Using diet and plant resources to set wildlife stocking densities in African savannas
The concept of carrying capacity originally was developed for domestic grazers and does not make provision for the wide variety of diets found in wild African herbivores. In the African savannas, herbivores are classified into 4 basic dietary classes: low-selective grazers, high-selective grazers, m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wildlife Society bulletin 2004-09, Vol.32 (3), p.840-851 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 851 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 840 |
container_title | Wildlife Society bulletin |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Bothma, Jdu P van Rooyen, N van Rooyen, M. W |
description | The concept of carrying capacity originally was developed for domestic grazers and does not make provision for the wide variety of diets found in wild African herbivores. In the African savannas, herbivores are classified into 4 basic dietary classes: low-selective grazers, high-selective grazers, mixed feeders, and browsers. Given these conditions, a more appropriate approach was needed than the agricultural method based on livestock units to determine stocking rates for wildlife. Consequently, a new approach was developed that recognizes plant resource variation at the plant community level and differentiates between the grazing and browsing component in the diet of herbivores in the African savannas. The model used to calculate the grazing and browsing capacity on wildlife ranches provides for rainfall variability, quality and quantity of available grazing and browse, dietary requirements of each type of wildlife, and availability of suitable habitat. In this model the conventional conversion of wildlife to a Large Stock Unit has been replaced by a Grazer Unit, which is the equivalent of a 180-kg blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), and a Browser Unit, which is the equivalent of a 140-kg greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros). By separating the grazing and browsing components in the diet of wildlife for stocking density calculation, the diversity in the vegetation resources is optimally utilized. This concept is exemplified with an actual case study of a wildlife ranch in a South African savanna. In doing so, quantitative and clearly defined parameters are provided on which to base wildlife management decisions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032[0840:UDAPRT]2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17475489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3784808</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3784808</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5212-8d38b26a7fb9423957ef83323068f3f6d4d6b844a89385241726cebbef45da233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkM1u1DAURi0EEsPAGyBhsUB0kan_4jiwGoZSkEYaRBuxQMhyErvykNqDnSnq23PToC5YdhVF97vn-jsInVKyYrTmp4TUtKikUG8ZIeKEcPaDKEHeNR_XX79d_mQrstrs3rNHaAFpVZRC8sdocb_1FD3LeU8IkYRWC9Q02Ycr3Hs7YhN6fBhMGHGyOR5TZzMeI84w-uOHfvDO4jzG7tfdhg3Zjx4iPuC1S74zAWdzY0Iw-Tl64syQ7Yt_3yVqPp1dbj4X2935l816W7Qlo6xQPVctk6ZybS0Yr8vKOsU540Qqx53sRS9bJYRR0KRkglZMdrZtrRNlbxjnS_Rm5h5S_H20edTXPnd2gBI2HrOmlahKAdtL9Pq_4B4KBnibhmsULt_RzudQl2LOyTp9SP7apFtNiZ7c68minizqyb0G93pyr2f3Gv70ZgfEJdrOJPBmbx-K0d8vPgjJJtzLGbcH_ekexyslFFEwfjWPnYnaXCWfdXPBCOVwp64lF5A4mxOtjzHYB_f6C3Get00</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230195723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using diet and plant resources to set wildlife stocking densities in African savannas</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Bothma, Jdu P ; van Rooyen, N ; van Rooyen, M. W</creator><creatorcontrib>Bothma, Jdu P ; van Rooyen, N ; van Rooyen, M. W</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of carrying capacity originally was developed for domestic grazers and does not make provision for the wide variety of diets found in wild African herbivores. In the African savannas, herbivores are classified into 4 basic dietary classes: low-selective grazers, high-selective grazers, mixed feeders, and browsers. Given these conditions, a more appropriate approach was needed than the agricultural method based on livestock units to determine stocking rates for wildlife. Consequently, a new approach was developed that recognizes plant resource variation at the plant community level and differentiates between the grazing and browsing component in the diet of herbivores in the African savannas. The model used to calculate the grazing and browsing capacity on wildlife ranches provides for rainfall variability, quality and quantity of available grazing and browse, dietary requirements of each type of wildlife, and availability of suitable habitat. In this model the conventional conversion of wildlife to a Large Stock Unit has been replaced by a Grazer Unit, which is the equivalent of a 180-kg blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), and