Integrating Cotton and Beef Production to Reduce Water Withdrawal from the Ogallala Aquifer in the Southern High Plains

Agriculture in the Texas High Plains depends heavily on irrigation with water withdrawn from the Ogallala aquifer at nonsustainable rates. Our hypothesis was that integrating crop and livestock systems would reduce irrigation water use, maintain profitability, and diversify income compared with a co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2005-03, Vol.97 (2), p.556-567
Hauptverfasser: Allen, V. G., Brown, C. P., Kellison, R., Segarra, E., Wheeler, T., Dotray, P. A., Conkwright, J. C., Green, C. J., Acosta‐Martinez, V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 567
container_issue 2
container_start_page 556
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 97
creator Allen, V. G.
Brown, C. P.
Kellison, R.
Segarra, E.
Wheeler, T.
Dotray, P. A.
Conkwright, J. C.
Green, C. J.
Acosta‐Martinez, V.
description Agriculture in the Texas High Plains depends heavily on irrigation with water withdrawn from the Ogallala aquifer at nonsustainable rates. Our hypothesis was that integrating crop and livestock systems would reduce irrigation water use, maintain profitability, and diversify income compared with a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) monoculture. Thus, from 1998 to 2002, two large‐scale systems, with three replications in a randomized block design, compared water use, productivity, and economics of (i) a cotton (var ‘Paymaster 2326RR’) monoculture with terminated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and (ii) an integrated three‐paddock system that included cotton in a two‐paddock rotation with grazed wheat and rye (Secale cereale L.) and the perennial ‘WW‐B. Dahl’ old world bluestem [Bothriochloa bladhii (Retz) S.T. Blake] for grazing and seed production. All paddocks were irrigated by subsurface drip. Angus crossbred beef steers (Bos taurus L.; initial body weight = 249 kg; standard deviation = 26 kg) grazed from January to mid‐July. During the 4 yr of this experiment following the establishment year, cotton lint yield was 1036 and 1062 kg ha−1 for the cotton monoculture and the integrated system, respectively. Bluestem seed yield averaged 24 kg pure live seed ha−1. Steers gained 153 kg on pasture and 0.82 kg d−1. Per hectare, the integrated system used 23% less (P < 0.001) irrigation water, 40% less N fertilizer, and fewer other chemical inputs than the cotton monoculture. Profitability was about 90% greater for the integrated system at described conditions. Integrated production systems that are less dependent on irrigation and chemical inputs appear possible while improving profitability.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2005.0556
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17429149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>822722111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-641b3f32674dd4f3c5eb0ca0c5b3f002dd61acf69c97b2f7ef415154f7b6635a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LAzEQxYMoWD_OXoMHb1uTbJJlT1KLthax4gceQ5pNtinbRJMsxf_e1AqCF0_DPH4zzJsHwBlGQ4JLeinb4N2KIMSGiDG-BwaYlqxAnLJ9MEAIkQLXnByCoxhXCGFcUzwAmzuXdBtksq6FY5-Sd1C6Bl5rbeBj8E2vks1a8vBJ50bDN5l0gG82LZsgN7KDJvg1TEsN563sOtlJOProrcmQdd_6s-9zCQ5ObbuEj520Lp6AAyO7qE9_6jF4vb15GU-L-_nkbjy6L1SZTRSc4kVpSsIr2jTUlIrpBVISKZblbKlpOJbK8FrV1YKYShuKGWbUVAvOSybLY3Cx2_se_EevYxJrG5XOdzrt-yhwRUmNaZ3B8z_gyvfB5dtE_hRDrCIoQ5c7SAUfY9BGvAe7luFTYCS2KYjfFMQ2hTxxtZvY2E5__oeL0WRGRpOn-cNsq31v-AJATY9u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194505720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Cotton and Beef Production to Reduce Water Withdrawal from the Ogallala Aquifer in the Southern High Plains</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Allen, V. G. ; Brown, C. P. ; Kellison, R. ; Segarra, E. ; Wheeler, T. ; Dotray, P. A. ; Conkwright, J. C. ; Green, C. J. ; Acosta‐Martinez, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, V. G. ; Brown, C. P. ; Kellison, R. ; Segarra, E. ; Wheeler, T. ; Dotray, P. A. ; Conkwright, J. C. ; Green, C. J. ; Acosta‐Martinez, V.