Post-exposure prophylaxis against Ebola virus disease with experimental antiviral agents: a case-series of health-care workers

Summary Background Although a few international health-care workers who have assisted in the current Ebola outbreak in west Africa have been medically evacuated for treatment of Ebola virus disease, more commonly they were evacuated after potential accidental exposure to Ebola virus. An urgent need...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet infectious diseases 2015-11, Vol.15 (11), p.1300-1304
Hauptverfasser: Jacobs, Michael, Dr, Aarons, Emma, FRCPath, Bhagani, Sanjay, FRCP, Buchanan, Ruaridh, MRCP, Cropley, Ian, FRCP, Hopkins, Susan, FRCP, Lester, Rebecca, MRCP, Martin, Daniel, FRCA, Marshall, Neal, MRPharmS, Mepham, Stephen, FRCPath, Warren, Simon, FRCPath, Rodger, Alison, FRCP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1304
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1300
container_title The Lancet infectious diseases
container_volume 15
creator Jacobs, Michael, Dr
Aarons, Emma, FRCPath
Bhagani, Sanjay, FRCP
Buchanan, Ruaridh, MRCP
Cropley, Ian, FRCP
Hopkins, Susan, FRCP
Lester, Rebecca, MRCP
Martin, Daniel, FRCA
Marshall, Neal, MRPharmS
Mepham, Stephen, FRCPath
Warren, Simon, FRCPath
Rodger, Alison, FRCP
description Summary Background Although a few international health-care workers who have assisted in the current Ebola outbreak in west Africa have been medically evacuated for treatment of Ebola virus disease, more commonly they were evacuated after potential accidental exposure to Ebola virus. An urgent need exists for a consensus about the risk assessment of Ebola virus transmission after accidental exposure, and to investigate the use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Experimental vaccines have occasionally been used for Ebola PEP, but newly developed experimental antiviral agents have potential advantages. Here, we describe a new method for risk assessment and management of health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus and report the use of experimental antiviral therapies for Ebola PEP in people. Methods We devised a risk assessment and management algorithm for health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus and applied this to eight consecutive individuals who were medically evacuated to the UK from west Africa between January, and March, 2015. PEP with antiviral agents was given to health-care workers assessed to have had substantial risk exposures to Ebola virus. Participants were followed up for 42 days after potential exposure. Findings Four of eight health-care workers were classified as having had low risk exposures and managed by watchful waiting in the community. None of these health-care workers developed Ebola virus disease. The other four health-care workers had intermediate or maximum risk exposures and were given PEP with antiviral agents. PEP was well tolerated with no serious adverse effects. None of these four health-care workers, including two with maximum risk exposures from penetrating injuries with freshly used hollow-bore needles, developed Ebola virus disease. Interpretation Standardised risk assessment should be adopted and consensus guidelines developed to systematically study the efficacy and safety of PEP with experimental agents. New experimental antiviral treatments are a viable option for PEP against Ebola. Funding Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00228-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746880839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1473309915002285</els_id><sourcerecordid>1746880839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-cabefae33598ff02e633b1e1cb3c166f6fb3af44e2c458f7854244a4278d85833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0CWuJRDwN9xOIBQVT6kSiABZ8txxl232XjxJG33wm_Huykg9QInj0fP-47Hb1U9ZfQlo0y_-spkI2pB2_aYqReUcm5qda86LG1ZS6ma-_t6QQ6qR4gXlLKGUfmwOuBacMZMe1j9_JJwquFmk3DOQDY5bVbbwd1EJO7cxREnctqlwZGrmGckfURwCOQ6TitSVJDjGsbJDcSNUyzMrjovHXxNHPEFrbEwgCQFsgI3TKvauzLoOuVLyPi4ehDcgPDk9jyqvr8__XbysT77_OHTybuz2qvWTEXSQXAgRLmFQDloIToGzHfCM62DDp1wQUrgXioTGqMkl9JJ3pjeKCPEUXW8-JYFf8yAk11H9DAMboQ0o2WN1MZQI9r_QAXVRnPBC_r8DnqR5jyWRQrFC1MeoAulFsrnhJgh2E35NZe3llG7y9Lus7S7oCxTdp-lVUX37NZ97tbQ_1H9Dq8AbxcAys9dRcgWfYTRQx8z-Mn2Kf5zxJs7Dn6IY_RuuIQt4N9tLHJLF5OdB1N7ByV-AQoPxEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1728624276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Post-exposure prophylaxis against Ebola virus disease with experimental antiviral agents: a case-series of health-care workers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Jacobs, Michael, Dr ; Aarons, Emma, FRCPath ; Bhagani, Sanjay, FRCP ; Buchanan, Ruaridh, MRCP ; Cropley, Ian, FRCP ; Hopkins, Susan, FRCP ; Lester, Rebecca, MRCP ; Martin, Daniel, FRCA ; Marshall, Neal, MRPharmS ; Mepham, Stephen, FRCPath ; Warren, Simon, FRCPath ; Rodger, Alison, FRCP</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Michael, Dr ; Aarons, Emma, FRCPath ; Bhagani, Sanjay, FRCP ; Buchanan, Ruaridh, MRCP ; Cropley, Ian, FRCP ; Hopkins, Susan, FRCP ; Lester, Rebecca, MRCP ; Martin, Daniel, FRCA ; Marshall, Neal, MRPharmS ; Mepham, Stephen, FRCPath ; Warren, Simon, FRCPath ; Rodger, Alison, FRCP</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Although a few international health-care workers who have assisted in the current Ebola outbreak in west Africa have been medically evacuated for treatment of Ebola virus disease, more commonly they were evacuated after potential accidental exposure to Ebola virus. An urgent need exists for a consensus about the risk assessment of Ebola virus transmission after accidental exposure, and to investigate the use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Experimental vaccines have occasionally been used for Ebola PEP, but newly developed experimental antiviral agents have potential advantages. Here, we describe a new method for risk assessment and management of health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus and report the use of experimental antiviral therapies for Ebola PEP in people. Methods We devised a risk assessment and management algorithm for health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus and applied this to eight consecutive individuals who were medically evacuated to the UK from west Africa between January, and March, 2015. PEP with antiviral agents was given to health-care workers assessed to have had substantial risk exposures to Ebola virus. Participants were followed up for 42 days after potential exposure. Findings Four of eight health-care workers were classified as having had low risk exposures and managed by watchful waiting in the community. None of these health-care workers developed Ebola virus disease. The other four health-care workers had intermediate or maximum risk exposures and were given PEP with antiviral agents. PEP was well tolerated with no serious adverse effects. None of these four health-care workers, including two with maximum risk exposures from penetrating injuries with freshly used hollow-bore needles, developed Ebola virus disease. Interpretation Standardised risk assessment should be adopted and consensus guidelines developed to systematically study the efficacy and safety of PEP with experimental agents. New experimental antiviral treatments are a viable option for PEP against Ebola. Funding Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00228-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26321189</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Africa, Western ; Antiviral agents ; Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use ; Ebola virus ; Female ; Health care ; Health Personnel ; Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - prevention &amp; control ; Humans ; Immunization ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; London ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Needlestick injuries ; Occupational Exposure ; Personal protective equipment ; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis - methods ; Prophylaxis ; Risk Assessment ; Vaccines ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Lancet infectious diseases, 2015-11, Vol.15 (11), p.1300-1304</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-cabefae33598ff02e633b1e1cb3c166f6fb3af44e2c458f7854244a4278d85833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-cabefae33598ff02e633b1e1cb3c166f6fb3af44e2c458f7854244a4278d85833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309915002285$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Michael, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarons, Emma, FRCPath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhagani, Sanjay, FRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Ruaridh, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cropley, Ian, FRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Susan, FRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Rebecca, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Daniel, FRCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Neal, MRPharmS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mepham, Stephen, FRCPath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Simon, FRCPath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Alison, FRCP</creatorcontrib><title>Post-exposure prophylaxis against Ebola virus disease with experimental antiviral agents: a case-series of health-care workers</title><title>The Lancet infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Summary Background Although a few international health-care workers who have assisted in the current Ebola outbreak in west Africa have been medically evacuated for treatment of Ebola virus disease, more commonly they were evacuated after potential accidental exposure to Ebola virus. An urgent need exists for a consensus about the risk assessment