Repellent properties of celery, Apium graveolens L., compared with commercial repellents, against mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions
Summary In our search for new bioactive products against mosquito vectors, we reported the slightly larvicidal and adulticidal potency, but remarkable repellency of Apium graveolens both in laboratory and field conditions. Repellency of the ethanolic preparation of hexane‐extracted A. graveolens was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical medicine & international health 2005-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1190-1198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1198 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1190 |
container_title | Tropical medicine & international health |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Tuetun, Benjawan Choochote, Wej Kanjanapothi, Duangta Rattanachanpichai, Eumporn Chaithong, Udom Chaiwong, Prasong Jitpakdi, Atchariya Tippawangkosol, Pongsri Riyong, Duangrat Pitasawat, Benjawan |
description | Summary
In our search for new bioactive products against mosquito vectors, we reported the slightly larvicidal and adulticidal potency, but remarkable repellency of Apium graveolens both in laboratory and field conditions. Repellency of the ethanolic preparation of hexane‐extracted A. graveolens was, therefore, investigated and compared with those of 15 commercial mosquito repellents including the most widely used, DEET. Hexane‐extracted A. graveolens showed a significant degree of repellency in a dose‐dependent manner with vanillin added. Ethanolic A. graveolens formulations (10–25% with and without vanillin) provided 2–5 h protection against female Aedes aegypti. Repellency that derived from the most effective repellent, 25% of hexane‐extracted A. graveolens with the addition of 5% vanillin, was comparable to the value obtained from 25% of DEET with 5% vanillin added. Moreover, commercial repellents, except formulations of DEET, showed lower repellency than that of A. graveolens extract. When applied on human skin under field conditions, the hexane‐extracted A. graveolens plus 5% vanillin showed a strong repellent action against a wide range of mosquito species belonging to various genera. It had a protective effect against Aedes gardnerii, Aedes lineatopennis, Anopheles barbirostris, Armigeres subalbatus, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Culex gelidus, Culex vishnui group and Mansonia uniformis. The hexane‐extracted A. graveolens did not cause a burning sensation or dermal irritation when applied to human skin. No adverse effects were observed on the skin or other parts of the human volunteers’ body during 6 months of the study period or in the following 3 months, after which time observations ceased. Therefore, A. graveolens can be a potential candidate for use in the development of commercial repellents that may be an alternative to conventional synthetic chemicals, particularly in community vector control applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01500.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17453154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>924307211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5050-af3e89ac7867a870b7f571dec581c985cca760e0e4e90a1acfeea0e3d011fc2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQhyMEoqXwCshCgtMmjJPYzh44VBV_Ki1CQuVszTqT4pUTp3bSdl-DJ8bpLlTihC-25W9-mvGXZYxDwdN6vyt4JUVecSGLEkAUwAVAcf8kO_378PThDHlZKnmSvYhxBwB1LeTz7ITLUpaqlqfZr-80knM0TGwMfqQwWYrMd8yQo7BfsfPRzj27DnhLPmGRbYoVM74fMVDL7uz0c7n1FIxFx8KftLhieI12iBPrfbyZ7eRT7jy0FJjDrQ84-bBnOLSss-TaFDK0drJ-iC-zZx26SK-O-1n249PHq4sv-ebb58uL801uBAjIsauoWaNRjVTYKNiqTijekhENN-tGGINKAgHVtAbkaDoiBKpa4LwzpanOsneH3DT4zUxx0r2NaWyHA_k5aq5qkT6yTuCbf8Cdn8OQetMlF4KXdbNAzQEywccYqNNjsD2GveagF2l6pxc3enGjF2n6QZq-T6Wvj_nztqf2sfBoKQFvjwBGg64LOBgbHzlVViDWInEfDtyddbT_7wb01dfL5VT9BtrZtZ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215512484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repellent properties of celery, Apium graveolens L., compared with commercial repellents, against mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Tuetun, Benjawan ; Choochote, Wej ; Kanjanapothi, Duangta ; Rattanachanpichai, Eumporn ; Chaithong, Udom ; Chaiwong, Prasong ; Jitpakdi, Atchariya ; Tippawangkosol, Pongsri ; Riyong, Duangrat ; Pitasawat, Benjawan</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuetun, Benjawan ; Choochote, Wej ; Kanjanapothi, Duangta ; Rattanachanpichai, Eumporn ; Chaithong, Udom ; Chaiwong, Prasong ; Jitpakdi, Atchariya ; Tippawangkosol, Pongsri ; Riyong, Duangrat ; Pitasawat, Benjawan</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
