Evaluation of solar sludge drying alternatives by costs and area requirements

Thermal drying is a common method to reach above 90% dry solids content (DS) in sludge. However, thermal drying requires high amount of energy and can be expensive. A greenhouse solar dryer (GSD) can be a cost-effective substitute if the drying performance, which is typically 70% DS, can be increase...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2015-10, Vol.82, p.47-57
Hauptverfasser: Kurt, Mayıs, Aksoy, Ayşegül, Sanin, F. Dilek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue
container_start_page 47
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 82
creator Kurt, Mayıs
Aksoy, Ayşegül
Sanin, F. Dilek
description Thermal drying is a common method to reach above 90% dry solids content (DS) in sludge. However, thermal drying requires high amount of energy and can be expensive. A greenhouse solar dryer (GSD) can be a cost-effective substitute if the drying performance, which is typically 70% DS, can be increased by additional heat. In this study feasibility of GSD supported with solar panels is evaluated as an alternative to thermal dryers to reach 90% DS. Evaluations are based on capital and O&M costs as well as area requirements for 37 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with various sludge production rates. Costs for the supported GSD system are compared to that of conventional and co-generation thermal dryers. To calculate the optimal costs associated with the drying system, an optimization model was developed in which area limitation was a constraint. Results showed that total cost was minimum when the DS in the GSD (DSm,i) was equal to the maximum attainable value (70% DS). On average, 58% of the total cost and 38% of total required area were associated with the GSD. Variations in costs for 37 WWTPs were due to differences in initial DS (DSi,i) and sludge production rates, indicating the importance of dewatering to lower drying costs. For large plants, GSD supported with solar panels provided savings in total costs especially in long term when compared to conventional and co-generation thermal dryers. [Display omitted] •GSD supported with solar panels are cost-effective compared to thermal dryers.•GSD with solar panels are suggested for small and medium sized WWTPs.•Sludge production rates and initial dry solids content affect area and costs.•Available area for installation impacts feasibility.•Drying costs are high for high sludge production rate and low initial DS.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1744684669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135415002936</els_id><sourcerecordid>1712775446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-7c84befbc721d546151712b46f3154d48072f579bd1e2dca7e3f19366832fbae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOj7-gUiWblrzTrsRZPAFihtdhzS5lQ59aNKOzL83Q9WlDBy4cPnuPXAOQueU5JRQdbXKv-wYIOaMUJkTkcT30IIWusyYEMU-WpC0yiiX4ggdx7gihDDGy0N0xBRhUhGyQM-3a9tOdmyGHg81jkNrA47t5N8B-7Bp-nds2xFCn5A1RFxtsBviGLHtPbYBLA7wOTUBOujHeIoOattGOPuZJ-jt7vZ1-ZA9vdw_Lm-eMicUHTPtClFBXTnNqJdpJammrBKq5lQKLwqiWS11WXkKzDurgde05EoVnNWVBX6CLue_H2H4nCCOpmuig7a1PQxTNFQLoQqhVLkDSpnWMvE7oERLWZRaJ1TMqAtDjAFq8xGazoaNocRs6zErM9djtvUYIpJ4Orv4cZiqDvzf0W8fCbieAUjprRsIJroGegc-RexG44fmf4dvJEiiKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1707558977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of solar sludge drying alternatives by costs and area requirements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kurt, Mayıs ; Aksoy, Ayşegül ; Sanin, F. Dilek</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Mayıs ; Aksoy, Ayşegül ; Sanin, F. Dilek</creatorcontrib><description>Thermal drying is a common method to reach above 90% dry solids content (DS) in sludge. However, thermal drying requires high amount of energy and can be expensive. A greenhouse solar dryer (GSD) can be a cost-effective substitute if the drying performance, which is typically 70% DS, can be increased by additional heat. In this study feasibility of GSD supported with solar panels is evaluated as an alternative to thermal dryers to reach 90% DS. Evaluations are based on capital and O&amp;M costs as well as area requirements for 37 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with various sludge production rates. Costs for the supported GSD system are compared to that of conventional and co-generation thermal dryers. To calculate the optimal costs associated with the drying system, an optimization model was developed in which area limitation was a constraint. Results showed that total cost was minimum when the DS in the GSD (DSm,i) was equal to the maximum attainable value (70% DS). On average, 58% of the total cost and 38% of total required area were associated with the GSD. Variations in costs for 37 WWTPs were due to differences in initial DS (DSi,i) and sludge production rates, indicating the importance of dewatering to lower drying costs. For large plants, GSD supported with solar panels provided savings in total costs especially in long term when compared to conventional and co-generation thermal dryers. [Display omitted] •GSD supported with solar panels are cost-effective compared to thermal dryers.