Skeletal evidence for variable patterns of handedness in chimpanzees, human hunter-gatherers, and recent British populations

Previous studies have shown a strong correspondence between long bone bilateral asymmetry and reported handedness. Here, we compare the pattern of asymmetry in mechanical properties of the humerus and second metacarpal of Pan troglodytes, recent British industrial and medieval populations, and a bro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2013-06, Vol.1288 (1), p.86-99
Hauptverfasser: Stock, Jay T., Shirley, Meghan K., Sarringhaus, Lauren A., Davies, Tom G., Shaw, Colin N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 86
container_title Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
container_volume 1288
creator Stock, Jay T.
Shirley, Meghan K.
Sarringhaus, Lauren A.
Davies, Tom G.
Shaw, Colin N.
description Previous studies have shown a strong correspondence between long bone bilateral asymmetry and reported handedness. Here, we compare the pattern of asymmetry in mechanical properties of the humerus and second metacarpal of Pan troglodytes, recent British industrial and medieval populations, and a broad range of human hunter–gatherers, to test whether technological variation corresponds with lateralization in bone function. The results suggest that P. troglodytes are left‐lateralized in the morphology of the humerus and right‐lateralized in the second metacarpal, while all human populations are predominantly right‐biased in the morphology of these bones. Among human populations, the second metacarpals of 63% of hunter–gatherers show right‐hand bias, a frequency similar to that found among chimpanzees. In contrast, the medieval and recent British populations show over 80% right‐lateralization in the second metacarpal. The proportion of individuals displaying right‐directional asymmetry is less than the expected 90% among all human groups. The variation observed suggests that the human pattern of right‐biased asymmetry developed in a mosaic manner throughout human history, perhaps in response to technological development.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nyas.12067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1744669219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1417875639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5637-58eac25dec69c2c624b6e7ba6a260c6c580ab9fc8d68fdcc340d310b0b461bd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1TAQhSMEopfChgdAltggRIp_krGzLBUU0FWR2iLEynKcCXGbOKmdFC7i4XF72y5YALPwSPZ3jsZzsuwpo3ss1Wu_MXGPcQryXrZisqhyAMHvZytKpcxVxcVO9ijGM0oZV4V8mO1wAVxCJVbZr5Nz7HE2PcFL16C3SNoxkEsTnKl7JJOZZww-krElnfENNh5jJM4T27lhMv4nYnxFumUwPp0-wfk3M3cYMKT7pCABLfqZvAludrEj0zgtvZnd6OPj7EFr-ohPbvpu9vnd29OD9_n60-GHg_11bksQMi8VGsvLBi1UllvgRQ0oawOGA7VgS0VNXbVWNaDaxlpR0EYwWtO6AFY3SuxmL7a-UxgvFoyzHly02PfG47hEnXZWAFScVf9GCyaVTGP9ByqgrKq0c0jo8z_Qs3EJPv35muJMccoT9XJL2TDGGLDVU3CDCRvNqL5KWl8lra-TTvCzG8ulHrC5Q2-jTQDbAt9dj5u_WOmjr_snt6b5VuPijD_uNCac6_QqS_3l6FB_PD1eK3UMGsRvYxHD5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365218202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skeletal evidence for variable patterns of handedness in chimpanzees, human hunter-gatherers, and recent British populations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stock, Jay T. ; Shirley, Meghan K. ; Sarringhaus, Lauren A. ; Davies, Tom G. ; Shaw, Colin N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stock, Jay T. ; Shirley, Meghan K. ; Sarringhaus, Lauren A. ; Davies, Tom G. ; Shaw, Colin N.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have shown a strong correspondence between long bone bilateral asymmetry and reported handedness. Here, we compare the pattern of asymmetry in mechanical properties of the humerus and second metacarpal of Pan troglodytes, recent British industrial and medieval populations, and a broad range of human hunter–gatherers, to test whether technological variation corresponds with lateralization in bone function. The results suggest that P. troglodytes are left‐lateralized in the morphology of the humerus and right‐lateralized in the second metacarpal, while all human populations are predominantly right‐biased in the morphology of these bones. Among human populations, the second metacarpals of 63% of hunter–gatherers show right‐hand bias, a frequency similar to that found among chimpanzees. In contrast, the medieval and recent British populations show over 80% right‐lateralization in the second metacarpal. The proportion of individuals displaying right‐directional asymmetry is less than the expected 90% among all human groups. The variation observed suggests that the human pattern of right‐biased asymmetry developed