Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability
The present study investigated the relationship between two of the most common measures of motor imagery ability, self-report ratings, and chronometric assessment. This was done for three types of imagery modalities: external visual imagery (EVI), internal visual imagery (IVI), and kinesthetic image...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of sport science 2015-01, Vol.15 (8), p.703-711 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 711 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 703 |
| container_title | European journal of sport science |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Williams, Sarah E Guillot, Aymeric Di Rienzo, Franck Cumming, Jennifer |
| description | The present study investigated the relationship between two of the most common measures of motor imagery ability, self-report ratings, and chronometric assessment. This was done for three types of imagery modalities: external visual imagery (EVI), internal visual imagery (IVI), and kinesthetic imagery (KI). Measures of imagery ability (i.e. self-report and mental chronometry) were also compared across skill levels. Participants (N = 198) completed the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) to generate self-report ratings. Chronometric assessment was obtained by recording the duration of each MIQ-3 movement imaged and physically performed and then calculating a discrepancy score. There were no significant correlations between self-report and mental chronometry for any of the three motor imagery types (p > .05). When assessing the different types of motor imagery ability using self-report ratings, elite athletes had significantly higher KI than IVI, which was in turn significantly higher than EVI (p .05). Findings suggest both measures address different components of MI quality and should be used together to obtain a more comprehensive assessment of motor imagery ability. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17461391.2015.1051133 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750431814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1758250481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6714-46bc81df9eb63f470652a407b8b15641c2de4938a6dd935232cb8d952913dd303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1O3DAUha2qVaHQRwBl2S5Cff0XZ4OgIyhFI1i0XVtO7ICREw92BpS3x1EGlhULy9bxd4-PdRA6AnwCWOIfUDEBtIYTgoFniQNQ-gHtA6eirEiNP-ZzZsoZ2kNfUnrAOAtEfkZ7RFCgee2jm1XoNzq64a5I1ndltJsQx0IPpujtMGpftPcxDKG3Y5yypNM22lSErujDGGLhen1n841unHfjdIg-ddon-3W3H6B_lxd_V1fl-vbX79X5umxFBaxkomklmK62jaAdq7DgRDNcNbIBLhi0xFhWU6mFMTXlhJK2kabmpAZqDMX0AH1ffO-1V5uYU8RJBe3U1flazRom-X9M4CfI7LeF3cTwuLVpVL1LrfVeDzZsk4KKS8Ixk-9CMaMggWWUL2gbQ0rRdm8xAKu5IfXakJobUruG8tzx7olt01vzNvVaSQZOF-DZeTu9z1VdXP9Z_bzEGZiTnS0GbuhC7PVziN6oUU8-xC7qoXVJ0f-HfAF3lq71</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750431814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Williams, Sarah E ; Guillot, Aymeric ; Di Rienzo, Franck ; Cumming, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, Sarah E ; Guillot, Aymeric ; Di Rienzo, Franck ; Cumming, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>The present study investigated the relationship between two of the most common measures of motor imagery ability, self-report ratings, and chronometric assessment. This was done for three types of imagery modalities: external visual imagery (EVI), internal visual imagery (IVI), and kinesthetic imagery (KI). Measures of imagery ability (i.e. self-report and mental chronometry) were also compared across skill levels. Participants (N = 198) completed the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) to generate self-report ratings. Chronometric assessment was obtained by recording the duration of each MIQ-3 movement imaged and physically performed and then calculating a discrepancy score. There were no significant correlations between self-report and mental chronometry for any of the three motor imagery types (p > .05). When assessing the different types of motor imagery ability using self-report ratings, elite athletes had significantly higher KI than IVI, which was in turn significantly higher than EVI (p < .05). When assessing motor imagery ability using mental chronometry, there were no significant differences in imagery type (p > .05). Findings suggest both measures address different components of MI quality and should be used together to obtain a more comprehensive assessment of motor imagery ability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-1391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-7290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1051133</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26313631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Athletes - psychology ; Ease of imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Imagination - physiology ; kinesthetic imagery ; Life Sciences ; Male ; mental chronometry ; Motor Skills - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; movement imagery ; Self Report ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; temporal equivalence ; Time Perception - physiology ; visual imagery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of sport science, 2015-01, Vol.15 (8), p.703-711</ispartof><rights>2015 European College of Sport Science 2015</rights><rights>European College of Sport Science</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6714-46bc81df9eb63f470652a407b8b15641c2de4938a6dd935232cb8d952913dd303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6714-46bc81df9eb63f470652a407b8b15641c2de4938a6dd935232cb8d952913dd303</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7920-8709 ; 0000-0003-1081-7375</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17461391.2015.1051133$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17461391.2015.1051133$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,59626,60415</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02363460$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillot, Aymeric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Rienzo, Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumming, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability</title><title>European journal of sport science</title><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><description>The present study investigated the relationship between two of the most common measures of motor imagery ability, self-report ratings, and chronometric assessment. This was done for three types of imagery modalities: external visual imagery (EVI), internal visual