Comparison of a Chemical and Enzymatic Extraction of Arsenic from Rice and an Assessment of the Arsenic Absorption from Contaminated Water by Cooked Rice

Rice is a target food for arsenic speciation based analyses because of its relatively high arsenic concentration and per capita consumption rates. Improved speciation data for rice can be helpful in estimating inorganic arsenic exposures in the U.S. and in endemic populations. The inorganic arsenic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2005-07, Vol.39 (14), p.5241-5246
Hauptverfasser: Ackerman, Amanda H, Creed, Patricia A, Parks, Amy N, Fricke, Michael W, Schwegel, Carol A, Creed, John T, Heitkemper, Douglas T, Vela, Nohora P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5246
container_issue 14
container_start_page 5241
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 39
creator Ackerman, Amanda H
Creed, Patricia A
Parks, Amy N
Fricke, Michael W
Schwegel, Carol A
Creed, John T
Heitkemper, Douglas T
Vela, Nohora P
description Rice is a target food for arsenic speciation based analyses because of its relatively high arsenic concentration and per capita consumption rates. Improved speciation data for rice can be helpful in estimating inorganic arsenic exposures in the U.S. and in endemic populations. The inorganic arsenic exposure for cooked rice should include both the arsenic in raw rice plus the arsenic absorbed from the water used to prepare it. The amount of arsenic absorbed from water by rice during preparation was assessed using five different types of rice cooked in both contaminated drinking water and arsenic-free reagent water. The rice samples were extracted using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and speciated using IC−ICP-MS. The TFA procedure was able to extract 84−104% of the arsenic (As) from the five different cooked rice samples. Chromatographic recoveries ranged from 99% to 116%. The dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) and inorganic arsenic concentra tion ranged from 22 to 270 ng of As/g of rice and from 31 to 108 ng of As/g of rice, respectively, for samples cooked in reagent water. The overall recoveries, which relate the sum of the chromatographic species back to the total digested concentration, ranged from 89% to 117%. The absorption of arsenic by rice from the total volume of water [1:1 to 4:1 (water:rice)] used in cooking was between 89% and 105% for two different contaminated drinking water samples. A comparison of the TFA extraction to an enzymatic extraction was made using the five rice samples and NIST 1568a rice flour. The two extraction procedures produced good agreement for inorganic arsenic, DMA, and the overall recovery. Through the use of IC−ESI-MS/MS with a parent ion of m/z 153 and fragment ions of m/z 138, 123, and 105, the structure dimethylthioarsinic acid was tentatively identified in two of the rice samples using the enzymatic extraction.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es048150n
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17386906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>876818631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a505t-f5e11134f0e9ca8813c8ae5ce79aee4528d4994971ac19dac6aad62a96c9ec9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0d1qFDEUB_Agil2rF76ABEHBi9FkZpJJLpdhbZWKYiuKN-Fs5gxNu5Nsk1no-ia-rdkPdkVvEpL88uckh5DnnL3lrOTvMLFaccH8AzLhomSFUII_JBPGeFXoSv44IU9SumGMlRVTj8kJl0yVWpQT8rsNwxKiS8HT0FOg7TUOzsKCgu_ozP9aDzA6S2f3YwQ7uh2bxoQ-7_YxDPSrs7jV4Ok0JUxpQD9u2HiNBzqdpxCX24DtrTb4EQbnYcSOfs9jpPN13g23eb2JfEoe9bBI-Gw_n5Jv72dX7Xlx8fnsQzu9KEAwMRa9QM55VfcMtQWleGUVoLDYaECsRam6WutaNxws1x1YCdDJErS0Gq3uqlPyepe7jOFuhWk0g0sWFwvwGFbJ8KZSUjOZ4ct_4E1YRZ9rM_lbeSWZ3KA3O2RjSClib5bRDRDXhjOzaZY5NCvbF_vA1XzA7ij33cng1R5Ayi3pI3jr0l9OS6EblV2xcy6NeH84h3hrZFM1wlx9uTQfxXl5efbzk2mPuWDT8RH_F_gH8T24ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230136066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a Chemical and Enzymatic Extraction of Arsenic from Rice and an Assessment of the Arsenic Absorption from Contaminated Water by Cooked Rice</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ackerman, Amanda H ; Creed, Patricia A ; Parks, Amy N ; Fricke, Michael W ; Schwegel, Carol A ; Creed, John T ; Heitkemper, Douglas T ; Vela, Nohora P</creator><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Amanda H ; Creed, Patricia A ; Parks, Amy N ; Fricke, Michael W ; Schwegel, Carol A ; Creed, John T ; Heitkemper, Douglas T ; Vela, Nohora P</creatorcontrib><description>Rice is a target food for arsenic speciation based analyses because of its relatively high arsenic concentration and per capita consumption rates. Improved speciation data for rice can be helpful in estimating inorganic arsenic exposures in the U.S. and in endemic populations. The inorganic arsenic exposure for cooked rice should include both the arsenic in raw rice plus the arsenic absorbed from the water used to prepare it. The amount of arsenic absorbed from water by rice during preparation was assessed using five different types of rice cooked in both contaminated drinking water and arsenic-free reagent water. The rice samples were extracted using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and speciated using IC−ICP-MS. The TFA procedure was able to extract 84−104% of the arsenic (As) from the five different cooked rice samples. Chromatographic recoveries ranged from 99% to 116%. The dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) and inorganic arsenic concentra tion ranged from 22 to 270 ng of As/g of rice and from 31 to 108 ng of As/g of rice, respectively, for samples cooked in reagent water. The overall recoveries, which relate the sum of the chromatographic