Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect

•We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and hi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Consciousness and cognition 2014-02, Vol.24, p.57-69
Hauptverfasser: Meeks, J. Thadeus, Knight, Justin B., Brewer, Gene A., Cook, Gabriel I., Marsh, Richard L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue
container_start_page 57
container_title Consciousness and cognition
container_volume 24
creator Meeks, J. Thadeus
Knight, Justin B.
Brewer, Gene A.
Cook, Gabriel I.
Marsh, Richard L.
description •We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and high frequency items were both presented. We sought to systematically investigate how participants subjectively classify the basis of their recognition memory judgments for low and high word frequency items. We found that participants more often reported rejection processes related to the increased perceived memorability for unstudied low word frequency items (relative to high word frequency items), rather than classifying their decision on a lack of familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated context variability and word frequency independently influenced the subjective classifications for correct rejections. Results of Experiment 3 revealed that these differences are dependent upon having experience with both low and high frequency items. Overall, these data suggest participants’ rejection of low frequency items is more strongly related to judgments of perceived memorability, but only when they are presented in the context of high frequency items. The results are discussed in relation to distinctiveness and expected memorability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746878463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053810013001669</els_id><sourcerecordid>3225906821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-affe05ccdfec21528c0601a70857998dbb251f8afd442368f44fda1da35dffe23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMotlb_gciACL2Z8Zx8zGRuBClWCwVv9Dpk87Fm2E3WZGZL_73Z7qrgRb3KITzvyzk8hLxG6BCwfz91JkWT1h0FZB3SDmB4Qs4RRmgpG_qnh1mwViLAGXlRygQAcuDiOTmjnONIKT0n6ibuXZnDWs8hrpv5h2vKspqcmcPeNdntUp5Lk3wdHz5TbHY5GVeKK02ID4G7lG3js_u5uGjum23IOeXGeV8DL8kzrzfFvTq9F-T79advV1_a26-fb64-3raGS5xbXWEQxtiaoSioNNAD6gGkGMZR2tWKCvRSe8s5Zb30nHur0WombI1SdkEuj711u7pHmdU2FOM2Gx1dWorCgfdykLxn_0cFoGRyHA-tb_9Bp7TkWA-phRQZB0HZo5QAGClwKivFj5TJqZTsvNrlsNX5XiGog1E1qaNRdTCqkKpqtMbenMqX1dbZP6HfCivw7gToYvTGZx1NKH85ScceB6jchyPnqoZ9cFkVE6owZ0OuopRN4fFNfgF08cBJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500920428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Meeks, J. Thadeus ; Knight, Justin B. ; Brewer, Gene A. ; Cook, Gabriel I. ; Marsh, Richard L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meeks, J. Thadeus ; Knight, Justin B. ; Brewer, Gene A. ; Cook, Gabriel I. ; Marsh, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><description>•We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and high frequency items were both presented. We sought to systematically investigate how participants subjectively classify the basis of their recognition memory judgments for low and high word frequency items. We found that participants more often reported rejection processes related to the increased perceived memorability for unstudied low word frequency items (relative to high word frequency items), rather than classifying their decision on a lack of familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated context variability and word frequency independently influenced the subjective classifications for correct rejections. Results of Experiment 3 revealed that these differences are dependent upon having experience with both low and high frequency items. Overall, these data suggest participants’ rejection of low frequency items is more strongly related to judgments of perceived memorability, but only when they are presented in the context of high frequency items. The results are discussed in relation to distinctiveness and expected memorability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24419222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Linguistics ; Memory ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Random Allocation ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Recognition memory ; Rejection processes ; Remember–Know ; Vocabulary ; Word frequency ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Consciousness and cognition, 2014-02, Vol.24, p.57-69</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-affe05ccdfec21528c0601a70857998dbb251f8afd442368f44fda1da35dffe23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-affe05ccdfec21528c0601a70857998dbb251f8afd442368f44fda1da35dffe23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810013001669$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28296170$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24419222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meeks, J. Thadeus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Justin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Gene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Gabriel I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect</title><title>Consciousness and cognition</title><addtitle>Conscious Cogn</addtitle><description>•We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and high frequency items were both presented. We sought to systematically investigate how participants subjectively classify the basis of their recognition memory judgments