In our search for new bioactive products against mosquito vectors, we reported the slightly larvicidal and adulticidal potency, but remarkable repellency of Apium graveolens both in laboratory and field conditions. Repellency of the ethanolic preparation of hexane‐extracted A. graveolens was, therefore, investigated and compared with those of 15 commercial mosquito repellents including the most widely used, DEET. Hexane‐extracted A. graveolens showed a significant degree of repellency in a dose‐dependent manner with vanillin added. Ethanolic A. graveolens formulations (10–25% with and without vanillin) provided 2–5 h protection against female Aedes aegypti. Repellency that derived from the most effective repellent, 25% of hexane‐extracted A. graveolens with the addition of 5% vanillin, was comparable to the value obtained from 25% of DEET with 5% vanillin added. Moreover, commercial repellents, except formulations of DEET, showed lower repellency than that of A. graveolens extract. When applied on human skin under field conditions, the hexane‐extracted A. graveolens plus 5% vanillin showed a strong repellent action against a wide range of mosquito species belonging to various genera. It had a protective effect against Aedes gardnerii, Aedes lineatopennis, Anopheles barbirostris, Armigeres subalbatus, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Culex gelidus, Culex vishnui group and Mansonia uniformis. The hexane‐extracted A. graveolens did not cause a burning sensation or dermal irritation when applied to human skin. No adverse effects were observed on the skin or other parts of the human volunteers’ body during 6 months of the study period or in the following 3 months, after which time observations ceased. Therefore, A. graveolens can be a potential candidate for use in the development of commercial repellents that may be an alternative to conventional synthetic chemicals, particularly in community vector control applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-2276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01500.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16262746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aedes - drug effects ; Aedes aegypti ; Aedes lineatopennis ; Animals ; Anopheles - drug effects ; Anopheles barbirostris ; Antioxidants - pharmacology ; Apium graveolens ; Apium graveolens - chemistry ; Armigeres subalbatus ; Benzaldehydes - pharmacology ; Biological and medical sciences ; celery ; commercial repellents ; Comparative studies ; Culex - drug effects ; Culex gelidus ; Culex tritaeniorhynchus ; Culex vishnui ; Culicidae ; Culicidae - drug effects ; DEET ; DEET - pharmacology ; Female ; field repellent bioassay ; General aspects ; Humans ; Insect Repellents - pharmacology ; Insecticides ; laboratory repellent bioassay ; Male ; Mansonia ; Medical sciences ; mosquito repellents ; Mosquitoes ; Plant Extracts - pharmacology ; Product testing</subject><ispartof>Tropical medicine & international health, 2005-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1190-1198</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5050-af3e89ac7867a870b7f571dec581c985cca760e0e4e90a1acfeea0e3d011fc2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5050-af3e89ac7867a870b7f571dec581c985cca760e0e4e90a1acfeea0e3d011fc2c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-3156.2005.01500.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-3156.2005.01500.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,1434,27929,27930,45579,45580,46414,46838</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17230595$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16262746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuetun, Benjawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choochote, Wej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanjanapothi, Duangta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rattanachanpichai, Eumporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaithong, Udom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaiwong, Prasong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitpakdi, Atchariya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tippawangkosol, Pongsri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riyong, Duangrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitasawat, Benjawan</creatorcontrib><title>Repellent properties of celery, Apium graveolens L., compared with commercial repellents, against mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions</title><title>Tropical medicine & international health</title><addtitle>Trop Med Int Health</addtitle><description>Summary
In our search for new bioactive products against mosquito vectors, we reported the slightly larvicidal and adulticidal potency, but remarkable repellency of Apium graveolens both in laboratory and field conditions. Repellency of the ethanolic preparation of hexane‐extracted A. graveolens was, therefore, investigated and compared with those of 15 commercial mosquito repellents including the most widely used, DEET. Hexane‐extracted A. graveolens showed a significant degree of repellency in a dose‐dependent manner with vanillin added. Ethanolic A. graveolens formulations (10–25% with and without vanillin) provided 2–5 h protection against female Aedes aegypti. Repellency that derived from the most effective repellent, 25% of hexane‐extracted A. graveolens with the addition of 5% vanillin, was comparable to the value obtained from 25% of DEET with 5% vanillin added. Moreover, commercial repellents, except formulations of DEET, showed lower repellency than that of A. graveolens extract. When applied on human skin under field conditions, the hexane‐extracted A. graveolens plus 5% vanillin showed a strong repellent action against a wide range of mosquito species belonging to various genera. It had a protective effect against Aedes gardnerii, Aedes lineatopennis, Anopheles barbirostris, Armigeres subalbatus, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Culex gelidus, Culex vishnui group and Mansonia uniformis. The hexane‐extracted A. graveolens did not cause a burning sensation or dermal irritation when applied to human skin. No adverse effects were observed on the skin or other parts of the human volunteers’ body during 6 months of the study period or in the following 3 months, after which time observations ceased. Therefore, A. graveolens can be a potential candidate for use in the development of commercial repellents that may be an alternative to conventional synthetic chemicals, particularly in community vector control applications.