Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial
Summary Background Radiotherapy is the standard care in elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma and the role of primary chemotherapy is poorly defined. We did a randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of dose-dense temozolomide alone versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The lancet oncology 2012-07, Vol.13 (7), p.707-715 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 715 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 707 |
container_title | The lancet oncology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Wick, Wolfgang, Prof Platten, Michael, Prof Meisner, Christoph, PhD Felsberg, Jörg, MD Tabatabai, Ghazaleh, MD Simon, Matthias, MD Nikkhah, Guido, Prof Papsdorf, Kirsten, MD Steinbach, Joachim P, Prof Sabel, Michael, MD Combs, Stephanie E, MD Vesper, Jan, MD Braun, Christian, MD Meixensberger, Jürgen, Prof Ketter, Ralf, MD Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, MD Reifenberger, Guido, Prof Weller, Michael, Prof |
description | Summary Background Radiotherapy is the standard care in elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma and the role of primary chemotherapy is poorly defined. We did a randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of dose-dense temozolomide alone versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Methods Between May 15, 2005, and Nov 2, 2009, we enrolled patients with confirmed anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma, age older than 65 years, and a Karnofsky performance score of 60 or higher. Patients were randomly assigned 100 mg/m2 temozolomide, given on days 1–7 of 1 week on, 1 week off cycles, or radiotherapy of 60·0 Gy, administered over 6–7 weeks in 30 fractions of 1·8–2·0 Gy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We assessed non-inferiority with a 25% margin, analysed for all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01502241. Findings Of 584 patients screened, we enrolled 412. 373 patients (195 randomly allocated to the temozolomide group and 178 to the radiotherapy group) received at least one dose of treatment and were included in efficacy analyses. Median overall survival was 8·6 months (95% CI 7·3–10·2) in the temozolomide group versus 9·6 months (8·2–10·8) in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·09, 95% CI 0·84–1·42, pnon-inferiority =0·033). Median event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly between the temozolomide and radiotherapy groups (3·3 months [95% CI 3·2–4·1] vs 4·7 [4·2–5·2]; HR 1·15, 95% CI 0·92–1·43, pnon-inferiority =0·043). Tumour MGMT promoter methylation was seen in 73 (35%) of 209 patients tested. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with longer overall survival than was unmethylated status (11·9 months [95% CI 9·0 to not reached] vs 8·2 months [7·0–10·0]; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·42–0·91, p=0·014). EFS was longer in patients with MGMT promoter methylation who received temozolomide than in those who underwent radiotherapy (8·4 months [95e% CI 5·5–11·7] vs 4·6 [4·2–5·0]), whereas the opposite was true for patients with no methylation of the MGMT promoter (3·3 months [3·0–3·5] vs 4·6 months [3·7–6·3]). The most frequent grade 3–4 intervention-related adverse events were neutropenia (16 patients in the temozolomide group vs two in the radiotherapy group), lymphocytopenia (46 vs one), thrombocytopenia (14 vs four), raised liver-enzyme concentrations (30 vs 16), infections (35 vs 23), and |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70164-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1751215467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S147020451270164X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1751215467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-7d666d9efa54872342fb8f015bec2191dd05bc23d79f54011774b1dd7d76c1513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCCBLXIpEwOPEccIBVFX8kyp6oEh7sxx7wro48WInlcIT8Nh4kwLSXnqyZ_ybb2b8ZdlToK-AQvX6K5SC5oyW_BTYC5FSZb65lx2ndJnzsq7vL_cVOcoexXhNKQig_GF2xBgXtWiK4-z3Ffb-l3e-twaJ3qZo3GJQu5ko5wckNxjiFElQxh68dD6QXjn7fVDDSFQcg9fz6HtF7EASStAZDG5-swRfLs9yWiedwaReEc1LstuqiKQgY7DKPc4edMpFfHJ7nmTfPry_Ov-UX1x-_Hx-dpFrXtMxF6aqKtNgp9KOghUl69q6o8Bb1AwaMIbyVrPCiKbjJQUQomxTVhhRaeBQnGSnq-4u-J8TxlGmaTQ6pwb0U5QgODDgZSXuRmkhKl4DbxL6_AC99lMY0iKJYmXVUKA0UXyldPAxBuzkLthehTlBcu-qXFyVe8skMLm4Kjep7tmt-tT2aP5V_bUxAe9WANPP3VgMMmqLg0ZjA-pRGm_vbPH2QEE7O1it3A-cMf7fRkYm6Sqy1wC2KGyKPzcJxn0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024690100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wick, Wolfgang, Prof ; Platten, Michael, Prof ; Meisner, Christoph, PhD ; Felsberg, Jörg, MD ; Tabatabai, Ghazaleh, MD ; Simon, Matthias, MD ; Nikkhah, Guido, Prof ; Papsdorf, Kirsten, MD ; Steinbach, Joachim P, Prof ; Sabel, Michael, MD ; Combs, Stephanie E, MD ; Vesper, Jan, MD ; Braun, Christian, MD ; Meixensberger, Jürgen, Prof ; Ketter, Ralf, MD ; Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, MD ; Reifenberger, Guido, Prof ; Weller, Michael, Prof</creator><creatorcontrib>Wick, Wolfgang, Prof ; Platten, Michael, Prof ; Meisner, Christoph, PhD ; Felsberg, Jörg, MD ; Tabatabai, Ghazaleh, MD ; Simon, Matthias, MD ; Nikkhah, Guido, Prof ; Papsdorf, Kirsten, MD ; Steinbach, Joachim P, Prof ; Sabel, Michael, MD ; Combs, Stephanie E, MD ; Vesper, Jan, MD ; Braun, Christian, MD ; Meixensberger, Jürgen, Prof ; Ketter, Ralf, MD ; Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, MD ; Reifenberger, Guido, Prof ; Weller, Michael, Prof ; for the NOA-08 Study Group of the Neuro-oncology Working Group (NOA) of the German Cancer Society ; NOA-08 Study Group of Neuro-oncology Working Group (NOA) of German Cancer Society</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Radiotherapy is the standard care in elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma and the role of primary chemotherapy is poorly defined. We did a randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of dose-dense temozolomide alone versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Methods Between May 15, 2005, and Nov 2, 2009, we enrolled patients with confirmed anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma, age older than 65 years, and a Karnofsky performance score of 60 or higher. Patients were randomly assigned 100 mg/m2 temozolomide, given on days 1–7 of 1 week on, 1 week off cycles, or radiotherapy of 60·0 Gy, administered over 6–7 weeks in 30 fractions of 1·8–2·0 Gy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We assessed non-inferiority with a 25% margin, analysed for all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01502241. Findings Of 584 patients screened, we enrolled 412. 373 patients (195 randomly allocated to the temozolomide group and 178 to the radiotherapy group) received at least one dose of treatment and were included in efficacy analyses. Median overall survival was 8·6 months (95% CI 7·3–10·2) in the temozolomide group versus 9·6 months (8·2–10·8) in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·09, 95% CI 0·84–1·42, pnon-inferiority =0·033). Median event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly between the temozolomide and radiotherapy groups (3·3 months [95% CI 3·2–4·1] vs 4·7 [4·2–5·2]; HR 1·15, 95% CI 0·92–1·43, pnon-inferiority =0·043). Tumour MGMT promoter methylation was seen in 73 (35%) of 209 patients tested. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with longer overall survival than was unmethylated status (11·9 months [95% CI 9·0 to not reached] vs 8·2 months [7·0–10·0]; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·42–0·91, p=0·014). EFS was longer in patients with MGMT promoter methylation who received temozolomide than in those who underwent radiotherapy (8·4 months [95e% CI 5·5–11·7] vs 4·6 [4·2–5·0]), whereas the opposite was true for patients with no methylation of the MGMT promoter (3·3 months [3·0–3·5] vs 4·6 months [3·7–6·3]). The most frequent grade 3–4 intervention-related adverse events were neutropenia (16 patients in the temozolomide group vs two in the radiotherapy group), lymphocytopenia (46 vs one), thrombocytopenia (14 vs four), raised liver-enzyme concentrations (30 vs 16), infections (35 vs 23), and thromboembolic events (24 vs eight). Interpretation Temozolomide alone is non-inferior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma. MGMT promoter methylation seems to be a useful biomarker for outcomes by treatment and could aid decision-making. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70164-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22578793</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating - therapeutic use ; Astrocytoma - drug therapy ; Astrocytoma - mortality ; Astrocytoma - radiotherapy ; Biopsy ; Brain cancer ; Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Brain Neoplasms - mortality ; Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Brain research ; Chemotherapy ; Dacarbazine - analogs & derivatives ; Dacarbazine - therapeutic use ; Disease-Free Survival ; DNA Methylation ; DNA Modification Methylases - genetics ; DNA Repair Enzymes - genetics ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase - genetics ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Patients ; Promoter Regions, Genetic ; Radiation therapy ; Tumor Suppressor Proteins - genetics ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The lancet oncology, 2012-07, Vol.13 (7), p.707-715</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-7d666d9efa54872342fb8f015bec2191dd05bc23d79f54011774b1dd7d76c1513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-7d666d9efa54872342fb8f015bec2191dd05bc23d79f54011774b1dd7d76c1513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147020451270164X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22578793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wick, Wolfgang, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platten, Michael, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, Christoph, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felsberg, Jörg, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabatabai, Ghazaleh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Matthias, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikkhah, Guido, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papsdorf, Kirsten, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinbach, Joachim P, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabel, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Combs, Stephanie E, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesper, Jan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Christian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meixensberger, Jürgen, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketter, Ralf, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reifenberger, Guido, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Michael, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the NOA-08 Study Group of the Neuro-oncology Working Group (NOA) of the German Cancer Society</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOA-08 Study Group of Neuro-oncology Working Group (NOA) of German Cancer Society</creatorcontrib><title>Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial</title><title>The lancet oncology</title><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><description>Summary Background Radiotherapy is the standard care in elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma and the role of primary chemotherapy is poorly defined. We did a randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of dose-dense temozolomide alone versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Methods Between May 15, 2005, and Nov 2, 2009, we enrolled patients with confirmed anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma, age older than 65 years, and a Karnofsky performance score of 60 or higher. Patients were randomly assigned 100 mg/m2 temozolomide, given on days 1–7 of 1 week on, 1 week off cycles, or radiotherapy of 60·0 Gy, administered over 6–7 weeks in 30 fractions of 1·8–2·0 Gy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We assessed non-inferiority with a 25% margin, analysed for all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01502241. Findings Of 584 patients screened, we enrolled 412. 373 patients (195 randomly allocated to the temozolomide group and 178 to the radiotherapy group) received at least one dose of treatment and were included in efficacy analyses. Median overall survival was 8·6 months (95% CI 7·3–10·2) in the temozolomide group versus 9·6 months (8·2–10·8) in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·09, 95% CI 0·84–1·42, pnon-inferiority =0·033). Median event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly between the temozolomide and radiotherapy groups (3·3 months [95% CI 3·2–4·1] vs 4·7 [4·2–5·2]; HR 1·15, 95% CI 0·92–1·43, pnon-inferiority =0·043). Tumour MGMT promoter methylation was seen in 73 (35%) of 209 patients tested. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with longer overall survival than was unmethylated status (11·9 months [95% CI 9·0 to not reached] vs 8·2 months [7·0–10·0]; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·42–0·91, p=0·014). EFS was longer in patients with MGMT promoter methylation who received temozolomide than in those who underwent radiotherapy (8·4 months [95e% CI 5·5–11·7] vs 4·6 [4·2–5·0]), whereas the opposite was true for patients with no methylation of the MGMT promoter (3·3 months [3·0–3·5] vs 4·6 months [3·7–6·3]). The most frequent grade 3–4 intervention-related adverse events were neutropenia (16 patients in the temozolomide group vs two in the radiotherapy group), lymphocytopenia (46 vs one), thrombocytopenia (14 vs four), raised liver-enzyme concentrations (30 vs 16), infections (35 vs 23), and thromboembolic events (24 vs eight). Interpretation Temozolomide alone is non-inferior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma. MGMT promoter methylation seems to be a useful biomarker for outcomes by treatment and could aid decision-making. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Astrocytoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Astrocytoma - mortality</subject><subject>Astrocytoma - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Dacarbazine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Dacarbazine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>DNA Methylation</subject><subject>DNA Modification Methylases - genetics</subject><subject>DNA Repair Enzymes - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isocitrate Dehydrogenase - genetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Promoter Regions, Genetic</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Tumor Suppressor Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1470-2045</issn><issn>1474-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCCBLXIpEwOPEccIBVFX8kyp6oEh7sxx7wro48WInlcIT8Nh4kwLSXnqyZ_ybb2b8ZdlToK-AQvX6K5SC5oyW_BTYC5FSZb65lx2ndJnzsq7vL_cVOcoexXhNKQig_GF2xBgXtWiK4-z3Ffb-l3e-twaJ3qZo3GJQu5ko5wckNxjiFElQxh68dD6QXjn7fVDDSFQcg9fz6HtF7EASStAZDG5-swRfLs9yWiedwaReEc1LstuqiKQgY7DKPc4edMpFfHJ7nmTfPry_Ov-UX1x-_Hx-dpFrXtMxF6aqKtNgp9KOghUl69q6o8Bb1AwaMIbyVrPCiKbjJQUQomxTVhhRaeBQnGSnq-4u-J8TxlGmaTQ6pwb0U5QgODDgZSXuRmkhKl4DbxL6_AC99lMY0iKJYmXVUKA0UXyldPAxBuzkLthehTlBcu-qXFyVe8skMLm4Kjep7tmt-tT2aP5V_bUxAe9WANPP3VgMMmqLg0ZjA-pRGm_vbPH2QEE7O1it3A-cMf7fRkYm6Sqy1wC2KGyKPzcJxn0</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Wick, Wolfgang, Prof</creator><creator>Platten, Michael, Prof</creator><creator>Meisner, Christoph, PhD</creator><creator>Felsberg, Jörg, MD</creator><creator>Tabatabai, Ghazaleh, MD</creator><creator>Simon, Matthias, MD</creator><creator>Nikkhah, Guido, Prof</creator><creator>Papsdorf, Kirsten, MD</creator><creator>Steinbach, Joachim P, Prof</creator><creator>Sabel, Michael, MD</creator><creator>Combs, Stephanie E, MD</creator><creator>Vesper, Jan, MD</creator><creator>Braun, Christian, MD</creator><creator>Meixensberger, Jürgen, Prof</creator><creator>Ketter, Ralf, MD</creator><creator>Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, MD</creator><creator>Reifenberger, Guido, Prof</creator><creator>Weller, Michael, Prof</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial</title><author>Wick, Wolfgang, Prof ; Platten, Michael, Prof ; Meisner, Christoph, PhD ; Felsberg, Jörg, MD ; Tabatabai, Ghazaleh, MD ; Simon, Matthias, MD ; Nikkhah, Guido, Prof ; Papsdorf, Kirsten, MD ; Steinbach, Joachim P, Prof ; Sabel, Michael, MD ; Combs, Stephanie E, MD ; Vesper, Jan, MD ; Braun, Christian, MD ; Meixensberger, Jürgen, Prof ; Ketter, Ralf, MD ; Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, MD ; Reifenberger, Guido, Prof ; Weller, Michael, Prof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-7d666d9efa54872342fb8f015bec2191dd05bc23d79f54011774b1dd7d76c1513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Astrocytoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Astrocytoma - mortality</topic><topic>Astrocytoma - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Dacarbazine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Dacarbazine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>DNA Methylation</topic><topic>DNA Modification Methylases - genetics</topic><topic>DNA Repair Enzymes - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isocitrate Dehydrogenase - genetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Promoter Regions, Genetic</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Tumor Suppressor Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wick, Wolfgang, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platten, Michael, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisner, Christoph, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felsberg, Jörg, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabatabai, Ghazaleh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Matthias, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikkhah, Guido, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papsdorf, Kirsten, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinbach, Joachim P, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabel, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Combs, Stephanie E, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesper, Jan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Christian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meixensberger, Jürgen, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketter, Ralf, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reifenberger, Guido, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Michael, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the NOA-08 Study Group of the Neuro-oncology Working Group (NOA) of the German Cancer Society</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOA-08 Study Group of Neuro-oncology Working Group (NOA) of German Cancer Society</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wick, Wolfgang, Prof</au><au>Platten, Michael, Prof</au><au>Meisner, Christoph, PhD</au><au>Felsberg, Jörg, MD</au><au>Tabatabai, Ghazaleh, MD</au><au>Simon, Matthias, MD</au><au>Nikkhah, Guido, Prof</au><au>Papsdorf, Kirsten, MD</au><au>Steinbach, Joachim P, Prof</au><au>Sabel, Michael, MD</au><au>Combs, Stephanie E, MD</au><au>Vesper, Jan, MD</au><au>Braun, Christian, MD</au><au>Meixensberger, Jürgen, Prof</au><au>Ketter, Ralf, MD</au><au>Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, MD</au><au>Reifenberger, Guido, Prof</au><au>Weller, Michael, Prof</au><aucorp>for the NOA-08 Study Group of the Neuro-oncology Working Group (NOA) of the German Cancer Society</aucorp><aucorp>NOA-08 Study Group of Neuro-oncology Working