“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption

The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of public policy 2014-12, Vol.34 (3), p.507-529
Hauptverfasser: Heywood, Paul M., Rose, Jonathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 529
container_issue 3
container_start_page 507
container_title Journal of public policy
container_volume 34
creator Heywood, Paul M.
Rose, Jonathan
description The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerted international attention began being devoted to the issue following the end of the Cold War. In reality, we still have a relatively weak understanding of how best to measure corruption and how to develop effective guides to action from such measurement. This paper provides a detailed review of existing approaches to measuring corruption, focusing in particular on perception-based and non-perceptual approaches. We highlight a gap between the conceptualisation of corruption and its measurement, and argue that there is a tension between the demands of policy-makers and anti-corruption activists on the one hand, and the motivations of academic researchers on the other. The search for actionable answers on the part of the former sits uncomfortably with the latter’s focus on the inherent complexity of corruption.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0143814X14000099
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735657840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0143814X14000099</cupid><jstor_id>43864106</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43864106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5fd2819013595922031e7d0bc815be18f495456b1141d18c13a93367ed3efa1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1KxEAQhRtRcBw9gAsh4MZNtCv9l3YnwT8YcKGCu9BJOmOGJD12Jwt3cxC93JzEDhlEFNHa1KK-9-oVhdAh4FPAIM7uMVASA30Cin1JuYUmQLkMRQxsG02GcTjMd9GecwuMgXjdBIn16i2pjdNB1ndBa4Kkmiu7Xr2fB92zDhqtXG91o9suMGWQG2v7ZVeZdh_tlKp2-mDTp-jx6vIhuQlnd9e3ycUszJmUXcjKIopB-m1MMhlFmIAWBc5ynyrTEJdUMsp4BkChgDgHoiQhXOiC6FJBRqboZPRdWvPSa9elTeVyXdeq1aZ3KQjCOBMxxX-j3EeQgBn5B8qFJJIy4dHjb-jC9Lb1N6fAOKcRE4x7CkYqt8Y5q8t0aatG2dcUcDo8KP3xIK85GjUL1xn7KfAUp4AHT7LxVE1mq2Kuv6z-1fUDxNWZrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566425756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Heywood, Paul M. ; Rose, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Paul M. ; Rose, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerted international attention began being devoted to the issue following the end of the Cold War. In reality, we still have a relatively weak understanding of how best to measure corruption and how to develop effective guides to action from such measurement. This paper provides a detailed review of existing approaches to measuring corruption, focusing in particular on perception-based and non-perceptual approaches. We highlight a gap between the conceptualisation of corruption and its measurement, and argue that there is a tension between the demands of policy-makers and anti-corruption activists on the one hand, and the motivations of academic researchers on the other. The search for actionable answers on the part of the former sits uncomfortably with the latter’s focus on the inherent complexity of corruption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-814X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X14000099</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPUPDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Activism ; Bribery ; Cigars ; Cold War ; Conceptualization ; Consumer Price Index ; Corruption ; Cost ; Data corruption ; Data lines ; Election fraud ; Election laws ; Foreign policy ; Geopolitics ; Governance ; Government corruption ; Gross Domestic Product ; International relations ; Measurement ; Motivation ; Perceptions ; Policy making ; Political corruption ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Post Cold War Period ; Public policy ; War ; World Bank</subject><ispartof>Journal of public policy, 2014-12, Vol.34 (3), p.507-529</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2014</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5fd2819013595922031e7d0bc815be18f495456b1141d18c13a93367ed3efa1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5fd2819013595922031e7d0bc815be18f495456b1141d18c13a93367ed3efa1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43864106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0143814X14000099/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,800,12826,27846,27847,27905,27906,55609,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption</title><title>Journal of public policy</title><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><description>The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerted international attention began being devoted to the issue following the end of the Cold War. In reality, we still have a relatively weak understanding of how best to measure corruption and how to develop effective guides to action from such measurement. This paper provides a detailed review of existing approaches to measuring corruption, focusing in particular on perception-based and non-perceptual approaches. We highlight a gap between the conceptualisation of corruption and its measurement, and argue that there is a tension between the demands of policy-makers and anti-corruption activists on the one hand, and the motivations of academic researchers on the other. The search for actionable answers on the part of the former sits uncomfortably with the latter’s focus on the inherent complexity of corruption.