Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI

•All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD chi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lingua 2015-07, Vol.161 (Jul), p.144-158
Hauptverfasser: Theodorou, Eleni, Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 158
container_issue Jul
container_start_page 144
container_title Lingua
container_volume 161
creator Theodorou, Eleni
Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
description •All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD children do.•TD children mixed the two patterns, proclisis and enclisis. This study investigates the production and placement of direct object clitic pronouns in children with specific language impairment (SLI). A total of 38 bilectal children were divided into four groups: two groups of children with SLI and two groups of age-matched typically developing children; 5-year-olds in the younger and 7-year-olds in the older groups. The goals of the study were (i) to investigate whether object clitics could serve as a clinical marker for Cypriot Greek-speaking children with SLI, (ii) to explore whether there are any quantitative and/or qualitative differences between typical language development and SLI, and (iii) to determine possible differences between the age groups. The design of the experiment aimed to shed some light on the question whether children with SLI exhibit difficulties with clitic production in the context assessed. The results reported here do not support the cross-linguistic finding that clitic production could serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek. However, what seems to be at stake is clitic (mis)placement, and the findings provide some evidence that there is more than meets the eye concerning the theoretical discussion around the use of clitics in Greek Cypriot children's language development.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1738473142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0024384114002794</els_id><sourcerecordid>1738473142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-50a0ca66a5f10c246421443de4891764ea8dd54af20f97c8f73fee115bda279a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwBwwZWRL8HCdOFiRUQalUqQMwW679TB3SpNgJqH-PqzAz3eXcK91DyC3QDCiU903Wuu5jVBmjwDOAjAKckRlUgqUl5MU5mVHKeJpXHC7JVQgNpZGs6xmBzbZBPSS6dYPTIXFdsjgevOuHZOkRPxO9c63x2CU_btglr-vVNbmwqg1485dz8v789LZ4Sdeb5WrxuE41p_WQFlRRrcpSFRaoZrzkDDjPDfKqBlFyVJUxBVeWUVsLXVmRW0SAYmsUE7XK5-Ru2j34_mvEMMi9CxrbVnXYj0GCiHdEDpxFlE-o9n0IHq2MD_bKHyVQeTIkGzkZkidDEkBGQ7H2MNUw3vh26GXQDjuNxvnoRJre_T_wCwDfbzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1738473142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Theodorou, Eleni ; Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, Eleni ; Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creatorcontrib><description>•All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD children do.•TD children mixed the two patterns, proclisis and enclisis. This study investigates the production and placement of direct object clitic pronouns in children with specific language impairment (SLI). A total of 38 bilectal children were divided into four groups: two groups of children with SLI and two groups of age-matched typically developing children; 5-year-olds in the younger and 7-year-olds in the older groups. The goals of the study were (i) to investigate whether object clitics could serve as a clinical marker for Cypriot Greek-speaking children with SLI, (ii) to explore whether there are any quantitative and/or qualitative differences between typical language development and SLI, and (iii) to determine possible differences between the age groups. The design of the experiment aimed to shed some light on the question whether children with SLI exhibit difficulties with clitic production in the context assessed. The results reported here do not support the cross-linguistic finding that clitic production could serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek. However, what seems to be at stake is clitic (mis)placement, and the findings provide some evidence that there is more than meets the eye concerning the theoretical discussion around the use of clitics in Greek Cypriot children's language development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6135</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LINGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>(Discrete) Bilectalism ; Clitic placement ; Diglossia ; Elicitation production ; Socio-syntax of development hypothesis ; Specific language impairment (SLI)</subject><ispartof>Lingua, 2015-07, Vol.161 (Jul), p.144-158</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-50a0ca66a5f10c246421443de4891764ea8dd54af20f97c8f73fee115bda279a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-50a0ca66a5f10c246421443de4891764ea8dd54af20f97c8f73fee115bda279a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4298-3191</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creatorcontrib><title>Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI</title><title>Lingua</title><description>•All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD children do.