Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI
•All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD chi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lingua 2015-07, Vol.161 (Jul), p.144-158 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 158 |
---|---|
container_issue | Jul |
container_start_page | 144 |
container_title | Lingua |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Theodorou, Eleni Grohmann, Kleanthes K. |
description | •All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD children do.•TD children mixed the two patterns, proclisis and enclisis.
This study investigates the production and placement of direct object clitic pronouns in children with specific language impairment (SLI). A total of 38 bilectal children were divided into four groups: two groups of children with SLI and two groups of age-matched typically developing children; 5-year-olds in the younger and 7-year-olds in the older groups. The goals of the study were (i) to investigate whether object clitics could serve as a clinical marker for Cypriot Greek-speaking children with SLI, (ii) to explore whether there are any quantitative and/or qualitative differences between typical language development and SLI, and (iii) to determine possible differences between the age groups. The design of the experiment aimed to shed some light on the question whether children with SLI exhibit difficulties with clitic production in the context assessed. The results reported here do not support the cross-linguistic finding that clitic production could serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek. However, what seems to be at stake is clitic (mis)placement, and the findings provide some evidence that there is more than meets the eye concerning the theoretical discussion around the use of clitics in Greek Cypriot children's language development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1738473142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0024384114002794</els_id><sourcerecordid>1738473142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-50a0ca66a5f10c246421443de4891764ea8dd54af20f97c8f73fee115bda279a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwBwwZWRL8HCdOFiRUQalUqQMwW679TB3SpNgJqH-PqzAz3eXcK91DyC3QDCiU903Wuu5jVBmjwDOAjAKckRlUgqUl5MU5mVHKeJpXHC7JVQgNpZGs6xmBzbZBPSS6dYPTIXFdsjgevOuHZOkRPxO9c63x2CU_btglr-vVNbmwqg1485dz8v789LZ4Sdeb5WrxuE41p_WQFlRRrcpSFRaoZrzkDDjPDfKqBlFyVJUxBVeWUVsLXVmRW0SAYmsUE7XK5-Ru2j34_mvEMMi9CxrbVnXYj0GCiHdEDpxFlE-o9n0IHq2MD_bKHyVQeTIkGzkZkidDEkBGQ7H2MNUw3vh26GXQDjuNxvnoRJre_T_wCwDfbzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1738473142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Theodorou, Eleni ; Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, Eleni ; Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creatorcontrib><description>•All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD children do.•TD children mixed the two patterns, proclisis and enclisis.
This study investigates the production and placement of direct object clitic pronouns in children with specific language impairment (SLI). A total of 38 bilectal children were divided into four groups: two groups of children with SLI and two groups of age-matched typically developing children; 5-year-olds in the younger and 7-year-olds in the older groups. The goals of the study were (i) to investigate whether object clitics could serve as a clinical marker for Cypriot Greek-speaking children with SLI, (ii) to explore whether there are any quantitative and/or qualitative differences between typical language development and SLI, and (iii) to determine possible differences between the age groups. The design of the experiment aimed to shed some light on the question whether children with SLI exhibit difficulties with clitic production in the context assessed. The results reported here do not support the cross-linguistic finding that clitic production could serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek. However, what seems to be at stake is clitic (mis)placement, and the findings provide some evidence that there is more than meets the eye concerning the theoretical discussion around the use of clitics in Greek Cypriot children's language development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6135</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LINGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>(Discrete) Bilectalism ; Clitic placement ; Diglossia ; Elicitation production ; Socio-syntax of development hypothesis ; Specific language impairment (SLI)</subject><ispartof>Lingua, 2015-07, Vol.161 (Jul), p.144-158</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-50a0ca66a5f10c246421443de4891764ea8dd54af20f97c8f73fee115bda279a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-50a0ca66a5f10c246421443de4891764ea8dd54af20f97c8f73fee115bda279a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4298-3191</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creatorcontrib><title>Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI</title><title>Lingua</title><description>•All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD children do.•TD children mixed the two patterns, proclisis and enclisis.
