Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect
•We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and hi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Consciousness and cognition 2014-02, Vol.24, p.57-69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 69 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 57 |
container_title | Consciousness and cognition |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Meeks, J. Thadeus Knight, Justin B. Brewer, Gene A. Cook, Gabriel I. Marsh, Richard L. |
description | •We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and high frequency items were both presented.
We sought to systematically investigate how participants subjectively classify the basis of their recognition memory judgments for low and high word frequency items. We found that participants more often reported rejection processes related to the increased perceived memorability for unstudied low word frequency items (relative to high word frequency items), rather than classifying their decision on a lack of familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated context variability and word frequency independently influenced the subjective classifications for correct rejections. Results of Experiment 3 revealed that these differences are dependent upon having experience with both low and high frequency items. Overall, these data suggest participants’ rejection of low frequency items is more strongly related to judgments of perceived memorability, but only when they are presented in the context of high frequency items. The results are discussed in relation to distinctiveness and expected memorability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746878463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053810013001669</els_id><sourcerecordid>3225906821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-affe05ccdfec21528c0601a70857998dbb251f8afd442368f44fda1da35dffe23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMotlb_gciACL2Z8Zx8zGRuBClWCwVv9Dpk87Fm2E3WZGZL_73Z7qrgRb3KITzvyzk8hLxG6BCwfz91JkWT1h0FZB3SDmB4Qs4RRmgpG_qnh1mwViLAGXlRygQAcuDiOTmjnONIKT0n6ibuXZnDWs8hrpv5h2vKspqcmcPeNdntUp5Lk3wdHz5TbHY5GVeKK02ID4G7lG3js_u5uGjum23IOeXGeV8DL8kzrzfFvTq9F-T79advV1_a26-fb64-3raGS5xbXWEQxtiaoSioNNAD6gGkGMZR2tWKCvRSe8s5Zb30nHur0WombI1SdkEuj711u7pHmdU2FOM2Gx1dWorCgfdykLxn_0cFoGRyHA-tb_9Bp7TkWA-phRQZB0HZo5QAGClwKivFj5TJqZTsvNrlsNX5XiGog1E1qaNRdTCqkKpqtMbenMqX1dbZP6HfCivw7gToYvTGZx1NKH85ScceB6jchyPnqoZ9cFkVE6owZ0OuopRN4fFNfgF08cBJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500920428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Meeks, J. Thadeus ; Knight, Justin B. ; Brewer, Gene A. ; Cook, Gabriel I. ; Marsh, Richard L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meeks, J. Thadeus ; Knight, Justin B. ; Brewer, Gene A. ; Cook, Gabriel I. ; Marsh, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><description>•We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and high frequency items were both presented.
We sought to systematically investigate how participants subjectively classify the basis of their recognition memory judgments for low and high word frequency items. We found that participants more often reported rejection processes related to the increased perceived memorability for unstudied low word frequency items (relative to high word frequency items), rather than classifying their decision on a lack of familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated context variability and word frequency independently influenced the subjective classifications for correct rejections. Results of Experiment 3 revealed that these differences are dependent upon having experience with both low and high frequency items. Overall, these data suggest participants’ rejection of low frequency items is more strongly related to judgments of perceived memorability, but only when they are presented in the context of high frequency items. The results are discussed in relation to distinctiveness and expected memorability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24419222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning. Memory ; Linguistics ; Memory ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Random Allocation ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Recognition memory ; Rejection processes ; Remember–Know ; Vocabulary ; Word frequency ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Consciousness and cognition, 2014-02, Vol.24, p.57-69</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-affe05ccdfec21528c0601a70857998dbb251f8afd442368f44fda1da35dffe23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-affe05ccdfec21528c0601a70857998dbb251f8afd442368f44fda1da35dffe23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810013001669$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28296170$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24419222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meeks, J. Thadeus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Justin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Gene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Gabriel I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect</title><title>Consciousness and cognition</title><addtitle>Conscious Cogn</addtitle><description>•We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and high frequency items were both presented.