imagery (IVI), and kinesthetic imagery (KI). Measures of imagery ability (i.e. self-report and mental chronometry) were also compared across skill levels. Participants (N = 198) completed the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) to generate self-report ratings. Chronometric assessment was obtained by recording the duration of each MIQ-3 movement imaged and physically performed and then calculating a discrepancy score. There were no significant correlations between self-report and mental chronometry for any of the three motor imagery types (p > .05). When assessing the different types of motor imagery ability using self-report ratings, elite athletes had significantly higher KI than IVI, which was in turn significantly higher than EVI (p < .05). When assessing motor imagery ability using mental chronometry, there were no significant differences in imagery type (p > .05). Findings suggest both measures address different components of MI quality and should be used together to obtain a more comprehensive assessment of motor imagery ability.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Athletes - psychology</subject><subject>Ease of imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imagination - physiology</subject><subject>kinesthetic imagery</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mental chronometry</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>movement imagery</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>temporal equivalence</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>visual imagery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1746-1391</issn><issn>1536-7290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1O3DAUha2qVaHQRwBl2S5Cff0XZ4OgIyhFI1i0XVtO7ICREw92BpS3x1EGlhULy9bxd4-PdRA6AnwCWOIfUDEBtIYTgoFniQNQ-gHtA6eirEiNP-ZzZsoZ2kNfUnrAOAtEfkZ7RFCgee2jm1XoNzq64a5I1ndltJsQx0IPpujtMGpftPcxDKG3Y5yypNM22lSErujDGGLhen1n841unHfjdIg-ddon-3W3H6B_lxd_V1fl-vbX79X5umxFBaxkomklmK62jaAdq7DgRDNcNbIBLhi0xFhWU6mFMTXlhJK2kabmpAZqDMX0AH1ffO-1V5uYU8RJBe3U1flazRom-X9M4CfI7LeF3cTwuLVpVL1LrfVeDzZsk4KKS8Ixk-9CMaMggWWUL2gbQ0rRdm8xAKu5IfXakJobUruG8tzx7olt01vzNvVaSQZOF-DZeTu9z1VdXP9Z_bzEGZiTnS0GbuhC7PVziN6oUU8-xC7qoXVJ0f-HfAF3lq71</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Williams, Sarah E</creator><creator>Guillot, Aymeric</creator><creator>Di Rienzo, Franck</creator><creator>Cumming, Jennifer</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7920-8709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1081-7375</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability</title><author>Williams, Sarah E ; Guillot, Aymeric ; Di Rienzo, Franck ; Cumming, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6714-46bc81df9eb63f470652a407b8b15641c2de4938a6dd935232cb8d952913dd303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Athletes - psychology</topic><topic>Ease of imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imagination - physiology</topic><topic>kinesthetic imagery</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mental chronometry</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>movement imagery</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>temporal equivalence</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>visual imagery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillot, Aymeric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Rienzo, Franck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cumming, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, Sarah E</au><au>Guillot, Aymeric</au><au>Di Rienzo, Franck</au><au>Cumming, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability</atitle><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>711</epage><pages>703-711</pages><issn>1746-1391</issn><eissn>1536-7290</eissn><abstract>The present study investigated the relationship between two of the most common measures of motor imagery ability, self-report ratings, and chronometric assessment. This was done for three types of imagery modalities: external visual imagery (EVI), internal visual imagery (IVI), and kinesthetic imagery (KI). Measures of imagery ability (i.e. self-report and mental chronometry) were also compared across skill levels. Participants (N = 198) completed the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) to generate self-report ratings. Chronometric assessment was obtained by recording the duration of each MIQ-3 movement imaged and physically performed and then calculating a discrepancy score. There were no significant correlations between self-report and mental chronometry for any of the three motor imagery types (p > .05). When assessing the different types of motor imagery ability using self-report ratings, elite athletes had significantly higher KI than IVI, which was in turn significantly higher than EVI (p < .05). When assessing motor imagery ability using mental chronometry, there were no significant differences in imagery type (p > .05). Findings suggest both measures address different components of MI quality and should be used together to obtain a more comprehensive assessment of motor imagery ability.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>26313631</pmid><doi>10.1080/17461391.2015.1051133</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7920-8709</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1081-7375</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1746-1391 |
| ispartof | European journal of sport science, 2015-01, Vol.15 (8), p.703-711 |
| issn | 1746-1391 1536-7290 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750431814 |
| source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Analysis of Variance Athletes - psychology Ease of imaging Female Humans Imagination - physiology kinesthetic imagery Life Sciences Male mental chronometry Motor Skills - physiology Movement - physiology movement imagery Self Report Surveys and Questionnaires temporal equivalence Time Perception - physiology visual imagery Young Adult |
| title | Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A10%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20self-report%20and%20mental%20chronometry%20measures%20of%20motor%20imagery%20ability&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20sport%20science&rft.au=Williams,%20Sarah%20E&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=711&rft.pages=703-711&rft.issn=1746-1391&rft.eissn=1536-7290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17461391.2015.1051133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1758250481%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750431814&rft_id=info:pmid/26313631&rfr_iscdi=true |