in a mosaic manner throughout human history, perhaps in response to technological development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0077-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12067</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23627693</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANYAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Asymmetry ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone and Bones ; Bones ; British ; Chimpanzees ; European Continental Ancestry Group ; Female ; foragers ; Handedness ; Human ; Human populations ; Humans ; Humerus ; laterality ; Male ; Monkeys &amp; apes ; Pan troglodytes ; Pan troglodytes - physiology ; Populations ; technology ; Troglodytes ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2013-06, Vol.1288 (1), p.86-99</ispartof><rights>2013 New York Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>2013 The New York Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5637-58eac25dec69c2c624b6e7ba6a260c6c580ab9fc8d68fdcc340d310b0b461bd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5637-58eac25dec69c2c624b6e7ba6a260c6c580ab9fc8d68fdcc340d310b0b461bd83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fnyas.12067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fnyas.12067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23627693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stock, Jay T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirley, Meghan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarringhaus, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Tom G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Colin N.</creatorcontrib><title>Skeletal evidence for variable patterns of handedness in chimpanzees, human hunter-gatherers, and recent British populations</title><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci</addtitle><description>Previous studies have shown a strong correspondence between long bone bilateral asymmetry and reported handedness. Here, we compare the pattern of asymmetry in mechanical properties of the humerus and second metacarpal of Pan troglodytes, recent British industrial and medieval populations, and a broad range of human hunter–gatherers, to test whether technological variation corresponds with lateralization in bone function. The results suggest that P. troglodytes are left‐lateralized in the morphology of the humerus and right‐lateralized in the second metacarpal, while all human populations are predominantly right‐biased in the morphology of these bones. Among human populations, the second metacarpals of 63% of hunter–gatherers show right‐hand bias, a frequency similar to that found among chimpanzees. In contrast, the medieval and recent British populations show over 80% right‐lateralization in the second metacarpal. The proportion of individuals displaying right‐directional asymmetry is less than the expected 90% among all human groups. The variation observed suggests that the human pattern of right‐biased asymmetry developed in a mosaic manner throughout human history, perhaps in response to technological development.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone and Bones</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>British</subject><subject>Chimpanzees</subject><subject>European Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>foragers</subject><subject>Handedness</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humerus</subject><subject>laterality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monkeys &amp; apes</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes</subject><subject>Pan troglodytes - physiology</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>technology</subject><subject>Troglodytes</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0077-8923</issn><issn>1749-6632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1TAQhSMEopfChgdAltggRIp_krGzLBUU0FWR2iLEynKcCXGbOKmdFC7i4XF72y5YALPwSPZ3jsZzsuwpo3ss1Wu_MXGPcQryXrZisqhyAMHvZytKpcxVxcVO9ijGM0oZV4V8mO1wAVxCJVbZr5Nz7HE2PcFL16C3SNoxkEsTnKl7JJOZZww-krElnfENNh5jJM4T27lhMv4nYnxFumUwPp0-wfk3M3cYMKT7pCABLfqZvAludrEj0zgtvZnd6OPj7EFr-ohPbvpu9vnd29OD9_n60-GHg_11bksQMi8VGsvLBi1UllvgRQ0oawOGA7VgS0VNXbVWNaDaxlpR0EYwWtO6AFY3SuxmL7a-UxgvFoyzHly02PfG47hEnXZWAFScVf9GCyaVTGP9ByqgrKq0c0jo8z_Qs3EJPv35muJMccoT9XJL2TDGGLDVU3CDCRvNqL5KWl8lra-TTvCzG8ulHrC5Q2-jTQDbAt9dj5u_WOmjr_snt6b5VuPijD_uNCac6_QqS_3l6FB_PD1eK3UMGsRvYxHD5A</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Stock, Jay T.</creator><creator>Shirley, Meghan K.</creator><creator>Sarringhaus, Lauren A.</creator><creator>Davies, Tom G.