Projected carbon stocks in the conterminous USA with land use and variable fire regimes

The dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) MC2 was run over the conterminous USA at 30 arc sec (~800 m) to simulate the impacts of nine climate futures generated by 3GCMs (CSIRO, MIROC and CGCM3) using 3 emission scenarios (A2, A1B and B1) in the context of the LandCarbon national carbon sequestrati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2015-12, Vol.21 (12), p.4548-4560
Hauptverfasser: Bachelet, Dominique, Ferschweiler, Ken, Sheehan, Timothy J., Sleeter, Benjamin M., Zhu, Zhiliang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4560
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4548
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 21
creator Bachelet, Dominique
Ferschweiler, Ken
Sheehan, Timothy J.
Sleeter, Benjamin M.
Zhu, Zhiliang
description The dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) MC2 was run over the conterminous USA at 30 arc sec (~800 m) to simulate the impacts of nine climate futures generated by 3GCMs (CSIRO, MIROC and CGCM3) using 3 emission scenarios (A2, A1B and B1) in the context of the LandCarbon national carbon sequestration assessment. It first simulated potential vegetation dynamics from coast to coast assuming no human impacts and naturally occurring wildfires. A moderate effect of increased atmospheric CO₂ on water use efficiency and growth enhanced carbon sequestration but did not greatly influence woody encroachment. The wildfires maintained prairie‐forest ecotones in the Great Plains. With simulated fire suppression, the number and impacts of wildfires was reduced as only catastrophic fires were allowed to escape. This greatly increased the expansion of forests and woodlands across the western USA and some of the ecotones disappeared. However, when fires did occur, their impacts (both extent and biomass consumed) were very large. We also evaluated the relative influence of human land use including forest and crop harvest by running the DGVM with land use (and fire suppression) and simple land management rules. From 2041 through 2060, carbon stocks (live biomass, soil and dead biomass) of US terrestrial ecosystems varied between 155 and 162 Pg C across the three emission scenarios when potential natural vegetation was simulated. With land use, periodic harvest of croplands and timberlands as well as the prevention of woody expansion across the West reduced carbon stocks to a range of 122–126 Pg C, while effective fire suppression reduced fire emissions by about 50%. Despite the simplicity of our approach, the differences between the size of the carbon stocks confirm other reports of the importance of land use on the carbon cycle over climate change.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.13048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746893343</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3859439781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4488-a5adebd45e7330e9d64d88a4b7643a7fd0a7a9d6b71047114a3395072cdbf4763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhS1ERR-w4A-AJTawSGvHzyzLFKaVqgGpjMrOcuKbqad5FDtp6b_HIW0XSJXw5lpX3z0618cIvaXkkKZztKnKQ8oI1y_QHmVSZDnX8uV0FzyjhLJdtB_jlhDCciJfod1c5kSpvNhDl99Dv4VqAIcrG8q-w3Hoq-uIfYeHK8BV3w0QWt_1Y8Tri2N854cr3NjO4TECnuqtDd6WDeDaB8ABNr6F-Brt1LaJ8OahHqD11y8_FqfZ-bfl2eL4PKs41zqzwjooHRegGCNQOMmd1paXSnJmVe2IVTZ1S0UJV5Ryy1ghiMorV9ZcSXaAPs66N6H_NUIcTOtjBU1yCMmyoYpLXTDG2X-g6XW01mJCP_yDbvsxdGmRiaKiKIQsEvVppqrQxxigNjfBtzbcG0rMFIxJwZi_wST23YPiWLbgnsjHJBJwNAN3voH755XMcvH5UTKbJ3wc4PfThA3XRiqmhLlcLY34WZwsT1bUrBL_fuZr2xu7CT6a9UVOqCTphwitOfsDg1KtQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1731599569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Projected carbon stocks in the conterminous USA with land use and variable fire regimes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bachelet, Dominique ; Ferschweiler, Ken ; Sheehan, Timothy J. ; Sleeter, Benjamin M. ; Zhu, Zhiliang</creator><creatorcontrib>Bachelet, Dominique ; Ferschweiler, Ken ; Sheehan, Timothy J. ; Sleeter, Benjamin M. ; Zhu, Zhiliang</creatorcontrib><description>The dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) MC2 was run over the conterminous USA at 30 arc sec (~800 m) to simulate the impacts of nine climate futures generated by 3GCMs (CSIRO, MIROC and CGCM3) using 3 emission scenarios (A2, A1B and B1) in the context of the LandCarbon national carbon sequestration assessment. It first simulated potential vegetation dynamics from coast to coast assuming no human impacts and naturally occurring wildfires. A moderate effect of increased atmospheric CO₂ on water use efficiency and growth enhanced carbon sequestration but did not greatly influence woody encroachment. The wildfires maintained prairie‐forest ecotones in the Great Plains. With simulated fire suppression, the number and impacts of wildfires was reduced as only catastrophic fires were allowed to escape. This greatly increased the expansion of forests and