“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption
The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of public policy 2014-12, Vol.34 (3), p.507-529 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 529 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 507 |
container_title | Journal of public policy |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Heywood, Paul M. Rose, Jonathan |
description | The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerted international attention began being devoted to the issue following the end of the Cold War. In reality, we still have a relatively weak understanding of how best to measure corruption and how to develop effective guides to action from such measurement. This paper provides a detailed review of existing approaches to measuring corruption, focusing in particular on perception-based and non-perceptual approaches. We highlight a gap between the conceptualisation of corruption and its measurement, and argue that there is a tension between the demands of policy-makers and anti-corruption activists on the one hand, and the motivations of academic researchers on the other. The search for actionable answers on the part of the former sits uncomfortably with the latter’s focus on the inherent complexity of corruption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0143814X14000099 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735657840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0143814X14000099</cupid><jstor_id>43864106</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43864106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5fd2819013595922031e7d0bc815be18f495456b1141d18c13a93367ed3efa1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1KxEAQhRtRcBw9gAsh4MZNtCv9l3YnwT8YcKGCu9BJOmOGJD12Jwt3cxC93JzEDhlEFNHa1KK-9-oVhdAh4FPAIM7uMVASA30Cin1JuYUmQLkMRQxsG02GcTjMd9GecwuMgXjdBIn16i2pjdNB1ndBa4Kkmiu7Xr2fB92zDhqtXG91o9suMGWQG2v7ZVeZdh_tlKp2-mDTp-jx6vIhuQlnd9e3ycUszJmUXcjKIopB-m1MMhlFmIAWBc5ynyrTEJdUMsp4BkChgDgHoiQhXOiC6FJBRqboZPRdWvPSa9elTeVyXdeq1aZ3KQjCOBMxxX-j3EeQgBn5B8qFJJIy4dHjb-jC9Lb1N6fAOKcRE4x7CkYqt8Y5q8t0aatG2dcUcDo8KP3xIK85GjUL1xn7KfAUp4AHT7LxVE1mq2Kuv6z-1fUDxNWZrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566425756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Heywood, Paul M. ; Rose, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Paul M. ; Rose, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerted international attention began being devoted to the issue following the end of the Cold War. In reality, we still have a relatively weak understanding of how best to measure corruption and how to develop effective guides to action from such measurement. This paper provides a detailed review of existing approaches to measuring corruption, focusing in particular on perception-based and non-perceptual approaches. We highlight a gap between the conceptualisation of corruption and its measurement, and argue that there is a tension between the demands of policy-makers and anti-corruption activists on the one hand, and the motivations of academic researchers on the other. The search for actionable answers on the part of the former sits uncomfortably with the latter’s focus on the inherent complexity of corruption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-814X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X14000099</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPUPDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Activism ; Bribery ; Cigars ; Cold War ; Conceptualization ; Consumer Price Index ; Corruption ; Cost ; Data corruption ; Data lines ; Election fraud ; Election laws ; Foreign policy ; Geopolitics ; Governance ; Government corruption ; Gross Domestic Product ; International relations ; Measurement ; Motivation ; Perceptions ; Policy making ; Political corruption ; Polls & surveys ; Post Cold War Period ; Public policy ; War ; World Bank</subject><ispartof>Journal of public policy, 2014-12, Vol.34 (3), p.507-529</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2014</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5fd2819013595922031e7d0bc815be18f495456b1141d18c13a93367ed3efa1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5fd2819013595922031e7d0bc815be18f495456b1141d18c13a93367ed3efa1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43864106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X14000099/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,800,12826,27846,27847,27905,27906,55609,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption</title><title>Journal of public policy</title><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><description>The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerted international attention began being devoted to the issue following the end of the Cold War. In reality, we still have a relatively weak understanding of how best to measure corruption and how to develop effective guides to action from such measurement. This paper provides a detailed review of existing approaches to measuring corruption, focusing in particular on perception-based and non-perceptual approaches. We highlight a gap between the conceptualisation of corruption and its measurement, and argue that there is a tension between the demands of policy-makers and anti-corruption activists on the one hand, and the motivations of academic researchers on the other. The search for actionable answers on the part of the former sits uncomfortably with the latter’s focus on the inherent complexity of corruption.