Strategy and industry approach to managing the QoI resistance challenge

Resistance management (RM) issues are handled through volunteer compliance of guidelines developed within the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) and the NA-FRAC QoI Working Group. Representatives from companies that are either developing or maintaining registrations for QoI fungicides writ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phytopathology 2005-06, Vol.95 (6)
1. Verfasser: Kaiser, R P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Phytopathology
container_volume 95
creator Kaiser, R P
description Resistance management (RM) issues are handled through volunteer compliance of guidelines developed within the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) and the NA-FRAC QoI Working Group. Representatives from companies that are either developing or maintaining registrations for QoI fungicides write specific guidelines for each crop. Factors considered when proposing guidelines are: theoretical measure of resistance risk, propensity for resistance based on models and or history of resistance development by the pathogen, spectrum of activity and the chemical/physical properties of the compounds, number and timing of fungicide sprays commonly used on a crop, and projected cost of the products. Examples of the interaction of these factors are found in sugar beets where at planting and foliar applications target different pathogens, peanuts where guidelines differ based on the projected number of sprays, and potatoes where product mixtures are common. Guidelines must be simple, clear, concise, and easy to apply in real life situations or they will not be utilized by growers. RM issues yet to be resolved include the role of government in writing and enforcing RM, expanding guidelines to specialty crops, and adoption of guidelines by generic producers when a chemical class is no longer covered by patents.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17448909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17448909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_174489093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLsOgjAUQDtoIj7-4U5uJCWgwGx8jUYHN3JTrqWmtNhbBv9eBz_A6eQkJ2ciEinzLK2L-j4Tc-anlLKsNttEHK8xYCT9BnQtGNeOHMNXhiF4VB1EDz061MZpiB3BxZ8hEBuO6BSB6tBacpqWYvpAy7T6cSHWh_1td0q_n9dIHJvesCJr0ZEfucnKoqhqWed_hx9siD6_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17448909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategy and industry approach to managing the QoI resistance challenge</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Kaiser, R P</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, R P</creatorcontrib><description>Resistance management (RM) issues are handled through volunteer compliance of guidelines developed within the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) and the NA-FRAC QoI Working Group. Representatives from companies that are either developing or maintaining registrations for QoI fungicides write specific guidelines for each crop. Factors considered when proposing guidelines are: theoretical measure of resistance risk, propensity for resistance based on models and or history of resistance development by the pathogen, spectrum of activity and the chemical/physical properties of the compounds, number and timing of fungicide sprays commonly used on a crop, and projected cost of the products. Examples of the interaction of these factors are found in sugar beets where at planting and foliar applications target different pathogens, peanuts where guidelines differ based on the projected number of sprays, and potatoes where product mixtures are common. Guidelines must be simple, clear, concise, and easy to apply in real life situations or they will not be utilized by growers. RM issues yet to be resolved include the role of government in writing and enforcing RM, expanding guidelines to specialty crops, and adoption of guidelines by generic producers when a chemical class is no longer covered by patents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-949X</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Solanum tuberosum</subject><ispartof>Phytopathology, 2005-06, Vol.95 (6)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, R P</creatorcontrib><title>Strategy and industry approach to managing the QoI resistance challenge</title><title>Phytopathology</title><description>Resistance management (RM) issues are handled through volunteer compliance of guidelines developed within the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) and the NA-FRAC QoI Working Group. Representatives from companies that are either developing or maintaining registrations for QoI fungicides write specific guidelines for each crop. Factors considered when proposing guidelines are: theoretical measure of resistance risk, propensity for resistance based on models and or history of resistance development by the pathogen, spectrum of activity and the chemical/physical properties of the compounds, number and timing of fungicide sprays commonly used on a crop, and projected cost of the products. Examples of the interaction of these factors are found in sugar beets where at planting and foliar applications target different pathogens, peanuts where guidelines differ based on the projected number of sprays, and potatoes where product mixtures are common. Guidelines must be simple, clear, concise, and easy to apply in real life situations or they will not be utilized by growers. RM issues yet to be resolved include the role of government in writing and enforcing RM, expanding guidelines to specialty crops, and adoption of guidelines by generic producers when a chemical class is no longer covered by patents.</description><subject>Solanum tuberosum</subject><issn>0031-949X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjLsOgjAUQDtoIj7-4U5uJCWgwGx8jUYHN3JTrqWmtNhbBv9eBz_A6eQkJ2ciEinzLK2L-j4Tc-anlLKsNttEHK8xYCT9BnQtGNeOHMNXhiF4VB1EDz061MZpiB3BxZ8hEBuO6BSB6tBacpqWYvpAy7T6cSHWh_1td0q_n9dIHJvesCJr0ZEfucnKoqhqWed_hx9siD6_</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>Kaiser, R P</creator><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>Strategy and industry approach to managing the QoI resistance challenge</title><author>Kaiser, R P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_174489093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Solanum tuberosum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, R P</creatorcontrib><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaiser, R P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategy and industry approach to managing the QoI resistance challenge</atitle><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>0031-949X</issn><abstract>Resistance management (RM) issues are handled through volunteer compliance of guidelines developed within the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) and the NA-FRAC QoI Working Group. Representatives from companies that are either developing or maintaining registrations for QoI fungicides write specific guidelines for each crop. Factors considered when proposing guidelines are: theoretical measure of resistance risk, propensity for resistance based on models and or history of resistance development by the pathogen, spectrum of activity and the chemical/physical properties of the compounds, number and timing of fungicide sprays commonly used on a crop, and projected cost of the products. Examples of the interaction of these factors are found in sugar beets where at planting and foliar applications target different pathogens, peanuts where guidelines differ based on the projected number of sprays, and potatoes where product mixtures are common. Guidelines must be simple, clear, concise, and easy to apply in real life situations or they will not be utilized by growers. RM issues yet to be resolved include the role of government in writing and enforcing RM, expanding guidelines to specialty crops, and adoption of guidelines by generic producers when a chemical class is no longer covered by patents.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-949X
ispartof Phytopathology, 2005-06, Vol.95 (6)
issn 0031-949X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17448909
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
subjects Solanum tuberosum
title Strategy and industry approach to managing the QoI resistance challenge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A59%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategy%20and%20industry%20approach%20to%20managing%20the%20QoI%20resistance%20challenge&rft.jtitle=Phytopathology&rft.au=Kaiser,%20R%20P&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=0031-949X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E17448909%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17448909&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true