Relative contribution of biological variation and technical variables to zone diameter variations of disc diffusion susceptibility testing

Disc diffusion is still largely based on manual procedures. Technical variations originate from inoculum preparation, variations in materials, individual operator plate streaking and reading accuracy. Resulting measurement imprecision contributes to categorization errors. Biological variation resemb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2016-01, Vol.71 (1), p.141-151
Hauptverfasser: Hombach, Michael, Ochoa, Carlos, Maurer, Florian P, Pfiffner, Tamara, Böttger, Erik C, Furrer, Reinhard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 151
container_issue 1
container_start_page 141
container_title Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
container_volume 71
creator Hombach, Michael
Ochoa, Carlos
Maurer, Florian P
Pfiffner, Tamara
Böttger, Erik C
Furrer, Reinhard
description Disc diffusion is still largely based on manual procedures. Technical variations originate from inoculum preparation, variations in materials, individual operator plate streaking and reading accuracy. Resulting measurement imprecision contributes to categorization errors. Biological variation resembles the natural fluctuation of a measured parameter such as antibiotic susceptibility around a mean value. It is deemed to originate from factors such as genetic background or metabolic state. This study analysed the relative contribution of different technical and biological factors to total disc diffusion variation. For calculation of relative error factor contribution to disc diffusion variability, five experiments were designed keeping different combinations of error factors constant. A mathematical model was developed to analyse the individual error factor contribution to disc diffusion variation for each of the tested drug-species combinations. The contribution of biological variation to total diameter variance ranged from 10.4% to 98.8% for different drug-species combinations. Highest biological variation was found for Enterococcus faecalis WT and vancomycin (98.8%) and for penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin G (96.0%). Average imprecision of automated zone reading revealed that 1.4%-5.3% of total imprecision was due to technical variation, while materials, i.e. antibiotic discs and agar plates, contributed between 2.6% and 3.9%. Inoculum preparation and manual plate streaking contributed 6.8%-24.8% and 6.6%-24.3%, respectively, to total imprecision. This study illustrates the relative contributions of technical factors that account for a significant part of total variance in disc diffusion. The highest relative contribution originated from the operator, i.e. manual inoculum preparation and plate streaking. Further standardization of inoculum preparation and plate streaking by automation could potentially increase the precision of disc diffusion and improve the correlation of susceptibility reports with clinical outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jac/dkv309
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750425242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1750425242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87437c2369e121692f65b335994f55abcdb87acdba99eede5e17be99c9edf31a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtKAzEQhoMoth5ufABZ8EaEtTlsdptLKZ6gIIheL0l2tqZuNzXJFuoj-NRmbbXgzQwM33wz8CN0RvA1wYKN5lKPqvcVw2IPDUmW45RiQfbREDPM0yLjbICOvJ9jjHOejw_RgOZZTsW4GKKvZ2hkMCtItG2DM6oLxraJrRNlbGNnRssmWUln5M9ctlUSQL-1u7lqwCfBJp-2haQycgEB3G7F967KeB1LXXe-t_jOa1gGo0xjwjoKfTDt7AQd1LLxcLrtx-j17vZl8pBOn-4fJzfTVDNOQjouMlZoynIBhJJc0DrnijEuRFZzLpWu1LiQsUohACrgQAoFQmgBVc2IZMfocuNdOvvRxdvlIr4HTSNbsJ0vScFxRjnNaEQv_qFz27k2ftdTlHNWCBKpqw2lnfXeQV0unVlIty4JLvuEyphQuUkowudbZacWUP2hv5Gwb-U8kM0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1752553791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative contribution of biological variation and technical variables to zone diameter variations of disc diffusion susceptibility testing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hombach, Michael ; Ochoa, Carlos ; Maurer, Florian P ; Pfiffner, Tamara ; Böttger, Erik C ; Furrer, Reinhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Hombach, Michael ; Ochoa, Carlos ; Maurer, Florian P ; Pfiffner, Tamara ; Böttger, Erik C ; Furrer, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><description>Disc diffusion is still largely based on manual procedures. Technical variations originate from inoculum preparation, variations in materials, individual operator plate streaking and reading accuracy. Resulting measurement imprecision contributes to categorization errors. Biological variation resembles the natural fluctuation of a measured parameter such as antibiotic susceptibility around a mean value. It is deemed to originate from factors such as genetic background or metabolic state. This study analysed the relative contribution of different technical and biological factors to total disc diffusion variation. For calculation of relative error factor contribution to disc diffusion variability, five experiments were designed keeping different combinations of error factors constant. A mathematical model was developed to analyse