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Bribery</subject><subject>Cigars</subject><subject>Cold War</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Consumer Price Index</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Data corruption</subject><subject>Data lines</subject><subject>Election fraud</subject><subject>Election laws</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government corruption</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political corruption</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Post Cold War Period</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>World Bank</subject><issn>0143-814X</issn><issn>1469-7815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1KxEAQhRtRcBw9gAsh4MZNtCv9l3YnwT8YcKGCu9BJOmOGJD12Jwt3cxC93JzEDhlEFNHa1KK-9-oVhdAh4FPAIM7uMVASA30Cin1JuYUmQLkMRQxsG02GcTjMd9GecwuMgXjdBIn16i2pjdNB1ndBa4Kkmiu7Xr2fB92zDhqtXG91o9suMGWQG2v7ZVeZdh_tlKp2-mDTp-jx6vIhuQlnd9e3ycUszJmUXcjKIopB-m1MMhlFmIAWBc5ynyrTEJdUMsp4BkChgDgHoiQhXOiC6FJBRqboZPRdWvPSa9elTeVyXdeq1aZ3KQjCOBMxxX-j3EeQgBn5B8qFJJIy4dHjb-jC9Lb1N6fAOKcRE4x7CkYqt8Y5q8t0aatG2dcUcDo8KP3xIK85GjUL1xn7KfAUp4AHT7LxVE1mq2Kuv6z-1fUDxNWZrA</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Heywood, Paul M.</creator><creator>Rose, Jonathan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption</title><author>Heywood, Paul M. ; Rose, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5fd2819013595922031e7d0bc815be18f495456b1141d18c13a93367ed3efa1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Bribery</topic><topic>Cigars</topic><topic>Cold War</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Consumer Price Index</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Data corruption</topic><topic>Data lines</topic><topic>Election fraud</topic><topic>Election laws</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government corruption</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political corruption</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Post Cold War Period</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>World Bank</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heywood, Paul M.</au><au>Rose, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>507-529</pages><issn>0143-814X</issn><eissn>1469-7815</eissn><coden>JPUPDE</coden><abstract>The financial cost of corruption has recently been estimated at more than 5 per cent of global GDP. Yet, despite the widespread agreement that corruption is one of the most pressing policy challenges facing world leaders, it remains as widespread today, possibly even more so, as it was when concerted international attention began being devoted to the issue following the end of the Cold War. In reality, we still have a relatively weak understanding of how best to measure corruption and how to develop effective guides to action from such measurement. This paper provides a detailed review of existing approaches to measuring corruption, focusing in particular on perception-based and non-perceptual approaches. We highlight a gap between the conceptualisation of corruption and its measurement, and argue that there is a tension between the demands of policy-makers and anti-corruption activists on the one hand, and the motivations of academic researchers on the other. The search for actionable answers on the part of the former sits uncomfortably with the latter’s focus on the inherent complexity of corruption.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0143814X14000099</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-814X
ispartof Journal of public policy, 2014-12, Vol.34 (3), p.507-529
issn 0143-814X
1469-7815
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735657840
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Activism
Bribery
Cigars
Cold War
Conceptualization
Consumer Price Index
Corruption
Cost
Data corruption
Data lines
Election fraud
Election laws
Foreign policy
Geopolitics
Governance
Government corruption
Gross Domestic Product
International relations
Measurement
Motivation
Perceptions
Policy making
Political corruption
Polls & surveys
Post Cold War Period
Public policy
War
World Bank
title “Close but no Cigar”: the measurement of corruption
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CClose%20but%20no%20Cigar%E2%80%9D:%20the%20measurement%20of%20corruption&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20policy&rft.au=Heywood,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=507-529&rft.issn=0143-814X&rft.eissn=1469-7815&rft.coden=JPUPDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0143814X14000099&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43864106%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566425756&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0143814X14000099&rft_jstor_id=43864106&rfr_iscdi=true