Targeting squares for survey: predicting species richness and incidence of species for a butterfly atlas

1. Predictions on species richness and incidence of species are made using data for three scales of mapping from the Greater Manchester butterfly atlas; for the whole of the conurbation (2 km x 2 km scale) and for two sample areas centred on the Mersey Valley (l km x 1 km scale; l ha scale). Predict...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global ecology and biogeography 1999-11, Vol.8 (6), p.443-454
Hauptverfasser: Dennis, Roger L. H., Hardy, Peter B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 454
container_issue 6
container_start_page 443
container_title Global ecology and biogeography
container_volume 8
creator Dennis, Roger L. H.
Hardy, Peter B.
description 1. Predictions on species richness and incidence of species are made using data for three scales of mapping from the Greater Manchester butterfly atlas; for the whole of the conurbation (2 km x 2 km scale) and for two sample areas centred on the Mersey Valley (l km x 1 km scale; l ha scale). Predictions are based on data for recording effort, altitude, biotopes, host-plants and nectar resources. 2. Data for Greater Manchester indicate that substantial shortfalls may occur in recording butterfly species for atlases despite the fact that butterflies are generally easily identified and well supported with recorders. Shortfalls tend to be larger for species with fewer records, indicating that some species may be more easily overlooked than others. 3. The results demonstrate that targeting squares for re-survey is necessary and feasible. The predictions have other valuable research applications, the most important of which is being able to assess the accuracy of distribution maps, to correct them, and to make projections of distribution changes. 4. Predictions may be enhanced by improvements to mapping in three ways: (i) Collecting data on recording effort. Variation in recording effort typically accounts for differences in species richness and incidence of species more than any other variable; (ii) Collecting data on biotopes and specific resources. The present results are promising and demonstrate that the collection of environmental data linked to a suitable sampling frame could facilitate knowledge of the distribution of species over extensive areas that remain under-recorded; and (iii) Distinguishing between breeding individuals and vagrants. Vagrancy is a problem associated both with species and scale. Although species vary substantially in their capacity to migrate beyond their habitats, the effect of vagrancy on distribution maps becomes an increasingly large problem as the grain of mapping (size of recording units) decreases. It is suggested that over-recording can be a problem, particularly when mapping is fine-grained.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00148.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17502379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2997865</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2997865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-d0de6bd137b89a73e5c057c661b9c0b3a695c5702ca0f7a6fc655402f38923743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1v2zAQhoWgBeKm_QcZOHWTexTFr6JLG8RODCNZEjQbQVGnmK4sOaTU2P8-UlV4znJ3wPM-N7xJQijMKeTi23ZOmeBpJrSeUz0MAJqr-eEsmdFciFRlTH043dnTefIpxi0A8JyLWbJ5sOEZO988k_jS24CRVG0gsQ9_8fid7AOW3k14j84POHi3aTBGYpuS-Mb5EhuHpK1OifGBJUXfdRiq-khsV9v4OflY2Tril__7InlcXD9c3aTr--Xt1c916nIKKi2hRFGUlMlCaSsZcgdcOiFooR0UzArNHZeQOQuVtKJygvMcsoopnTGZs4vk6_R3H9qXHmNndj46rGvbYNtHQyWHIaiHoJqCLrQxBqzMPvidDUdDwYzVmq0ZqzVjtWas1vyr1hwG9cekvvoaj-_2zPL613AM-uWkb2PXhpOeaS2V4ANOJ-xjh4cTtuGPEZJJbn7fLQ2slnKxUiuzYG_u-ZlL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17502379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Targeting squares for survey: predicting species richness and incidence of species for a butterfly atlas</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Dennis, Roger L. H. ; Hardy, Peter B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Roger L. H. ; Hardy, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Predictions on species richness and incidence of species are made using data for three scales of mapping from the Greater Manchester butterfly atlas; for the whole of the conurbation (2 km x 2 km scale) and for two sample areas centred on the Mersey Valley (l km x 1 km scale; l ha scale). Predictions are based on data for recording effort, altitude, biotopes, host-plants and nectar resources. 2. Data for Greater Manchester indicate that substantial shortfalls may occur in recording butterfly species for atlases despite the fact that butterflies are generally easily identified and well supported with recorders. Shortfalls tend to be larger for species with fewer records, indicating that some species may be more easily overlooked than others. 3. The results demonstrate that targeting squares for re-survey is necessary and feasible. The predictions have other valuable research applications, the most important of which is being able to assess the accuracy of distribution maps, to correct them, and to make projections of distribution changes. 