HLA-A68: 02-restricted Gag-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses can drive selection pressure on HIV but are subdominant and ineffective

BACKGROUND:Human leukocyte allele (HLA) class I polymorphism has the greatest impact of human genetic variation on viral load set point. A substantial part of this effect is due to the action of HLA-B and HLA-C alleles. With few exceptions the role of HLA-A molecules in immune control of HIV is uncl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIDS (London) 2013-07, Vol.27 (11), p.1717-1723
Hauptverfasser: Kløverpris, Henrik N, Stryhn, Anette, Harndahl, Mikkel, Carlson, Jonathan M, Leslie, Alasdair J, Chen, Fabian, Riddell, Lynn, Mulenga, Joseph, Walker, Bruce D, Ndung’u, Thumbi, Buus, Søren, Goulder, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Human leukocyte allele (HLA) class I polymorphism has the greatest impact of human genetic variation on viral load set point. A substantial part of this effect is due to the action of HLA-B and HLA-C alleles. With few exceptions the role of HLA-A molecules in immune control of HIV is unclear. METHODS:We here study HLA-A*68:02, one of the most highly prevalent HLA-A alleles in C-clade infected sub-Saharan African populations, and one that plays a prominent role in the HIV-specific CD8 T-cell responses made against the virus. RESULTS:We define eight epitopes restricted by this allele and propose the peptide binding motif for HLA-A*68:02. Although one of these epitopes almost exactly overlaps an HLA-B*57-restricted epitope in Gag linked with immune control of HIV, this HLA-A*68:02-restricted Gag-TA10 response imposed only weak selection pressure on the virus and was not associated with significantly lower viral setpoint. The only HLA-A*68:02-restricted responses imposing strong selection pressure on HIV were in the flanking regions of Pol-EA8 and Pol-EA11 and within the Vpr-EV10 epitope (P = 8 × 10). However, targeting of this latter epitope was associated with significantly higher viral loads (P = 0.003), suggesting lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION:This study is consistent with previous data showing that HLA-A-restricted Gag-specific responses can impose selection pressure on HIV. In the case of HLA-A*68:02 the Gag response is subdominant, and apparently has little impact in natural infection. However, these data suggest the potential for high frequency vaccine-induced Gag responses restricted by this allele to have significant antiviral efficacy in vaccine recipients.
ISSN:0269-9370
1473-5571
DOI:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32836146cd