Microchimerism and Renal Transplantation: Doubt Still Persists

The Presence of donor leukocytes in recipients of organ allograft has been shown even several years after transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether this donor cell microchimerism plays an effective role in allograft acceptance or is simply a consequence of immunosuppressive conditions in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Iranian Journal of Immunology 2004-01, Vol.1 (3), p.162-168
Hauptverfasser: Nikbin, B, Tajik, N, Saraji, A, Pourmand, G R, Talebian, F, Mehrsai, A, Amirzargar, A A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 168
container_issue 3
container_start_page 162
container_title Iranian Journal of Immunology
container_volume 1
creator Nikbin, B
Tajik, N
Saraji, A
Pourmand, G R
Talebian, F
Mehrsai, A
Amirzargar, A A
description The Presence of donor leukocytes in recipients of organ allograft has been shown even several years after transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether this donor cell microchimerism plays an effective role in allograft acceptance or is simply a consequence of immunosuppressive conditions in recipients. To study microchimerism in a group of kidney transplant recipients. In this study, the Peripheral Blood Microchimerism (PBM) after renal transplantation was retrospectively evaluated in 32 male-to-female recipients of living (unrelated) and cadaveric donor renal transplants. Using a Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (Nested-PCR) amplification specific for SRY region of the Y chromosome, microchimerism was detected with a sensitivity of 1:1000000. Recipients were classified and compared according to the presence of PBM, acute and chronic rejection episodes, type of allotransplant, recipient and donor age at transplantation, previous male labor or blood transfusion, allograft function (serum creatinine level), and body mass index. Among 32 recipients, 7 (21.9) were positive for PBM in multiple testing at different post-transplantation times. All microchimeric recipients had received kidney from living-unrelated donors. No significant difference was observed with regard to other parameters mentioned above. In addition, acute rejection rate in the microchimeric group was 3 (42%) versus 4 (16%) in the nonmicrochimeric recipients (not significant). Our results demonstrate better establishment of microchimerism after living donor kidney transplantation. However, concerning the true effect of microchimerism after renal transplantation doubt still persists; and it seems that microchimerism alone has no major protective role in renal allograft survival.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17407281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17407281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_174072813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLsKwjAUQIMoWB__kMmtkDSmKQ4uPnARRLuXGK8YSZOam_6_HfwAp3OGwxmRjItS5oUs1XhwJWTORSWmZIb4ZowLJmVGtmdrYjAv20K02FLtH_QKXjtaR-2xc9onnWzwG7oP_T3RW7LO0QtEtJhwQSZP7RCWP87J6niod6e8i-HTA6amtWjADRsIPTZcrZkqKi7-Dr9e7z0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17407281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microchimerism and Renal Transplantation: Doubt Still Persists</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nikbin, B ; Tajik, N ; Saraji, A ; Pourmand, G R ; Talebian, F ; Mehrsai, A ; Amirzargar, A A</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikbin, B ; Tajik, N ; Saraji, A ; Pourmand, G R ; Talebian, F ; Mehrsai, A ; Amirzargar, A A</creatorcontrib><description>The Presence of donor leukocytes in recipients of organ allograft has been shown even several years after transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether this donor cell microchimerism plays an effective role in allograft acceptance or is simply a consequence of immunosuppressive conditions in recipients. To study microchimerism in a group of kidney transplant recipients. In this study, the Peripheral Blood Microchimerism (PBM) after renal transplantation was retrospectively evaluated in 32 male-to-female recipients of living (unrelated) and cadaveric donor renal transplants. Using a Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (Nested-PCR) amplification specific for SRY region of the Y chromosome, microchimerism was detected with a sensitivity of 1:1000000. Recipients were classified and compared according to the presence of PBM, acute and chronic rejection episodes, type of allotransplant, recipient and donor age at transplantation, previous male labor or blood transfusion, allograft function (serum creatinine level), and body mass index. Among 32 recipients, 7 (21.9) were positive for PBM in multiple testing at different post-transplantation times. All microchimeric recipients had received kidney from living-unrelated donors. No significant difference was observed with regard to other parameters mentioned above. In addition, acute rejection rate in the microchimeric group was 3 (42%) versus 4 (16%) in the nonmicrochimeric recipients (not significant). Our results demonstrate better establishment of microchimerism after living donor kidney transplantation. However, concerning the true effect of microchimerism after renal transplantation doubt still persists; and it seems that microchimerism alone has no major protective role in renal allograft survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2567</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Iranian Journal of Immunology, 2004-01, Vol.1 (3), p.162-168</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikbin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajik, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraji, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourmand, G R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talebian, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrsai, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirzargar, A A</creatorcontrib><title>Microchimerism and Renal Transplantation: Doubt Still Persists</title><title>Iranian Journal of Immunology</title><description>The Presence of donor leukocytes in recipients of organ allograft has been shown even several