</creatorcontrib><description>Agriculture in the Texas High Plains depends heavily on irrigation with water withdrawn from the Ogallala aquifer at nonsustainable rates. Our hypothesis was that integrating crop and livestock systems would reduce irrigation water use, maintain profitability, and diversify income compared with a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) monoculture. Thus, from 1998 to 2002, two large‐scale systems, with three replications in a randomized block design, compared water use, productivity, and economics of (i) a cotton (var ‘Paymaster 2326RR’) monoculture with terminated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and (ii) an integrated three‐paddock system that included cotton in a two‐paddock rotation with grazed wheat and rye (Secale cereale L.) and the perennial ‘WW‐B. Dahl’ old world bluestem [Bothriochloa bladhii (Retz) S.T. Blake] for grazing and seed production. All paddocks were irrigated by subsurface drip. Angus crossbred beef steers (Bos taurus L.; initial body weight = 249 kg; standard deviation = 26 kg) grazed from January to mid‐July. During the 4 yr of this experiment following the establishment year, cotton lint yield was 1036 and 1062 kg ha−1 for the cotton monoculture and the integrated system, respectively. Bluestem seed yield averaged 24 kg pure live seed ha−1. Steers gained 153 kg on pasture and 0.82 kg d−1. Per hectare, the integrated system used 23% less (P &lt; 0.001) irrigation water, 40% less N fertilizer, and fewer other chemical inputs than the cotton monoculture. Profitability was about 90% greater for the integrated system at described conditions. Integrated production systems that are less dependent on irrigation and chemical inputs appear possible while improving profitability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0556</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2005-03, Vol.97 (2), p.556-567</ispartof><rights>American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-641b3f32674dd4f3c5eb0ca0c5b3f002dd61acf69c97b2f7ef415154f7b6635a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-641b3f32674dd4f3c5eb0ca0c5b3f002dd61acf69c97b2f7ef415154f7b6635a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2005.0556$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2005.0556$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, V. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellison, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segarra, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dotray, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conkwright, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acosta‐Martinez, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Cotton and Beef Production to Reduce Water Withdrawal from the Ogallala Aquifer in the Southern High Plains</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Agriculture in the Texas High Plains depends heavily on irrigation with water withdrawn from the Ogallala aquifer at nonsustainable rates. Our hypothesis was that integrating crop and livestock systems would reduce irrigation water use, maintain profitability, and diversify income compared with a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) monoculture. Thus, from 1998 to 2002, two large‐scale systems, with three replications in a randomized block design, compared water use, productivity, and economics of (i) a cotton (var ‘Paymaster 2326RR’) monoculture with terminated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and (ii) an integrated three‐paddock system that included cotton in a two‐paddock rotation with grazed wheat and rye (Secale cereale L.) and the perennial ‘WW‐B. Dahl’ old world bluestem [Bothriochloa bladhii (Retz) S.T. Blake] for grazing and seed production. All paddocks were irrigated by subsurface drip. Angus crossbred beef steers (Bos taurus L.; initial body weight = 249 kg; standard deviation = 26 kg) grazed from January to mid‐July. During the 4 yr of this experiment following the establishment year, cotton lint yield was 1036 and 1062 kg ha−1 for the cotton monoculture and the integrated system, respectively. Bluestem seed yield averaged 24 kg pure live seed ha−1. Steers gained 153 kg on pasture and 0.82 kg d−1. Per hectare, the integrated system used 23% less (P &lt; 0.001) irrigation water, 40% less N fertilizer, and fewer other chemical inputs than the cotton monoculture. Profitability was about 90% greater for the integrated system at described conditions. Integrated production systems that are less dependent on irrigation and chemical inputs appear possible while improving profitability.</description><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1LAzEQxYMoWD_OXoMHb1uTbJJlT1KLthax4gceQ5pNtinbRJMsxf_e1AqCF0_DPH4zzJsHwBlGQ4JLeinb4N2KIMSGiDG-BwaYlqxAnLJ9MEAIkQLXnByCoxhXCGFcUzwAmzuXdBtksq6FY5-Sd1C6Bl5rbeBj8E2vks1a8vBJ50bDN5l0gG82LZsgN7KDJvg1TEsN563sOtlJOProrcmQdd_6s-9zCQ5ObbuEj520Lp6AAyO7qE9_6jF4vb15GU-L-_nkbjy6L1SZTRSc4kVpSsIr2jTUlIrpBVISKZblbKlpOJbK8FrV1YKYShuKGWbUVAvOSybLY3Cx2_se_EevYxJrG5XOdzrt-yhwRUmNaZ3B8z_gyvfB5dtE_hRDrCIoQ5c7SAUfY9BGvAe7luFTYCS2KYjfFMQ2hTxxtZvY2E5__oeL0WRGRpOn-cNsq31v-AJATY9u</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Allen, V. G.