The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis
Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge review of international affairs 2014-07, Vol.27 (3), p.401-423 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 423 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 401 |
container_title | Cambridge review of international affairs |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Macartney, Huw |
description | Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those same institutions that regulate the adjustment process. Recent analyses have suggested that this failure of democracy will prove decisive; legitimacy for crisis management efforts requires a redemocratization of the European polity. Instead, drawing on an analysis of ordo- and neo-liberal traditions, the article explains how European integration was itself a response to the perceived threat of democratic demands at the domestic level. The body of the article then traces the crisis through three phases, arguing that efforts by state managers reflect a deliberate attempt to depoliticize policy-making processes. Yet the selective intervention-to restore accumulation whilst withdrawing social spending-has only fuelled the politicization of segments of European society. This threatens to test the limits of depoliticization as a governing strategy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09557571.2013.819836 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735655000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1650143132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-5a93064e1f208a85b34b79d4fa5ad26a6836b45c944e57c8c3fbedef155209d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkbtOxDAQRS0EEsvjDygi0dBksWM7caoVrJaHtBLNItFZEz8gqyQOdiLYvych0FAA1TTn3pnRQeiM4DnBAl_inPOMZ2SeYELnguSCpntoRljGYsbyp300G5F4ZA7RUQhbPIAU5zN0vXkxUQsetHuPnI3KpjPPHrrSNYto1XvXGmgibWqnPKhdBI2OuiGiTdFFypehDCfowEIVzOnXPEaPN6vN8i5eP9zeL6_WseIcdzGHnOKUGWITLEDwgrIiyzWzwEEnKaTD0QXjKmfM8EwJRW1htLGE8wTnWtBjdDH1tt699iZ0si6DMlUFjXF9kCSjPB1WYfw3mnJMGCU0-QeaJBQTkY3o-Q9063rfDD8PFBkMpOJzN5so5V0I3ljZ-rIGv5MEy1GX_NYlR11y0jXEFlOsbKzzNbw5X2nZwa5y3npoVBkk_bXhA879mQ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615756800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Macartney, Huw</creator><creatorcontrib>Macartney, Huw</creatorcontrib><description>Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those same institutions that regulate the adjustment process. Recent analyses have suggested that this failure of democracy will prove decisive; legitimacy for crisis management efforts requires a redemocratization of the European polity. Instead, drawing on an analysis of ordo- and neo-liberal traditions, the article explains how European integration was itself a response to the perceived threat of democratic demands at the domestic level. The body of the article then traces the crisis through three phases, arguing that efforts by state managers reflect a deliberate attempt to depoliticize policy-making processes. Yet the selective intervention-to restore accumulation whilst withdrawing social spending-has only fuelled the politicization of segments of European society. This threatens to test the limits of depoliticization as a governing strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-7571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-449X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2013.819836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Routledge</publisher><subject>Accession ; Competitiveness ; Crisis Intervention ; Crisis management ; Debt ; Democracy ; Depoliticization ; Economic conditions ; Economic Crises ; Economic crisis ; Europe ; European integration ; Legitimacy ; Management of crises ; Neoliberalism ; Policy Making ; Political behavior ; Public Debt ; Social costs ; Sovereign debt ; Threats</subject><ispartof>Cambridge review of international affairs, 2014-07, Vol.27 (3), p.401-423</ispartof><rights>2014 Centre of International Studies 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-5a93064e1f208a85b34b79d4fa5ad26a6836b45c944e57c8c3fbedef155209d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-5a93064e1f208a85b34b79d4fa5ad26a6836b45c944e57c8c3fbedef155209d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macartney, Huw</creatorcontrib><title>The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis</title><title>Cambridge review of international affairs</title><description>Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those same institutions that regulate the adjustment process. Recent analyses have suggested that this failure of democracy will prove decisive; legitimacy for crisis management efforts requires a redemocratization of the European polity. Instead, drawing on an analysis of ordo- and neo-liberal traditions, the article explains how European integration was itself a response to the perceived threat of democratic demands at the domestic level. The body of the article then traces the crisis through three phases, arguing that efforts by state managers reflect a deliberate attempt to depoliticize policy-making processes. Yet the selective intervention-to restore accumulation whilst withdrawing social spending-has only fuelled the politicization of segments of European society. This threatens to test the limits of depoliticization as a governing strategy.