Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?
Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oikos 2005-11, Vol.111 (2), p.279-290 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 290 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Oikos |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | McAbendroth, L. Ramsay, P. M. Foggo, A. Rundle, S. D. Bilton, D. T. |
description | Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stands of mixed species composition, making estimates of structural complexity difficult to obtain. Here we use fractal indices to describe the structural complexity of mixed stands of aquatic macrophytes, and these are employed to examine the effects of habitat complexity on the composition of free-living invertebrate assemblages that utilise the habitat in three dimensions. Macrophytes and associated invertebrates were sampled from shallow ponds in southwest England, and rapid digital image analysis was used to quantify the fractal complexity of all plant species recorded, allowing the complexity of vegetation stands to be reconstructed based on their species composition. Fractal indices were found to be significantly related to both invertebrate biomass-body size scaling and overall invertebrate biomass; more complex stands of macrophytes contained a greater number of small animals. Habitat complexity was unrelated to invertebrate taxon richness and macrophyte surface area and species richness were not correlated with any of the invertebrate community parameters. The biomass-body size scaling relationship of lentic macroinvertebrates matched those predicted by models incorporating both allometric scaling of resource use and the fractal dimension of a habitat, suggesting that both habitat fractal complexity and allometry may control density-body size scaling in lentic macroinvertebrate communities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13804.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17448956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3548697</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3548697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5664-639119966f9fc0963ef1e169df063dc4b7f4623afcb57bed5c764750354ab0753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-P1CAchonRxHH1G3ggJnqy9UehMFw07v-Nm92Du_FIKKWR2pZZ6OxO_fTS7WZMPMkFwvvwQh4QwgRyksanNgegkJFCyrwAKHNC18Dy3TO0IhwgAwH8OVrtoZfoVYwtAAgh2ArZY28j7rUJfvNzGi1ugjaj7rDx_aazOzdOuA7u3mI33Nsw2iroRNVpJ8QUfsSV872OEeuhxpWvJxzd7xmIY3DVdnR-iF9eoxeN7qJ98zQfoNvTk5uj8-zy-uzi6OtlZkrOWcapJERKzhvZGJCc2oZYwmXdAKe1YZVoGC-obkxVisrWpRGciRJoyXQFoqQH6MPSuwn-bmvjqHoXje06PVi_jYoIxtay5Al89w_Y-m0Y0ttUQQjjkhOaoPUCJTkxBtuoTXC9DpMioGb5qlWzVzV7VbN89Shf7dLR90_9OhrdJamDcfHveVGwdAtL3OeFe3Cdnf67X11ffHtcpoK3S0EbRx_2BcnImkuR4myJ03fY3T7W4ZfigopS_bg6U4fylH-_Oj9Wh_QPxCuxEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211469613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>McAbendroth, L. ; Ramsay, P. M. ; Foggo, A. ; Rundle, S. D. ; Bilton, D. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>McAbendroth, L. ; Ramsay, P. M. ; Foggo, A. ; Rundle, S. D. ; Bilton, D. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stands of mixed species composition, making estimates of structural complexity difficult to obtain. Here we use fractal indices to describe the structural complexity of mixed stands of aquatic macrophytes, and these are employed to examine the effects of habitat complexity on the composition of free-living invertebrate assemblages that utilise the habitat in three dimensions. Macrophytes and associated invertebrates were sampled from shallow ponds in southwest England, and rapid digital image analysis was used to quantify the fractal complexity of all plant species recorded, allowing the complexity of vegetation stands to be reconstructed based on their species composition. Fractal indices were found to be significantly related to both invertebrate biomass-body size scaling and overall invertebrate biomass; more complex stands of macrophytes contained a greater number of small animals. Habitat complexity was unrelated to invertebrate taxon richness and macrophyte surface area and species richness were not correlated with any of the invertebrate community parameters. The biomass-body size scaling relationship of lentic macroinvertebrates matched those predicted by models incorporating both allometric scaling of resource use and the fractal dimension of a habitat, suggesting that both habitat fractal complexity and allometry may control density-body size scaling in lentic macroinvertebrate communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13804.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OIKSAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Copenhagen: Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Body size ; Flowers & plants ; Fractal dimensions ; Fractals ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitats ; Invertebrata ; Invertebrates ; Macroinvertebrates ; Macrophytes ; Magnification ; Marine ecology ; Plants ; Synecology ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2005-11, Vol.111 (2), p.279-290</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Oikos</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>OIKOS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5664-639119966f9fc0963ef1e169df063dc4b7f4623afcb57bed5c764750354ab0753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5664-639119966f9fc0963ef1e169df063dc4b7f4623afcb57bed5c764750354ab0753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3548697$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3548697$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17241464$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAbendroth, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foggo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rundle, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilton, D. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?