Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors
Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine envi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological journal of the Linnean Society 2003-10, Vol.80 (2), p.235-260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | Biological journal of the Linnean Society |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | MCKINNEY, F. K. MCGHEE, G. R. |
description | Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine environments, achieved different growth habits, and utilized different aspects of an array of functional potentials resulting from the radially symmetrical colonies. Examination of the distribution of these four genera (Archimedes, Bugula, Crisidmonea, and Retiflustra) within a theoretical morphospace of hypothetical helical colony form reveals that each occupies its own characteristic region of morphospace, broadly overlapping in some dimensions but separated in others. The genera differ markedly in the branching densities within their filtration‐sheet whorls, reflecting their phylogenetic legacies rather than constructional or functional constraints associated with helical growth. In contrast, all tend toward helices in which the radiating whorls of the unilaminate branches are held at an average of 50–60° to the central axis of the colony, and this may reflect a common functional optimum associated with the cilia‐driven, auto‐generated currents within the helix. The region of morphospace characterized by high values of surface area – i.e. helical geometries with branches orientated at very low angles to the central axis, and with very closely spaced whorls along the axis – is entirely empty of bryozoans, and these geometries apparently represent functionally unrealistic colony forms. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 235–260. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00227.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17519545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17519545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4337-9e6319635a6f45f47d7d0e07734daef94a5d5a61c363761afaa8228bd2bb11aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1vEzEQhi0EEqHwH3yBUzf1t3cRFxKV0qqCSxBHa-K1EwdnHewNZPn13W2qcprRvB8aPQhhSuaUCHW1G0cjq5pTNmeE8DkhjOn56QWaPQsv0Wy8ikoQpV6jN6XsCKFUaDZDm-s_KR77kDqcPHbZ2R5vXQwWIrYppm7APuU9Dh3utw4v8pD-JfiID9shpo3rXB_sJfbHzk4dEC8xdC12U3TzWOLB9imXt-iVh1jcu6d5gX58uV4tv1b3329ul5_vKxCc66pxitNGcQnKC-mFbnVLHNGaixacbwTIdtSo5YprRcED1IzV65at15QC8Av04dx7yOn30ZXe7EOxLkboXDoWQ7WkjRRyNL5_MkIZ__QZOhuKOeSwhzwYKqmqOWOj79PZ9zdEN_zXiZnwm52ZKJuJspnwm0f85mQWt3fjMsarczyU3p2e45B_GaW5lubntxuzWollTe4WhvIHN9WKZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17519545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Current</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>MCKINNEY, F. K. ; MCGHEE, G. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>MCKINNEY, F. K. ; MCGHEE, G. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine environments, achieved different growth habits, and utilized different aspects of an array of functional potentials resulting from the radially symmetrical colonies. Examination of the distribution of these four genera (Archimedes, Bugula, Crisidmonea, and Retiflustra) within a theoretical morphospace of hypothetical helical colony form reveals that each occupies its own characteristic region of morphospace, broadly overlapping in some dimensions but separated in others. The genera differ markedly in the branching densities within their filtration‐sheet whorls, reflecting their phylogenetic legacies rather than constructional or functional constraints associated with helical growth. In contrast, all tend toward helices in which the radiating whorls of the unilaminate branches are held at an average of 50–60° to the central axis of the colony, and this may reflect a common functional optimum associated with the cilia‐driven, auto‐generated currents within the helix. The region of morphospace characterized by high values of surface area – i.e. helical geometries with branches orientated at very low angles to the central axis, and with very closely spaced whorls along the axis – is entirely empty of bryozoans, and these geometries apparently represent functionally unrealistic colony forms. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 235–260.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-4066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00227.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJLSBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Archimedes ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological evolution ; Bugula ; Crisidmonea ; Ectoprocta ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Marine ; modular organisms ; Retiflustra ; theoretical morphology ; unilaminate Bryozoa</subject><ispartof>Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 2003-10, Vol.80 (2), p.235-260</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4337-9e6319635a6f45f47d7d0e07734daef94a5d5a61c363761afaa8228bd2bb11aa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1095-8312.2003.00227.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1095-8312.2003.00227.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15168322$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MCKINNEY, F. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGHEE, G. