Gustatory response by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata to a range of nectar and honeydew sugars

The feeding response of food-deprived Cotesia glomerata to solutions of 14 naturally occurring sugars was determined. Glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, erlose, melezitose, trehalose, and stachyose all elicited a feeding response. The sugars differed, however, with respect to the lowest concentrat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical ecology 1999-12, Vol.25 (12), p.2863-2877
1. Verfasser: WACKERS, F. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2877
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2863
container_title Journal of chemical ecology
container_volume 25
creator WACKERS, F. L
description The feeding response of food-deprived Cotesia glomerata to solutions of 14 naturally occurring sugars was determined. Glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, erlose, melezitose, trehalose, and stachyose all elicited a feeding response. The sugars differed, however, with respect to the lowest concentration at which they were accepted (acceptance threshold). The parasitoids showed no feeding response when presented with 2 M solutions of galactose, mannose, rhamnose, lactose, raffinose, and melibiose. Sugars from the latter group did not show a deterrent effect when offered to water-deprived parasitoids. When mannose, rhamnose, melibiose, or raffinose were combined with low molar solutions of either fructose or sucrose, sucrose acceptance was affected by mannose and raffinose, whereas no negative interactions were found in mixtures with fructose. Compared to acceptance thresholds reported in other insect systems, the responses of C. glomerata differ considerably with respect to both the range of saccharides accepted as well as the acceptance thresholds. The novel finding that the parasitoid accepts a number of sugars that fail to elicit a feeding response in its herbivorous hosts is of particular interest to the use of (selective) food supplements in biological control programs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1023/a:1020868027970
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17446697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2093912051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3d055ced6b0c95aa30b6f144cccdae8955209b11de1cc6b61a595ba0ea868cfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdz0FLxDAQBeAgCq6rZ69BxFt10jRp400WXYUFL3ou03S626Xb1CRF-u-tuCdP7zAfj3mMXQu4F5DKB3ycAwpdQJqbHE7YQqhcJkJpccoWAKZIQEpxzi5C2ANAqgu1YN16DBGj8xP3FAbXB-LVxOOO-G46UO-GSB57PqDH0EbX1nzlIoUW-bZzh_kWkUfHkc9qS9w1vCcb0XPsa75zPU01ffMwbtGHS3bWYBfo6phL9vny_LF6TTbv67fV0yaxUqUxkTUoZanWFVijECVUuhFZZq2tkQqjVAqmEqImYa2utEBlVIVAOK-3TS2X7O6vd_Dua6QQy0MbLHUd9uTGUIo8y7Q2-Qxv_sG9G30__1bmUoJUovhFt0eEwWLXzENtG8rBtwf0UylSKQtj5A8PFnar</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733035187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gustatory response by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata to a range of nectar and honeydew sugars</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>WACKERS, F. L</creator><creatorcontrib>WACKERS, F. L</creatorcontrib><description>The feeding response of food-deprived Cotesia glomerata to solutions of 14 naturally occurring sugars was determined. Glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, erlose, melezitose, trehalose, and stachyose all elicited a feeding response. The sugars differed, however, with respect to the lowest concentration at which they were accepted (acceptance threshold). The parasitoids showed no feeding response when presented with 2 M solutions of galactose, mannose, rhamnose, lactose, raffinose, and melibiose. Sugars from the latter group did not show a deterrent effect when offered to water-deprived parasitoids. When mannose, rhamnose, melibiose, or raffinose were combined with low molar solutions of either fructose or sucrose, sucrose acceptance was affected by mannose and raffinose, whereas no negative interactions were found in mixtures with fructose. Compared to acceptance thresholds reported in other insect systems, the responses of C. glomerata differ considerably with respect to both the range of saccharides accepted as well as the acceptance thresholds. The novel finding that the parasitoid accepts a number of sugars that fail to elicit a feeding response in its herbivorous hosts is of particular interest to the use of (selective) food supplements in biological control programs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-0331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/a:1020868027970</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCECD8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological control ; Braconidae ; Cotesia glomerata ; Dietary supplements ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Saccharides ; Sucrose ; Sugar</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical ecology, 1999-12, Vol.25 (12), p.2863-2877</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3d055ced6b0c95aa30b6f144cccdae8955209b11de1cc6b61a595ba0ea868cfd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1233899$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WACKERS, F. L</creatorcontrib><title>Gustatory response by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata to a range of nectar and honeydew sugars</title><title>Journal of chemical ecology</title><description>The feeding response of food-deprived Cotesia glomerata to solutions of 14 naturally occurring sugars was