Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors

Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine envi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological journal of the Linnean Society 2003-10, Vol.80 (2), p.235-260
Hauptverfasser: MCKINNEY, F. K., MCGHEE, G. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 260
container_issue 2
container_start_page 235
container_title Biological journal of the Linnean Society
container_volume 80
creator MCKINNEY, F. K.
MCGHEE, G. R.
description Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine environments, achieved different growth habits, and utilized different aspects of an array of functional potentials resulting from the radially symmetrical colonies. Examination of the distribution of these four genera (Archimedes, Bugula, Crisidmonea, and Retiflustra) within a theoretical morphospace of hypothetical helical colony form reveals that each occupies its own characteristic region of morphospace, broadly overlapping in some dimensions but separated in others. The genera differ markedly in the branching densities within their filtration‐sheet whorls, reflecting their phylogenetic legacies rather than constructional or functional constraints associated with helical growth. In contrast, all tend toward helices in which the radiating whorls of the unilaminate branches are held at an average of 50–60° to the central axis of the colony, and this may reflect a common functional optimum associated with the cilia‐driven, auto‐generated currents within the helix. The region of morphospace characterized by high values of surface area – i.e. helical geometries with branches orientated at very low angles to the central axis, and with very closely spaced whorls along the axis – is entirely empty of bryozoans, and these geometries apparently represent functionally unrealistic colony forms. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 235–260.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00227.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17519545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17519545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4337-9e6319635a6f45f47d7d0e07734daef94a5d5a61c363761afaa8228bd2bb11aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1vEzEQhi0EEqHwH3yBUzf1t3cRFxKV0qqCSxBHa-K1EwdnHewNZPn13W2qcprRvB8aPQhhSuaUCHW1G0cjq5pTNmeE8DkhjOn56QWaPQsv0Wy8ikoQpV6jN6XsCKFUaDZDm-s_KR77kDqcPHbZ2R5vXQwWIrYppm7APuU9Dh3utw4v8pD-JfiID9shpo3rXB_sJfbHzk4dEC8xdC12U3TzWOLB9imXt-iVh1jcu6d5gX58uV4tv1b3329ul5_vKxCc66pxitNGcQnKC-mFbnVLHNGaixacbwTIdtSo5YprRcED1IzV65at15QC8Av04dx7yOn30ZXe7EOxLkboXDoWQ7WkjRRyNL5_MkIZ__QZOhuKOeSwhzwYKqmqOWOj79PZ9zdEN_zXiZnwm52ZKJuJspnwm0f85mQWt3fjMsarczyU3p2e45B_GaW5lubntxuzWollTe4WhvIHN9WKZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17519545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Current</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>MCKINNEY, F. K. ; MCGHEE, G. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>MCKINNEY, F. K. ; MCGHEE, G. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine environments, achieved different growth habits, and utilized different aspects of an array of functional potentials resulting from the radially symmetrical colonies. Examination of the distribution of these four genera (Archimedes, Bugula, Crisidmonea, and Retiflustra) within a theoretical morphospace of hypothetical helical colony form reveals that each occupies its own characteristic region of morphospace, broadly overlapping in some dimensions but separated in others. The genera differ markedly in the branching densities within their filtration‐sheet whorls, reflecting their phylogenetic legacies rather than constructional or functional constraints associated with helical growth. In contrast, all tend toward helices in which the radiating whorls of the unilaminate branches are held at an average of 50–60° to the central axis of the colony, and this may reflect a common functional optimum associated with the cilia‐driven, auto‐generated currents within the helix. The region of morphospace characterized by high values of surface area – i.e. helical geometries with branches orientated at very low angles to the central axis, and with very closely spaced whorls along the axis – is entirely empty of bryozoans, and these geometries apparently represent functionally unrealistic colony forms. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 235–260.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-4066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00227.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJLSBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Archimedes ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological evolution ; Bugula ; Crisidmonea ; Ectoprocta ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Marine ; modular organisms ; Retiflustra ; theoretical morphology ; unilaminate Bryozoa</subject><ispartof>Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 2003-10, Vol.80 (2), p.235-260</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4337-9e6319635a6f45f47d7d0e07734daef94a5d5a61c363761afaa8228bd2bb11aa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1095-8312.2003.00227.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1095-8312.2003.00227.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15168322$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MCKINNEY, F. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGHEE, G. