Complementarity of fishers' traditional ecological knowledge and conventional science: Contributions to the management of groupers (Epinephelinae) fisheries around Mafia Island, Tanzania

Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is increasingly advocated as a complementary source of information that can potentially be integrated into mainstream science, particularly to help improve fisheries management. However, less attention has been paid to identifying specific areas where the TEK o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ocean & coastal management 2015-09, Vol.114, p.88-101
Hauptverfasser: Gaspare, Lydia, Bryceson, Ian, Kulindwa, Kassim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue
container_start_page 88
container_title Ocean & coastal management
container_volume 114
creator Gaspare, Lydia
Bryceson, Ian
Kulindwa, Kassim
description Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is increasingly advocated as a complementary source of information that can potentially be integrated into mainstream science, particularly to help improve fisheries management. However, less attention has been paid to identifying specific areas where the TEK of fishers may confirm or contradict conventional scientific knowledge (CSK); or where TEK may provide new insights for fisheries systems characterized by multi-species and multi-gear usage. We conducted a qualitative exploration of TEK of grouper fishing patterns and compared the findings with an analysis of catch data in order to elucidate the extent of fishing pressure on groupers. We further compared TEK of the ecology and biology of groupers with published CSK to understand the complementarity between the two domains. Data collection methods included structured open-ended questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with key informants, focus group discussions, personal observations and a literature review. Results indicate that TEK complements CSK in terms of catch assessment and the ecology of groupers. TEK provides additional information on fishing gear, specific grouper species caught, habitat use and feeding habits; however, TEK contradicts CSK regarding spawning aggregation behavior. TEK offers new knowledge on environmental threats facing groupers, but fishers lack knowledge on reproductive modes and life history traits (i.e. hermaphroditism and spawning season) of groupers. We conclude that, in a conducive democratic setting based upon mutual respect and trust, TEK can complement conventional science and help to make more informed management decisions for sustainable fishing. •Fishers' knowledge complement fisheries-dependent data.•Information from fishers may be new or contradict data from conventional scientists.•Fishers lack knowledge of reproductive aspects of groupers.•Changes in monsoon wind and fishing practices structure groupers utilization.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746883487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0964569115001647</els_id><sourcerecordid>1746883487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2f8dfe093584e95a3faddc53c82a8b041492d573315c50d717477ebc93abb44b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEEkvLM-AbRSKpHdv5w61aFahUxKWVerMm9mTXS2IH29uqPBpPh5ddceXkkfV985uZryjeMVoxyprLXeU1ag8zuKqmTFa0qShjL4oV61peylo8vCxWtG9EKZuevS7exLijlNay6VbF77WflwlndAmCTc_Ej2S0cYshvicpgLHJegcTyYjJb6zO5Q_nnyY0GyTgDNHePWb3URW1RafxE1l7l4Id9of_SJInaYskjwibv6wDZhP8fskccnG9WIfLFifrAD-c-BYjgSzJiG8wWiA3ccq8j-QO3C9wFs6LVyNMEd-e3rPi_vP13fprefv9y8366rbUXHSprMfOjEh7LjuBvQQ-gjFact3V0A1UMNHXRracM6klNS1rRdvioHsOwyDEwM-Ki2PfJfife4xJzTZqnPI06PdRZUPTdZnVZml7lOrgYww4qiXYGcKzYlQd0lI79S8tdUhL0UbltLLz6ujEvMmjxaBOpzQ2oE7KePvfHn8ArQCntA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1746883487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complementarity of fishers' traditional ecological knowledge and conventional science: Contributions to the management of groupers (Epinephelinae) fisheries around Mafia Island, Tanzania</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Gaspare, Lydia ; Bryceson, Ian ; Kulindwa, Kassim</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaspare, Lydia ; Bryceson, Ian ; Kulindwa, Kassim</creatorcontrib><description>Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is increasingly advocated as a complementary source of information that can potentially be integrated into mainstream science, particularly to help improve fisheries management. However, less attention has been paid to identifying specific areas where the TEK of fishers may confirm or contradict conventional scientific knowledge (CSK); or where TEK may provide new insights for fisheries systems characterized by multi-species and multi-gear usage. We conducted a qualitative exploration of TEK of grouper fishing patterns and compared the findings with an analysis of catch data in order to elucidate the extent of fishing pressure on groupers. We further compared TEK of the ecology and biology of groupers with published CSK to understand the complementarity between the two domains. Data