhanafi, Sherif, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Jesus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houle, Jennifer, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Othman, Mohamed O., MD</au><au>Guerrero, Richard, MD, MPH</au><au>Elhanafi, Sherif, MD</au><au>Davis, Brian, MD</au><au>Hernandez, Jesus, MD</au><au>Houle, Jennifer, RN</au><au>Mallawaarachchi, Indika, MS</au><au>Dwivedi, Alok Kumar, PhD</au><au>Zuckerman, Marc J., MD, FASGE, FACG</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>151-157</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims The frequency of bacteremia during ERCP with cholangioscopy has not been well studied. There are no formal guidelines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP with cholangioscopy. The aim was to estimate the frequency of bacteremia and subsequent infectious adverse events after ERCP with cholangioscopy. Methods This prospective nonrandomized study performed in a single tertiary referral center included adult patients who were undergoing ERCP with cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Blood cultures were drawn from patients before the procedure and 5 and 30 minutes after the procedure. Antibiotics were not given before or after the procedure. Patients were followed up after 24 hours and 1 week after the procedure for infectious adverse events. The primary outcome was bacteremia rate, and secondary outcomes were cholangitis rate and adverse events. Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the study with 60 procedures performed. The first procedure from each patient was considered in the analysis, and thus we included 57 patients with 57 procedures in this study analysis. Postprocedure bacteremia was seen in 5 of 57 procedures (8.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.9%-19.3%). Four patients were readmitted with cholangitis (7.0%). Bacteremia was more common in patients who had cholangioscopy with biopsy sampling compared with patients who had cholangioscopy without biopsy sampling ( P = .011). Cholangitis was significantly more common in patients with bacteremia than in those patients with a negative blood culture ( P = .035). Conclusion ERCP with cholangioscopy is associated with a bacteremia rate of 8.8% and a cholangitis rate of 7.0%. Preprocedural antibiotics may be considered before cholangioscopy, especially if tissue acquisition with biopsy sampling is expected. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01673269 .)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26116469</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4137-5728</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2016-01, Vol.83 (1), p.151-157 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1751992780 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Bacteremia - epidemiology Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures Biopsy - utilization Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangitis - epidemiology Common Bile Duct - pathology Common Bile Duct - surgery Endoscopy, Digestive System Female Gastroenterology and Hepatology Humans Male Middle Aged Pilot Projects Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Prospective Studies |
title | A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20study%20of%20the%20risk%20of%20bacteremia%20in%20directed%20cholangioscopic%20examination%20of%20the%20common%20bile%20duct&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Othman,%20Mohamed%20O.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=151-157&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1751992780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1751992780&rft_id=info:pmid/26116469&rft_els_id=S0016510715024372&rfr_iscdi=true |