Spanish Pacemaker Registry. Twelfth Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2014)

This report describes the results of the analysis of pacemaker implant and replacement data submitted to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry in 2014, with special reference to pacing mode selection. The report is based on the processing of information provided by the European Pacemaker Patient Identifica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista española de cardiología (English ed.) 2015-12, Vol.68 (12), p.1138-1153
Hauptverfasser: Cano Pérez, Óscar, Pombo Jiménez, Marta, Coma Samartín, Raúl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1153
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1138
container_title Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)
container_volume 68
creator Cano Pérez, Óscar
Pombo Jiménez, Marta
Coma Samartín, Raúl
description This report describes the results of the analysis of pacemaker implant and replacement data submitted to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry in 2014, with special reference to pacing mode selection. The report is based on the processing of information provided by the European Pacemaker Patient Identification Card. Information was received from 117 hospitals, with a total of 12 358 cards, representing 34% of estimated activity. Use of conventional generators and resynchronization devices was 784 and 64.4 units per million population, respectively. The mean age of patients receiving an implant was 77.3 years. Men received 59% of implants and 56.4% of replacements. Most patients receiving generator implants and replacements were in the age range 80 to 89 years. Most endocardial leads used were bipolar, and 84.2% had an active fixation system. Pacing was in VVI/R mode despite being in sinus rhythm in 24.7% of patients with sick sinus syndrome and 24% of those with atrioventricular block. The use of pacemaker generators and resynchronization devices per million population continued to increase. Most implanted leads had active fixation and approximately 20% had magnetic resonance imaging protection. Age and sex directly influenced pacing mode selection, which could have been improved in more than 20% of cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rec.2015.08.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750431179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1750431179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c183t-d203b77de64bbc035582d94d3c57413460798b25fec2ffeb998bbdc977e59bf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0E4lH4ADbIS1g02HEcO0tUQUGqVERBLC3HGbcuaR3sVKgrfp1EpYjVPO-d0UHokpKEEprfLpMAJkkJ5QmRCaHsAJ1SKfmQSy4O_-Un6CzGJSGcSZEdo5M055yleXGKvmeNXru4wM_awEp_QMAvMHexDdsEv35BbdsFnlrrjNN1N2p8aLG3uF0A3ktn3jhot317pEPlfO3nW_zuw4dbz_E4-E2D_Xo306a_1Pevu7-zm3N0ZHUd4eI3DtDbw_3r6HE4mY6fRneToaGStcMqJawUooI8K0tDGOcyrYqsYoaLjLIsJ6KQZcotmNRaKIuuKitTCAG8KC1nA3S9822C_9xAbNXKRQN1rdfgN1FRwUnGKBVFt0p3qyb4GANY1QS30mGrKFE9d7VUHXfVc1dEqo57p7n6td-UK6j-FHvQ7AfpQ38p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750431179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spanish Pacemaker Registry. Twelfth Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2014)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Cano Pérez, Óscar ; Pombo Jiménez, Marta ; Coma Samartín, Raúl</creator><creatorcontrib>Cano Pérez, Óscar ; Pombo Jiménez, Marta ; Coma Samartín, Raúl</creatorcontrib><description>This report describes the results of the analysis of pacemaker implant and replacement data submitted to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry in 2014, with special reference to pacing mode selection. The report is based on the processing of information provided by the European Pacemaker Patient Identification Card. Information was received from 117 hospitals, with a total of 12 358 cards, representing 34% of estimated activity. Use of conventional generators and resynchronization devices was 784 and 64.4 units per million population, respectively. The mean age of patients receiving an implant was 77.3 years. Men received 59% of implants and 56.4% of replacements. Most patients receiving generator implants and replacements were in the age range 80 to 89 years. Most endocardial leads used were bipolar, and 84.2% had an active fixation system. Pacing was in VVI/R mode despite being in sinus rhythm in 24.7% of patients with sick sinus syndrome and 24% of those with atrioventricular block. The use of pacemaker generators and resynchronization devices per million population continued to increase. Most implanted leads had active fixation and approximately 20% had magnetic resonance imaging protection. Age and sex directly influenced pacing mode selection, which could have been improved in more than 20% of cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1885-5857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1885-5857</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2015.08.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26553269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Age Distribution ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - statistics & numerical data ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - statistics & numerical data ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices - statistics & numerical data ; Cardiology - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Health Smart Cards ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pacemaker, Artificial - statistics & numerical data ; Registries - statistics & numerical data ; Sex Distribution ; Societies, Medical ; Spain]]></subject><ispartof>Revista española de cardiología (English ed.), 2015-12, Vol.68 (12), p.1138-1153</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c183t-d203b77de64bbc035582d94d3c57413460798b25fec2ffeb998bbdc977e59bf53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26553269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cano Pérez, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pombo Jiménez, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coma Samartín, Raúl</creatorcontrib><title>Spanish Pacemaker Registry. Twelfth Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2014)</title><title>Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)</title><addtitle>Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)</addtitle><description>This report describes the results of the analysis of pacemaker implant and replacement data submitted to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry in 2014, with