collection methods included structured open-ended questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with key informants, focus group discussions, personal observations and a literature review. Results indicate that TEK complements CSK in terms of catch assessment and the ecology of groupers. TEK provides additional information on fishing gear, specific grouper species caught, habitat use and feeding habits; however, TEK contradicts CSK regarding spawning aggregation behavior. TEK offers new knowledge on environmental threats facing groupers, but fishers lack knowledge on reproductive modes and life history traits (i.e. hermaphroditism and spawning season) of groupers. We conclude that, in a conducive democratic setting based upon mutual respect and trust, TEK can complement conventional science and help to make more informed management decisions for sustainable fishing. •Fishers' knowledge complement fisheries-dependent data.•Information from fishers may be new or contradict data from conventional scientists.•Fishers lack knowledge of reproductive aspects of groupers.•Changes in monsoon wind and fishing practices structure groupers utilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-5691</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-524X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Epinephelidae ; Epinephelinae ; Fisheries management ; Fishers' ecological knowledge ; Integrating</subject><ispartof>Ocean &amp; coastal management, 2015-09, Vol.114, p.88-101</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2f8dfe093584e95a3faddc53c82a8b041492d573315c50d717477ebc93abb44b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2f8dfe093584e95a3faddc53c82a8b041492d573315c50d717477ebc93abb44b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3351-0168</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaspare, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryceson, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulindwa, Kassim</creatorcontrib><title>Complementarity of fishers' traditional ecological knowledge and conventional science: Contributions to the management of groupers (Epinephelinae) fisheries around Mafia Island, Tanzania</title><title>Ocean &amp; coastal management</title><description>Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is increasingly advocated as a complementary source of information that can potentially be integrated into mainstream science, particularly to help improve fisheries management. However, less attention has been paid to identifying specific areas where the TEK of fishers may confirm or contradict conventional scientific knowledge (CSK); or where TEK may provide new insights for fisheries systems characterized by multi-species and multi-gear usage. We conducted a qualitative exploration of TEK of grouper fishing patterns and compared the findings with an analysis of catch data in order to elucidate the extent of fishing pressure on groupers. We further compared TEK of the ecology and biology of groupers with published CSK to understand the complementarity between the two domains. Data collection methods included structured open-ended questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with key informants, focus group discussions, personal observations and a literature review. Results indicate that TEK complements CSK in terms of catch assessment and the ecology of groupers. TEK provides additional information on fishing gear, specific grouper species caught, habitat use and feeding habits; however, TEK contradicts CSK regarding spawning aggregation behavior. TEK offers new knowledge on environmental threats facing groupers, but fishers lack knowledge on reproductive modes and life history traits (i.e. hermaphroditism and spawning season) of groupers. We conclude that, in a conducive democratic setting based upon mutual respect and trust, TEK can complement conventional science and help to make more informed management decisions for sustainable fishing. •Fishers' knowledge complement fisheries-dependent data.•Information from fishers may be new or contradict data from conventional scientists.•Fishers lack knowledge of reproductive aspects of groupers.•Changes in monsoon wind and fishing practices structure groupers utilization.</description><subject>Epinephelidae</subject><subject>Epinephelinae</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishers' ecological knowledge</subject><subject>Integrating</subject><issn>0964-5691</issn><issn>1873-524X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEEkvLM-AbRSKpHdv5w61aFahUxKWVerMm9mTXS2IH29uqPBpPh5ddceXkkfV985uZryjeMVoxyprLXeU1ag8zuKqmTFa0qShjL4oV61peylo8vCxWtG9EKZuevS7exLijlNay6VbF77WflwlndAmCTc_Ej2S0cYshvicpgLHJegcTyYjJb6zO5Q_nnyY0GyTgDNHePWb3URW1RafxE1l7l4Id9of_SJInaYskjwibv6wDZhP8fskccnG9WIfLFifrAD-c-BYjgSzJiG8wWiA3ccq8j-QO3C9wFs6LVyNMEd-e3rPi_vP13fprefv9y8366rbUXHSprMfOjEh7LjuBvQQ-gjFact3V0A1UMNHXRracM6klNS1rRdvioHsOwyDEwM-Ki2PfJfife4xJzTZqnPI06PdRZUPTdZnVZml7lOrgYww4qiXYGcKzYlQd0lI79S8tdUhL0UbltLLz6ujEvMmjxaBOpzQ2oE7KePvfHn8ArQCntA</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Gaspare, Lydia</creator><creator>Bryceson, Ian</creator><creator>Kulindwa, Kassim</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-0168</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Complementarity