A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment
Objectives To evaluate the medium-term clinical performance of direct composite build-ups for diastema closures and teeth recontouring using a nano and a nanohybrid composite in combination with three- or two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives following treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Materi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral investigations 2015-12, Vol.19 (9), p.2187-2199 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2199 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 2187 |
| container_title | Clinical oral investigations |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Demirci, Mustafa Tuncer, Safa Öztaş, Evren Tekçe, Neslihan Uysal, Ömer |
| description | Objectives
To evaluate the medium-term clinical performance of direct composite build-ups for diastema closures and teeth recontouring using a nano and a nanohybrid composite in combination with three- or two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives following treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances.
Materials and methods
A total of 30 patients (mean age, 19.5 years) received 147 direct composite additions for teeth recontouring and diastema closures. A nano and a nanohybrid composite (Filtek Supreme XT and CeramX Duo) were bonded to tooth structure by using a three-step (Scotchbond Multipurpose) or a two-step (XP Bond) etch and rinse adhesive. Ten out of 147 composite build-ups (composite addition) constituted tooth recontouring cases, and the remaining 137 constituted diastema closure cases. The restorations were evaluated by two experienced, calibrated examiners according to modified Ryge criteria at the following time intervals: baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years.
Results
The 4-year survival rates were 92.8 % for Filtek Supreme XT/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus and 93 % for CeramX Duo/XP Bond. Only ten restorations failed (5 Filtek Supreme XT and 5 CeramX Duo). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the two composite–adhesive combinations with respect to color match, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, caries formation, marginal adaptation, and surface texture on comparing the five time periods (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years)
Conclusions
The 4-year survival rates in the present study were favorable. The restorations exhibited excellent scores with regard to color match, marginal adaptation, surface texture, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, and caries formation, after 4 years of clinical evaluation.
Clinical relevance
An alternative clinical approach for correcting discrepancies in tooth size and form, such as performing direct composite restorations following fixed orthodontic treatment, may be an excellent and minimally invasive treatment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00784-015-1458-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1736413796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3874582361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e08697cbbeda14303698cdafe6d672aae61fa38ee7cc15c511c9bbb921e72ded3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFOHiEUhUlTU63tA3TTkHTjBuXCDMwsjVFrYtJNuyYM3FHMzDAFpolvL39_NU0TWQAJ3zn3hEPIF-CnwLk-y3XrGsahZdC0HevekSNopGJSa3j_9y6Y6js4JB9zfuAcGqXlB3Io2o6Luo7I_Tlt2CPaRN0UluDsRPGPnTZbQlxoHKkPCV2hLs5rzKEgHbYwebatmY4x0bxah1Ub85aQ2rFgojGV--jjUoKjJaEtMy7lEzkY7ZTx8_N5TH5dXf68-M5uf1zfXJzfMtc0ojDkneq1Gwb0tsbnssZ33o6ovNLCWlQwWtkhauegdS2A64dh6AWgFh69PCYne981xd8b5mLmkB1Ok10wbtmAlqoBqXtV0W__oQ9xS0tNt6Patle9kJWCPeVSzDnhaNYUZpseDXCzq8HsazC1BrOrwXRV8_XZeRtm9K-Kl3-vgNgDuT4td5j-Gf2m6xPImpQS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735596923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Demirci, Mustafa ; Tuncer, Safa ; Öztaş, Evren ; Tekçe, Neslihan ; Uysal, Ömer</creator><creatorcontrib>Demirci, Mustafa ; Tuncer, Safa ; Öztaş, Evren ; Tekçe, Neslihan ; Uysal, Ömer</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate the medium-term clinical performance of direct composite build-ups for diastema closures and teeth recontouring using a nano and a nanohybrid composite in combination with three- or two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives following treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances.