4. Predictions may be enhanced by improvements to mapping in three ways: (i) Collecting data on recording effort. Variation in recording effort typically accounts for differences in species richness and incidence of species more than any other variable; (ii) Collecting data on biotopes and specific resources. The present results are promising and demonstrate that the collection of environmental data linked to a suitable sampling frame could facilitate knowledge of the distribution of species over extensive areas that remain under-recorded; and (iii) Distinguishing between breeding individuals and vagrants. Vagrancy is a problem associated both with species and scale. Although species vary substantially in their capacity to migrate beyond their habitats, the effect of vagrancy on distribution maps becomes an increasingly large problem as the grain of mapping (size of recording units) decreases. It is suggested that over-recording can be a problem, particularly when mapping is fine-grained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-8238</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00148.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Altitude ; Biogeography ; British Isles, England ; Butterflies ; Ecology ; Grasses ; Habitat conservation ; Insect ecology ; Lepidoptera ; mapping ; Nectar ; predicting distributions ; recording bias ; Research Article ; Species ; survey techniques ; U.K ; urban regions ; vagrants</subject><ispartof>Global ecology and biogeography, 1999-11, Vol.8 (6), p.443-454</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-d0de6bd137b89a73e5c057c661b9c0b3a695c5702ca0f7a6fc655402f38923743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-d0de6bd137b89a73e5c057c661b9c0b3a695c5702ca0f7a6fc655402f38923743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2997865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2997865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Roger L. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><title>Targeting squares for survey: predicting species richness and incidence of species for a butterfly atlas</title><title>Global ecology and biogeography</title><description>1. Predictions on species richness and incidence of species are made using data for three scales of mapping from the Greater Manchester butterfly atlas; for the whole of the conurbation (2 km x 2 km scale) and for two sample areas centred on the Mersey Valley (l km x 1 km scale; l ha scale). Predictions are based on data for recording effort, altitude, biotopes, host-plants and nectar resources. 2. Data for Greater Manchester indicate that substantial shortfalls may occur in recording butterfly species for atlases despite the fact that butterflies are generally easily identified and well supported with recorders. Shortfalls tend to be larger for species with fewer records, indicating that some species may be more easily overlooked than others. 3. The results demonstrate that targeting squares for re-survey is necessary and feasible. The predictions have other valuable research applications, the most important of which is being able to assess the accuracy of distribution maps, to correct them, and to make projections of distribution changes. 4. Predictions may be enhanced by improvements to mapping in three ways: (i) Collecting data on recording effort. Variation in recording effort typically accounts for differences in species richness and incidence of species more than any other variable; (ii) Collecting data on biotopes and specific resources. The present results are promising and demonstrate that the collection of environmental data linked to a suitable sampling frame could facilitate knowledge of the distribution of species over extensive areas that remain under-recorded; and (iii) Distinguishing between breeding individuals and vagrants. Vagrancy is a problem associated both with species and scale. Although species vary substantially in their capacity to migrate beyond their habitats, the effect of vagrancy on distribution maps becomes an increasingly large problem as the grain of mapping (size of recording units) decreases. It is suggested that over-recording can be a problem, particularly when mapping is fine-grained.</description><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>British Isles, England</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>mapping</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>predicting distributions</subject><subject>recording bias</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>survey techniques</subject><subject>U.K</subject><subject>urban regions</subject><subject>vagrants</subject><issn>1466-822X</issn><issn>1466-8238</issn><issn>1466-822X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1v2zAQhoWgBeKm_QcZOHWTexTFr6JLG8RODCNZEjQbQVGnmK4sOaTU2P8-UlV4znJ3wPM-N7xJQijMKeTi23ZOmeBpJrSeUz0MAJqr-eEsmdFciFRlTH043dnTefIpxi0A8JyLWbJ5sOEZO988k_jS24CRVG0gsQ9_8fid7AOW3k14j84POHi3aTBGYpuS-Mb5EhuHpK1OifGBJUXfdRiq-khsV9v4OflY2Tril__7InlcXD9c3aTr--Xt1c916nIKKi2hRFGUlMlCaSsZcgdcOiFooR0UzArNHZeQOQuVtKJygvMcsoopnTGZs4vk6_R3H9qXHmNndj46rGvbYNtHQyWHIaiHoJqCLrQxBqzMPvidDUdDwYzVmq0ZqzVjtWas1vyr1hwG9cekvvoaj-_2zPL613AM-uWkb2PXhpOeaS2V4ANOJ-xjh4cTtuGPEZJJbn7fLQ2slnKxUiuzYG_u-ZlL</recordid><startdate>199911</startdate><enddate>199911</enddate><creator>Dennis, Roger L. H.