woodlands across the western USA and some of the ecotones disappeared. However, when fires did occur, their impacts (both extent and biomass consumed) were very large. We also evaluated the relative influence of human land use including forest and crop harvest by running the DGVM with land use (and fire suppression) and simple land management rules. From 2041 through 2060, carbon stocks (live biomass, soil and dead biomass) of US terrestrial ecosystems varied between 155 and 162 Pg C across the three emission scenarios when potential natural vegetation was simulated. With land use, periodic harvest of croplands and timberlands as well as the prevention of woody expansion across the West reduced carbon stocks to a range of 122–126 Pg C, while effective fire suppression reduced fire emissions by about 50%. Despite the simplicity of our approach, the differences between the size of the carbon stocks confirm other reports of the importance of land use on the carbon cycle over climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26207729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; carbon ; Carbon - analysis ; Carbon Sequestration ; Climate Change ; CMIP3 ; Computer Simulation ; DGVM ; Ecosystem ; fire ; Fires ; Forestry ; Global warming ; Land use ; Models, Theoretical ; Prescribed fire ; simulation ; SRES ; United States ; USA ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2015-12, Vol.21 (12), p.4548-4560</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4488-a5adebd45e7330e9d64d88a4b7643a7fd0a7a9d6b71047114a3395072cdbf4763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4488-a5adebd45e7330e9d64d88a4b7643a7fd0a7a9d6b71047114a3395072cdbf4763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.13048$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.13048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26207729$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bachelet, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferschweiler, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeter, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhiliang</creatorcontrib><title>Projected carbon stocks in the conterminous USA with land use and variable fire regimes</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Change Biol</addtitle><description>The dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) MC2 was run over the conterminous USA at 30 arc sec (~800 m) to simulate the impacts of nine climate futures generated by 3GCMs (CSIRO, MIROC and CGCM3) using 3 emission scenarios (A2, A1B and B1) in the context of the LandCarbon national carbon sequestration assessment. It first simulated potential vegetation dynamics from coast to coast assuming no human impacts and naturally occurring wildfires. A moderate effect of increased atmospheric CO₂ on water use efficiency and growth enhanced carbon sequestration but did not greatly influence woody encroachment. The wildfires maintained prairie‐forest ecotones in the Great Plains. With simulated fire suppression, the number and impacts of wildfires was reduced as only catastrophic fires were allowed to escape. This greatly increased the expansion of forests and woodlands across the western USA and some of the ecotones disappeared. However, when fires did occur, their impacts (both extent and biomass consumed) were very large. We also evaluated the relative influence of human land use including forest and crop harvest by running the DGVM with land use (and fire suppression) and simple land management rules. From 2041 through 2060, carbon stocks (live biomass, soil and dead biomass) of US terrestrial ecosystems varied between 155 and 162 Pg C across the three emission scenarios when potential natural vegetation was simulated. With land use, periodic harvest of croplands and timberlands as well as the prevention of woody expansion across the West reduced carbon stocks to a range of 122–126 Pg C, while effective fire suppression reduced fire emissions by about 50%. Despite the simplicity of our approach, the differences between the size of the carbon stocks confirm other reports of the importance of land use on the carbon cycle over climate change.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon Sequestration</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>CMIP3</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>DGVM</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>fire</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Prescribed fire</subject><subject>simulation</subject><subject>SRES</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhS1ERR-w4A-AJTawSGvHzyzLFKaVqgGpjMrOcuKbqad5FDtp6b_HIW0XSJXw5lpX3z0618cIvaXkkKZztKnKQ8oI1y_QHmVSZDnX8uV0FzyjhLJdtB_jlhDCciJfod1c5kSpvNhDl99Dv4VqAIcrG8q-w3Hoq-uIfYeHK8BV3w0QWt_1Y8Tri2N854cr3NjO4TECnuqtDd6WDeDaB8ABNr6F-Brt1LaJ8OahHqD11y8_FqfZ-bfl2eL4PKs41zqzwjooHRegGCNQOMmd1paXSnJmVe2IVTZ1S0UJV5Ryy1ghiMorV9ZcSXaAPs66N6H_NUIcTOtjBU1yCMmyoYpLXTDG2X-g6XW01mJCP_yDbvsxdGmRiaKiKIQsEvVppqrQxxigNjfBtzbcG0rMFIxJwZi_wST23YPiWLbgnsjHJBJwNAN3voH755XMcvH5UTKbJ3wc4PfThA3XRiqmhLlcLY34WZwsT1bUrBL_fuZr2xu7CT6a9UVOqCTphwitOfsDg1KtQw</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Bachelet, Dominique</creator><creator>Ferschweiler, Ken</creator><creator>Sheehan, Timothy J.