</creator><creator>Shaw, Colin N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>Skeletal evidence for variable patterns of handedness in chimpanzees, human hunter-gatherers, and recent British populations</title><author>Stock, Jay T. ; Shirley, Meghan K. ; Sarringhaus, Lauren A. ; Davies, Tom G. ; Shaw, Colin N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5637-58eac25dec69c2c624b6e7ba6a260c6c580ab9fc8d68fdcc340d310b0b461bd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone and Bones</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>British</topic><topic>Chimpanzees</topic><topic>European Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>foragers</topic><topic>Handedness</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humerus</topic><topic>laterality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monkeys &amp; apes</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes</topic><topic>Pan troglodytes - physiology</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>technology</topic><topic>Troglodytes</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stock, Jay T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirley, Meghan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarringhaus, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Tom G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Colin N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stock, Jay T.</au><au>Shirley, Meghan K.</au><au>Sarringhaus, Lauren A.</au><au>Davies, Tom G.</au><au>Shaw, Colin N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Skeletal evidence for variable patterns of handedness in chimpanzees, human hunter-gatherers, and recent British populations</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>1288</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>86-99</pages><issn>0077-8923</issn><eissn>1749-6632</eissn><coden>ANYAA9</coden><abstract>Previous studies have shown a strong correspondence between long bone bilateral asymmetry and reported handedness. Here, we compare the pattern of asymmetry in mechanical properties of the humerus and second metacarpal of Pan troglodytes, recent British industrial and medieval populations, and a broad range of human hunter–gatherers, to test whether technological variation corresponds with lateralization in bone function. The results suggest that P. troglodytes are left‐lateralized in the morphology of the humerus and right‐lateralized in the second metacarpal, while all human populations are predominantly right‐biased in the morphology of these bones. Among human populations, the second metacarpals of 63% of hunter–gatherers show right‐hand bias, a frequency similar to that found among chimpanzees. In contrast, the medieval and recent British populations show over 80% right‐lateralization in the second metacarpal. The proportion of individuals displaying right‐directional asymmetry is less than the expected 90% among all human groups. The variation observed suggests that the human pattern of right‐biased asymmetry developed in a mosaic manner throughout human history, perhaps in response to technological development.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23627693</pmid><doi>10.1111/nyas.12067</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0077-8923
ispartof Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2013-06, Vol.1288 (1), p.86-99
issn 0077-8923
1749-6632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1744669219
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Asymmetry
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone and Bones
Bones
British
Chimpanzees
European Continental Ancestry Group
Female
foragers
Handedness
Human
Human populations
Humans
Humerus
laterality
Male
Monkeys & apes
Pan troglodytes
Pan troglodytes - physiology
Populations
technology
Troglodytes
United Kingdom
title Skeletal evidence for variable patterns of handedness in chimpanzees, human hunter-gatherers, and recent British populations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skeletal%20evidence%20for%20variable%20patterns%20of%20handedness%20in%20chimpanzees,%20human%20hunter-gatherers,%20and%20recent%20British%20populations&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20New%20York%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=Stock,%20Jay%20T.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=1288&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=86-99&rft.issn=0077-8923&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft.coden=ANYAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nyas.12067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1417875639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365218202&rft_id=info:pmid/23627693&rfr_iscdi=true