•GSD with solar panels are suggested for small and medium sized WWTPs.•Sludge production rates and initial dry solids content affect area and costs.•Available area for installation impacts feasibility.•Drying costs are high for high sludge production rate and low initial DS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26025600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Costs ; Desiccation - methods ; Dewatering ; Driers ; Drying ; Drying cost ; Feasibility Studies ; Greenhouse solar dryer ; Greenhouses ; Optimization ; Panels ; Sewage - chemistry ; Sludge ; Sludge drying ; Solar Energy - economics ; Solar panel ; Thermal dryer ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - economics ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2015-10, Vol.82, p.47-57</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-7c84befbc721d546151712b46f3154d48072f579bd1e2dca7e3f19366832fbae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-7c84befbc721d546151712b46f3154d48072f579bd1e2dca7e3f19366832fbae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26025600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Mayıs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksoy, Ayşegül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanin, F. Dilek</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of solar sludge drying alternatives by costs and area requirements</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Thermal drying is a common method to reach above 90% dry solids content (DS) in sludge. However, thermal drying requires high amount of energy and can be expensive. A greenhouse solar dryer (GSD) can be a cost-effective substitute if the drying performance, which is typically 70% DS, can be increased by additional heat. In this study feasibility of GSD supported with solar panels is evaluated as an alternative to thermal dryers to reach 90% DS. Evaluations are based on capital and O&amp;M costs as well as area requirements for 37 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with various sludge production rates. Costs for the supported GSD system are compared to that of conventional and co-generation thermal dryers. To calculate the optimal costs associated with the drying system, an optimization model was developed in which area limitation was a constraint. Results showed that total cost was minimum when the DS in the GSD (DSm,i) was equal to the maximum attainable value (70% DS). On average, 58% of the total cost and 38% of total required area were associated with the GSD. Variations in costs for 37 WWTPs were due to differences in initial DS (DSi,i) and sludge production rates, indicating the importance of dewatering to lower drying costs. For large plants, GSD supported with solar panels provided savings in total costs especially in long term when compared to conventional and co-generation thermal dryers. [Display omitted] •GSD supported with solar panels are cost-effective compared to thermal dryers.•GSD with solar panels are suggested for small and medium sized WWTPs.•Sludge production rates and initial dry solids content affect area and costs.•Available area for installation impacts feasibility.•Drying costs are high for high sludge production rate and low initial DS.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Desiccation - methods</subject><subject>Dewatering</subject><subject>Driers</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Drying cost</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Greenhouse solar dryer</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Panels</subject><subject>Sewage - chemistry</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sludge drying</subject><subject>Solar Energy - economics</subject><subject>Solar panel</subject><subject>Thermal dryer</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - economics</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLxDAUhYMoOj7-gUiWblrzTrsRZPAFihtdhzS5lQ59aNKOzL83Q9WlDBy4cPnuPXAOQueU5JRQdbXKv-wYIOaMUJkTkcT30IIWusyYEMU-WpC0yiiX4ggdx7gihDDGy0N0xBRhUhGyQM-3a9tOdmyGHg81jkNrA47t5N8B-7Bp-nds2xFCn5A1RFxtsBviGLHtPbYBLA7wOTUBOujHeIoOattGOPuZJ-jt7vZ1-ZA9vdw_Lm-eMicUHTPtClFBXTnNqJdpJammrBKq5lQKLwqiWS11WXkKzDurgde05EoVnNWVBX6CLue_H2H4nCCOpmuig7a1PQxTNFQLoQqhVLkDSpnWMvE7oERLWZRaJ1TMqAtDjAFq8xGazoaNocRs6zErM9djtvUYIpJ4Orv4cZiqDvzf0W8fCbieAUjprRsIJroGegc-RexG44fmf4dvJEiiKw</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Kurt, Mayıs</creator><creator>Aksoy, Ayşegül</creator><creator>Sanin, F. Dilek</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Evaluation