The Future of Multilateralism: Governing the World in a Post-Hegemonic Era
Since the middle of the twentieth century, the governance of the global system has been organized around the United States and the advanced industrial democracies. In the shadow of the Cold War, these countries established a wide array of global and regional institutions to manage economic, politica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Japanese journal of political science 2015-09, Vol.16 (3), p.399-413 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 413 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | Japanese journal of political science |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | IKENBERRY, G. JOHN |
description | Since the middle of the twentieth century, the governance of the global system has been organized around the United States and the advanced industrial democracies. In the shadow of the Cold War, these countries established a wide array of global and regional institutions to manage economic, political, and security relations. The Bretton Woods institutions, GATT (and later the WTO), the United Nations, and various functional institutions provided the bulwark for an open and managed postwar world economy and global order. An American-led alliance system provided a structure for regional security in Europe and East Asia. When the Cold War ended, these far-flung institutions were extended into a more fully global multilateral system of governance. The United States dominated the global order. But, more so than did leading states in previous eras, it established its dominance through institutions. It was an American-led liberal hegemonic order. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1468109915000158 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1748863357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1468109915000158</cupid><sourcerecordid>3769161751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-8ad5c493def5475d43e37c5165f9e20cf79de4c38ca93540af6d1ce9046a228d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5fVpPnYxJuUfigVBSsel5jM1pTdTU12Bf-9W9qDKJ5mYJ7nZXgROqfkihKaXz9TLhUlWlNBCKFCHaAB5TnPCJHkcLtLlW3vx-gkpXWPMKLZAN0v3wFPu7aLgEOJH7qq9ZVpIZrKp_oGz8InxMY3K9z24GuIlcO-wQY_hdRmc1hBHRpv8SSaU3RUmirB2X4O0ct0shzPs8Xj7G58u8gsE6TNlHHCcs0clILnwnEGLLeCSlFqGBFb5toBt0xZo5ngxJTSUQuacGlGI-XYEF3ucjcxfHSQ2qL2yUJVmQZClwqac6UkYyLv0Ytf6Dp0sem_6ylC5UhSJnqK7igbQ0oRymITfW3iV0FJsW23-NNu77C9Y-q36N0KfkT_a30DNm96Bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701626135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Future of Multilateralism: Governing the World in a Post-Hegemonic Era</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>IKENBERRY, G. JOHN</creator><creatorcontrib>IKENBERRY, G. JOHN</creatorcontrib><description>Since the middle of the twentieth century, the governance of the global system has been organized around the United States and the advanced industrial democracies. In the shadow of the Cold War, these countries established a wide array of global and regional institutions to manage economic, political, and security relations. The Bretton Woods institutions, GATT (and later the WTO), the United Nations, and various functional institutions provided the bulwark for an open and managed postwar world economy and global order. An American-led alliance system provided a structure for regional security in Europe and East Asia. When the Cold War ended, these far-flung institutions were extended into a more fully global multilateral system of governance. The United States dominated the global order. But, more so than did leading states in previous eras, it established its dominance through institutions. It was an American-led liberal hegemonic order.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-1099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1468109915000158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>19th century ; Cold War ; Cooperation ; Foreign policy ; General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade ; Governance ; Government ; International relations ; Modernity ; Multilateralism ; National Security ; Political science ; Politics ; Regional Security ; Special Issue Articles: Whither Multilateralism? ; United Nations ; United States of America ; WTO</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of political science, 2015-09, Vol.16 (3), p.399-413</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-8ad5c493def5475d43e37c5165f9e20cf79de4c38ca93540af6d1ce9046a228d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-8ad5c493def5475d43e37c5165f9e20cf79de4c38ca93540af6d1ce9046a228d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1468109915000158/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12845,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>IKENBERRY, G. JOHN</creatorcontrib><title>The Future of Multilateralism: Governing the World in a Post-Hegemonic Era</title><title>Japanese journal of political science</title><addtitle>Japanese Journal of Political Science</addtitle><description>Since the middle of the twentieth century, the governance of the global system has been organized around the United States and the advanced industrial democracies. In the shadow of the Cold War, these countries established a wide array of global and regional institutions to manage economic, political, and security relations. The Bretton Woods institutions, GATT (and later the WTO), the United Nations, and various functional institutions provided the bulwark for an open and managed postwar world economy and global order. An American-led alliance system provided a structure for regional security in Europe and East Asia. When the Cold War ended, these far-flung institutions were extended into a more fully global multilateral system of governance. The United States dominated the global order. But, more so than did leading states in previous eras, it established its dominance through institutions. It was an American-led liberal hegemonic order.