Northern Bobwhite Chick Mortality Caused by Red Imported Fire Ants

Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) populations have declined throughout their range during the last 30 years. Change in land management is thought to be a primary cause of this decline, but the invasion of northern bobwhite habitats by the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) also may be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 1999-10, Vol.63 (4), p.1291-1298
Hauptverfasser: Mueller, James M., Dabbert, C. Brad, Demarais, Stephen, Forbes, Andrew R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1298
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1291
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 63
creator Mueller, James M.
Dabbert, C. Brad
Demarais, Stephen
Forbes, Andrew R.
description Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) populations have declined throughout their range during the last 30 years. Change in land management is thought to be a primary cause of this decline, but the invasion of northern bobwhite habitats by the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) also may be involved. We compared hatching success and subsequent survival of wild northern bobwhite chicks on the Coastal Prairie of Texas in 1997 and 1998 between broods that hatched under natural conditions or following fire ant suppression treatments. In 1997, the fire ant suppression treatment resulted in a 70% reduction in the number of red imported fire ants on baits placed in treated nests on the day after hatch. Using 2 fire ant suppression treatments in 1998 reduced the number of red imported fire ants on baits by >99%. No year or treatment × year interaction effects were detected for hatching success or survival, and no treatment effect was detected for hatching success (P > 0.10). However, the proportion of chicks surviving to 21 days was higher (P = 0.010) for treated nests (n = 18) than control nests (n = 25; proportions of broods surviving: 53.5 ± 8.6% [x̄ ± SE] vs. 24.7 ± 6.6%; chick survival: 60.1 ± 7.6% vs. 22.0 ± 6.2%). The probability of chick survival decreased (P < 0.001) as our index of red imported fire ant activity in the nest increased. These results indicate northern bobwhite chicks can suffer high levels of mortality due to red imported fire ants, which could explain declines in some northern bobwhite populations following infestations by red imported fire ants. Current methods for controlling red imported fire ants are expensive and may last
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3802847
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17491382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3802847</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3802847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-78210ddacb0766de577a84220b1044fd506c74eb654b85cd57fcfe10a97fcfa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4F4KIXlXz1Sa53IrTwVQQBe9KmqYss2tm0iL796ZsoAhenZdzHp5zOACcY3RDKOK3VCAiGD8AIywpT4jA_BCMECIkSRl-PwYnIawQohiLbASmT853S-NbOHXl19J2BuZLqz_gY-yrxnZbmKs-mAqWW_gSy3y9iZMYZtYbOGm7cAqOatUEc7avY_A2u3vNH5LF8_08nywSTansEi4IRlWldIl4llUm5VwJRggqMWKsrlKUac5MmaWsFKmuUl7r2mCk5BCUpGNwtfNuvPvsTeiKtQ3aNI1qjetDgTmTmAoSwYs_4Mr1vo23FYTGjVJmg-16B2nvQvCmLjberpXfFhgVwyOL_SMjebnXqaBVU3vVaht-cMmj8he2Cp3z_9q-ATZkexo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234229969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Northern Bobwhite Chick Mortality Caused by Red Imported Fire Ants</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Mueller, James M. ; Dabbert, C. Brad ; Demarais, Stephen ; Forbes, Andrew R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mueller, James M. ; Dabbert, C. Brad ; Demarais, Stephen ; Forbes, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><description>Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) populations have declined throughout their range during the last 30 years. Change in land management is thought to be a primary cause of this decline, but the invasion of northern bobwhite habitats by the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) also may be involved. We compared hatching success and subsequent survival of wild northern bobwhite chicks on the Coastal Prairie of Texas in 1997 and 1998 between broods that hatched under natural conditions or following fire ant suppression treatments. In 1997, the fire ant suppression treatment resulted in a 70% reduction in the number of red imported fire ants on baits placed in treated nests on the day after hatch. Using 2 fire ant suppression treatments in 1998 reduced the number of red imported fire ants on baits by &gt;99%. No year or treatment × year interaction effects were detected for hatching success or survival, and no treatment effect was detected for hatching success (P &gt; 0.10). However, the proportion of chicks surviving to 21 days was higher (P = 0.010) for treated nests (n = 18) than control nests (n = 25; proportions of broods surviving: 53.5 ± 8.6% [x̄ ± SE] vs. 24.7 ± 6.6%; chick survival: 60.1 ± 7.6% vs. 22.0 ± 6.2%). The probability of chick survival decreased (P &lt; 0.001) as our index of red imported fire ant activity in the nest increased. These results indicate northern bobwhite chicks can suffer high levels of mortality due to red imported fire ants, which could explain declines in some northern bobwhite populations following infestations by red imported fire ants. Current methods for controlling red imported fire ants are expensive and may last &lt;3 months. Thus, strategies for mitigating the effect of red imported fire ants to northern bobwhite populations in this area should probably focus on reducing other mortality factors or increasing productivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3802847</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal reproduction ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Ants ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bobwhites ; Chicks ; Colinus virginianus ; Demecology ; Fire ants ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hatching ; Hens ; Insect eggs ; Insect nests ; Insects ; Invasive insects ; Land management ; Mortality ; Nonnative species ; Solenopsis invicta ; USA, Texas ; Vertebrata ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 1999-10, Vol.63 (4), p.1291-1298</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Oct 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-78210ddacb0766de577a84220b1044fd506c74eb654b85cd57fcfe10a97fcfa93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3802847$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3802847$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1972297$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mueller, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabbert, C. Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demarais, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><title>Northern Bobwhite Chick Mortality Caused by Red Imported Fire Ants</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) populations have declined throughout their range during the last 30 years. Change in land management is thought to be a primary cause of this decline, but the invasion of northern bobwhite habitats by the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) also may be involved. We compared hatching success and subsequent survival of wild northern bobwhite chicks on the Coastal Prairie of Texas in 1997 and 1998 between broods that hatched under natural conditions or following fire ant suppression treatments. In 1997, the fire ant suppression treatment resulted in a 70% reduction in the number of red imported fire ants on baits placed in treated nests on the day after hatch. Using 2 fire ant suppression treatments in 1998 reduced the number of red imported fire ants on baits by &gt;99%. No year or treatment × year interaction effects were detected for hatching success or survival, and no treatment effect was detected for hatching success (P &gt; 0.10). However, the proportion of chicks surviving to 21 days was higher (P = 0.010) for treated nests (n = 18) than control nests (n = 25; proportions of broods surviving: 53.5 ± 8.6% [x̄ ± SE] vs. 24.7 ± 6.6%; chick survival: 60.1 ± 7.6% vs. 22.0 ± 6.2%). The probability of chick survival decreased (P &lt; 0.001) as our index of red imported fire ant activity in the nest increased. These results indicate northern bobwhite chicks can suffer high levels of mortality due to red imported fire ants, which could explain declines in some northern bobwhite populations following infestations by red imported fire ants. Current methods for controlling red imported fire ants are expensive and may last &lt;3 months. Thus, strategies for mitigating the effect of red imported fire ants to northern bobwhite populations in this area should probably focus on reducing other mortality factors or increasing productivity.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bobwhites</subject><subject>Chicks</subject><subject>Colinus virginianus</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Fire ants</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Hens</subject><subject>Insect eggs</subject><subject>Insect nests</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Invasive insects</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Solenopsis invicta</subject><subject>USA, Texas</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4F4KIXlXz1Sa53IrTwVQQBe9KmqYss2tm0iL796ZsoAhenZdzHp5zOACcY3RDKOK3VCAiGD8AIywpT4jA_BCMECIkSRl-PwYnIawQohiLbASmT853S-NbOHXl19J2BuZLqz_gY-yrxnZbmKs-mAqWW_gSy3y9iZMYZtYbOGm7cAqOatUEc7avY_A2u3vNH5LF8_08nywSTansEi4IRlWldIl4llUm5VwJRggqMWKsrlKUac5MmaWsFKmuUl7r2mCk5BCUpGNwtfNuvPvsTeiKtQ3aNI1qjetDgTmTmAoSwYs_4Mr1vo23FYTGjVJmg-16B2nvQvCmLjberpXfFhgVwyOL_SMjebnXqaBVU3vVaht-cMmj8he2Cp3z_9q-ATZkexo</recordid><startdate>19991001</startdate><enddate>19991001</enddate><creator>Mueller, James M.