</creator><creator>Sleeter, Benjamin M.</creator><creator>Zhu, Zhiliang</creator><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Projected carbon stocks in the conterminous USA with land use and variable fire regimes</title><author>Bachelet, Dominique ; Ferschweiler, Ken ; Sheehan, Timothy J. ; Sleeter, Benjamin M. ; Zhu, Zhiliang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4488-a5adebd45e7330e9d64d88a4b7643a7fd0a7a9d6b71047114a3395072cdbf4763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon Sequestration</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>CMIP3</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>DGVM</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>fire</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Prescribed fire</topic><topic>simulation</topic><topic>SRES</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bachelet, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferschweiler, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeter, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhiliang</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bachelet, Dominique</au><au>Ferschweiler, Ken</au><au>Sheehan, Timothy J.</au><au>Sleeter, Benjamin M.</au><au>Zhu, Zhiliang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Projected carbon stocks in the conterminous USA with land use and variable fire regimes</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Change Biol</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4548</spage><epage>4560</epage><pages>4548-4560</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>The dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) MC2 was run over the conterminous USA at 30 arc sec (~800 m) to simulate the impacts of nine climate futures generated by 3GCMs (CSIRO, MIROC and CGCM3) using 3 emission scenarios (A2, A1B and B1) in the context of the LandCarbon national carbon sequestration assessment. It first simulated potential vegetation dynamics from coast to coast assuming no human impacts and naturally occurring wildfires. A moderate effect of increased atmospheric CO₂ on water use efficiency and growth enhanced carbon sequestration but did not greatly influence woody encroachment. The wildfires maintained prairie‐forest ecotones in the Great Plains. With simulated fire suppression, the number and impacts of wildfires was reduced as only catastrophic fires were allowed to escape. This greatly increased the expansion of forests and woodlands across the western USA and some of the ecotones disappeared. However, when fires did occur, their impacts (both extent and biomass consumed) were very large. We also evaluated the relative influence of human land use including forest and crop harvest by running the DGVM with land use (and fire suppression) and simple land management rules. From 2041 through 2060, carbon stocks (live biomass, soil and dead biomass) of US terrestrial ecosystems varied between 155 and 162 Pg C across the three emission scenarios when potential natural vegetation was simulated. With land use, periodic harvest of croplands and timberlands as well as the prevention of woody expansion across the West reduced carbon stocks to a range of 122–126 Pg C, while effective fire suppression reduced fire emissions by about 50%. Despite the simplicity of our approach, the differences between the size of the carbon stocks confirm other reports of the importance of land use on the carbon cycle over climate change.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Science</pub><pmid>26207729</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.13048</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2015-12, Vol.21 (12), p.4548-4560
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746893343
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Agriculture
carbon
Carbon - analysis
Carbon Sequestration
Climate Change
CMIP3
Computer Simulation
DGVM
Ecosystem
fire
Fires
Forestry
Global warming
Land use
Models, Theoretical
Prescribed fire
simulation
SRES
United States
USA
Vegetation
title Projected carbon stocks in the conterminous USA with land use and variable fire regimes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T16%3A44%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Projected%20carbon%20stocks%20in%20the%20conterminous%20USA%20with%20land%20use%20and%20variable%20fire%20regimes&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Bachelet,%20Dominique&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4548&rft.epage=4560&rft.pages=4548-4560&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.13048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3859439781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1731599569&rft_id=info:pmid/26207729&rfr_iscdi=true