Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101

A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introdu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International studies perspectives 2013-08, Vol.14 (3), p.235-254
1. Verfasser: Lupovici, Amir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 254
container_issue 3
container_start_page 235
container_title International studies perspectives
container_volume 14
creator Lupovici, Amir
description A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introductory level. I assert that teaching IR through the framework of relations between different me(s) and other(s) would address this problem. In short, I claim that international relations are almost by definition about interactions between a me and an other. Acknowledging this fact will allow us to sharpen a number of important issues and questions in world politics concerning the me(s) (for example, states, ethnic groups, IGOs, NGOs, transnational communities) and their relevant other(s). I contend that this approach helps to capture the multiplicity of actors, interactions, and practices in IR, and to better connect them to the theories in the field. I further suggest that this approach not only provides a fruitful method for teaching IR, but it also allows scholars (and students) to rethink and reflect on the field.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00473.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1737482615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44218743</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44218743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e3a68904d8392dfd7712657033041c68f06f6cd5c3c05e64b675eccdb9d72d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhosoOKc_QQh4401rvpN6N4Yfg8lE9DpkaYotWTuTVua_N93GLgRZLpID53nPCe-bJADBDMVzV2eIYZkSJlmGIcIZhFSQbHOSjA6N00MtxHlyEUINIeRC4FGiXyzQTQG6TwsW8fKgasCs6axvdFe1jXbgzbptGe7BpAETt-99W_Dqeq9dFbr_FPGX6DI5K7UL9mr_jpOPx4f36XM6XzzNppN5aiiUXUot0VzmkBaS5LgoCyEQ5kxAQiBFhssS8pKbghliILOcLrlg1phimRcCF4iMk9vd3LVvv3obOrWqgrHO6ca2fVBIEEEl5ogdRyknkNE87j6OUpnnJLoZ0Zs_aN320RQ3UDg6TiSDkZI7yvg2BG9LtfbVSvsfhaAaElW1GsJSQ3BqSFRtE1WbKL3eSevQtf6goxQjKSghv4MtnAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1420003850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Lupovici, Amir</creator><creatorcontrib>Lupovici, Amir</creatorcontrib><description>A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introductory level. I assert that teaching IR through the framework of relations between different me(s) and other(s) would address this problem. In short, I claim that international relations are almost by definition about interactions between a me and an other. Acknowledging this fact will allow us to sharpen a number of important issues and questions in world politics concerning the me(s) (for example, states, ethnic groups, IGOs, NGOs, transnational communities) and their relevant other(s). I contend that this approach helps to capture the multiplicity of actors, interactions, and practices in IR, and to better connect them to the theories in the field. I further suggest that this approach not only provides a fruitful method for teaching IR, but it also allows scholars (and students) to rethink and reflect on the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-3577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-3585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00473.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic profession ; Classrooms ; Educational policy ; Ethnic Groups ; Ethnicity ; Interaction ; International Relations ; International relations theory ; Non-governmental organizations ; Nongovernmental Organizations ; Political theory ; Students ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>International studies perspectives, 2013-08, Vol.14 (3), p.235-254</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 International Studies Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e3a68904d8392dfd7712657033041c68f06f6cd5c3c05e64b675eccdb9d72d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e3a68904d8392dfd7712657033041c68f06f6cd5c3c05e64b675eccdb9d72d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44218743$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44218743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27852,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lupovici, Amir</creatorcontrib><title>Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101</title><title>International studies perspectives</title><description>A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introductory level. I assert that teaching IR through the framework of relations between different me(s) and other(s) would address this problem. In short, I claim that international relations are almost by definition about interactions between a me and an other. Acknowledging this fact will allow us to sharpen a number of important issues and questions in world politics concerning the me(s) (for example, states, ethnic groups, IGOs, NGOs, transnational communities) and their relevant other(s). I contend that this approach helps to capture the multiplicity of actors, interactions, and practices in IR, and to better connect them to the theories in the field. I further suggest that this approach not only provides a fruitful method for teaching IR, but it also allows scholars (and students) to rethink and reflect on the field.</description><subject>Academic profession</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Educational policy</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>International relations theory</subject><subject>Non-governmental organizations</subject><subject>Nongovernmental Organizations</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>1528-3577</issn><issn>1528-3585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhosoOKc_QQh4401rvpN6N4Yfg8lE9DpkaYotWTuTVua_N93GLgRZLpID53nPCe-bJADBDMVzV2eIYZkSJlmGIcIZhFSQbHOSjA6N00MtxHlyEUINIeRC4FGiXyzQTQG6TwsW8fKgasCs6axvdFe1jXbgzbptGe7BpAETt-99W_Dqeq9dFbr_FPGX6DI5K7UL9mr_jpOPx4f36XM6XzzNppN5aiiUXUot0VzmkBaS5LgoCyEQ5kxAQiBFhssS8pKbghliILOcLrlg1phimRcCF4iMk9vd3LVvv3obOrWqgrHO6ca2fVBIEEEl5ogdRyknkNE87j6OUpnnJLoZ0Zs_aN320RQ3UDg6TiSDkZI7yvg2BG9LtfbVSvsfhaAaElW1GsJSQ3BqSFRtE1WbKL3eSevQtf6goxQjKSghv4MtnAI</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Lupovici, Amir</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101</title><author>Lupovici, Amir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e3a68904d8392dfd7712657033041c68f06f6cd5c3c05e64b675eccdb9d72d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic profession</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Educational policy</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>International relations theory</topic><topic>Non-governmental organizations</topic><topic>Nongovernmental Organizations</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lupovici, Amir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International studies perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lupovici, Amir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101</atitle><jtitle>International studies perspectives</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>235-254</pages><issn>1528-3577</issn><eissn>1528-3585</eissn><abstract>A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introductory level. I assert that teaching IR through the framework of relations between different me(s) and other(s) would address this problem. In short, I claim that international relations are almost by definition about interactions between a me and an other. Acknowledging this fact will allow us to sharpen a number of important issues and questions in world politics concerning the me(s) (for example, states, ethnic groups, IGOs, NGOs, transnational communities) and their relevant other(s). I contend that this approach helps to capture the multiplicity of actors, interactions, and practices in IR, and to better connect them to the theories in the field. I further suggest that this approach not only provides a fruitful method for teaching IR, but it also allows scholars (and students) to rethink and reflect on the field.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00473.x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1528-3577
ispartof International studies perspectives, 2013-08, Vol.14 (3), p.235-254
issn 1528-3577
1528-3585
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1737482615
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Academic profession
Classrooms
Educational policy
Ethnic Groups
Ethnicity
Interaction
International Relations
International relations theory
Non-governmental organizations
Nongovernmental Organizations
Political theory
Students
Teaching
Teaching methods
Transnationalism
title Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A54%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Me%20and%20the%20Other%20in%20International%20Relations:%20An%20Alternative%20Pluralist%20International%20Relations%20101&rft.jtitle=International%20studies%20perspectives&rft.au=Lupovici,%20Amir&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=235-254&rft.issn=1528-3577&rft.eissn=1528-3585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00473.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44218743%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1420003850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44218743&rfr_iscdi=true