species back to the total digested concentration, ranged from 89% to 117%. The absorption of arsenic by rice from the total volume of water [1:1 to 4:1 (water:rice)] used in cooking was between 89% and 105% for two different contaminated drinking water samples. A comparison of the TFA extraction to an enzymatic extraction was made using the five rice samples and NIST 1568a rice flour. The two extraction procedures produced good agreement for inorganic arsenic, DMA, and the overall recovery. Through the use of IC−ESI-MS/MS with a parent ion of m/z 153 and fragment ions of m/z 138, 123, and 105, the structure dimethylthioarsinic acid was tentatively identified in two of the rice samples using the enzymatic extraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es048150n</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16082952</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Arsenic ; Arsenic - analysis ; Arsenic - chemistry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical compounds ; Chemistry Techniques, Analytical - methods ; Chromatography ; Cooking ; Drinking water ; Enzymes ; Food Contamination ; Food toxicology ; Mass Spectrometry ; Medical sciences ; Oryza - chemistry ; Oryza sativa ; Rice ; Toxicology ; Water ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2005-07, Vol.39 (14), p.5241-5246</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jul 15, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a505t-f5e11134f0e9ca8813c8ae5ce79aee4528d4994971ac19dac6aad62a96c9ec9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a505t-f5e11134f0e9ca8813c8ae5ce79aee4528d4994971ac19dac6aad62a96c9ec9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es048150n$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es048150n$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16965978$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16082952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Amanda H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creed, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Amy N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fricke, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwegel, Carol A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creed, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitkemper, Douglas T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vela, Nohora P</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a Chemical and Enzymatic Extraction of Arsenic from Rice and an Assessment of the Arsenic Absorption from Contaminated Water by Cooked Rice</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Rice is a target food for arsenic speciation based analyses because of its relatively high arsenic concentration and per capita consumption rates. Improved speciation data for rice can be helpful in estimating inorganic arsenic exposures in the U.S. and in endemic populations. The inorganic arsenic exposure for cooked rice should include both the arsenic in raw rice plus the arsenic absorbed from the water used to prepare it. The amount of arsenic absorbed from water by rice during preparation was assessed using five different types of rice cooked in both contaminated drinking water and arsenic-free reagent water. The rice samples were extracted using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and speciated using IC−ICP-MS. The TFA procedure was able to extract 84−104% of the arsenic (As) from the five different cooked rice samples. Chromatographic recoveries ranged from 99% to 116%. The dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) and inorganic arsenic concentra tion ranged from 22 to 270 ng of As/g of rice and from 31 to 108 ng of As/g of rice, respectively, for samples cooked in reagent water. The overall recoveries, which relate the sum of the chromatographic species back to the total digested concentration, ranged from 89% to 117%. The absorption of arsenic by rice from the total volume of water [1:1 to 4:1 (water:rice)] used in cooking was between 89% and 105% for two different contaminated drinking water samples. A comparison of the TFA extraction to an enzymatic extraction was made using the five rice samples and NIST 1568a rice flour. The two extraction procedures produced good agreement for inorganic arsenic, DMA, and the overall recovery. Through the use of IC−ESI-MS/MS with a parent ion of m/z 153 and fragment ions of m/z 138, 123, and 105, the structure dimethylthioarsinic acid was tentatively identified in two of the rice samples using the enzymatic extraction.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Arsenic - analysis</subject><subject>Arsenic - chemistry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>Chemistry Techniques, Analytical - methods</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Food Contamination</subject><subject>Food toxicology</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oryza - chemistry</subject><subject>Oryza sativa</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpl0d1qFDEUB_Agil2rF76ABEHBi9FkZpJJLpdhbZWKYiuKN-Fs5gxNu5Nsk1no-ia-rdkPdkVvEpL88uckh5DnnL3lrOTvMLFaccH8AzLhomSFUII_JBPGeFXoSv44IU9SumGMlRVTj8kJl0yVWpQT8rsNwxKiS8HT0FOg7TUOzsKCgu_ozP9aDzA6S2f3YwQ7uh2bxoQ-7_YxDPSrs7jV4Ok0JUxpQD9u2HiNBzqdpxCX24DtrTb4EQbnYcSOfs9jpPN13g23eb2JfEoe9bBI-Gw_n5Jv72dX7Xlx8fnsQzu9KEAwMRa9QM55VfcMtQWleGUVoLDYaECsRam6WutaNxws1x1YCdDJErS0Gq3uqlPyepe7jOFuhWk0g0sWFwvwGFbJ8KZSUjOZ4ct_4E1YRZ9rM_lbeSWZ3KA3O2RjSClib5bRDRDXhjOzaZY5NCvbF_vA1XzA7ij33cng1R5Ayi3pI3jr0l9OS6EblV2xcy6NeH84h3hrZFM1wlx9uTQfxXl5efbzk2mPuWDT8RH_F_gH8T24ug</recordid><startdate>20050715</startdate><enddate>20050715</enddate><creator>Ackerman, Amanda H</creator><creator>Creed, Patricia A</creator><creator>Parks, Amy