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aedes - drug effects</subject><subject>Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Aedes lineatopennis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anopheles - drug effects</subject><subject>Anopheles barbirostris</subject><subject>Antioxidants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Apium graveolens</subject><subject>Apium graveolens - chemistry</subject><subject>Armigeres subalbatus</subject><subject>Benzaldehydes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>celery</subject><subject>commercial repellents</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Culex - drug effects</subject><subject>Culex gelidus</subject><subject>Culex tritaeniorhynchus</subject><subject>Culex vishnui</subject><subject>Culicidae</subject><subject>Culicidae - drug effects</subject><subject>DEET</subject><subject>DEET - pharmacology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>field repellent bioassay</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insect Repellents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>laboratory repellent bioassay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mansonia</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>mosquito repellents</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Plant Extracts - pharmacology</subject><subject>Product testing</subject><issn>1360-2276</issn><issn>1365-3156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQhyMEoqXwCshCgtMmjJPYzh44VBV_Ki1CQuVszTqT4pUTp3bSdl-DJ8bpLlTihC-25W9-mvGXZYxDwdN6vyt4JUVecSGLEkAUwAVAcf8kO_378PThDHlZKnmSvYhxBwB1LeTz7ITLUpaqlqfZr-80knM0TGwMfqQwWYrMd8yQo7BfsfPRzj27DnhLPmGRbYoVM74fMVDL7uz0c7n1FIxFx8KftLhieI12iBPrfbyZ7eRT7jy0FJjDrQ84-bBnOLSss-TaFDK0drJ-iC-zZx26SK-O-1n249PHq4sv-ebb58uL801uBAjIsauoWaNRjVTYKNiqTijekhENN-tGGINKAgHVtAbkaDoiBKpa4LwzpanOsneH3DT4zUxx0r2NaWyHA_k5aq5qkT6yTuCbf8Cdn8OQetMlF4KXdbNAzQEywccYqNNjsD2GveagF2l6pxc3enGjF2n6QZq-T6Wvj_nztqf2sfBoKQFvjwBGg64LOBgbHzlVViDWInEfDtyddbT_7wb01dfL5VT9BtrZtZ8</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>Tuetun, Benjawan</creator><creator>Choochote, Wej</creator><creator>Kanjanapothi, Duangta</creator><creator>Rattanachanpichai, Eumporn</creator><creator>Chaithong, Udom</creator><creator>Chaiwong, Prasong</creator><creator>Jitpakdi, Atchariya</creator><creator>Tippawangkosol, Pongsri</creator><creator>Riyong, Duangrat</creator><creator>Pitasawat, Benjawan</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Repellent properties of celery, Apium graveolens L., compared with commercial repellents, against mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions</title><author>Tuetun, Benjawan ; Choochote, Wej ; Kanjanapothi, Duangta ; Rattanachanpichai, Eumporn ; Chaithong, Udom ; Chaiwong, Prasong ; Jitpakdi, Atchariya ; Tippawangkosol, Pongsri ; Riyong, Duangrat ; Pitasawat, Benjawan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5050-af3e89ac7867a870b7f571dec581c985cca760e0e4e90a1acfeea0e3d011fc2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aedes - drug effects</topic><topic>Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Aedes lineatopennis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anopheles - drug effects</topic><topic>Anopheles barbirostris</topic><topic>Antioxidants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Apium graveolens</topic><topic>Apium graveolens - chemistry</topic><topic>Armigeres subalbatus</topic><topic>Benzaldehydes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>celery</topic><topic>commercial repellents</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Culex - drug effects</topic><topic>Culex gelidus</topic><topic>Culex tritaeniorhynchus</topic><topic>Culex vishnui</topic><topic>Culicidae</topic><topic>Culicidae - drug effects</topic><topic>DEET</topic><topic>DEET - pharmacology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>field repellent bioassay</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insect Repellents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>laboratory repellent bioassay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mansonia</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>mosquito repellents</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Plant Extracts - pharmacology</topic><topic>Product testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuetun, Benjawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choochote, Wej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanjanapothi, Duangta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rattanachanpichai, Eumporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaithong, Udom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaiwong, Prasong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jitpakdi, Atchariya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tippawangkosol, Pongsri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riyong, Duangrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitasawat, Benjawan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Tropical medicine & international health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuetun, Benjawan</au><au>Choochote, Wej</au><au>Kanjanapothi, Duangta</au><au>Rattanachanpichai, Eumporn</au><au>Chaithong, Udom</au><au>Chaiwong, Prasong</au><au>Jitpakdi, Atchariya</au><au>Tippawangkosol, Pongsri</au><au>Riyong, Duangrat</au><au>Pitasawat, Benjawan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repellent properties of celery, Apium graveolens L., compared with commercial repellents, against mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions</atitle><jtitle>Tropical medicine & international health</jtitle><addtitle>Trop Med Int Health</addtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1190</spage><epage>1198</epage><pages>1190-1198</pages><issn>1360-2276</issn><eissn>1365-3156</eissn><abstract>Summary
In our search for new bioactive products against mosquito vectors, we reported the slightly larvicidal and adulticidal potency, but remarkable repellency of Apium graveolens both in laboratory and field conditions. Repellency of the ethanolic preparation of hexane‐extracted A. graveolens was, therefore, investigated and compared with those of 15 commercial mosquito repellents including the most widely used, DEET. Hexane‐extracted A. graveolens showed a significant degree of repellency in a dose‐dependent manner with vanillin added. Ethanolic A. graveolens formulations (10–25% with and without vanillin) provided 2–5 h protection against female Aedes aegypti. Repellency that derived from the most effective repellent, 25% of hexane‐extracted A. graveolens with the addition of 5% vanillin, was comparable to the value obtained from 25% of DEET with 5% vanillin added. Moreover, commercial repellents, except formulations of DEET, showed lower repellency than that of A. graveolens extract. When applied on human skin under field conditions, the hexane‐extracted A. graveolens plus 5% vanillin showed a strong repellent action against a wide range of mosquito species belonging to various genera. It had a protective effect against Aedes gardnerii, Aedes lineatopennis, Anopheles barbirostris, Armigeres subalbatus, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Culex gelidus, Culex vishnui group and Mansonia uniformis. The hexane‐extracted A. graveolens did not cause a burning sensation or dermal irritation when applied to human skin. No adverse effects were observed on the skin or other parts of the human volunteers’ body during 6 months of the study period or in the following 3 months, after which time observations ceased. Therefore, A. graveolens can be a potential candidate for use in the development of commercial repellents that may be an alternative to conventional synthetic chemicals, particularly in community vector control applications.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>16262746</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01500.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1360-2276 |
ispartof | Tropical medicine & international health, 2005-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1190-1198 |
issn | 1360-2276 1365-3156 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17453154 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aedes - drug effects Aedes aegypti Aedes lineatopennis Animals Anopheles - drug effects Anopheles barbirostris Antioxidants - pharmacology Apium graveolens Apium graveolens - chemistry Armigeres subalbatus Benzaldehydes - pharmacology Biological and medical sciences celery commercial repellents Comparative studies Culex - drug effects Culex gelidus Culex tritaeniorhynchus Culex vishnui Culicidae Culicidae - drug effects DEET DEET - pharmacology Female field repellent bioassay General aspects Humans Insect Repellents - pharmacology Insecticides laboratory repellent bioassay Male Mansonia Medical sciences mosquito repellents Mosquitoes Plant Extracts - pharmacology Product testing |
title | Repellent properties of celery, Apium graveolens L., compared with commercial repellents, against mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T01%3A59%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repellent%20properties%20of%20celery,%20Apium%20graveolens%20L.,%20compared%20with%20commercial%20repellents,%20against%20mosquitoes%20under%20laboratory%20and%20field%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20medicine%20&%20international%20health&rft.au=Tuetun,%20Benjawan&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1190&rft.epage=1198&rft.pages=1190-1198&rft.issn=1360-2276&rft.eissn=1365-3156&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01500.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E924307211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215512484&rft_id=info:pmid/16262746&rfr_iscdi=true |