years after transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether this donor cell microchimerism plays an effective role in allograft acceptance or is simply a consequence of immunosuppressive conditions in recipients. To study microchimerism in a group of kidney transplant recipients. In this study, the Peripheral Blood Microchimerism (PBM) after renal transplantation was retrospectively evaluated in 32 male-to-female recipients of living (unrelated) and cadaveric donor renal transplants. Using a Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (Nested-PCR) amplification specific for SRY region of the Y chromosome, microchimerism was detected with a sensitivity of 1:1000000. Recipients were classified and compared according to the presence of PBM, acute and chronic rejection episodes, type of allotransplant, recipient and donor age at transplantation, previous male labor or blood transfusion, allograft function (serum creatinine level), and body mass index. Among 32 recipients, 7 (21.9) were positive for PBM in multiple testing at different post-transplantation times. All microchimeric recipients had received kidney from living-unrelated donors. No significant difference was observed with regard to other parameters mentioned above. In addition, acute rejection rate in the microchimeric group was 3 (42%) versus 4 (16%) in the nonmicrochimeric recipients (not significant). Our results demonstrate better establishment of microchimerism after living donor kidney transplantation. However, concerning the true effect of microchimerism after renal transplantation doubt still persists; and it seems that microchimerism alone has no major protective role in renal allograft survival.</description><issn>1735-1383</issn><issn>1365-2567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjLsKwjAUQIMoWB__kMmtkDSmKQ4uPnARRLuXGK8YSZOam_6_HfwAp3OGwxmRjItS5oUs1XhwJWTORSWmZIb4ZowLJmVGtmdrYjAv20K02FLtH_QKXjtaR-2xc9onnWzwG7oP_T3RW7LO0QtEtJhwQSZP7RCWP87J6niod6e8i-HTA6amtWjADRsIPTZcrZkqKi7-Dr9e7z0Q</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Nikbin, B</creator><creator>Tajik, N</creator><creator>Saraji, A</creator><creator>Pourmand, G R</creator><creator>Talebian, F</creator><creator>Mehrsai, A</creator><creator>Amirzargar, A A</creator><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Microchimerism and Renal Transplantation: Doubt Still Persists</title><author>Nikbin, B ; Tajik, N ; Saraji, A ; Pourmand, G R ; Talebian, F ; Mehrsai, A ; Amirzargar, A A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_174072813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikbin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajik, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraji, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourmand, G R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talebian, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrsai, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirzargar, A A</creatorcontrib><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Iranian Journal of Immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikbin, B</au><au>Tajik, N</au><au>Saraji, A</au><au>Pourmand, G R</au><au>Talebian, F</au><au>Mehrsai, A</au><au>Amirzargar, A A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microchimerism and Renal Transplantation: Doubt Still Persists</atitle><jtitle>Iranian Journal of Immunology</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>162-168</pages><issn>1735-1383</issn><eissn>1365-2567</eissn><abstract>The Presence of donor leukocytes in recipients of organ allograft has been shown even several years after transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether this donor cell microchimerism plays an effective role in allograft acceptance or is simply a consequence of immunosuppressive conditions in recipients. To study microchimerism in a group of kidney transplant recipients. In this study, the Peripheral Blood Microchimerism (PBM) after renal transplantation was retrospectively evaluated in 32 male-to-female recipients of living (unrelated) and cadaveric donor renal transplants. Using a Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (Nested-PCR) amplification specific for SRY region of the Y chromosome, microchimerism was detected with a sensitivity of 1:1000000. Recipients were classified and compared according to the presence of PBM, acute and chronic rejection episodes, type of allotransplant, recipient and donor age at transplantation, previous male labor or blood transfusion, allograft function (serum creatinine level), and body mass index. Among 32 recipients, 7 (21.9) were positive for PBM in multiple testing at different post-transplantation times. All microchimeric recipients had received kidney from living-unrelated donors. No significant difference was observed with regard to other parameters mentioned above. In addition, acute rejection rate in the microchimeric group was 3 (42%) versus 4 (16%) in the nonmicrochimeric recipients (not significant). Our results demonstrate better establishment of microchimerism after living donor kidney transplantation. However, concerning the true effect of microchimerism after renal transplantation doubt still persists; and it seems that microchimerism alone has no major protective role in renal allograft survival.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1735-1383
ispartof Iranian Journal of Immunology, 2004-01, Vol.1 (3), p.162-168
issn 1735-1383
1365-2567
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17407281
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; PubMed Central
title Microchimerism and Renal Transplantation: Doubt Still Persists
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T16%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microchimerism%20and%20Renal%20Transplantation:%20Doubt%20Still%20Persists&rft.jtitle=Iranian%20Journal%20of%20Immunology&rft.au=Nikbin,%20B&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=162-168&rft.issn=1735-1383&rft.eissn=1365-2567&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E17407281%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17407281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true