the individual error factor contribution to disc diffusion variation for each of the tested drug-species combinations. The contribution of biological variation to total diameter variance ranged from 10.4% to 98.8% for different drug-species combinations. Highest biological variation was found for Enterococcus faecalis WT and vancomycin (98.8%) and for penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin G (96.0%). Average imprecision of automated zone reading revealed that 1.4%-5.3% of total imprecision was due to technical variation, while materials, i.e. antibiotic discs and agar plates, contributed between 2.6% and 3.9%. Inoculum preparation and manual plate streaking contributed 6.8%-24.8% and 6.6%-24.3%, respectively, to total imprecision. This study illustrates the relative contributions of technical factors that account for a significant part of total variance in disc diffusion. The highest relative contribution originated from the operator, i.e. manual inoculum preparation and plate streaking. Further standardization of inoculum preparation and plate streaking by automation could potentially increase the precision of disc diffusion and improve the correlation of susceptibility reports with clinical outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv309</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26462987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Biological variation ; Diffusion ; Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests - methods ; Mathematical models ; Models, Theoretical ; Reproducibility of Results ; Specimen Handling - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016-01, Vol.71 (1), p.141-151</ispartof><rights>The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jan 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87437c2369e121692f65b335994f55abcdb87acdba99eede5e17be99c9edf31a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87437c2369e121692f65b335994f55abcdb87acdba99eede5e17be99c9edf31a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462987$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hombach, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Florian P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfiffner, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böttger, Erik C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furrer, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><title>Relative contribution of biological variation and technical variables to zone diameter variations of disc diffusion susceptibility testing</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><description>Disc diffusion is still largely based on manual procedures. Technical variations originate from inoculum preparation, variations in materials, individual operator plate streaking and reading accuracy. Resulting measurement imprecision contributes to categorization errors. Biological variation resembles the natural fluctuation of a measured parameter such as antibiotic susceptibility around a mean value. It is deemed to originate from factors such as genetic background or metabolic state. This study analysed the relative contribution of different technical and biological factors to total disc diffusion variation. For calculation of relative error factor contribution to disc diffusion variability, five experiments were designed keeping different combinations of error factors constant. A mathematical model was developed to analyse the individual error factor contribution to disc diffusion variation for each of the tested drug-species combinations. The contribution of biological variation to total diameter variance ranged from 10.4% to 98.8% for different drug-species combinations. Highest biological variation was found for Enterococcus faecalis WT and vancomycin (98.8%) and for penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin G (96.0%). Average imprecision of automated zone reading revealed that 1.4%-5.3% of total imprecision was due to technical variation, while materials, i.e. antibiotic discs and agar plates, contributed between 2.6% and 3.9%. Inoculum preparation and manual plate streaking contributed 6.8%-24.8% and 6.6%-24.3%, respectively, to total imprecision. This study illustrates the relative contributions of technical factors that account for a significant part of total variance in disc diffusion. The highest relative contribution originated from the operator, i.e. manual inoculum preparation and plate streaking. Further standardization of inoculum preparation and plate streaking by automation could potentially increase the precision of disc diffusion and improve the correlation of susceptibility reports with clinical outcome.