Safety of anthrax vaccine: an expanded review and evaluation of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

Purpose To assess the safety of a licensed anthrax vaccine (AVA) given to more than 500 000 US military personnel, through review and medical evaluation of adverse events (AEs) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Methods AEs were summarized by person, vaccine lot, type, f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety 2004-12, Vol.13 (12), p.825-840
Hauptverfasser: Sever, John L., Brenner, Alan I., Gale, Arnold D., Lyle, Jerry M., Moulton, Lawrence H., Ward, Brian J., West, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 840
container_issue 12
container_start_page 825
container_title Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
container_volume 13
creator Sever, John L.
Brenner, Alan I.
Gale, Arnold D.
Lyle, Jerry M.
Moulton, Lawrence H.
Ward, Brian J.
West, David J.
description Purpose To assess the safety of a licensed anthrax vaccine (AVA) given to more than 500 000 US military personnel, through review and medical evaluation of adverse events (AEs) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Methods AEs were summarized by person, vaccine lot, type, frequency and impact. A Delphic approach was used to tentatively assess causality in an effort to detect serious AEs (SAEs) or other medically important AEs (OMIAEs) possibly attributable to AVA. Results The Anthrax Vaccine Expert Committee (AVEC) reviewed 1841 reports describing 3991 AEs (9.4 reports/10 000 doses of AVA) that were submitted to VAERS from 1Q1998 through 4Q2001. One hundred forty‐seven reports described an SAE or OMIAE, of which 26 were tentatively rated as possible, probable or certain consequences of vaccination (injection‐site reaction [12], ‘anaphylactic‐like reaction’ [5] and eight other systemic AEs [1–2 each]). Conclusions This review produced no evidence for an unusual rate of any SAE or OMIAE attributable to AVA. It supported an earlier impression that AVA may cause significant local inflammation and should be administered over the deltoid rather than the triceps to avoid direct or compression injury to the ulnar nerve. The subjects of VAERS reports tended to be older than all recipients of AVA. Females generally had and/or reported AEs more often than males, but transient articular reactions were surprisingly more common in males. Variations in the frequency or severity (as judged by hospitalization and/or loss of duty) of reported AEs did not suggest a significant problem with (1) a particular lot of AVA, (2) recurrent AEs after multiple doses or (3) vaccination of persons with a concomitant illness or those given other vaccines or medications. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pds.936
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17424808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17424808</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3846-6b535e3ef0a9bee57c9883792a9a8d4931b2f23129e880f6286f84a3896437b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1P2zAUBmBrYhofm_YPkK82EAqz49ixd9dB-ZDQVrVV4c5ykhPISJPMdkv7I_jPc0kFV1zZOuc578WL0FdKTikh8Y-ucKeKiQ9ojxKlIsp5urP5cxZJLtQu2nfuLyFhp5JPaJdyJkVK1R56npgS_Bq3JTaNf7BmhZcmz6sGfoYBhlVnmgIKbGFZwVMYFRiWpl4YX7XNy1WxBOsgTKHxLriutT4c-Bb7B8CzPgwPtmy4YXj8oqrmHk_WzsMcH80Gw_Hk-DP6WJrawZfte4CmF8Pp2VV08-fy-mxwE-VMJiISGWccGJTEqAyAp7mSkqUqNsrIIlGMZnEZMxorkJKUIpailIlhUomEpRk7QN_62M62_xbgvJ5XLoe6Ng20C6dpmsSJJDLA7z3MbeuchVJ3tpobu9aU6E3xOhSvQ_FBHm4jF9kcije3bTqAkx48VTWs38vRo_NJHxf1ugr1rF61sY9apCzl-vb3pY7vRne3CTnXv9h_Ya6b3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17424808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of anthrax vaccine: an expanded review and evaluation of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sever, John L. ; Brenner, Alan I. ; Gale, Arnold D. ; Lyle, Jerry M. ; Moulton, Lawrence H. ; Ward, Brian J. ; West, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sever, John L. ; Brenner, Alan I. ; Gale, Arnold D. ; Lyle, Jerry M. ; Moulton, Lawrence H. ; Ward, Brian J. ; West, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To assess the safety of a licensed anthrax vaccine (AVA) given to more than 500 000 US military personnel, through review and medical evaluation of adverse events (AEs) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Methods AEs were summarized by person, vaccine lot, type, frequency and impact. A Delphic approach was used to tentatively assess causality in an effort to detect serious AEs (SAEs) or other medically important AEs (OMIAEs) possibly attributable to AVA. Results The Anthrax Vaccine Expert Committee (AVEC) reviewed 1841 reports describing 3991 AEs (9.4 reports/10 000 doses of AVA) that were submitted to VAERS from 1Q1998 through 4Q2001. One hundred forty‐seven reports described an SAE or OMIAE, of which 26 were tentatively rated as possible, probable or certain consequences of vaccination (injection‐site reaction [12], ‘anaphylactic‐like reaction’ [5] and eight other systemic AEs [1–2 each]). Conclusions This review produced no evidence for an unusual rate of any SAE