Materials and methods
A total of 30 patients (mean age, 19.5 years) received 147 direct composite additions for teeth recontouring and diastema closures. A nano and a nanohybrid composite (Filtek Supreme XT and CeramX Duo) were bonded to tooth structure by using a three-step (Scotchbond Multipurpose) or a two-step (XP Bond) etch and rinse adhesive. Ten out of 147 composite build-ups (composite addition) constituted tooth recontouring cases, and the remaining 137 constituted diastema closure cases. The restorations were evaluated by two experienced, calibrated examiners according to modified Ryge criteria at the following time intervals: baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years.
Results
The 4-year survival rates were 92.8 % for Filtek Supreme XT/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus and 93 % for CeramX Duo/XP Bond. Only ten restorations failed (5 Filtek Supreme XT and 5 CeramX Duo). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the two composite–adhesive combinations with respect to color match, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, caries formation, marginal adaptation, and surface texture on comparing the five time periods (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years)
Conclusions
The 4-year survival rates in the present study were favorable. The restorations exhibited excellent scores with regard to color match, marginal adaptation, surface texture, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, and caries formation, after 4 years of clinical evaluation.
Clinical relevance
An alternative clinical approach for correcting discrepancies in tooth size and form, such as performing direct composite restorations following fixed orthodontic treatment, may be an excellent and minimally invasive treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1458-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25802222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acid Etching, Dental ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Cements - chemistry ; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods ; Dentin-Bonding Agents ; Dentistry ; Diastema - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Nanostructures - chemistry ; Original Article ; Orthodontic Space Closure - methods ; Resin Cements ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2015-12, Vol.19 (9), p.2187-2199</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e08697cbbeda14303698cdafe6d672aae61fa38ee7cc15c511c9bbb921e72ded3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e08697cbbeda14303698cdafe6d672aae61fa38ee7cc15c511c9bbb921e72ded3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-015-1458-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-015-1458-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25802222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demirci, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öztaş, Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekçe, Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uysal, Ömer</creatorcontrib><title>A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate the medium-term clinical performance of direct composite build-ups for diastema closures and teeth recontouring using a nano and a nanohybrid composite in combination with three- or two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives following treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances.
Materials and methods
A total of 30 patients (mean age, 19.5 years) received 147 direct composite additions for teeth recontouring and diastema closures. A nano and a nanohybrid composite (Filtek Supreme XT and CeramX Duo) were bonded to tooth structure by using a three-step (Scotchbond Multipurpose) or a two-step (XP Bond) etch and rinse adhesive. Ten out of 147 composite build-ups (composite addition) constituted tooth recontouring cases, and the remaining 137 constituted diastema closure cases. The restorations were evaluated by two experienced, calibrated examiners according to modified Ryge criteria at the following time intervals: baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years.
Results
The 4-year survival rates were 92.8 % for Filtek Supreme XT/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus and 93 % for CeramX Duo/XP Bond. Only ten restorations failed (5 Filtek Supreme XT and 5 CeramX Duo). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the two composite–adhesive combinations with respect to color match, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, caries formation, marginal adaptation, and surface texture on comparing the five time periods (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years)
Conclusions
The 4-year survival rates in the present study were favorable. The restorations exhibited excellent scores with regard to color match, marginal adaptation, surface texture, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, and caries formation, after 4 years of clinical evaluation.
