Allograft-prosthetic composite reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for reconstruction of proximal humerus tumor resections

Background Proximal humerus reconstructions after resection of tumors are challenging. Early success of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty for reconstructions has recently been reported. The reverse allograft-prosthetic composite offers the advantage of improved glenohumeral stability compared with h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2016-01, Vol.25 (1), p.45-54
Hauptverfasser: King, Joseph J., MD, Nystrom, Lukas M., MD, Reimer, Nickolas B., MD, Gibbs, C. Parker, MD, Scarborough, Mark T., MD, Wright, Thomas W., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 54
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 25
creator King, Joseph J., MD
Nystrom, Lukas M., MD
Reimer, Nickolas B., MD
Gibbs, C. Parker, MD
Scarborough, Mark T., MD
Wright, Thomas W., MD
description Background Proximal humerus reconstructions after resection of tumors are challenging. Early success of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty for reconstructions has recently been reported. The reverse allograft-prosthetic composite offers the advantage of improved glenohumeral stability compared with hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral reconstructions as it uses the deltoid for stability. Methods This article describes the technique for treating proximal humeral tumors, including preoperative planning, biopsy principles, resection pearls, soft tissue tensioning, and specifics about reconstruction using the reverse allograft-prosthetic composite. Two cases are presented along with the functional outcomes with use of this technique. Biomechanical considerations during reconstruction are reviewed, including techniques to improve the deltoid compression force. Results Reported instability rates are less with reverse shoulder arthroplasty reconstruction as opposed to hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty reconstructions of tumor resections. Reported functional outcomes are promising for the reverse allograft-prosthetic composite reconstructions, although complications are reported. Conclusion Reverse allograft-prosthetic composites are a promising option for proximal humeral reconstructions, although nonunion of the allograft–host bone junction continues to be a challenge for this technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1751195432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1058274615003419</els_id><sourcerecordid>1751195432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3ad0a47b0379400bb1e64484afff4f4e94bb29861674c6dc64ea58d5a5568eb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kj2P1DAQhiME4j7gB9CglDQJY8d2EiEhnU7AIZ1EAdSW40xYBydePM6J5dfjvT0oKKjs4nlfjZ9xUbxgUDNg6vVcz4Q1ByZrUDVw9qg4Z7LhlZIAj_MdZFfxVqiz4oJoBoBeAH9anHHFpQLWnBe_rrwP36KZUrWPgdIOk7OlDcs-kEtYRrzDSFimkIwvaRc2P2IsTUy7GPbeUDqUU4iZs2GlFDebXFjLMJW57qdbcmi3LRg3KtO23IOE9ww9K55MxhM-fzgvi6_v3325vqluP334eH11W1nRdqlqzAhGtAM0bZ4ehoGhEqITZpomMQnsxTDwvlNMtcKq0SqBRnajNFKqDoe-uSxenXrzRD82pKQXRxa9NyuGjTRrJWO9FA3PKDuhNrugiJPex_yGeNAM9FG5nnVWro_KNSidlefMy4f6bVhw_Jv44zgDb04A5kfeOYyarMPV4uiytaTH4P5b__aftPVuddb473hAmsMW12xPM01cg_583Plx5Sx_gUawvvkNrJ-qVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1751195432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Allograft-prosthetic composite reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for reconstruction of proximal humerus tumor resections</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>King, Joseph J., MD ; Nystrom, Lukas M., MD ; Reimer, Nickolas B., MD ; Gibbs, C. Parker, MD ; Scarborough, Mark T., MD ; Wright, Thomas W., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Joseph J., MD ; Nystrom, Lukas M., MD ; Reimer, Nickolas B., MD ; Gibbs, C. Parker, MD ; Scarborough, Mark T., MD ; Wright, Thomas W., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Proximal humerus reconstructions after resection of tumors are challenging. Early success of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty for reconstructions has recently been reported. The reverse allograft-prosthetic composite offers the advantage of improved glenohumeral stability compared with hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral reconstructions as it uses the deltoid for stability. Methods This article describes the technique for treating proximal humeral tumors, including preoperative planning, biopsy principles, resection pearls, soft tissue tensioning, and specifics about reconstruction using the reverse allograft-prosthetic composite. Two cases are presented along with the functional outcomes with use of this technique. Biomechanical considerations during reconstruction are reviewed, including techniques to improve the deltoid compression force. Results Reported instability rates are less with reverse shoulder arthroplasty reconstruction as opposed to hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty reconstructions of tumor resections. Reported functional outcomes are promising for the reverse allograft-prosthetic composite reconstructions, although complications are reported. Conclusion Reverse allograft-prosthetic composites are a promising option for proximal humeral reconstructions, although nonunion of the allograft–host bone junction continues to be a challenge for this technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26256013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; allograft-prosthetic composite ; Allografts ; Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Neoplasms - surgery ; Bone Transplantation ; Chondrosarcoma - surgery ; Deltoid Muscle - surgery ; Female ; glenohumeral joint ; Humans ; Humeral Head - surgery ; Joint Prosthesis ; Male ; Orthopedics ; Patient Care Planning ; Prosthesis Design ; proximal humerus reconstruction ; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; tumor resections ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2016-01, Vol.25 (1), p.45-54</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3ad0a47b0379400bb1e64484afff4f4e94bb29861674c6dc64ea58d5a5568eb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3ad0a47b0379400bb1e64484afff4f4e94bb29861674c6dc64ea58d5a5568eb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274615003419$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26256013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Joseph J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nystrom, Lukas M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimer, Nickolas B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, C. Parker, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarborough, Mark T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Thomas W., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Allograft-prosthetic composite reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for reconstruction of proximal humerus tumor resections</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background Proximal humerus reconstructions after resection of tumors are challenging. Early success of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty for reconstructions has recently been reported. The reverse allograft-prosthetic composite offers the advantage of improved glenohumeral stability compared with hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral reconstructions as it uses the deltoid for stability. Methods This article describes the technique for treating proximal humeral tumors, including preoperative planning, biopsy principles, resection pearls, soft tissue tensioning, and specifics about reconstruction using the reverse allograft-prosthetic composite. Two cases are presented along with the functional outcomes with use of this technique. Biomechanical considerations during reconstruction are reviewed, including techniques to improve the deltoid compression force. Results Reported instability rates are less with reverse shoulder arthroplasty reconstruction as opposed to hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty reconstructions of tumor resections. Reported functional outcomes are promising for the reverse allograft-prosthetic composite reconstructions, although complications are reported. Conclusion Reverse allograft-prosthetic composites are a promising option for proximal humeral reconstructions, although nonunion of the allograft–host bone junction continues to be a challenge for this technique.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>allograft-prosthetic composite</subject><subject>Allografts</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation</subject><subject>Chondrosarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>Deltoid Muscle - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>glenohumeral joint</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Head - surgery</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>proximal humerus reconstruction</subject><subject>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>tumor resections</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kj2P1DAQhiME4j7gB9CglDQJY8d2EiEhnU7AIZ1EAdSW40xYBydePM6J5dfjvT0oKKjs4nlfjZ9xUbxgUDNg6vVcz4Q1ByZrUDVw9qg4Z7LhlZIAj_MdZFfxVqiz4oJoBoBeAH9anHHFpQLWnBe_rrwP36KZUrWPgdIOk7OlDcs-kEtYRrzDSFimkIwvaRc2P2IsTUy7GPbeUDqUU4iZs2GlFDebXFjLMJW57qdbcmi3LRg3KtO23IOE9ww9K55MxhM-fzgvi6_v3325vqluP334eH11W1nRdqlqzAhGtAM0bZ4ehoGhEqITZpomMQnsxTDwvlNMtcKq0SqBRnajNFKqDoe-uSxenXrzRD82pKQXRxa9NyuGjTRrJWO9FA3PKDuhNrugiJPex_yGeNAM9FG5nnVWro_KNSidlefMy4f6bVhw_Jv44zgDb04A5kfeOYyarMPV4uiytaTH4P5b__aftPVuddb473hAmsMW12xPM01cg_583Plx5Sx_gUawvvkNrJ-qVg</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>King, Joseph J., MD</creator><creator>Nystrom, Lukas M., MD</creator><creator>Reimer, Nickolas B., MD</creator><creator>Gibbs, C. Parker, MD</creator><creator>Scarborough, Mark T., MD</creator><creator>Wright, Thomas W., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Allograft-prosthetic composite reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for reconstruction of proximal humerus tumor resections</title><author>King, Joseph J., MD ; Nystrom, Lukas M., MD ; Reimer, Nickolas B., MD ; Gibbs, C. Parker, MD ; Scarborough, Mark T., MD ; Wright, Thomas W., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-3ad0a47b0379400bb1e64484afff4f4e94bb29861674c6dc64ea58d5a5568eb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>allograft-prosthetic composite</topic><topic>Allografts</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation</topic><topic>Chondrosarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>Deltoid Muscle - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>glenohumeral joint</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Head - surgery</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>proximal humerus reconstruction</topic><topic>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>tumor resections</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Joseph J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nystrom, Lukas M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimer, Nickolas B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, C. Parker, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarborough, Mark T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Thomas W., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Joseph J., MD</au><au>Nystrom, Lukas M., MD</au><au>Reimer, Nickolas B., MD</au><au>Gibbs, C. Parker, MD</au><au>Scarborough, Mark T., MD</au><au>Wright, Thomas W., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Allograft-prosthetic composite reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for reconstruction of proximal humerus tumor resections</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>45-54</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background Proximal humerus reconstructions after resection of tumors are challenging. Early success of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty for reconstructions has recently been reported. The reverse allograft-prosthetic composite offers the advantage of improved glenohumeral stability compared with hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral reconstructions as it uses the deltoid for stability. Methods This article describes the technique for treating proximal humeral tumors, including preoperative planning, biopsy principles, resection pearls, soft tissue tensioning, and specifics about reconstruction using the reverse allograft-prosthetic composite. Two cases are presented along with the functional outcomes with use of this technique. Biomechanical considerations during reconstruction are reviewed, including techniques to improve the deltoid compression force. Results Reported instability rates are less with reverse shoulder arthroplasty reconstruction as opposed to hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty reconstructions of tumor resections. Reported functional outcomes are promising for the reverse allograft-prosthetic composite reconstructions, although complications are reported. Conclusion Reverse allograft-prosthetic composites are a promising option for proximal humeral reconstructions, although nonunion of the allograft–host bone junction continues to be a challenge for this technique.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26256013</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.021</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2016-01, Vol.25 (1), p.45-54
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1751195432
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
allograft-prosthetic composite
Allografts
Arthroplasty, Replacement - instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement - methods
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Neoplasms - surgery
Bone Transplantation
Chondrosarcoma - surgery
Deltoid Muscle - surgery
Female
glenohumeral joint
Humans
Humeral Head - surgery
Joint Prosthesis
Male
Orthopedics
Patient Care Planning
Prosthesis Design
proximal humerus reconstruction
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
Shoulder Joint - physiopathology
Shoulder Joint - surgery
tumor resections
Young Adult
title Allograft-prosthetic composite reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for reconstruction of proximal humerus tumor resections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A02%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Allograft-prosthetic%20composite%20reverse%20total%20shoulder%20arthroplasty%20for%20reconstruction%20of%20proximal%20humerus%20tumor%20resections&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=King,%20Joseph%20J.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=45-54&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1751195432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1751195432&rft_id=info:pmid/26256013&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1058274615003419&rfr_iscdi=true