of solar sludge drying alternatives by costs and area requirements</title><author>Kurt, Mayıs ; Aksoy, Ayşegül ; Sanin, F. Dilek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-7c84befbc721d546151712b46f3154d48072f579bd1e2dca7e3f19366832fbae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Desiccation - methods</topic><topic>Dewatering</topic><topic>Driers</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Drying cost</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Greenhouse solar dryer</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Panels</topic><topic>Sewage - chemistry</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sludge drying</topic><topic>Solar Energy - economics</topic><topic>Solar panel</topic><topic>Thermal dryer</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - economics</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Mayıs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksoy, Ayşegül</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanin, F. Dilek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurt, Mayıs</au><au>Aksoy, Ayşegül</au><au>Sanin, F. Dilek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of solar sludge drying alternatives by costs and area requirements</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>82</volume><spage>47</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>47-57</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>Thermal drying is a common method to reach above 90% dry solids content (DS) in sludge. However, thermal drying requires high amount of energy and can be expensive. A greenhouse solar dryer (GSD) can be a cost-effective substitute if the drying performance, which is typically 70% DS, can be increased by additional heat. In this study feasibility of GSD supported with solar panels is evaluated as an alternative to thermal dryers to reach 90% DS. Evaluations are based on capital and O&amp;M costs as well as area requirements for 37 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with various sludge production rates. Costs for the supported GSD system are compared to that of conventional and co-generation thermal dryers. To calculate the optimal costs associated with the drying system, an optimization model was developed in which area limitation was a constraint. Results showed that total cost was minimum when the DS in the GSD (DSm,i) was equal to the maximum attainable value (70% DS). On average, 58% of the total cost and 38% of total required area were associated with the GSD. Variations in costs for 37 WWTPs were due to differences in initial DS (DSi,i) and sludge production rates, indicating the importance of dewatering to lower drying costs. For large plants, GSD supported with solar panels provided savings in total costs especially in long term when compared to conventional and co-generation thermal dryers. [Display omitted] •GSD supported with solar panels are cost-effective compared to thermal dryers.•GSD with solar panels are suggested for small and medium sized WWTPs.•Sludge production rates and initial dry solids content affect area and costs.•Available area for installation impacts feasibility.•Drying costs are high for high sludge production rate and low initial DS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26025600</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.043</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2015-10, Vol.82, p.47-57
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1744684669
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Costs
Desiccation - methods
Dewatering
Driers
Drying
Drying cost
Feasibility Studies
Greenhouse solar dryer
Greenhouses
Optimization
Panels
Sewage - chemistry
Sludge
Sludge drying
Solar Energy - economics
Solar panel
Thermal dryer
Waste Disposal, Fluid - economics
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
title Evaluation of solar sludge drying alternatives by costs and area requirements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A54%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20solar%20sludge%20drying%20alternatives%20by%20costs%20and%20area%20requirements&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Kurt,%20May%C4%B1s&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=82&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=47-57&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1712775446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1707558977&rft_id=info:pmid/26025600&rft_els_id=S0043135415002936&rfr_iscdi=true