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors</title><title>Biological journal of the Linnean Society</title><description>Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine environments, achieved different growth habits, and utilized different aspects of an array of functional potentials resulting from the radially symmetrical colonies. Examination of the distribution of these four genera (Archimedes, Bugula, Crisidmonea, and Retiflustra) within a theoretical morphospace of hypothetical helical colony form reveals that each occupies its own characteristic region of morphospace, broadly overlapping in some dimensions but separated in others. The genera differ markedly in the branching densities within their filtration‐sheet whorls, reflecting their phylogenetic legacies rather than constructional or functional constraints associated with helical growth. In contrast, all tend toward helices in which the radiating whorls of the unilaminate branches are held at an average of 50–60° to the central axis of the colony, and this may reflect a common functional optimum associated with the cilia‐driven, auto‐generated currents within the helix. The region of morphospace characterized by high values of surface area – i.e. helical geometries with branches orientated at very low angles to the central axis, and with very closely spaced whorls along the axis – is entirely empty of bryozoans, and these geometries apparently represent functionally unrealistic colony forms. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 235–260.</description><subject>Archimedes</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Bugula</subject><subject>Crisidmonea</subject><subject>Ectoprocta</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>modular organisms</subject><subject>Retiflustra</subject><subject>theoretical morphology</subject><subject>unilaminate Bryozoa</subject><issn>0024-4066</issn><issn>1095-8312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1vEzEQhi0EEqHwH3yBUzf1t3cRFxKV0qqCSxBHa-K1EwdnHewNZPn13W2qcprRvB8aPQhhSuaUCHW1G0cjq5pTNmeE8DkhjOn56QWaPQsv0Wy8ikoQpV6jN6XsCKFUaDZDm-s_KR77kDqcPHbZ2R5vXQwWIrYppm7APuU9Dh3utw4v8pD-JfiID9shpo3rXB_sJfbHzk4dEC8xdC12U3TzWOLB9imXt-iVh1jcu6d5gX58uV4tv1b3329ul5_vKxCc66pxitNGcQnKC-mFbnVLHNGaixacbwTIdtSo5YprRcED1IzV65at15QC8Av04dx7yOn30ZXe7EOxLkboXDoWQ7WkjRRyNL5_MkIZ__QZOhuKOeSwhzwYKqmqOWOj79PZ9zdEN_zXiZnwm52ZKJuJspnwm0f85mQWt3fjMsarczyU3p2e45B_GaW5lubntxuzWollTe4WhvIHN9WKZQ</recordid><startdate>200310</startdate><enddate>200310</enddate><creator>MCKINNEY, F. K.</creator><creator>MCGHEE, G. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200310</creationdate><title>Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors</title><author>MCKINNEY, F. K. ; MCGHEE, G. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4337-9e6319635a6f45f47d7d0e07734daef94a5d5a61c363761afaa8228bd2bb11aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Archimedes</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Bugula</topic><topic>Crisidmonea</topic><topic>Ectoprocta</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>modular organisms</topic><topic>Retiflustra</topic><topic>theoretical morphology</topic><topic>unilaminate Bryozoa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MCKINNEY, F. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCGHEE, G. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Biological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MCKINNEY, F. K.</au><au>MCGHEE, G. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors</atitle><jtitle>Biological journal of the Linnean Society</jtitle><date>2003-10</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>235-260</pages><issn>0024-4066</issn><eissn>1095-8312</eissn><coden>BJLSBG</coden><abstract>Erect helical colony forms have evolved at least six separate times within the Bryozoa, but only among those in which branches are composed of a single layer of feeding zooids. The four best known genera with helical colony forms evolved independently, and each occupied different benthic marine environments, achieved different growth habits, and utilized different aspects of an array of functional potentials resulting from the radially symmetrical colonies. Examination of the distribution of these four genera (Archimedes, Bugula, Crisidmonea, and Retiflustra) within a theoretical morphospace of hypothetical helical colony form reveals that each occupies its own characteristic region of morphospace, broadly overlapping in some dimensions but separated in others. The genera differ markedly in the branching densities within their filtration‐sheet whorls, reflecting their phylogenetic legacies rather than constructional or functional constraints associated with helical growth. In contrast, all tend toward helices in which the radiating whorls of the unilaminate branches are held at an average of 50–60° to the central axis of the colony, and this may reflect a common functional optimum associated with the cilia‐driven, auto‐generated currents within the helix. The region of morphospace characterized by high values of surface area – i.e. helical geometries with branches orientated at very low angles to the central axis, and with very closely spaced whorls along the axis – is entirely empty of bryozoans, and these geometries apparently represent functionally unrealistic colony forms. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 235–260.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00227.x</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-4066
ispartof Biological journal of the Linnean Society, 2003-10, Vol.80 (2), p.235-260
issn 0024-4066
1095-8312
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17519545
source Oxford University Press Journals Current; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Archimedes
Biological and medical sciences
Biological evolution
Bugula
Crisidmonea
Ectoprocta
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
Marine
modular organisms
Retiflustra
theoretical morphology
unilaminate Bryozoa
title Evolution of erect helical colony form in the Bryozoa: phylogenetic, functional, and ecological factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A21%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20erect%20helical%20colony%20form%20in%20the%20Bryozoa:%20phylogenetic,%20functional,%20and%20ecological%20factors&rft.jtitle=Biological%20journal%20of%20the%20Linnean%20Society&rft.au=MCKINNEY,%20F.%20K.&rft.date=2003-10&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=235-260&rft.issn=0024-4066&rft.eissn=1095-8312&rft.coden=BJLSBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00227.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E17519545%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17519545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true