Group (NOA) of German Cancer Society</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial</atitle><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>715</epage><pages>707-715</pages><issn>1470-2045</issn><eissn>1474-5488</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Radiotherapy is the standard care in elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma and the role of primary chemotherapy is poorly defined. We did a randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of dose-dense temozolomide alone versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Methods Between May 15, 2005, and Nov 2, 2009, we enrolled patients with confirmed anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma, age older than 65 years, and a Karnofsky performance score of 60 or higher. Patients were randomly assigned 100 mg/m2 temozolomide, given on days 1–7 of 1 week on, 1 week off cycles, or radiotherapy of 60·0 Gy, administered over 6–7 weeks in 30 fractions of 1·8–2·0 Gy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We assessed non-inferiority with a 25% margin, analysed for all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01502241. Findings Of 584 patients screened, we enrolled 412. 373 patients (195 randomly allocated to the temozolomide group and 178 to the radiotherapy group) received at least one dose of treatment and were included in efficacy analyses. Median overall survival was 8·6 months (95% CI 7·3–10·2) in the temozolomide group versus 9·6 months (8·2–10·8) in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·09, 95% CI 0·84–1·42, pnon-inferiority =0·033). Median event-free survival (EFS) did not differ significantly between the temozolomide and radiotherapy groups (3·3 months [95% CI 3·2–4·1] vs 4·7 [4·2–5·2]; HR 1·15, 95% CI 0·92–1·43, pnon-inferiority =0·043). Tumour MGMT promoter methylation was seen in 73 (35%) of 209 patients tested. MGMT promoter methylation was associated with longer overall survival than was unmethylated status (11·9 months [95% CI 9·0 to not reached] vs 8·2 months [7·0–10·0]; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·42–0·91, p=0·014). EFS was longer in patients with MGMT promoter methylation who received temozolomide than in those who underwent radiotherapy (8·4 months [95e% CI 5·5–11·7] vs 4·6 [4·2–5·0]), whereas the opposite was true for patients with no methylation of the MGMT promoter (3·3 months [3·0–3·5] vs 4·6 months [3·7–6·3]). The most frequent grade 3–4 intervention-related adverse events were neutropenia (16 patients in the temozolomide group vs two in the radiotherapy group), lymphocytopenia (46 vs one), thrombocytopenia (14 vs four), raised liver-enzyme concentrations (30 vs 16), infections (35 vs 23), and thromboembolic events (24 vs eight). Interpretation Temozolomide alone is non-inferior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma. MGMT promoter methylation seems to be a useful biomarker for outcomes by treatment and could aid decision-making. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22578793</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70164-X</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-2045 |
ispartof | The lancet oncology, 2012-07, Vol.13 (7), p.707-715 |
issn | 1470-2045 1474-5488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1751215467 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating - therapeutic use Astrocytoma - drug therapy Astrocytoma - mortality Astrocytoma - radiotherapy Biopsy Brain cancer Brain Neoplasms - drug therapy Brain Neoplasms - mortality Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy Brain research Chemotherapy Dacarbazine - analogs & derivatives Dacarbazine - therapeutic use Disease-Free Survival DNA Methylation DNA Modification Methylases - genetics DNA Repair Enzymes - genetics Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Isocitrate Dehydrogenase - genetics Male Medical prognosis Patients Promoter Regions, Genetic Radiation therapy Tumor Suppressor Proteins - genetics Tumors |
title | Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A37%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temozolomide%20chemotherapy%20alone%20versus%20radiotherapy%20alone%20for%20malignant%20astrocytoma%20in%20the%20elderly:%20the%20NOA-08%20randomised,%20phase%203%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20lancet%20oncology&rft.au=Wick,%20Wolfgang,%20Prof&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20NOA-08%20Study%20Group%20of%20the%20Neuro-oncology%20Working%20Group%20(NOA)%20of%20the%20German%20Cancer%20Society&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=715&rft.pages=707-715&rft.issn=1470-2045&rft.eissn=1474-5488&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70164-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1751215467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024690100&rft_id=info:pmid/22578793&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S147020451270164X&rfr_iscdi=true |