</creator><creator>Brown, C. P.</creator><creator>Kellison, R.</creator><creator>Segarra, E.</creator><creator>Wheeler, T.</creator><creator>Dotray, P. A.</creator><creator>Conkwright, J. C.</creator><creator>Green, C. J.</creator><creator>Acosta‐Martinez, V.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Integrating Cotton and Beef Production to Reduce Water Withdrawal from the Ogallala Aquifer in the Southern High Plains</title><author>Allen, V. G. ; Brown, C. P. ; Kellison, R. ; Segarra, E. ; Wheeler, T. ; Dotray, P. A. ; Conkwright, J. C. ; Green, C. J. ; Acosta‐Martinez, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3556-641b3f32674dd4f3c5eb0ca0c5b3f002dd61acf69c97b2f7ef415154f7b6635a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, V. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellison, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segarra, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dotray, P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conkwright, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acosta‐Martinez, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, V. G.</au><au>Brown, C. P.</au><au>Kellison, R.</au><au>Segarra, E.</au><au>Wheeler, T.</au><au>Dotray, P. A.</au><au>Conkwright, J. C.</au><au>Green, C. J.</au><au>Acosta‐Martinez, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating Cotton and Beef Production to Reduce Water Withdrawal from the Ogallala Aquifer in the Southern High Plains</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>556</spage><epage>567</epage><pages>556-567</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>Agriculture in the Texas High Plains depends heavily on irrigation with water withdrawn from the Ogallala aquifer at nonsustainable rates. Our hypothesis was that integrating crop and livestock systems would reduce irrigation water use, maintain profitability, and diversify income compared with a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) monoculture. Thus, from 1998 to 2002, two large‐scale systems, with three replications in a randomized block design, compared water use, productivity, and economics of (i) a cotton (var ‘Paymaster 2326RR’) monoculture with terminated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and (ii) an integrated three‐paddock system that included cotton in a two‐paddock rotation with grazed wheat and rye (Secale cereale L.) and the perennial ‘WW‐B. Dahl’ old world bluestem [Bothriochloa bladhii (Retz) S.T. Blake] for grazing and seed production. All paddocks were irrigated by subsurface drip. Angus crossbred beef steers (Bos taurus L.; initial body weight = 249 kg; standard deviation = 26 kg) grazed from January to mid‐July. During the 4 yr of this experiment following the establishment year, cotton lint yield was 1036 and 1062 kg ha−1 for the cotton monoculture and the integrated system, respectively. Bluestem seed yield averaged 24 kg pure live seed ha−1. Steers gained 153 kg on pasture and 0.82 kg d−1. Per hectare, the integrated system used 23% less (P &lt; 0.001) irrigation water, 40% less N fertilizer, and fewer other chemical inputs than the cotton monoculture. Profitability was about 90% greater for the integrated system at described conditions. Integrated production systems that are less dependent on irrigation and chemical inputs appear possible while improving profitability.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2005.0556</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2005-03, Vol.97 (2), p.556-567
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17429149
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Integrating Cotton and Beef Production to Reduce Water Withdrawal from the Ogallala Aquifer in the Southern High Plains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A14%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Cotton%20and%20Beef%20Production%20to%20Reduce%20Water%20Withdrawal%20from%20the%20Ogallala%20Aquifer%20in%20the%20Southern%20High%20Plains&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Allen,%20V.%20G.&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=567&rft.pages=556-567&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2005.0556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E822722111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194505720&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true