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Bribery</subject><subject>Cigars</subject><subject>Cold War</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Consumer Price Index</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Data corruption</subject><subject>Data lines</subject><subject>Election fraud</subject><subject>Election laws</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government corruption</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political corruption</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Post Cold War Period</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>World Bank</subject><issn>0143-814X</issn><issn>1469-7815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1KxEAQhRtRcBw9gAsh4MZNtCv9l3YnwT8YcKGCu9BJOmOGJD12Jwt3cxC93JzEDhlEFNHa1KK-9-oVhdAh4FPAIM7uMVASA30Cin1JuYUmQLkMRQxsG02GcTjMd9GecwuMgXjdBIn16i2pjdNB1ndBa4Kkmiu7Xr2fB92zDhqtXG91o9suMGWQG2v7ZVeZdh_tlKp2-mDTp-jx6vIhuQlnd9e3ycUszJmUXcjKIopB-m1MMhlFmIAWBc5ynyrTEJdUMsp4BkChgDgHoiQhXOiC6FJBRqboZPRdWvPSa9elTeVyXdeq1aZ3KQjCOBMxxX-j3EeQgBn5B8qFJJIy4dHjb-jC9Lb1N6fAOKcRE4x7CkYqt8Y5q8t0aatG2dcUcDo8KP3xIK85GjUL1xn7KfAUp4AHT7LxVE1mq2Kuv6z-1fUDxNWZrA</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Heywood, Paul M.</creator><creator>Rose, Jonathan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption</title><author>Heywood, Paul M. ; Rose, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5fd2819013595922031e7d0bc815be18f495456b1141d18c13a93367ed3efa1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Bribery</topic><topic>Cigars</topic><topic>Cold War</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Consumer Price Index</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Data corruption</topic><topic>Data lines</topic><topic>Election fraud</topic><topic>Election laws</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government corruption</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political corruption</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Post Cold War Period</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>World Bank</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heywood, Paul M.</au><au>Rose, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>507-529</pages><issn>0143-814X</issn><eissn>1469-7815</eissn><coden>JPUPDE</coden><abstract>The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerted international attention began being devoted to the issue following the end of the Cold War. In reality, we still have a relatively weak understanding of how best to measure corruption and how to develop effective guides to action from such measurement. This paper provides a detailed review of existing approaches to measuring corruption, focusing in particular on perception-based and non-perceptual approaches. We highlight a gap between the conceptualisation of corruption and its measurement, and argue that there is a tension between the demands of policy-makers and anti-corruption activists on the one hand, and the motivations of academic researchers on the other. The search for actionable answers on the part of the former sits uncomfortably with the latter’s focus on the inherent complexity of corruption.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0143814X14000099</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-814X |
ispartof | Journal of public policy, 2014-12, Vol.34 (3), p.507-529 |
issn | 0143-814X 1469-7815 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735657840 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Activism Bribery Cigars Cold War Conceptualization Consumer Price Index Corruption Cost Data corruption Data lines Election fraud Election laws Foreign policy Geopolitics Governance Government corruption Gross Domestic Product International relations Measurement Motivation Perceptions Policy making Political corruption Polls & surveys Post Cold War Period Public policy War World Bank |
title | “Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CClose%20but%20no%20Cigar%E2%80%9D:%20the%20measurement%20of%20corruption&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20policy&rft.au=Heywood,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=507-529&rft.issn=0143-814X&rft.eissn=1469-7815&rft.coden=JPUPDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0143814X14000099&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43864106%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566425756&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0143814X14000099&rft_jstor_id=43864106&rfr_iscdi=true |