or OMIAE attributable to AVA. It supported an earlier impression that AVA may cause significant local inflammation and should be administered over the deltoid rather than the triceps to avoid direct or compression injury to the ulnar nerve. The subjects of VAERS reports tended to be older than all recipients of AVA. Females generally had and/or reported AEs more often than males, but transient articular reactions were surprisingly more common in males. Variations in the frequency or severity (as judged by hospitalization and/or loss of duty) of reported AEs did not suggest a significant problem with (1) a particular lot of AVA, (2) recurrent AEs after multiple doses or (3) vaccination of persons with a concomitant illness or those given other vaccines or medications. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pds.936</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15386719</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems ; anthrax vaccine ; Anthrax Vaccines - adverse effects ; Anthrax Vaccines - immunology ; Bacillus anthracis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Military Personnel ; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing ; Sex Factors ; United States ; Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) ; vaccine safety</subject><ispartof>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2004-12, Vol.13 (12), p.825-840</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3846-6b535e3ef0a9bee57c9883792a9a8d4931b2f23129e880f6286f84a3896437b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3846-6b535e3ef0a9bee57c9883792a9a8d4931b2f23129e880f6286f84a3896437b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpds.936$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpds.936$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15386719$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sever, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Alan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gale, Arnold D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyle, Jerry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulton, Lawrence H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of anthrax vaccine: an expanded review and evaluation of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)</title><title>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety</title><addtitle>Pharmacoepidem. Drug Safe</addtitle><description>Purpose To assess the safety of a licensed anthrax vaccine (AVA) given to more than 500 000 US military personnel, through review and medical evaluation of adverse events (AEs) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Methods AEs were summarized by person, vaccine lot, type, frequency and impact. A Delphic approach was used to tentatively assess causality in an effort to detect serious AEs (SAEs) or other medically important AEs (OMIAEs) possibly attributable to AVA. Results The Anthrax Vaccine Expert Committee (AVEC) reviewed 1841 reports describing 3991 AEs (9.4 reports/10 000 doses of AVA) that were submitted to VAERS from 1Q1998 through 4Q2001. One hundred forty‐seven reports described an SAE or OMIAE, of which 26 were tentatively rated as possible, probable or certain consequences of vaccination (injection‐site reaction [12], ‘anaphylactic‐like reaction’ [5] and eight other systemic AEs [1–2 each]). Conclusions This review produced no evidence for an unusual rate of any SAE or OMIAE attributable to AVA. It supported an earlier impression that AVA may cause significant local inflammation and should be administered over the deltoid rather than the triceps to avoid direct or compression injury to the ulnar nerve. The subjects of VAERS reports tended to be older than all recipients of AVA. Females generally had and/or reported AEs more often than males, but transient articular reactions were surprisingly more common in males. Variations in the frequency or severity (as judged by hospitalization and/or loss of duty) of reported AEs did not suggest a significant problem with (1) a particular lot of AVA, (2) recurrent AEs after multiple doses or (3) vaccination of persons with a concomitant illness or those given other vaccines or medications. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems</subject><subject>anthrax vaccine</subject><subject>Anthrax Vaccines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anthrax Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)</subject><subject>vaccine safety</subject><issn>1053-8569</issn><issn>1099-1557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F1P2zAUBmBrYhofm_YPkK82EAqz49ixd9dB-ZDQVrVV4c5ykhPISJPMdkv7I_jPc0kFV1zZOuc578WL0FdKTikh8Y-ucKeKiQ9ojxKlIsp5urP5cxZJLtQu2nfuLyFhp5JPaJdyJkVK1R56npgS_Bq3JTaNf7BmhZcmz6sGfoYBhlVnmgIKbGFZwVMYFRiWpl4YX7XNy1WxBOsgTKHxLriutT4c-Bb7B8CzPgwPtmy4YXj8oqrmHk_WzsMcH80Gw_Hk-DP6WJrawZfte4CmF8Pp2VV08-fy-mxwE-VMJiISGWccGJTEqAyAp7mSkqUqNsrIIlGMZnEZMxorkJKUIpailIlhUomEpRk7QN_62M62_xbgvJ5XLoe6Ng20C6dpmsSJJDLA7z3MbeuchVJ3tpobu9aU6E3xOhSvQ_FBHm4jF9kcije3bTqAkx48VTWs38vRo_NJHxf1ugr1rF61sY9apCzl-vb3pY7vRne3CTnXv9h_Ya6b3g</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Sever, John L.