special reference to pacing mode selection. The report is based on the processing of information provided by the European Pacemaker Patient Identification Card. Information was received from 117 hospitals, with a total of 12 358 cards, representing 34% of estimated activity. Use of conventional generators and resynchronization devices was 784 and 64.4 units per million population, respectively. The mean age of patients receiving an implant was 77.3 years. Men received 59% of implants and 56.4% of replacements. Most patients receiving generator implants and replacements were in the age range 80 to 89 years. Most endocardial leads used were bipolar, and 84.2% had an active fixation system. Pacing was in VVI/R mode despite being in sinus rhythm in 24.7% of patients with sick sinus syndrome and 24% of those with atrioventricular block. The use of pacemaker generators and resynchronization devices per million population continued to increase. Most implanted leads had active fixation and approximately 20% had magnetic resonance imaging protection. Age and sex directly influenced pacing mode selection, which could have been improved in more than 20% of cases.</description><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cardiology - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Smart Cards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sex Distribution</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Spain</subject><issn>1885-5857</issn><issn>1885-5857</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0E4lH4ADbIS1g02HEcO0tUQUGqVERBLC3HGbcuaR3sVKgrfp1EpYjVPO-d0UHokpKEEprfLpMAJkkJ5QmRCaHsAJ1SKfmQSy4O_-Un6CzGJSGcSZEdo5M055yleXGKvmeNXru4wM_awEp_QMAvMHexDdsEv35BbdsFnlrrjNN1N2p8aLG3uF0A3ktn3jhot317pEPlfO3nW_zuw4dbz_E4-E2D_Xo306a_1Pevu7-zm3N0ZHUd4eI3DtDbw_3r6HE4mY6fRneToaGStcMqJawUooI8K0tDGOcyrYqsYoaLjLIsJ6KQZcotmNRaKIuuKitTCAG8KC1nA3S9822C_9xAbNXKRQN1rdfgN1FRwUnGKBVFt0p3qyb4GANY1QS30mGrKFE9d7VUHXfVc1dEqo57p7n6td-UK6j-FHvQ7AfpQ38p</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Cano Pérez, Óscar</creator><creator>Pombo Jiménez, Marta</creator><creator>Coma Samartín, Raúl</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Spanish Pacemaker Registry. Twelfth Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2014)</title><author>Cano Pérez, Óscar ; Pombo Jiménez, Marta ; Coma Samartín, Raúl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c183t-d203b77de64bbc035582d94d3c57413460798b25fec2ffeb998bbdc977e59bf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cardiology - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Smart Cards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Registries - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sex Distribution</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Spain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cano Pérez, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pombo Jiménez, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coma Samartín, Raúl</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cano Pérez, Óscar</au><au>Pombo Jiménez, Marta</au><au>Coma Samartín, Raúl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spanish Pacemaker Registry. Twelfth Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2014)</atitle><jtitle>Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1138</spage><epage>1153</epage><pages>1138-1153</pages><issn>1885-5857</issn><eissn>1885-5857</eissn><abstract>This report describes the results of the analysis of pacemaker implant and replacement data submitted to the Spanish Pacemaker Registry in 2014, with special reference to pacing mode selection. The report is based on the processing of information provided by the European Pacemaker Patient Identification Card. Information was received from 117 hospitals, with a total of 12 358 cards, representing 34% of estimated activity. Use of conventional generators and resynchronization devices was 784 and 64.4 units per million population, respectively. The mean age of patients receiving an implant was 77.3 years. Men received 59% of implants and 56.4% of replacements. Most patients receiving generator implants and replacements were in the age range 80 to 89 years. Most endocardial leads used were bipolar, and 84.2% had an active fixation system. Pacing was in VVI/R mode despite being in sinus rhythm in 24.7% of patients with sick sinus syndrome and 24% of those with atrioventricular block. The use of pacemaker generators and resynchronization devices per million population continued to increase. Most implanted leads had active fixation and approximately 20% had magnetic resonance imaging protection. Age and sex directly influenced pacing mode selection, which could have been improved in more than 20% of cases.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>26553269</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rec.2015.08.013</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1885-5857
ispartof Revista española de cardiología (English ed.), 2015-12, Vol.68 (12), p.1138-1153
issn 1885-5857
1885-5857
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750431179
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Age Distribution
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - statistics & numerical data
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - statistics & numerical data
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices - statistics & numerical data
Cardiology - statistics & numerical data
Female
Health Smart Cards
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pacemaker, Artificial - statistics & numerical data
Registries - statistics & numerical data
Sex Distribution
Societies, Medical
Spain
title Spanish Pacemaker Registry. Twelfth Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Pacing (2014)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A03%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spanish%20Pacemaker%20Registry.%20Twelfth%20Official%20Report%20of%20the%20Spanish%20Society%20of%20Cardiology%20Working%20Group%20on%20Cardiac%20Pacing%20(2014)&rft.jtitle=Revista%20espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20cardiolog%C3%ADa%20(English%20ed.)&rft.au=Cano%20P%C3%A9rez,%20%C3%93scar&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1138&rft.epage=1153&rft.pages=1138-1153&rft.issn=1885-5857&rft.eissn=1885-5857&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rec.2015.08.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1750431179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750431179&rft_id=info:pmid/26553269&rfr_iscdi=true