</description><subject>Accession</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Crisis Intervention</subject><subject>Crisis management</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Depoliticization</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic Crises</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European integration</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Management of crises</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Public Debt</subject><subject>Social costs</subject><subject>Sovereign debt</subject><subject>Threats</subject><issn>0955-7571</issn><issn>1474-449X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkbtOxDAQRS0EEsvjDygi0dBksWM7caoVrJaHtBLNItFZEz8gqyQOdiLYvych0FAA1TTn3pnRQeiM4DnBAl_inPOMZ2SeYELnguSCpntoRljGYsbyp300G5F4ZA7RUQhbPIAU5zN0vXkxUQsetHuPnI3KpjPPHrrSNYto1XvXGmgibWqnPKhdBI2OuiGiTdFFypehDCfowEIVzOnXPEaPN6vN8i5eP9zeL6_WseIcdzGHnOKUGWITLEDwgrIiyzWzwEEnKaTD0QXjKmfM8EwJRW1htLGE8wTnWtBjdDH1tt699iZ0si6DMlUFjXF9kCSjPB1WYfw3mnJMGCU0-QeaJBQTkY3o-Q9063rfDD8PFBkMpOJzN5so5V0I3ljZ-rIGv5MEy1GX_NYlR11y0jXEFlOsbKzzNbw5X2nZwa5y3npoVBkk_bXhA879mQ8</recordid><startdate>20140703</startdate><enddate>20140703</enddate><creator>Macartney, Huw</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140703</creationdate><title>The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis</title><author>Macartney, Huw</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-5a93064e1f208a85b34b79d4fa5ad26a6836b45c944e57c8c3fbedef155209d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accession</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Crisis Intervention</topic><topic>Crisis management</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Depoliticization</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic Crises</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European integration</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Management of crises</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Public Debt</topic><topic>Social costs</topic><topic>Sovereign debt</topic><topic>Threats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macartney, Huw</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Cambridge review of international affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macartney, Huw</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge review of international affairs</jtitle><date>2014-07-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>401-423</pages><issn>0955-7571</issn><eissn>1474-449X</eissn><abstract>Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those same institutions that regulate the adjustment process. Recent analyses have suggested that this failure of democracy will prove decisive; legitimacy for crisis management efforts requires a redemocratization of the European polity. Instead, drawing on an analysis of ordo- and neo-liberal traditions, the article explains how European integration was itself a response to the perceived threat of democratic demands at the domestic level. The body of the article then traces the crisis through three phases, arguing that efforts by state managers reflect a deliberate attempt to depoliticize policy-making processes. Yet the selective intervention-to restore accumulation whilst withdrawing social spending-has only fuelled the politicization of segments of European society. This threatens to test the limits of depoliticization as a governing strategy.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09557571.2013.819836</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-7571 |
ispartof | Cambridge review of international affairs, 2014-07, Vol.27 (3), p.401-423 |
issn | 0955-7571 1474-449X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735655000 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Accession Competitiveness Crisis Intervention Crisis management Debt Democracy Depoliticization Economic conditions Economic Crises Economic crisis Europe European integration Legitimacy Management of crises Neoliberalism Policy Making Political behavior Public Debt Social costs Sovereign debt Threats |
title | The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20paradox%20of%20integration?%20European%20democracy%20and%20the%20debt%20crisis&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20review%20of%20international%20affairs&rft.au=Macartney,%20Huw&rft.date=2014-07-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=401-423&rft.issn=0955-7571&rft.eissn=1474-449X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09557571.2013.819836&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1650143132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615756800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |