Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?

Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oikos 2005-11, Vol.111 (2), p.279-290
Hauptverfasser: McAbendroth, L., Ramsay, P. M., Foggo, A., Rundle, S. D., Bilton, D. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 290
container_issue 2
container_start_page 279
container_title Oikos
container_volume 111
creator McAbendroth, L.
Ramsay, P. M.
Foggo, A.
Rundle, S. D.
Bilton, D. T.
description Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stands of mixed species composition, making estimates of structural complexity difficult to obtain. Here we use fractal indices to describe the structural complexity of mixed stands of aquatic macrophytes, and these are employed to examine the effects of habitat complexity on the composition of free-living invertebrate assemblages that utilise the habitat in three dimensions. Macrophytes and associated invertebrates were sampled from shallow ponds in southwest England, and rapid digital image analysis was used to quantify the fractal complexity of all plant species recorded, allowing the complexity of vegetation stands to be reconstructed based on their species composition. Fractal indices were found to be significantly related to both invertebrate biomass-body size scaling and overall invertebrate biomass; more complex stands of macrophytes contained a greater number of small animals. Habitat complexity was unrelated to invertebrate taxon richness and macrophyte surface area and species richness were not correlated with any of the invertebrate community parameters. The biomass-body size scaling relationship of lentic macroinvertebrates matched those predicted by models incorporating both allometric scaling of resource use and the fractal dimension of a habitat, suggesting that both habitat fractal complexity and allometry may control density-body size scaling in lentic macroinvertebrate communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13804.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17448956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3548697</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3548697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5664-639119966f9fc0963ef1e169df063dc4b7f4623afcb57bed5c764750354ab0753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-P1CAchonRxHH1G3ggJnqy9UehMFw07v-Nm92Du_FIKKWR2pZZ6OxO_fTS7WZMPMkFwvvwQh4QwgRyksanNgegkJFCyrwAKHNC18Dy3TO0IhwgAwH8OVrtoZfoVYwtAAgh2ArZY28j7rUJfvNzGi1ugjaj7rDx_aazOzdOuA7u3mI33Nsw2iroRNVpJ8QUfsSV872OEeuhxpWvJxzd7xmIY3DVdnR-iF9eoxeN7qJ98zQfoNvTk5uj8-zy-uzi6OtlZkrOWcapJERKzhvZGJCc2oZYwmXdAKe1YZVoGC-obkxVisrWpRGciRJoyXQFoqQH6MPSuwn-bmvjqHoXje06PVi_jYoIxtay5Al89w_Y-m0Y0ttUQQjjkhOaoPUCJTkxBtuoTXC9DpMioGb5qlWzVzV7VbN89Shf7dLR90_9OhrdJamDcfHveVGwdAtL3OeFe3Cdnf67X11ffHtcpoK3S0EbRx_2BcnImkuR4myJ03fY3T7W4ZfigopS_bg6U4fylH-_Oj9Wh_QPxCuxEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211469613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>McAbendroth, L. ; Ramsay, P. M. ; Foggo, A. ; Rundle, S. D. ; Bilton, D. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>McAbendroth, L. ; Ramsay, P. M. ; Foggo, A. ; Rundle, S. D. ; Bilton, D. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stands of mixed species composition, making estimates of structural complexity difficult to obtain. Here we use fractal indices to describe the structural complexity of mixed stands of aquatic macrophytes, and these are employed to examine the effects of habitat complexity on the composition of free-living invertebrate assemblages that utilise the habitat in three dimensions. Macrophytes and associated invertebrates were sampled from shallow ponds in southwest England, and rapid digital image analysis was used to quantify the fractal complexity of all plant species recorded, allowing the complexity of vegetation stands to be reconstructed based on their species composition. Fractal indices were found to be significantly related to both invertebrate biomass-body size scaling and overall invertebrate biomass; more complex stands of macrophytes contained a greater number of small animals. Habitat complexity was unrelated to invertebrate taxon richness and macrophyte surface area and species richness were not correlated with any of the invertebrate community parameters. The biomass-body size scaling relationship of lentic macroinvertebrates matched those predicted by models incorporating both allometric scaling of resource use and the fractal dimension of a habitat, suggesting that both habitat fractal complexity and allometry may control density-body size scaling in lentic macroinvertebrate communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13804.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OIKSAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Copenhagen: Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Body size ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Fractal dimensions ; Fractals ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitats ; Invertebrata ; Invertebrates ; Macroinvertebrates ; Macrophytes ; Magnification ; Marine ecology ; Plants ; Synecology ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2005-11, Vol.111 (2), p.279-290</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Oikos</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>OIKOS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5664-639119966f9fc0963ef1e169df063dc4b7f4623afcb57bed5c764750354ab0753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5664-639119966f9fc0963ef1e169df063dc4b7f4623afcb57bed5c764750354ab0753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3548697$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3548697$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17241464$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAbendroth, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foggo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rundle, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilton, D. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?