This study investigates the production and placement of direct object clitic pronouns in children with specific language impairment (SLI). A total of 38 bilectal children were divided into four groups: two groups of children with SLI and two groups of age-matched typically developing children; 5-year-olds in the younger and 7-year-olds in the older groups. The goals of the study were (i) to investigate whether object clitics could serve as a clinical marker for Cypriot Greek-speaking children with SLI, (ii) to explore whether there are any quantitative and/or qualitative differences between typical language development and SLI, and (iii) to determine possible differences between the age groups. The design of the experiment aimed to shed some light on the question whether children with SLI exhibit difficulties with clitic production in the context assessed. The results reported here do not support the cross-linguistic finding that clitic production could serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek. However, what seems to be at stake is clitic (mis)placement, and the findings provide some evidence that there is more than meets the eye concerning the theoretical discussion around the use of clitics in Greek Cypriot children's language development.</description><subject>(Discrete) Bilectalism</subject><subject>Clitic placement</subject><subject>Diglossia</subject><subject>Elicitation production</subject><subject>Socio-syntax of development hypothesis</subject><subject>Specific language impairment (SLI)</subject><issn>0024-3841</issn><issn>1872-6135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwBwwZWRL8HCdOFiRUQalUqQMwW679TB3SpNgJqH-PqzAz3eXcK91DyC3QDCiU903Wuu5jVBmjwDOAjAKckRlUgqUl5MU5mVHKeJpXHC7JVQgNpZGs6xmBzbZBPSS6dYPTIXFdsjgevOuHZOkRPxO9c63x2CU_btglr-vVNbmwqg1485dz8v789LZ4Sdeb5WrxuE41p_WQFlRRrcpSFRaoZrzkDDjPDfKqBlFyVJUxBVeWUVsLXVmRW0SAYmsUE7XK5-Ru2j34_mvEMMi9CxrbVnXYj0GCiHdEDpxFlE-o9n0IHq2MD_bKHyVQeTIkGzkZkidDEkBGQ7H2MNUw3vh26GXQDjuNxvnoRJre_T_wCwDfbzA</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Theodorou, Eleni</creator><creator>Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4298-3191</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI</title><author>Theodorou, Eleni ; Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-50a0ca66a5f10c246421443de4891764ea8dd54af20f97c8f73fee115bda279a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>(Discrete) Bilectalism</topic><topic>Clitic placement</topic><topic>Diglossia</topic><topic>Elicitation production</topic><topic>Socio-syntax of development hypothesis</topic><topic>Specific language impairment (SLI)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Lingua</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Theodorou, Eleni</au><au>Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI</atitle><jtitle>Lingua</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>Jul</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>144-158</pages><issn>0024-3841</issn><eissn>1872-6135</eissn><coden>LINGAO</coden><abstract>•All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD children do.•TD children mixed the two patterns, proclisis and enclisis.
This study investigates the production and placement of direct object clitic pronouns in children with specific language impairment (SLI). A total of 38 bilectal children were divided into four groups: two groups of children with SLI and two groups of age-matched typically developing children; 5-year-olds in the younger and 7-year-olds in the older groups. The goals of the study were (i) to investigate whether object clitics could serve as a clinical marker for Cypriot Greek-speaking children with SLI, (ii) to explore whether there are any quantitative and/or qualitative differences between typical language development and SLI, and (iii) to determine possible differences between the age groups. The design of the experiment aimed to shed some light on the question whether children with SLI exhibit difficulties with clitic production in the context assessed. The results reported here do not support the cross-linguistic finding that clitic production could serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek. However, what seems to be at stake is clitic (mis)placement, and the findings provide some evidence that there is more than meets the eye concerning the theoretical discussion around the use of clitics in Greek Cypriot children's language development.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4298-3191</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0024-3841 |
ispartof | Lingua, 2015-07, Vol.161 (Jul), p.144-158 |
issn | 0024-3841 1872-6135 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1738473142 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | (Discrete) Bilectalism Clitic placement Diglossia Elicitation production Socio-syntax of development hypothesis Specific language impairment (SLI) |
title | Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Object%20clitics%20in%20Cypriot%20Greek%20children%20with%20SLI&rft.jtitle=Lingua&rft.au=Theodorou,%20Eleni&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=Jul&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=144-158&rft.issn=0024-3841&rft.eissn=1872-6135&rft.coden=LINGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1738473142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1738473142&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0024384114002794&rfr_iscdi=true |