determined. Glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, erlose, melezitose, trehalose, and stachyose all elicited a feeding response. The sugars differed, however, with respect to the lowest concentration at which they were accepted (acceptance threshold). The parasitoids showed no feeding response when presented with 2 M solutions of galactose, mannose, rhamnose, lactose, raffinose, and melibiose. Sugars from the latter group did not show a deterrent effect when offered to water-deprived parasitoids. When mannose, rhamnose, melibiose, or raffinose were combined with low molar solutions of either fructose or sucrose, sucrose acceptance was affected by mannose and raffinose, whereas no negative interactions were found in mixtures with fructose. Compared to acceptance thresholds reported in other insect systems, the responses of C. glomerata differ considerably with respect to both the range of saccharides accepted as well as the acceptance thresholds. The novel finding that the parasitoid accepts a number of sugars that fail to elicit a feeding response in its herbivorous hosts is of particular interest to the use of (selective) food supplements in biological control programs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Braconidae</subject><subject>Cotesia glomerata</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Saccharides</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><issn>0098-0331</issn><issn>1573-1561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdz0FLxDAQBeAgCq6rZ69BxFt10jRp400WXYUFL3ou03S626Xb1CRF-u-tuCdP7zAfj3mMXQu4F5DKB3ycAwpdQJqbHE7YQqhcJkJpccoWAKZIQEpxzi5C2ANAqgu1YN16DBGj8xP3FAbXB-LVxOOO-G46UO-GSB57PqDH0EbX1nzlIoUW-bZzh_kWkUfHkc9qS9w1vCcb0XPsa75zPU01ffMwbtGHS3bWYBfo6phL9vny_LF6TTbv67fV0yaxUqUxkTUoZanWFVijECVUuhFZZq2tkQqjVAqmEqImYa2utEBlVIVAOK-3TS2X7O6vd_Dua6QQy0MbLHUd9uTGUIo8y7Q2-Qxv_sG9G30__1bmUoJUovhFt0eEwWLXzENtG8rBtwf0UylSKQtj5A8PFnar</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>WACKERS, F. L</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>Gustatory response by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata to a range of nectar and honeydew sugars</title><author>WACKERS, F. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3d055ced6b0c95aa30b6f144cccdae8955209b11de1cc6b61a595ba0ea868cfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Braconidae</topic><topic>Cotesia glomerata</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Saccharides</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WACKERS, F. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WACKERS, F. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gustatory response by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata to a range of nectar and honeydew sugars</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2863</spage><epage>2877</epage><pages>2863-2877</pages><issn>0098-0331</issn><eissn>1573-1561</eissn><coden>JCECD8</coden><abstract>The feeding response of food-deprived Cotesia glomerata to solutions of 14 naturally occurring sugars was determined. Glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, erlose, melezitose, trehalose, and stachyose all elicited a feeding response. The sugars differed, however, with respect to the lowest concentration at which they were accepted (acceptance threshold). The parasitoids showed no feeding response when presented with 2 M solutions of galactose, mannose, rhamnose, lactose, raffinose, and melibiose. Sugars from the latter group did not show a deterrent effect when offered to water-deprived parasitoids. When mannose, rhamnose, melibiose, or raffinose were combined with low molar solutions of either fructose or sucrose, sucrose acceptance was affected by mannose and raffinose, whereas no negative interactions were found in mixtures with fructose. Compared to acceptance thresholds reported in other insect systems, the responses of C. glomerata differ considerably with respect to both the range of saccharides accepted as well as the acceptance thresholds. The novel finding that the parasitoid accepts a number of sugars that fail to elicit a feeding response in its herbivorous hosts is of particular interest to the use of (selective) food supplements in biological control programs.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/a:1020868027970</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-0331
ispartof Journal of chemical ecology, 1999-12, Vol.25 (12), p.2863-2877
issn 0098-0331
1573-1561
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17446697
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Biological and medical sciences
Biological control
Braconidae
Cotesia glomerata
Dietary supplements
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Protozoa. Invertebrata
Saccharides
Sucrose
Sugar
title Gustatory response by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata to a range of nectar and honeydew sugars
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A00%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gustatory%20response%20by%20the%20hymenopteran%20parasitoid%20Cotesia%20glomerata%20to%20a%20range%20of%20nectar%20and%20honeydew%20sugars&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20ecology&rft.au=WACKERS,%20F.%20L&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2863&rft.epage=2877&rft.pages=2863-2877&rft.issn=0098-0331&rft.eissn=1573-1561&rft.coden=JCECD8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/a:1020868027970&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E2093912051%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733035187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true