N</creator><creator>Fricke, Michael W</creator><creator>Schwegel, Carol A</creator><creator>Creed, John T</creator><creator>Heitkemper, Douglas T</creator><creator>Vela, Nohora P</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050715</creationdate><title>Comparison of a Chemical and Enzymatic Extraction of Arsenic from Rice and an Assessment of the Arsenic Absorption from Contaminated Water by Cooked Rice</title><author>Ackerman, Amanda H ; Creed, Patricia A ; Parks, Amy N ; Fricke, Michael W ; Schwegel, Carol A ; Creed, John T ; Heitkemper, Douglas T ; Vela, Nohora P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a505t-f5e11134f0e9ca8813c8ae5ce79aee4528d4994971ac19dac6aad62a96c9ec9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Arsenic - analysis</topic><topic>Arsenic - chemistry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>Chemistry Techniques, Analytical - methods</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Food Contamination</topic><topic>Food toxicology</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oryza - chemistry</topic><topic>Oryza sativa</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Amanda H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creed, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Amy N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fricke, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwegel, Carol A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creed, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitkemper, Douglas T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vela, Nohora P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ackerman, Amanda H</au><au>Creed, Patricia A</au><au>Parks, Amy N</au><au>Fricke, Michael W</au><au>Schwegel, Carol A</au><au>Creed, John T</au><au>Heitkemper, Douglas T</au><au>Vela, Nohora P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a Chemical and Enzymatic Extraction of Arsenic from Rice and an Assessment of the Arsenic Absorption from Contaminated Water by Cooked Rice</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2005-07-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>5241</spage><epage>5246</epage><pages>5241-5246</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Rice is a target food for arsenic speciation based analyses because of its relatively high arsenic concentration and per capita consumption rates. Improved speciation data for rice can be helpful in estimating inorganic arsenic exposures in the U.S. and in endemic populations. The inorganic arsenic exposure for cooked rice should include both the arsenic in raw rice plus the arsenic absorbed from the water used to prepare it. The amount of arsenic absorbed from water by rice during preparation was assessed using five different types of rice cooked in both contaminated drinking water and arsenic-free reagent water. The rice samples were extracted using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and speciated using IC−ICP-MS. The TFA procedure was able to extract 84−104% of the arsenic (As) from the five different cooked rice samples. Chromatographic recoveries ranged from 99% to 116%. The dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) and inorganic arsenic concentra tion ranged from 22 to 270 ng of As/g of rice and from 31 to 108 ng of As/g of rice, respectively, for samples cooked in reagent water. The overall recoveries, which relate the sum of the chromatographic species back to the total digested concentration, ranged from 89% to 117%. The absorption of arsenic by rice from the total volume of water [1:1 to 4:1 (water:rice)] used in cooking was between 89% and 105% for two different contaminated drinking water samples. A comparison of the TFA extraction to an enzymatic extraction was made using the five rice samples and NIST 1568a rice flour. The two extraction procedures produced good agreement for inorganic arsenic, DMA, and the overall recovery. Through the use of IC−ESI-MS/MS with a parent ion of m/z 153 and fragment ions of m/z 138, 123, and 105, the structure dimethylthioarsinic acid was tentatively identified in two of the rice samples using the enzymatic extraction.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>16082952</pmid><doi>10.1021/es048150n</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2005-07, Vol.39 (14), p.5241-5246
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17386906
source ACS Publications; MEDLINE
subjects Absorption
Arsenic
Arsenic - analysis
Arsenic - chemistry
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical compounds
Chemistry Techniques, Analytical - methods
Chromatography
Cooking
Drinking water
Enzymes
Food Contamination
Food toxicology
Mass Spectrometry
Medical sciences
Oryza - chemistry
Oryza sativa
Rice
Toxicology
Water
Water pollution
title Comparison of a Chemical and Enzymatic Extraction of Arsenic from Rice and an Assessment of the Arsenic Absorption from Contaminated Water by Cooked Rice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T09%3A00%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20Chemical%20and%20Enzymatic%20Extraction%20of%20Arsenic%20from%20Rice%20and%20an%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Arsenic%20Absorption%20from%20Contaminated%20Water%20by%20Cooked%20Rice&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Ackerman,%20Amanda%20H&rft.date=2005-07-15&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=5241&rft.epage=5246&rft.pages=5241-5246&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es048150n&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E876818631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230136066&rft_id=info:pmid/16082952&rfr_iscdi=true