a Browser Unit, which is the equivalent of a 140-kg greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros). By separating the grazing and browsing components in the diet of wildlife for stocking density calculation, the diversity in the vegetation resources is optimally utilized. This concept is exemplified with an actual case study of a wildlife ranch in a South African savanna. In doing so, quantitative and clearly defined parameters are provided on which to base wildlife management decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032[0840:UDAPRT]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WLSBA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>African savannas ; Browsing ; browsing capacity ; Capacity ; carrying capacity ; Connochaetes taurinus ; Diet ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; grazing capacity ; Habitat Assessment and Management ; Herbivores ; Plants ; Ranches ; stocking rates ; Tragelaphus strepsiceros ; Wildlife ; Wildlife ecology ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management ; wildlife ranching</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 2004-09, Vol.32 (3), p.840-851</ispartof><rights>The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2004 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Fall 2004</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5212-8d38b26a7fb9423957ef83323068f3f6d4d6b844a89385241726cebbef45da233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5212-8d38b26a7fb9423957ef83323068f3f6d4d6b844a89385241726cebbef45da233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032[0840:UDAPRT]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3784808$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,26955,27901,27902,45550,45551,52338,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bothma, Jdu P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rooyen, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rooyen, M. W</creatorcontrib><title>Using diet and plant resources to set wildlife stocking densities in African savannas</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><description>The concept of carrying capacity originally was developed for domestic grazers and does not make provision for the wide variety of diets found in wild African herbivores. In the African savannas, herbivores are classified into 4 basic dietary classes: low-selective grazers, high-selective grazers, mixed feeders, and browsers. Given these conditions, a more appropriate approach was needed than the agricultural method based on livestock units to determine stocking rates for wildlife. Consequently, a new approach was developed that recognizes plant resource variation at the plant community level and differentiates between the grazing and browsing component in the diet of herbivores in the African savannas. The model used to calculate the grazing and browsing capacity on wildlife ranches provides for rainfall variability, quality and quantity of available grazing and browse, dietary requirements of each type of wildlife, and availability of suitable habitat. In this model the conventional conversion of wildlife to a Large Stock Unit has been replaced by a Grazer Unit, which is the equivalent of a 180-kg blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), and a Browser Unit, which is the equivalent of a 140-kg greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros). By separating the grazing and browsing components in the diet of wildlife for stocking density calculation, the diversity in the vegetation resources is optimally utilized. This concept is exemplified with an actual case study of a wildlife ranch in a South African savanna. In doing so, quantitative and clearly defined parameters are provided on which to base wildlife management decisions.</description><subject>African savannas</subject><subject>Browsing</subject><subject>browsing capacity</subject><subject>Capacity</subject><subject>carrying capacity</subject><subject>Connochaetes taurinus</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>grazing capacity</subject><subject>Habitat Assessment and Management</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Ranches</subject><subject>stocking rates</subject><subject>Tragelaphus strepsiceros</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife ecology</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>wildlife ranching</subject><issn>0091-7648</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkM1u1DAURi0EEsPAGyBhsUB0kan_4jiwGoZSkEYaRBuxQMhyErvykNqDnSnq23PToC5YdhVF97vn-jsInVKyYrTmp4TUtKikUG8ZIeKEcPaDKEHeNR_XX79d_mQrstrs3rNHaAFpVZRC8sdocb_1FD3LeU8IkYRWC9Q02Ycr3Hs7YhN6fBhMGHGyOR5TZzMeI84w-uOHfvDO4jzG7tfdhg3Zjx4iPuC1S74zAWdzY0Iw-Tl64syQ7Yt_3yVqPp1dbj4X2935l816W7Qlo6xQPVctk6ZybS0Yr8vKOsU540Qqx53sRS9bJYRR0KRkglZMdrZtrRNlbxjnS_Rm5h5S_H20edTXPnd2gBI2HrOmlahKAdtL9Pq_4B4KBnibhmsULt_RzudQl2LOyTp9SP7apFtNiZ7c68minizqyb0G93pyr2f3Gv70ZgfEJdrOJPBmbx-K0d8vPgjJJtzLGbcH_ekexyslFFEwfjWPnYnaXCWfdXPBCOVwp64lF5A4mxOtjzHYB_f6C3Get00</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>Bothma, Jdu