Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101
A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introdu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International studies perspectives 2013-08, Vol.14 (3), p.235-254 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 254 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | International studies perspectives |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Lupovici, Amir |
description | A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introductory level. I assert that teaching IR through the framework of relations between different me(s) and other(s) would address this problem. In short, I claim that international relations are almost by definition about interactions between a me and an other. Acknowledging this fact will allow us to sharpen a number of important issues and questions in world politics concerning the me(s) (for example, states, ethnic groups, IGOs, NGOs, transnational communities) and their relevant other(s). I contend that this approach helps to capture the multiplicity of actors, interactions, and practices in IR, and to better connect them to the theories in the field. I further suggest that this approach not only provides a fruitful method for teaching IR, but it also allows scholars (and students) to rethink and reflect on the field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00473.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1737482615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44218743</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44218743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e3a68904d8392dfd7712657033041c68f06f6cd5c3c05e64b675eccdb9d72d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhosoOKc_QQh4401rvpN6N4Yfg8lE9DpkaYotWTuTVua_N93GLgRZLpID53nPCe-bJADBDMVzV2eIYZkSJlmGIcIZhFSQbHOSjA6N00MtxHlyEUINIeRC4FGiXyzQTQG6TwsW8fKgasCs6axvdFe1jXbgzbptGe7BpAETt-99W_Dqeq9dFbr_FPGX6DI5K7UL9mr_jpOPx4f36XM6XzzNppN5aiiUXUot0VzmkBaS5LgoCyEQ5kxAQiBFhssS8pKbghliILOcLrlg1phimRcCF4iMk9vd3LVvv3obOrWqgrHO6ca2fVBIEEEl5ogdRyknkNE87j6OUpnnJLoZ0Zs_aN320RQ3UDg6TiSDkZI7yvg2BG9LtfbVSvsfhaAaElW1GsJSQ3BqSFRtE1WbKL3eSevQtf6goxQjKSghv4MtnAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1420003850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Lupovici, Amir</creator><creatorcontrib>Lupovici, Amir</creatorcontrib><description>A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introductory level. I assert that teaching IR through the framework of relations between different me(s) and other(s) would address this problem. In short, I claim that international relations are almost by definition about interactions between a me and an other. Acknowledging this fact will allow us to sharpen a number of important issues and questions in world politics concerning the me(s) (for example, states, ethnic groups, IGOs, NGOs, transnational communities) and their relevant other(s). I contend that this approach helps to capture the multiplicity of actors, interactions, and practices in IR, and to better connect them to the theories in the field. I further suggest that this approach not only provides a fruitful method for teaching IR, but it also allows scholars (and students) to rethink and reflect on the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-3577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-3585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00473.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic profession ; Classrooms ; Educational policy ; Ethnic Groups ; Ethnicity ; Interaction ; International Relations ; International relations theory ; Non-governmental organizations ; Nongovernmental Organizations ; Political theory ; Students ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>International studies perspectives, 2013-08, Vol.14 (3), p.235-254</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 International Studies Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e3a68904d8392dfd7712657033041c68f06f6cd5c3c05e64b675eccdb9d72d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e3a68904d8392dfd7712657033041c68f06f6cd5c3c05e64b675eccdb9d72d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44218743$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44218743$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27852,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lupovici, Amir</creatorcontrib><title>Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101</title><title>International studies perspectives</title><description>A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introductory level. I assert that teaching IR through the framework of relations between different me(s) and other(s) would address this problem. In short, I claim that international relations are almost by definition about interactions between a me and an other. Acknowledging this fact will allow us to sharpen a number of important issues and questions in world politics concerning the me(s) (for example, states, ethnic groups, IGOs, NGOs, transnational communities) and their relevant other(s). I contend that this approach helps to capture the multiplicity of actors, interactions, and practices in IR, and to better connect them to the theories in the field. I further suggest that this approach not only provides a fruitful method for teaching IR, but it also allows scholars (and students) to rethink and reflect on the field.</description><subject>Academic profession</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Educational policy</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>International relations theory</subject><subject>Non-governmental organizations</subject><subject>Nongovernmental Organizations</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>1528-3577</issn><issn>1528-3585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhosoOKc_QQh4401rvpN6N4Yfg8lE9DpkaYotWTuTVua_N93GLgRZLpID53nPCe-bJADBDMVzV2eIYZkSJlmGIcIZhFSQbHOSjA6N00MtxHlyEUINIeRC4FGiXyzQTQG6TwsW8fKgasCs6axvdFe1jXbgzbptGe7BpAETt-99W_Dqeq9dFbr_FPGX6DI5K7UL9mr_jpOPx4f36XM6XzzNppN5aiiUXUot0VzmkBaS5LgoCyEQ5kxAQiBFhssS8pKbghliILOcLrlg1phimRcCF4iMk9vd3LVvv3obOrWqgrHO6ca2fVBIEEEl5ogdRyknkNE87j6OUpnnJLoZ0Zs_aN320RQ3UDg6TiSDkZI7yvg2BG9LtfbVSvsfhaAaElW1GsJSQ3BqSFRtE1WbKL3eSevQtf6goxQjKSghv4MtnAI</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Lupovici, Amir</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101</title><author>Lupovici, Amir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e3a68904d8392dfd7712657033041c68f06f6cd5c3c05e64b675eccdb9d72d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic profession</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Educational policy</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>International relations theory</topic><topic>Non-governmental organizations</topic><topic>Nongovernmental Organizations</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lupovici, Amir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International studies perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lupovici, Amir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101</atitle><jtitle>International studies perspectives</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>235-254</pages><issn>1528-3577</issn><eissn>1528-3585</eissn><abstract>A gap is currently growing between the rich theories in International Relations (IR) and how they are presented in classrooms. Although the scholarly literature acknowledges the complexities of international relations, these notions are not fully integrated into IR courses, especially at the introductory level. I assert that teaching IR through the framework of relations between different me(s) and other(s) would address this problem. In short, I claim that international relations are almost by definition about interactions between a me and an other. Acknowledging this fact will allow us to sharpen a number of important issues and questions in world politics concerning the me(s) (for example, states, ethnic groups, IGOs, NGOs, transnational communities) and their relevant other(s). I contend that this approach helps to capture the multiplicity of actors, interactions, and practices in IR, and to better connect them to the theories in the field. I further suggest that this approach not only provides a fruitful method for teaching IR, but it also allows scholars (and students) to rethink and reflect on the field.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00473.x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1528-3577 |
ispartof | International studies perspectives, 2013-08, Vol.14 (3), p.235-254 |
issn | 1528-3577 1528-3585 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1737482615 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Academic profession Classrooms Educational policy Ethnic Groups Ethnicity Interaction International Relations International relations theory Non-governmental organizations Nongovernmental Organizations Political theory Students Teaching Teaching methods Transnationalism |
title | Me and the Other in International Relations: An Alternative Pluralist International Relations 101 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A54%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Me%20and%20the%20Other%20in%20International%20Relations:%20An%20Alternative%20Pluralist%20International%20Relations%20101&rft.jtitle=International%20studies%20perspectives&rft.au=Lupovici,%20Amir&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=235-254&rft.issn=1528-3577&rft.eissn=1528-3585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2012.00473.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44218743%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1420003850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44218743&rfr_iscdi=true |