of fishers' traditional ecological knowledge and conventional science: Contributions to the management of groupers (Epinephelinae) fisheries around Mafia Island, Tanzania</title><author>Gaspare, Lydia ; Bryceson, Ian ; Kulindwa, Kassim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2f8dfe093584e95a3faddc53c82a8b041492d573315c50d717477ebc93abb44b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Epinephelidae</topic><topic>Epinephelinae</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishers' ecological knowledge</topic><topic>Integrating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaspare, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryceson, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulindwa, Kassim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ocean &amp; coastal management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaspare, Lydia</au><au>Bryceson, Ian</au><au>Kulindwa, Kassim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complementarity of fishers' traditional ecological knowledge and conventional science: Contributions to the management of groupers (Epinephelinae) fisheries around Mafia Island, Tanzania</atitle><jtitle>Ocean &amp; coastal management</jtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><spage>88</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>88-101</pages><issn>0964-5691</issn><eissn>1873-524X</eissn><abstract>Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is increasingly advocated as a complementary source of information that can potentially be integrated into mainstream science, particularly to help improve fisheries management. However, less attention has been paid to identifying specific areas where the TEK of fishers may confirm or contradict conventional scientific knowledge (CSK); or where TEK may provide new insights for fisheries systems characterized by multi-species and multi-gear usage. We conducted a qualitative exploration of TEK of grouper fishing patterns and compared the findings with an analysis of catch data in order to elucidate the extent of fishing pressure on groupers. We further compared TEK of the ecology and biology of groupers with published CSK to understand the complementarity between the two domains. Data collection methods included structured open-ended questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with key informants, focus group discussions, personal observations and a literature review. Results indicate that TEK complements CSK in terms of catch assessment and the ecology of groupers. TEK provides additional information on fishing gear, specific grouper species caught, habitat use and feeding habits; however, TEK contradicts CSK regarding spawning aggregation behavior. TEK offers new knowledge on environmental threats facing groupers, but fishers lack knowledge on reproductive modes and life history traits (i.e. hermaphroditism and spawning season) of groupers. We conclude that, in a conducive democratic setting based upon mutual respect and trust, TEK can complement conventional science and help to make more informed management decisions for sustainable fishing. •Fishers' knowledge complement fisheries-dependent data.•Information from fishers may be new or contradict data from conventional scientists.•Fishers lack knowledge of reproductive aspects of groupers.•Changes in monsoon wind and fishing practices structure groupers utilization.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.011</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-0168</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-5691
ispartof Ocean & coastal management, 2015-09, Vol.114, p.88-101
issn 0964-5691
1873-524X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746883487
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Epinephelidae
Epinephelinae
Fisheries management
Fishers' ecological knowledge
Integrating
title Complementarity of fishers' traditional ecological knowledge and conventional science: Contributions to the management of groupers (Epinephelinae) fisheries around Mafia Island, Tanzania
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A43%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complementarity%20of%20fishers'%20traditional%20ecological%20knowledge%20and%20conventional%20science:%20Contributions%20to%20the%20management%20of%20groupers%20(Epinephelinae)%20fisheries%20around%20Mafia%20Island,%20Tanzania&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20&%20coastal%20management&rft.au=Gaspare,%20Lydia&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=114&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=88-101&rft.issn=0964-5691&rft.eissn=1873-524X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1746883487%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1746883487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0964569115001647&rfr_iscdi=true