</title><title>Oikos</title><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><description>Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stands of mixed species composition, making estimates of structural complexity difficult to obtain. Here we use fractal indices to describe the structural complexity of mixed stands of aquatic macrophytes, and these are employed to examine the effects of habitat complexity on the composition of free-living invertebrate assemblages that utilise the habitat in three dimensions. Macrophytes and associated invertebrates were sampled from shallow ponds in southwest England, and rapid digital image analysis was used to quantify the fractal complexity of all plant species recorded, allowing the complexity of vegetation stands to be reconstructed based on their species composition. Fractal indices were found to be significantly related to both invertebrate biomass-body size scaling and overall invertebrate biomass; more complex stands of macrophytes contained a greater number of small animals. Habitat complexity was unrelated to invertebrate taxon richness and macrophyte surface area and species richness were not correlated with any of the invertebrate community parameters. The biomass-body size scaling relationship of lentic macroinvertebrates matched those predicted by models incorporating both allometric scaling of resource use and the fractal dimension of a habitat, suggesting that both habitat fractal complexity and allometry may control density-body size scaling in lentic macroinvertebrate communities.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Fractal dimensions</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Invertebrata</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Magnification</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU-P1CAchonRxHH1G3ggJnqy9UehMFw07v-Nm92Du_FIKKWR2pZZ6OxO_fTS7WZMPMkFwvvwQh4QwgRyksanNgegkJFCyrwAKHNC18Dy3TO0IhwgAwH8OVrtoZfoVYwtAAgh2ArZY28j7rUJfvNzGi1ugjaj7rDx_aazOzdOuA7u3mI33Nsw2iroRNVpJ8QUfsSV872OEeuhxpWvJxzd7xmIY3DVdnR-iF9eoxeN7qJ98zQfoNvTk5uj8-zy-uzi6OtlZkrOWcapJERKzhvZGJCc2oZYwmXdAKe1YZVoGC-obkxVisrWpRGciRJoyXQFoqQH6MPSuwn-bmvjqHoXje06PVi_jYoIxtay5Al89w_Y-m0Y0ttUQQjjkhOaoPUCJTkxBtuoTXC9DpMioGb5qlWzVzV7VbN89Shf7dLR90_9OhrdJamDcfHveVGwdAtL3OeFe3Cdnf67X11ffHtcpoK3S0EbRx_2BcnImkuR4myJ03fY3T7W4ZfigopS_bg6U4fylH-_Oj9Wh_QPxCuxEQ</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>McAbendroth, L.</creator><creator>Ramsay, P. M.</creator><creator>Foggo, A.</creator><creator>Rundle, S. D.</creator><creator>Bilton, D. T.</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?</title><author>McAbendroth, L. ; Ramsay, P. M. ; Foggo, A. ; Rundle, S. D. ; Bilton, D. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5664-639119966f9fc0963ef1e169df063dc4b7f4623afcb57bed5c764750354ab0753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Fractal dimensions</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Invertebrata</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Magnification</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAbendroth, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foggo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rundle, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilton, D. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAbendroth, L.</au><au>Ramsay, P. M.</au><au>Foggo, A.</au><au>Rundle, S. D.</au><au>Bilton, D. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>279-290</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><coden>OIKSAA</coden><abstract>Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stands of mixed species composition, making estimates of structural complexity difficult to obtain. Here we use fractal indices to describe the structural complexity of mixed stands of aquatic macrophytes, and these are employed to examine the effects of habitat complexity on the composition of free-living invertebrate assemblages that utilise the habitat in three dimensions. Macrophytes and associated invertebrates were sampled from shallow ponds in southwest England, and rapid digital image analysis was used to quantify the fractal complexity of all plant species recorded, allowing the complexity of vegetation stands to be reconstructed based on their species composition. Fractal indices were found to be significantly related to both invertebrate biomass-body size scaling and overall invertebrate biomass; more complex stands of macrophytes contained a greater number of small animals. Habitat complexity was unrelated to invertebrate taxon richness and macrophyte surface area and species richness were not correlated with any of the invertebrate community parameters. The biomass-body size scaling relationship of lentic macroinvertebrates matched those predicted by models incorporating both allometric scaling of resource use and the fractal dimension of a habitat, suggesting that both habitat fractal complexity and allometry may control density-body size scaling in lentic macroinvertebrate communities.</abstract><cop>Copenhagen</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers</pub><doi>10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13804.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-1299 |
ispartof | Oikos, 2005-11, Vol.111 (2), p.279-290 |
issn | 0030-1299 1600-0706 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17448956 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Biomass Body size Flowers & plants Fractal dimensions Fractals Fresh water ecosystems Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitats Invertebrata Invertebrates Macroinvertebrates Macrophytes Magnification Marine ecology Plants Synecology Vegetation |
title | Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20macrophyte%20fractal%20complexity%20drive%20invertebrate%20diversity,%20biomass%20and%20body%20size%20distributions?&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=McAbendroth,%20L.&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=279-290&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft.coden=OIKSAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13804.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3548697%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211469613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3548697&rfr_iscdi=true |