</creator><creator>Brenner, Alan I.</creator><creator>Gale, Arnold D.</creator><creator>Lyle, Jerry M.</creator><creator>Moulton, Lawrence H.</creator><creator>Ward, Brian J.</creator><creator>West, David J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Safety of anthrax vaccine: an expanded review and evaluation of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)</title><author>Sever, John L. ; Brenner, Alan I. ; Gale, Arnold D. ; Lyle, Jerry M. ; Moulton, Lawrence H. ; Ward, Brian J. ; West, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3846-6b535e3ef0a9bee57c9883792a9a8d4931b2f23129e880f6286f84a3896437b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems</topic><topic>anthrax vaccine</topic><topic>Anthrax Vaccines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anthrax Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)</topic><topic>vaccine safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sever, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Alan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gale, Arnold D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyle, Jerry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulton, Lawrence H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sever, John L.</au><au>Brenner, Alan I.</au><au>Gale, Arnold D.</au><au>Lyle, Jerry M.</au><au>Moulton, Lawrence H.</au><au>Ward, Brian J.</au><au>West, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of anthrax vaccine: an expanded review and evaluation of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)</atitle><jtitle>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety</jtitle><addtitle>Pharmacoepidem. Drug Safe</addtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>825</spage><epage>840</epage><pages>825-840</pages><issn>1053-8569</issn><eissn>1099-1557</eissn><abstract>Purpose To assess the safety of a licensed anthrax vaccine (AVA) given to more than 500 000 US military personnel, through review and medical evaluation of adverse events (AEs) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Methods AEs were summarized by person, vaccine lot, type, frequency and impact. A Delphic approach was used to tentatively assess causality in an effort to detect serious AEs (SAEs) or other medically important AEs (OMIAEs) possibly attributable to AVA. Results The Anthrax Vaccine Expert Committee (AVEC) reviewed 1841 reports describing 3991 AEs (9.4 reports/10 000 doses of AVA) that were submitted to VAERS from 1Q1998 through 4Q2001. One hundred forty‐seven reports described an SAE or OMIAE, of which 26 were tentatively rated as possible, probable or certain consequences of vaccination (injection‐site reaction [12], ‘anaphylactic‐like reaction’ [5] and eight other systemic AEs [1–2 each]). Conclusions This review produced no evidence for an unusual rate of any SAE or OMIAE attributable to AVA. It supported an earlier impression that AVA may cause significant local inflammation and should be administered over the deltoid rather than the triceps to avoid direct or compression injury to the ulnar nerve. The subjects of VAERS reports tended to be older than all recipients of AVA. Females generally had and/or reported AEs more often than males, but transient articular reactions were surprisingly more common in males. Variations in the frequency or severity (as judged by hospitalization and/or loss of duty) of reported AEs did not suggest a significant problem with (1) a particular lot of AVA, (2) recurrent AEs after multiple doses or (3) vaccination of persons with a concomitant illness or those given other vaccines or medications. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>15386719</pmid><doi>10.1002/pds.936</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8569
ispartof Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2004-12, Vol.13 (12), p.825-840
issn 1053-8569
1099-1557
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17424808
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems
anthrax vaccine
Anthrax Vaccines - adverse effects
Anthrax Vaccines - immunology
Bacillus anthracis
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Military Personnel
Product Surveillance, Postmarketing
Sex Factors
United States
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
vaccine safety
title Safety of anthrax vaccine: an expanded review and evaluation of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T18%3A04%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20anthrax%20vaccine:%20an%20expanded%20review%20and%20evaluation%20of%20adverse%20events%20reported%20to%20the%20Vaccine%20Adverse%20Event%20Reporting%20System%20(VAERS)&rft.jtitle=Pharmacoepidemiology%20and%20drug%20safety&rft.au=Sever,%20John%20L.&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=825&rft.epage=840&rft.pages=825-840&rft.issn=1053-8569&rft.eissn=1099-1557&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pds.936&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17424808%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17424808&rft_id=info:pmid/15386719&rfr_iscdi=true