</creator><creator>Dabbert, C. Brad</creator><creator>Demarais, Stephen</creator><creator>Forbes, Andrew R.</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991001</creationdate><title>Northern Bobwhite Chick Mortality Caused by Red Imported Fire Ants</title><author>Mueller, James M. ; Dabbert, C. Brad ; Demarais, Stephen ; Forbes, Andrew R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-78210ddacb0766de577a84220b1044fd506c74eb654b85cd57fcfe10a97fcfa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bobwhites</topic><topic>Chicks</topic><topic>Colinus virginianus</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Fire ants</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Hens</topic><topic>Insect eggs</topic><topic>Insect nests</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Invasive insects</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Solenopsis invicta</topic><topic>USA, Texas</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mueller, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabbert, C. Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demarais, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mueller, James M.</au><au>Dabbert, C. Brad</au><au>Demarais, Stephen</au><au>Forbes, Andrew R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Northern Bobwhite Chick Mortality Caused by Red Imported Fire Ants</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>1999-10-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1291</spage><epage>1298</epage><pages>1291-1298</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) populations have declined throughout their range during the last 30 years. Change in land management is thought to be a primary cause of this decline, but the invasion of northern bobwhite habitats by the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) also may be involved. We compared hatching success and subsequent survival of wild northern bobwhite chicks on the Coastal Prairie of Texas in 1997 and 1998 between broods that hatched under natural conditions or following fire ant suppression treatments. In 1997, the fire ant suppression treatment resulted in a 70% reduction in the number of red imported fire ants on baits placed in treated nests on the day after hatch. Using 2 fire ant suppression treatments in 1998 reduced the number of red imported fire ants on baits by &gt;99%. No year or treatment × year interaction effects were detected for hatching success or survival, and no treatment effect was detected for hatching success (P &gt; 0.10). However, the proportion of chicks surviving to 21 days was higher (P = 0.010) for treated nests (n = 18) than control nests (n = 25; proportions of broods surviving: 53.5 ± 8.6% [x̄ ± SE] vs. 24.7 ± 6.6%; chick survival: 60.1 ± 7.6% vs. 22.0 ± 6.2%). The probability of chick survival decreased (P &lt; 0.001) as our index of red imported fire ant activity in the nest increased. These results indicate northern bobwhite chicks can suffer high levels of mortality due to red imported fire ants, which could explain declines in some northern bobwhite populations following infestations by red imported fire ants. Current methods for controlling red imported fire ants are expensive and may last &lt;3 months. Thus, strategies for mitigating the effect of red imported fire ants to northern bobwhite populations in this area should probably focus on reducing other mortality factors or increasing productivity.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3802847</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 1999-10, Vol.63 (4), p.1291-1298
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17491382
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal reproduction
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Ants
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Bobwhites
Chicks
Colinus virginianus
Demecology
Fire ants
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hatching
Hens
Insect eggs
Insect nests
Insects
Invasive insects
Land management
Mortality
Nonnative species
Solenopsis invicta
USA, Texas
Vertebrata
Wildfowl
Wildlife management
title Northern Bobwhite Chick Mortality Caused by Red Imported Fire Ants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A43%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Northern%20Bobwhite%20Chick%20Mortality%20Caused%20by%20Red%20Imported%20Fire%20Ants&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Mueller,%20James%20M.&rft.date=1999-10-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1291&rft.epage=1298&rft.pages=1291-1298&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3802847&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3802847%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234229969&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3802847&rfr_iscdi=true