We sought to systematically investigate how participants subjectively classify the basis of their recognition memory judgments for low and high word frequency items. We found that participants more often reported rejection processes related to the increased perceived memorability for unstudied low word frequency items (relative to high word frequency items), rather than classifying their decision on a lack of familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated context variability and word frequency independently influenced the subjective classifications for correct rejections. Results of Experiment 3 revealed that these differences are dependent upon having experience with both low and high frequency items. Overall, these data suggest participants’ rejection of low frequency items is more strongly related to judgments of perceived memorability, but only when they are presented in the context of high frequency items. The results are discussed in relation to distinctiveness and expected memorability.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition memory</subject><subject>Rejection processes</subject><subject>Remember–Know</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Word frequency</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-8100</issn><issn>1090-2376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoMotlb_gciACL2Z8Zx8zGRuBClWCwVv9Dpk87Fm2E3WZGZL_73Z7qrgRb3KITzvyzk8hLxG6BCwfz91JkWT1h0FZB3SDmB4Qs4RRmgpG_qnh1mwViLAGXlRygQAcuDiOTmjnONIKT0n6ibuXZnDWs8hrpv5h2vKspqcmcPeNdntUp5Lk3wdHz5TbHY5GVeKK02ID4G7lG3js_u5uGjum23IOeXGeV8DL8kzrzfFvTq9F-T79advV1_a26-fb64-3raGS5xbXWEQxtiaoSioNNAD6gGkGMZR2tWKCvRSe8s5Zb30nHur0WombI1SdkEuj711u7pHmdU2FOM2Gx1dWorCgfdykLxn_0cFoGRyHA-tb_9Bp7TkWA-phRQZB0HZo5QAGClwKivFj5TJqZTsvNrlsNX5XiGog1E1qaNRdTCqkKpqtMbenMqX1dbZP6HfCivw7gToYvTGZx1NKH85ScceB6jchyPnqoZ9cFkVE6owZ0OuopRN4fFNfgF08cBJ</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Meeks, J. Thadeus</creator><creator>Knight, Justin B.</creator><creator>Brewer, Gene A.</creator><creator>Cook, Gabriel I.</creator><creator>Marsh, Richard L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect</title><author>Meeks, J. Thadeus ; Knight, Justin B. ; Brewer, Gene A. ; Cook, Gabriel I. ; Marsh, Richard L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-affe05ccdfec21528c0601a70857998dbb251f8afd442368f44fda1da35dffe23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition memory</topic><topic>Rejection processes</topic><topic>Remember–Know</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Word frequency</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meeks, J. Thadeus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Justin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Gene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Gabriel I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Consciousness and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meeks, J. Thadeus</au><au>Knight, Justin B.</au><au>Brewer, Gene A.</au><au>Cook, Gabriel I.</au><au>Marsh, Richard L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect</atitle><jtitle>Consciousness and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Conscious Cogn</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><spage>57</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>57-69</pages><issn>1053-8100</issn><eissn>1090-2376</eissn><abstract>•We examined the word frequency mirror effect.•We focused on the subjective memory classifications of correct rejections.•Low word frequency items elicited more judgments of higher perceived memorability.•This finding was independent of context variability.•This finding only occurred when low and high frequency items were both presented.
We sought to systematically investigate how participants subjectively classify the basis of their recognition memory judgments for low and high word frequency items. We found that participants more often reported rejection processes related to the increased perceived memorability for unstudied low word frequency items (relative to high word frequency items), rather than classifying their decision on a lack of familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern and demonstrated context variability and word frequency independently influenced the subjective classifications for correct rejections. Results of Experiment 3 revealed that these differences are dependent upon having experience with both low and high frequency items. Overall, these data suggest participants’ rejection of low frequency items is more strongly related to judgments of perceived memorability, but only when they are presented in the context of high frequency items. The results are discussed in relation to distinctiveness and expected memorability.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24419222</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8100 |
ispartof | Consciousness and cognition, 2014-02, Vol.24, p.57-69 |
issn | 1053-8100 1090-2376 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1746878463 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Learning. Memory Linguistics Memory Mental Recall - physiology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Random Allocation Recognition (Psychology) - physiology Recognition memory Rejection processes Remember–Know Vocabulary Word frequency Young Adult |
title | Investigating the subjective reports of rejection processes in the word frequency mirror effect |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T14%3A13%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20subjective%20reports%20of%20rejection%20processes%20in%20the%20word%20frequency%20mirror%20effect&rft.jtitle=Consciousness%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Meeks,%20J.%20Thadeus&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=57-69&rft.issn=1053-8100&rft.eissn=1090-2376&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.concog.2013.12.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3225906821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500920428&rft_id=info:pmid/24419222&rft_els_id=S1053810013001669&rfr_iscdi=true |