P</creator><creator>van Rooyen, N</creator><creator>van Rooyen, M. W</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Using diet and plant resources to set wildlife stocking densities in African savannas</title><author>Bothma, Jdu P ; van Rooyen, N ; van Rooyen, M. W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b5212-8d38b26a7fb9423957ef83323068f3f6d4d6b844a89385241726cebbef45da233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>African savannas</topic><topic>Browsing</topic><topic>browsing capacity</topic><topic>Capacity</topic><topic>carrying capacity</topic><topic>Connochaetes taurinus</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>grazing capacity</topic><topic>Habitat Assessment and Management</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Ranches</topic><topic>stocking rates</topic><topic>Tragelaphus strepsiceros</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife ecology</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>wildlife ranching</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bothma, Jdu P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rooyen, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rooyen, M. W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bothma, Jdu P</au><au>van Rooyen, N</au><au>van Rooyen, M. W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using diet and plant resources to set wildlife stocking densities in African savannas</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>840</spage><epage>851</epage><pages>840-851</pages><issn>0091-7648</issn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><coden>WLSBA6</coden><abstract>The concept of carrying capacity originally was developed for domestic grazers and does not make provision for the wide variety of diets found in wild African herbivores. In the African savannas, herbivores are classified into 4 basic dietary classes: low-selective grazers, high-selective grazers, mixed feeders, and browsers. Given these conditions, a more appropriate approach was needed than the agricultural method based on livestock units to determine stocking rates for wildlife. Consequently, a new approach was developed that recognizes plant resource variation at the plant community level and differentiates between the grazing and browsing component in the diet of herbivores in the African savannas. The model used to calculate the grazing and browsing capacity on wildlife ranches provides for rainfall variability, quality and quantity of available grazing and browse, dietary requirements of each type of wildlife, and availability of suitable habitat. In this model the conventional conversion of wildlife to a Large Stock Unit has been replaced by a Grazer Unit, which is the equivalent of a 180-kg blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), and a Browser Unit, which is the equivalent of a 140-kg greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros). By separating the grazing and browsing components in the diet of wildlife for stocking density calculation, the diversity in the vegetation resources is optimally utilized. This concept is exemplified with an actual case study of a wildlife ranch in a South African savanna. In doing so, quantitative and clearly defined parameters are provided on which to base wildlife management decisions.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032[0840:UDAPRT]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-7648 |
ispartof | Wildlife Society bulletin, 2004-09, Vol.32 (3), p.840-851 |
issn | 0091-7648 1938-5463 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17475489 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; BioOne Complete |
subjects | African savannas Browsing browsing capacity Capacity carrying capacity Connochaetes taurinus Diet Grasses Grasslands Grazing grazing capacity Habitat Assessment and Management Herbivores Plants Ranches stocking rates Tragelaphus strepsiceros Wildlife Wildlife ecology Wildlife habitats Wildlife management wildlife ranching |
title | Using diet and plant resources to set wildlife stocking densities in African savannas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A13%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20diet%20and%20plant%20resources%20to%20set%20wildlife%20stocking%20densities%20in%20African%20savannas&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=Bothma,%20Jdu%20P&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=840&rft.epage=851&rft.pages=840-851&rft.issn=0091-7648&rft.eissn=1938-5463&rft.coden=WLSBA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032%5B0840:UDAPRT%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3784808%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230195723&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3784808&rfr_iscdi=true |