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Biological variation</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests - methods</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtKAzEQhoMoth5ufABZ8EaEtTlsdptLKZ6gIIheL0l2tqZuNzXJFuoj-NRmbbXgzQwM33wz8CN0RvA1wYKN5lKPqvcVw2IPDUmW45RiQfbREDPM0yLjbICOvJ9jjHOejw_RgOZZTsW4GKKvZ2hkMCtItG2DM6oLxraJrRNlbGNnRssmWUln5M9ctlUSQL-1u7lqwCfBJp-2haQycgEB3G7F967KeB1LXXe-t_jOa1gGo0xjwjoKfTDt7AQd1LLxcLrtx-j17vZl8pBOn-4fJzfTVDNOQjouMlZoynIBhJJc0DrnijEuRFZzLpWu1LiQsUohACrgQAoFQmgBVc2IZMfocuNdOvvRxdvlIr4HTSNbsJ0vScFxRjnNaEQv_qFz27k2ftdTlHNWCBKpqw2lnfXeQV0unVlIty4JLvuEyphQuUkowudbZacWUP2hv5Gwb-U8kM0</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Hombach, Michael</creator><creator>Ochoa, Carlos</creator><creator>Maurer, Florian P</creator><creator>Pfiffner, Tamara</creator><creator>Böttger, Erik C</creator><creator>Furrer, Reinhard</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Relative contribution of biological variation and technical variables to zone diameter variations of disc diffusion susceptibility testing</title><author>Hombach, Michael ; Ochoa, Carlos ; Maurer, Florian P ; Pfiffner, Tamara ; Böttger, Erik C ; Furrer, Reinhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87437c2369e121692f65b335994f55abcdb87acdba99eede5e17be99c9edf31a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Biological variation</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests - methods</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hombach, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Florian P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfiffner, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böttger, Erik C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furrer, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hombach, Michael</au><au>Ochoa, Carlos</au><au>Maurer, Florian P</au><au>Pfiffner, Tamara</au><au>Böttger, Erik C</au><au>Furrer, Reinhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative contribution of biological variation and technical variables to zone diameter variations of disc diffusion susceptibility testing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Antimicrob Chemother</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>151</epage><pages>141-151</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><abstract>Disc diffusion is still largely based on manual procedures. Technical variations originate from inoculum preparation, variations in materials, individual operator plate streaking and reading accuracy. Resulting measurement imprecision contributes to categorization errors. Biological variation resembles the natural fluctuation of a measured parameter such as antibiotic susceptibility around a mean value. It is deemed to originate from factors such as genetic background or metabolic state. This study analysed the relative contribution of different technical and biological factors to total disc diffusion variation. For calculation of relative error factor contribution to disc diffusion variability, five experiments were designed keeping different combinations of error factors constant. A mathematical model was developed to analyse the individual error factor contribution to disc diffusion variation for each of the tested drug-species combinations. The contribution of biological variation to total diameter variance ranged from 10.4% to 98.8% for different drug-species combinations. Highest biological variation was found for Enterococcus faecalis WT and vancomycin (98.8%) and for penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin G (96.0%). Average imprecision of automated zone reading revealed that 1.4%-5.3% of total imprecision was due to technical variation, while materials, i.e. antibiotic discs and agar plates, contributed between 2.6% and 3.9%. Inoculum preparation and manual plate streaking contributed 6.8%-24.8% and 6.6%-24.3%, respectively, to total imprecision. This study illustrates the relative contributions of technical factors that account for a significant part of total variance in disc diffusion. The highest relative contribution originated from the operator, i.e. manual inoculum preparation and plate streaking. Further standardization of inoculum preparation and plate streaking by automation could potentially increase the precision of disc diffusion and improve the correlation of susceptibility reports with clinical outcome.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub><pmid>26462987</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/dkv309</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7453
ispartof Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016-01, Vol.71 (1), p.141-151
issn 0305-7453
1460-2091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750425242
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Antibiotics
Bacteria - drug effects
Biological variation
Diffusion
Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests - methods
Mathematical models
Models, Theoretical
Reproducibility of Results
Specimen Handling - methods
title Relative contribution of biological variation and technical variables to zone diameter variations of disc diffusion susceptibility testing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A02%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20contribution%20of%20biological%20variation%20and%20technical%20variables%20to%20zone%20diameter%20variations%20of%20disc%20diffusion%20susceptibility%20testing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Hombach,%20Michael&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=151&rft.pages=141-151&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/dkv309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1750425242%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1752553791&rft_id=info:pmid/26462987&rfr_iscdi=true