•TD children mixed the two patterns, proclisis and enclisis. This study investigates the production and placement of direct object clitic pronouns in children with specific language impairment (SLI). A total of 38 bilectal children were divided into four groups: two groups of children with SLI and two groups of age-matched typically developing children; 5-year-olds in the younger and 7-year-olds in the older groups. The goals of the study were (i) to investigate whether object clitics could serve as a clinical marker for Cypriot Greek-speaking children with SLI, (ii) to explore whether there are any quantitative and/or qualitative differences between typical language development and SLI, and (iii) to determine possible differences between the age groups. The design of the experiment aimed to shed some light on the question whether children with SLI exhibit difficulties with clitic production in the context assessed. The results reported here do not support the cross-linguistic finding that clitic production could serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek. However, what seems to be at stake is clitic (mis)placement, and the findings provide some evidence that there is more than meets the eye concerning the theoretical discussion around the use of clitics in Greek Cypriot children's language development.</description><subject>(Discrete) Bilectalism</subject><subject>Clitic placement</subject><subject>Diglossia</subject><subject>Elicitation production</subject><subject>Socio-syntax of development hypothesis</subject><subject>Specific language impairment (SLI)</subject><issn>0024-3841</issn><issn>1872-6135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwBwwZWRL8HCdOFiRUQalUqQMwW679TB3SpNgJqH-PqzAz3eXcK91DyC3QDCiU903Wuu5jVBmjwDOAjAKckRlUgqUl5MU5mVHKeJpXHC7JVQgNpZGs6xmBzbZBPSS6dYPTIXFdsjgevOuHZOkRPxO9c63x2CU_btglr-vVNbmwqg1485dz8v789LZ4Sdeb5WrxuE41p_WQFlRRrcpSFRaoZrzkDDjPDfKqBlFyVJUxBVeWUVsLXVmRW0SAYmsUE7XK5-Ru2j34_mvEMMi9CxrbVnXYj0GCiHdEDpxFlE-o9n0IHq2MD_bKHyVQeTIkGzkZkidDEkBGQ7H2MNUw3vh26GXQDjuNxvnoRJre_T_wCwDfbzA</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Theodorou, Eleni</creator><creator>Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4298-3191</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI</title><author>Theodorou, Eleni ; Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-50a0ca66a5f10c246421443de4891764ea8dd54af20f97c8f73fee115bda279a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>(Discrete) Bilectalism</topic><topic>Clitic placement</topic><topic>Diglossia</topic><topic>Elicitation production</topic><topic>Socio-syntax of development hypothesis</topic><topic>Specific language impairment (SLI)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Theodorou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Lingua</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Theodorou, Eleni</au><au>Grohmann, Kleanthes K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI</atitle><jtitle>Lingua</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>Jul</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>144-158</pages><issn>0024-3841</issn><eissn>1872-6135</eissn><coden>LINGAO</coden><abstract>•All children (SLI and TD) performed at ceiling in clitic production.•There were no quantitative differences between children with SLI and TD children.•Clitic production cannot serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek.•Younger children with SLI produced fewer preverbal clitics than TD children do.•TD children mixed the two patterns, proclisis and enclisis. This study investigates the production and placement of direct object clitic pronouns in children with specific language impairment (SLI). A total of 38 bilectal children were divided into four groups: two groups of children with SLI and two groups of age-matched typically developing children; 5-year-olds in the younger and 7-year-olds in the older groups. The goals of the study were (i) to investigate whether object clitics could serve as a clinical marker for Cypriot Greek-speaking children with SLI, (ii) to explore whether there are any quantitative and/or qualitative differences between typical language development and SLI, and (iii) to determine possible differences between the age groups. The design of the experiment aimed to shed some light on the question whether children with SLI exhibit difficulties with clitic production in the context assessed. The results reported here do not support the cross-linguistic finding that clitic production could serve as a clinical marker for SLI in Cypriot Greek. However, what seems to be at stake is clitic (mis)placement, and the findings provide some evidence that there is more than meets the eye concerning the theoretical discussion around the use of clitics in Greek Cypriot children's language development.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4298-3191</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3841
ispartof Lingua, 2015-07, Vol.161 (Jul), p.144-158
issn 0024-3841
1872-6135
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1738473142
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects (Discrete) Bilectalism
Clitic placement
Diglossia
Elicitation production
Socio-syntax of development hypothesis
Specific language impairment (SLI)
title Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Object%20clitics%20in%20Cypriot%20Greek%20children%20with%20SLI&rft.jtitle=Lingua&rft.au=Theodorou,%20Eleni&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=Jul&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=144-158&rft.issn=0024-3841&rft.eissn=1872-6135&rft.coden=LINGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1738473142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1738473142&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0024384114002794&rfr_iscdi=true