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Cold War</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Multilateralism</subject><subject>National Security</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Regional Security</subject><subject>Special Issue Articles: Whither Multilateralism?</subject><subject>United Nations</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>WTO</subject><issn>1468-1099</issn><issn>1474-0060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvAi5fVpPnYxJuUfigVBSsel5jM1pTdTU12Bf-9W9qDKJ5mYJ7nZXgROqfkihKaXz9TLhUlWlNBCKFCHaAB5TnPCJHkcLtLlW3vx-gkpXWPMKLZAN0v3wFPu7aLgEOJH7qq9ZVpIZrKp_oGz8InxMY3K9z24GuIlcO-wQY_hdRmc1hBHRpv8SSaU3RUmirB2X4O0ct0shzPs8Xj7G58u8gsE6TNlHHCcs0clILnwnEGLLeCSlFqGBFb5toBt0xZo5ngxJTSUQuacGlGI-XYEF3ucjcxfHSQ2qL2yUJVmQZClwqac6UkYyLv0Ytf6Dp0sem_6ylC5UhSJnqK7igbQ0oRymITfW3iV0FJsW23-NNu77C9Y-q36N0KfkT_a30DNm96Bg</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>IKENBERRY, G. JOHN</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>The Future of Multilateralism: Governing the World in a Post-Hegemonic Era</title><author>IKENBERRY, G. JOHN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-8ad5c493def5475d43e37c5165f9e20cf79de4c38ca93540af6d1ce9046a228d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Cold War</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Multilateralism</topic><topic>National Security</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Regional Security</topic><topic>Special Issue Articles: Whither Multilateralism?</topic><topic>United Nations</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>WTO</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>IKENBERRY, G. JOHN</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>IKENBERRY, G. JOHN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Future of Multilateralism: Governing the World in a Post-Hegemonic Era</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of political science</jtitle><addtitle>Japanese Journal of Political Science</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>399-413</pages><issn>1468-1099</issn><eissn>1474-0060</eissn><abstract>Since the middle of the twentieth century, the governance of the global system has been organized around the United States and the advanced industrial democracies. In the shadow of the Cold War, these countries established a wide array of global and regional institutions to manage economic, political, and security relations. The Bretton Woods institutions, GATT (and later the WTO), the United Nations, and various functional institutions provided the bulwark for an open and managed postwar world economy and global order. An American-led alliance system provided a structure for regional security in Europe and East Asia. When the Cold War ended, these far-flung institutions were extended into a more fully global multilateral system of governance. The United States dominated the global order. But, more so than did leading states in previous eras, it established its dominance through institutions. It was an American-led liberal hegemonic order.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1468109915000158</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1468-1099 |
ispartof | Japanese journal of political science, 2015-09, Vol.16 (3), p.399-413 |
issn | 1468-1099 1474-0060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1748863357 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | 19th century Cold War Cooperation Foreign policy General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Governance Government International relations Modernity Multilateralism National Security Political science Politics Regional Security Special Issue Articles: Whither Multilateralism? United Nations United States of America WTO |
title | The Future of Multilateralism: Governing the World in a Post-Hegemonic Era |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A39%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Future%20of%20Multilateralism:%20Governing%20the%20World%20in%20a%20Post-Hegemonic%20Era&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=IKENBERRY,%20G.%20JOHN&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=399-413&rft.issn=1468-1099&rft.eissn=1474-0060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1468109915000158&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3769161751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701626135&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1468109915000158&rfr_iscdi=true |