of Ebola virus transmission after accidental exposure, and to investigate the use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Experimental vaccines have occasionally been used for Ebola PEP, but newly developed experimental antiviral agents have potential advantages. Here, we describe a new method for risk assessment and management of health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus and report the use of experimental antiviral therapies for Ebola PEP in people. Methods We devised a risk assessment and management algorithm for health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus and applied this to eight consecutive individuals who were medically evacuated to the UK from west Africa between January, and March, 2015. PEP with antiviral agents was given to health-care workers assessed to have had substantial risk exposures to Ebola virus. Participants were followed up for 42 days after potential exposure. Findings Four of eight health-care workers were classified as having had low risk exposures and managed by watchful waiting in the community. None of these health-care workers developed Ebola virus disease. The other four health-care workers had intermediate or maximum risk exposures and were given PEP with antiviral agents. PEP was well tolerated with no serious adverse effects. None of these four health-care workers, including two with maximum risk exposures from penetrating injuries with freshly used hollow-bore needles, developed Ebola virus disease. Interpretation Standardised risk assessment should be adopted and consensus guidelines developed to systematically study the efficacy and safety of PEP with experimental agents. New experimental antiviral treatments are a viable option for PEP against Ebola. Funding Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust.</description><subject>Africa, Western</subject><subject>Antiviral agents</subject><subject>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ebola virus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needlestick injuries</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure</subject><subject>Personal protective equipment</subject><subject>Post-Exposure Prophylaxis - methods</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1473-3099</issn><issn>1474-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0CWuJRDwN9xOIBQVT6kSiABZ8txxl232XjxJG33wm_Huykg9QInj0fP-47Hb1U9ZfQlo0y_-spkI2pB2_aYqReUcm5qda86LG1ZS6ma-_t6QQ6qR4gXlLKGUfmwOuBacMZMe1j9_JJwquFmk3DOQDY5bVbbwd1EJO7cxREnctqlwZGrmGckfURwCOQ6TitSVJDjGsbJDcSNUyzMrjovHXxNHPEFrbEwgCQFsgI3TKvauzLoOuVLyPi4ehDcgPDk9jyqvr8__XbysT77_OHTybuz2qvWTEXSQXAgRLmFQDloIToGzHfCM62DDp1wQUrgXioTGqMkl9JJ3pjeKCPEUXW8-JYFf8yAk11H9DAMboQ0o2WN1MZQI9r_QAXVRnPBC_r8DnqR5jyWRQrFC1MeoAulFsrnhJgh2E35NZe3llG7y9Lus7S7oCxTdp-lVUX37NZ97tbQ_1H9Dq8AbxcAys9dRcgWfYTRQx8z-Mn2Kf5zxJs7Dn6IY_RuuIQt4N9tLHJLF5OdB1N7ByV-AQoPxEE</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Jacobs, Michael, Dr</creator><creator>Aarons, Emma, FRCPath</creator><creator>Bhagani, Sanjay, FRCP</creator><creator>Buchanan, Ruaridh, MRCP</creator><creator>Cropley, Ian, FRCP</creator><creator>Hopkins, Susan, FRCP</creator><creator>Lester, Rebecca, MRCP</creator><creator>Martin, Daniel, FRCA</creator><creator>Marshall, Neal, MRPharmS</creator><creator>Mepham, Stephen, FRCPath</creator><creator>Warren, Simon, FRCPath</creator><creator>Rodger, Alison, FRCP</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Post-exposure prophylaxis against Ebola virus disease with experimental antiviral agents: a case-series of health-care workers</title><author>Jacobs, Michael, Dr ; Aarons, Emma, FRCPath ; Bhagani, Sanjay, FRCP ; Buchanan, Ruaridh, MRCP ; Cropley, Ian, FRCP ; Hopkins, Susan, FRCP ; Lester, Rebecca, MRCP ; Martin, Daniel, FRCA ; Marshall, Neal, MRPharmS ; Mepham, Stephen, FRCPath ; Warren, Simon, FRCPath ; Rodger, Alison, FRCP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-cabefae33598ff02e633b1e1cb3c166f6fb3af44e2c458f7854244a4278d85833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Africa, Western</topic><topic>Antiviral agents</topic><topic>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ebola virus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needlestick injuries</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure</topic><topic>Personal protective equipment</topic><topic>Post-Exposure Prophylaxis - methods</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Michael, Dr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarons, Emma, FRCPath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhagani, Sanjay, FRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, Ruaridh, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cropley, Ian, FRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Susan, FRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Rebecca, MRCP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Daniel, FRCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Neal, MRPharmS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mepham, Stephen, FRCPath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Simon, FRCPath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Alison, FRCP</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobs, Michael, Dr</au><au>Aarons, Emma, FRCPath</au><au>Bhagani, Sanjay, FRCP</au><au>Buchanan, Ruaridh, MRCP</au><au>Cropley, Ian, FRCP</au><au>Hopkins, Susan, FRCP</au><au>Lester, Rebecca, MRCP</au><au>Martin, Daniel, FRCA</au><au>Marshall, Neal, MRPharmS</au><au>Mepham, Stephen, FRCPath</au><au>Warren, Simon, FRCPath</au><au>Rodger, Alison, FRCP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Post-exposure prophylaxis against Ebola virus disease with experimental antiviral agents: a case-series of health-care workers</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1300</spage><epage>1304</epage><pages>1300-1304</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><eissn>1474-4457</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Although a few international health-care workers who have assisted in the current Ebola outbreak in west Africa have been medically evacuated for treatment of Ebola virus disease, more commonly they were evacuated after potential accidental exposure to Ebola virus. An urgent need exists for a consensus about the risk assessment of Ebola virus transmission after accidental exposure, and to investigate the use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Experimental vaccines have occasionally been used for Ebola PEP, but newly developed experimental antiviral agents have potential advantages. Here, we describe a new method for risk assessment and management of health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus and report the use of experimental antiviral therapies for Ebola PEP in people. Methods We devised a risk assessment and management algorithm for health-care workers potentially exposed to Ebola virus and applied this to eight consecutive individuals who were medically evacuated to the UK from west Africa between January, and March, 2015. PEP with antiviral agents was given to health-care workers assessed to have had substantial risk exposures to Ebola virus. Participants were followed up for 42 days after potential exposure. Findings Four of eight health-care workers were classified as having had low risk exposures and managed by watchful waiting in the community. None of these health-care workers developed Ebola virus disease. The other four health-care workers had intermediate or maximum risk exposures and were given PEP with antiviral agents. PEP was well tolerated with no serious adverse effects. None of these four health-care workers, including two with maximum risk exposures from penetrating injuries with freshly used hollow-bore needles, developed Ebola virus disease. Interpretation Standardised risk assessment should be adopted and consensus guidelines developed to systematically study the efficacy and safety of PEP with experimental agents. New experimental antiviral treatments are a viable option for PEP against Ebola. Funding Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26321189</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00228-5</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-3099
ispartof The Lancet infectious diseases, 2015-11, Vol.15 (11), p.1300-1304
issn 1473-3099
1474-4457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746880839
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Africa, Western
Antiviral agents
Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use
Ebola virus
Female
Health care
Health Personnel
Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - prevention & control
Humans
Immunization
Infectious Disease
Infectious diseases
London
Male
Middle Aged
Needlestick injuries
Occupational Exposure
Personal protective equipment
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis - methods
Prophylaxis
Risk Assessment
Vaccines
Young Adult
title Post-exposure prophylaxis against Ebola virus disease with experimental antiviral agents: a case-series of health-care workers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A41%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-exposure%20prophylaxis%20against%20Ebola%20virus%20disease%20with%20experimental%20antiviral%20agents:%20a%20case-series%20of%20health-care%20workers&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Jacobs,%20Michael,%20Dr&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1300&rft.epage=1304&rft.pages=1300-1304&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft.eissn=1474-4457&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00228-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1746880839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1728624276&rft_id=info:pmid/26321189&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1473309915002285&rfr_iscdi=true