for low and high word frequency items. We found that participants more often reported rejection processes related to the increased perceived memorability for unstudied low word frequency items (relative to high word frequency items), rather than classifying their decision on a lack of familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated context variability and word frequency independently influenced the subjective classifications for correct rejections. Results of Experiment 3 revealed that these differences are dependent upon having experience with both low and high frequency items. Overall, these data suggest participants’ rejection of low frequency items is more strongly related to judgments of perceived memorability, but only when they are presented in the context of high frequency items. The results are discussed in relation to distinctiveness and expected memorability.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition memory</subject><subject>Rejection processes</subject><subject>Remember–Know</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Word frequency</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8100</issn><issn>1090-2376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMotlb_gciACL2Z8Zx8zGRuBClWCwVv9Dpk87Fm2E3WZGZL_73Z7qrgRb3KITzvyzk8hLxG6BCwfz91JkWT1h0FZB3SDmB4Qs4RRmgpG_qnh1mwViLAGXlRygQAcuDiOTmjnONIKT0n6ibuXZnDWs8hrpv5h2vKspqcmcPeNdntUp5Lk3wdHz5TbHY5GVeKK02ID4G7lG3js_u5uGjum23IOeXGeV8DL8kzrzfFvTq9F-T79advV1_a26-fb64-3raGS5xbXWEQxtiaoSioNNAD6gGkGMZR2tWKCvRSe8s5Zb30nHur0WombI1SdkEuj711u7pHmdU2FOM2Gx1dWorCgfdykLxn_0cFoGRyHA-tb_9Bp7TkWA-phRQZB0HZo5QAGClwKivFj5TJqZTsvNrlsNX5XiGog1E1qaNRdTCqkKpqtMbenMqX1dbZP6HfCivw7gToYvTGZx1NKH85ScceB6jchyPnqoZ9cFkVE6owZ0OuopRN4fFNfgF08cBJ</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Meeks, J. Thadeus</creator><creator>Knight, Justin B.</creator><creator>Brewer, Gene A.</creator><creator>Cook, Gabriel I.</creator><creator>Marsh, Richard L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect</title><author>Meeks, J. Thadeus ; Knight, Justin B. ; Brewer, Gene A. ; Cook, Gabriel I. ; Marsh, Richard L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-affe05ccdfec21528c0601a70857998dbb251f8afd442368f44fda1da35dffe23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition memory</topic><topic>Rejection processes</topic><topic>Remember–Know</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Word frequency</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meeks, J. Thadeus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Justin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Gene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Gabriel I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Consciousness and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meeks, J. Thadeus</au><au>Knight, Justin B.</au><au>Brewer, Gene A.</au><au>Cook, Gabriel I.</au><au>Marsh, Richard L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect</atitle><jtitle>Consciousness and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Conscious Cogn</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><spage>57</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>57-69</pages><issn>1053-8100</issn><eissn>1090-2376</eissn><abstract>•We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and high frequency items were both presented. We sought to systematically investigate how participants subjectively classify the basis of their recognition memory judgments for low and high word frequency items. We found that participants more often reported rejection processes related to the increased perceived memorability for unstudied low word frequency items (relative to high word frequency items), rather than classifying their decision on a lack of familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated context variability and word frequency independently influenced the subjective classifications for correct rejections. Results of Experiment 3 revealed that these differences are dependent upon having experience with both low and high frequency items. Overall, these data suggest participants’ rejection of low frequency items is more strongly related to judgments of perceived memorability, but only when they are presented in the context of high frequency items. The results are discussed in relation to distinctiveness and expected memorability.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24419222</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8100
ispartof Consciousness and cognition, 2014-02, Vol.24, p.57-69
issn 1053-8100
1090-2376
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746878463
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Learning. Memory
Linguistics
Memory
Mental Recall - physiology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Random Allocation
Recognition (Psychology) - physiology
Recognition memory
Rejection processes
Remember–Know
Vocabulary
Word frequency
Young Adult
title Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T14%3A13%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20subjective%20reports%20of%20rejection%20processes%20in%20the%20word%20frequency%20mirror%20effect&rft.jtitle=Consciousness%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Meeks,%20J.%20Thadeus&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=57-69&rft.issn=1053-8100&rft.eissn=1090-2376&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3225906821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500920428&rft_id=info:pmid/24419222&rft_els_id=S1053810013001669&rfr_iscdi=true