</title><title>Oikos</title><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><description>Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stands of mixed species composition, making estimates of structural complexity difficult to obtain. Here we use fractal indices to describe the structural complexity of mixed stands of aquatic macrophytes, and these are employed to examine the effects of habitat complexity on the composition of free-living invertebrate assemblages that utilise the habitat in three dimensions. Macrophytes and associated invertebrates were sampled from shallow ponds in southwest England, and rapid digital image analysis was used to quantify the fractal complexity of all plant species recorded, allowing the complexity of vegetation stands to be reconstructed based on their species composition. Fractal indices were found to be significantly related to both invertebrate biomass-body size scaling and overall invertebrate biomass; more complex stands of macrophytes contained a greater number of small animals. Habitat complexity was unrelated to invertebrate taxon richness and macrophyte surface area and species richness were not correlated with any of the invertebrate community parameters. The biomass-body size scaling relationship of lentic macroinvertebrates matched those predicted by models incorporating both allometric scaling of resource use and the fractal dimension of a habitat, suggesting that both habitat fractal complexity and allometry may control density-body size scaling in lentic macroinvertebrate communities.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Fractal dimensions</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Invertebrata</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Magnification</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU-P1CAchonRxHH1G3ggJnqy9UehMFw07v-Nm92Du_FIKKWR2pZZ6OxO_fTS7WZMPMkFwvvwQh4QwgRyksanNgegkJFCyrwAKHNC18Dy3TO0IhwgAwH8OVrtoZfoVYwtAAgh2ArZY28j7rUJfvNzGi1ugjaj7rDx_aazOzdOuA7u3mI33Nsw2iroRNVpJ8QUfsSV872OEeuhxpWvJxzd7xmIY3DVdnR-iF9eoxeN7qJ98zQfoNvTk5uj8-zy-uzi6OtlZkrOWcapJERKzhvZGJCc2oZYwmXdAKe1YZVoGC-obkxVisrWpRGciRJoyXQFoqQH6MPSuwn-bmvjqHoXje06PVi_jYoIxtay5Al89w_Y-m0Y0ttUQQjjkhOaoPUCJTkxBtuoTXC9DpMioGb5qlWzVzV7VbN89Shf7dLR90_9OhrdJamDcfHveVGwdAtL3OeFe3Cdnf67X11ffHtcpoK3S0EbRx_2BcnImkuR4myJ03fY3T7W4ZfigopS_bg6U4fylH-_Oj9Wh_QPxCuxEQ</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>McAbendroth, L.</creator><creator>Ramsay, P. M.</creator><creator>Foggo, A.</creator><creator>Rundle, S. D.</creator><creator>Bilton, D. T.</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?</title><author>McAbendroth, L. ; Ramsay, P. M. ; Foggo, A. ; Rundle, S. D. ; Bilton, D. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5664-639119966f9fc0963ef1e169df063dc4b7f4623afcb57bed5c764750354ab0753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Fractal dimensions</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Invertebrata</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Magnification</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAbendroth, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foggo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rundle, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilton, D. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAbendroth, L.</au><au>Ramsay, P. M.</au><au>Foggo, A.</au><au>Rundle, S. D.</au><au>Bilton, D. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>279-290</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><coden>OIKSAA</coden><abstract>Habitat structure is one of the fundamental factors determining the distribution of organisms at all spatial scales, and vegetation is of primary importance in shaping the structural environment for invertebrates in many systems. In the majority of biotopes, invertebrates live within vegetation stands of mixed species composition, making estimates of structural complexity difficult to obtain. Here we use fractal indices to describe the structural complexity of mixed stands of aquatic macrophytes, and these are employed to examine the effects of habitat complexity on the composition of free-living invertebrate assemblages that utilise the habitat in three dimensions. Macrophytes and associated invertebrates were sampled from shallow ponds in southwest England, and rapid digital image analysis was used to quantify the fractal complexity of all plant species recorded, allowing the complexity of vegetation stands to be reconstructed based on their species composition. Fractal indices were found to be significantly related to both invertebrate biomass-body size scaling and overall invertebrate biomass; more complex stands of macrophytes contained a greater number of small animals. Habitat complexity was unrelated to invertebrate taxon richness and macrophyte surface area and species richness were not correlated with any of the invertebrate community parameters. The biomass-body size scaling relationship of lentic macroinvertebrates matched those predicted by models incorporating both allometric scaling of resource use and the fractal dimension of a habitat, suggesting that both habitat fractal complexity and allometry may control density-body size scaling in lentic macroinvertebrate communities.</abstract><cop>Copenhagen</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers</pub><doi>10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13804.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-1299
ispartof Oikos, 2005-11, Vol.111 (2), p.279-290
issn 0030-1299
1600-0706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17448956
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Body size
Flowers & plants
Fractal dimensions
Fractals
Fresh water ecosystems
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitats
Invertebrata
Invertebrates
Macroinvertebrates
Macrophytes
Magnification
Marine ecology
Plants
Synecology
Vegetation
title Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20macrophyte%20fractal%20complexity%20drive%20invertebrate%20diversity,%20biomass%20and%20body%20size%20distributions?&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=McAbendroth,%20L.&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=279-290&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft.coden=OIKSAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13804.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3548697%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211469613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3548697&rfr_iscdi=true