Clinical relevance
An alternative clinical approach for correcting discrepancies in tooth size and form, such as performing direct composite restorations following fixed orthodontic treatment, may be an excellent and minimally invasive treatment.</description><subject>Acid Etching, Dental</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diastema - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Nanostructures - chemistry</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthodontic Space Closure - methods</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFOHiEUhUlTU63tA3TTkHTjBuXCDMwsjVFrYtJNuyYM3FHMzDAFpolvL39_NU0TWQAJ3zn3hEPIF-CnwLk-y3XrGsahZdC0HevekSNopGJSa3j_9y6Y6js4JB9zfuAcGqXlB3Io2o6Luo7I_Tlt2CPaRN0UluDsRPGPnTZbQlxoHKkPCV2hLs5rzKEgHbYwebatmY4x0bxah1Ub85aQ2rFgojGV--jjUoKjJaEtMy7lEzkY7ZTx8_N5TH5dXf68-M5uf1zfXJzfMtc0ojDkneq1Gwb0tsbnssZ33o6ovNLCWlQwWtkhauegdS2A64dh6AWgFh69PCYne981xd8b5mLmkB1Ok10wbtmAlqoBqXtV0W__oQ9xS0tNt6Patle9kJWCPeVSzDnhaNYUZpseDXCzq8HsazC1BrOrwXRV8_XZeRtm9K-Kl3-vgNgDuT4td5j-Gf2m6xPImpQS</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Demirci, Mustafa</creator><creator>Tuncer, Safa</creator><creator>Öztaş, Evren</creator><creator>Tekçe, Neslihan</creator><creator>Uysal, Ömer</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment</title><author>Demirci, Mustafa ; Tuncer, Safa ; Öztaş, Evren ; Tekçe, Neslihan ; Uysal, Ömer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e08697cbbeda14303698cdafe6d672aae61fa38ee7cc15c511c9bbb921e72ded3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acid Etching, Dental</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diastema - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Nanostructures - chemistry</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthodontic Space Closure - methods</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demirci, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuncer, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öztaş, Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekçe, Neslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uysal, Ömer</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demirci, Mustafa</au><au>Tuncer, Safa</au><au>Öztaş, Evren</au><au>Tekçe, Neslihan</au><au>Uysal, Ömer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2187</spage><epage>2199</epage><pages>2187-2199</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate the medium-term clinical performance of direct composite build-ups for diastema closures and teeth recontouring using a nano and a nanohybrid composite in combination with three- or two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives following treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances.
Materials and methods
A total of 30 patients (mean age, 19.5 years) received 147 direct composite additions for teeth recontouring and diastema closures. A nano and a nanohybrid composite (Filtek Supreme XT and CeramX Duo) were bonded to tooth structure by using a three-step (Scotchbond Multipurpose) or a two-step (XP Bond) etch and rinse adhesive. Ten out of 147 composite build-ups (composite addition) constituted tooth recontouring cases, and the remaining 137 constituted diastema closure cases. The restorations were evaluated by two experienced, calibrated examiners according to modified Ryge criteria at the following time intervals: baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years.
Results
The 4-year survival rates were 92.8 % for Filtek Supreme XT/Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus and 93 % for CeramX Duo/XP Bond. Only ten restorations failed (5 Filtek Supreme XT and 5 CeramX Duo). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the two composite–adhesive combinations with respect to color match, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, caries formation, marginal adaptation, and surface texture on comparing the five time periods (baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years)
Conclusions
The 4-year survival rates in the present study were favorable. The restorations exhibited excellent scores with regard to color match, marginal adaptation, surface texture, marginal discoloration, wear/loss of anatomical form, and caries formation, after 4 years of clinical evaluation.
Clinical relevance
An alternative clinical approach for correcting discrepancies in tooth size and form, such as performing direct composite restorations following fixed orthodontic treatment, may be an excellent and minimally invasive treatment.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25802222</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-015-1458-8</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1432-6981 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral investigations, 2015-12, Vol.19 (9), p.2187-2199 |
| issn | 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1736413796 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Acid Etching, Dental Adolescent Adult Composite Resins - chemistry Dental Cements - chemistry Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods Dentin-Bonding Agents Dentistry Diastema - therapy Female Humans Male Medicine Nanostructures - chemistry Original Article Orthodontic Space Closure - methods Resin Cements Treatment Outcome |
| title | A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A47%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%204-year%20clinical%20evaluation%20of%20direct%20composite%20build-ups%20for%20space%20closure%20after%20orthodontic%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Demirci,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2187&rft.epage=2199&rft.pages=2187-2199&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-015-1458-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3874582361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735596923&rft_id=info:pmid/25802222&rfr_iscdi=true |