</creator><creator>Hardy, Peter B.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199911</creationdate><title>Targeting squares for survey: predicting species richness and incidence of species for a butterfly atlas</title><author>Dennis, Roger L. H. ; Hardy, Peter B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-d0de6bd137b89a73e5c057c661b9c0b3a695c5702ca0f7a6fc655402f38923743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>British Isles, England</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>mapping</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>predicting distributions</topic><topic>recording bias</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>survey techniques</topic><topic>U.K</topic><topic>urban regions</topic><topic>vagrants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Roger L. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dennis, Roger L. H.</au><au>Hardy, Peter B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Targeting squares for survey: predicting species richness and incidence of species for a butterfly atlas</atitle><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle><date>1999-11</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>454</epage><pages>443-454</pages><issn>1466-822X</issn><eissn>1466-8238</eissn><eissn>1466-822X</eissn><abstract>1. Predictions on species richness and incidence of species are made using data for three scales of mapping from the Greater Manchester butterfly atlas; for the whole of the conurbation (2 km x 2 km scale) and for two sample areas centred on the Mersey Valley (l km x 1 km scale; l ha scale). Predictions are based on data for recording effort, altitude, biotopes, host-plants and nectar resources. 2. Data for Greater Manchester indicate that substantial shortfalls may occur in recording butterfly species for atlases despite the fact that butterflies are generally easily identified and well supported with recorders. Shortfalls tend to be larger for species with fewer records, indicating that some species may be more easily overlooked than others. 3. The results demonstrate that targeting squares for re-survey is necessary and feasible. The predictions have other valuable research applications, the most important of which is being able to assess the accuracy of distribution maps, to correct them, and to make projections of distribution changes. 4. Predictions may be enhanced by improvements to mapping in three ways: (i) Collecting data on recording effort. Variation in recording effort typically accounts for differences in species richness and incidence of species more than any other variable; (ii) Collecting data on biotopes and specific resources. The present results are promising and demonstrate that the collection of environmental data linked to a suitable sampling frame could facilitate knowledge of the distribution of species over extensive areas that remain under-recorded; and (iii) Distinguishing between breeding individuals and vagrants. Vagrancy is a problem associated both with species and scale. Although species vary substantially in their capacity to migrate beyond their habitats, the effect of vagrancy on distribution maps becomes an increasingly large problem as the grain of mapping (size of recording units) decreases. It is suggested that over-recording can be a problem, particularly when mapping is fine-grained.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00148.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1466-822X
ispartof Global ecology and biogeography, 1999-11, Vol.8 (6), p.443-454
issn 1466-822X
1466-8238
1466-822X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17502379
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Altitude
Biogeography
British Isles, England
Butterflies
Ecology
Grasses
Habitat conservation
Insect ecology
Lepidoptera
mapping
Nectar
predicting distributions
recording bias
Research Article
Species
survey techniques
U.K
urban regions
vagrants
title Targeting squares for survey: predicting species richness and incidence of species for a butterfly atlas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A36%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Targeting%20squares%20for%20survey:%20predicting%20species%20richness%20and%20incidence%20of%20species%20for%20a%20butterfly%20atlas&rft.jtitle=Global%20ecology%20and%20biogeography&rft.au=Dennis,%20Roger%20L.%20H.&rft.date=1999-11&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=454&rft.pages=443-454&rft.issn=1466-822X&rft.eissn=1466-8238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00148.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2997865%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17502379&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2997865&rfr_iscdi=true