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors</title><title>Biological journal of the Linnean Society</title><description>Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine environments, achieved different growth habits, and utilized different aspects of an array of functional potentials resulting from the radially symmetrical colonies. Examination of the distribution of these four genera (Archimedes, Bugula, Crisidmonea, and Retiflustra) within a theoretical morphospace of hypothetical helical colony form reveals that each occupies its own characteristic region of morphospace, broadly overlapping in some dimensions but separated in others. The genera differ markedly in the branching densities within their filtration‐sheet whorls, reflecting their phylogenetic legacies rather than constructional or functional constraints associated with helical growth. In contrast, all tend toward helices in which the radiating whorls of the unilaminate branches are held at an average of 50–60° to the central axis of the colony, and this may reflect a common functional optimum associated with the cilia‐driven, auto‐generated currents within the helix. The region of morphospace characterized by high values of surface area – i.e. helical geometries with branches orientated at very low angles to the central axis, and with very closely spaced whorls along the axis – is entirely empty of bryozoans, and these geometries apparently represent functionally unrealistic colony forms. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 235–260.</description><subject>Archimedes</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Bugula</subject><subject>Crisidmonea</subject><subject>Ectoprocta</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>modular organisms</subject><subject>Retiflustra</subject><subject>theoretical morphology</subject><subject>unilaminate Bryozoa</subject><issn>0024-4066</issn><issn>1095-8312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1vEzEQhi0EEqHwH3yBUzf1t3cRFxKV0qqCSxBHa-K1EwdnHewNZPn13W2qcprRvB8aPQhhSuaUCHW1G0cjq5pTNmeE8DkhjOn56QWaPQsv0Wy8ikoQpV6jN6XsCKFUaDZDm-s_KR77kDqcPHbZ2R5vXQwWIrYppm7APuU9Dh3utw4v8pD-JfiID9shpo3rXB_sJfbHzk4dEC8xdC12U3TzWOLB9imXt-iVh1jcu6d5gX58uV4tv1b3329ul5_vKxCc66pxitNGcQnKC-mFbnVLHNGaixacbwTIdtSo5YprRcED1IzV65at15QC8Av04dx7yOn30ZXe7EOxLkboXDoWQ7WkjRRyNL5_MkIZ__QZOhuKOeSwhzwYKqmqOWOj79PZ9zdEN_zXiZnwm52ZKJuJspnwm0f85mQWt3fjMsarczyU3p2e45B_GaW5lubntxuzWollTe4WhvIHN9WKZQ</recordid><startdate>200310</startdate><enddate>200310</enddate><creator>MCKINNEY, F. K.</creator><creator>MCGHEE, G. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200310</creationdate><title>Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors</title><author>MCKINNEY, F. K. ; MCGHEE, G. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4337-9e6319635a6f45f47d7d0e07734daef94a5d5a61c363761afaa8228bd2bb11aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Archimedes</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Bugula</topic><topic>Crisidmonea</topic><topic>Ectoprocta</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>modular organisms</topic><topic>Retiflustra</topic><topic>theoretical morphology</topic><topic>unilaminate Bryozoa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MCKINNEY, F. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGHEE, G. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Biological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MCKINNEY, F. K.</au><au>MCGHEE, G. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors</atitle><jtitle>Biological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle><date>2003-10</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>235-260</pages><issn>0024-4066</issn><eissn>1095-8312</eissn><coden>BJLSBG</coden><abstract>Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine environments, achieved different growth habits, and utilized different aspects of an array of functional potentials resulting from the radially symmetrical colonies. Examination of the distribution of these four genera (Archimedes, Bugula, Crisidmonea, and Retiflustra) within a theoretical morphospace of hypothetical helical colony form reveals that each occupies its own characteristic region of morphospace, broadly overlapping in some dimensions but separated in others. The genera differ markedly in the branching densities within their filtration‐sheet whorls, reflecting their phylogenetic legacies rather than constructional or functional constraints associated with helical growth. In contrast, all tend toward helices in which the radiating whorls of the unilaminate branches are held at an average of 50–60° to the central axis of the colony, and this may reflect a common functional optimum associated with the cilia‐driven, auto‐generated currents within the helix. The region of morphospace characterized by high values of surface area – i.e. helical geometries with branches orientated at very low angles to the central axis, and with very closely spaced whorls along the axis – is entirely empty of bryozoans, and these geometries apparently represent functionally unrealistic colony forms. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 235–260.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00227.x</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0024-4066 |
ispartof | Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 2003-10, Vol.80 (2), p.235-260 |
issn | 0024-4066 1095-8312 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17519545 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals Current; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Archimedes Biological and medical sciences Biological evolution Bugula Crisidmonea Ectoprocta Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution Marine modular organisms Retiflustra theoretical morphology unilaminate Bryozoa |
title | Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A21%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20erect%20helical%20colony%20form%20in%20the%20Bryozoa:%20phylogenetic,%20functional,%20and%20ecological%20factors&rft.jtitle=Biological%20journal%20of%20the%20Linnean%20Society&rft.au=MCKINNEY,%20F.%20K.&rft.date=2003-10&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=235-260&rft.issn=0024-4066&rft.eissn=1095-8312&rft.coden=BJLSBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00227.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E17519545%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17519545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |