The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis

Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cambridge review of international affairs 2014-07, Vol.27 (3), p.401-423
1. Verfasser: Macartney, Huw
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 423
container_issue 3
container_start_page 401
container_title Cambridge review of international affairs
container_volume 27
creator Macartney, Huw
description Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those same institutions that regulate the adjustment process. Recent analyses have suggested that this failure of democracy will prove decisive; legitimacy for crisis management efforts requires a redemocratization of the European polity. Instead, drawing on an analysis of ordo- and neo-liberal traditions, the article explains how European integration was itself a response to the perceived threat of democratic demands at the domestic level. The body of the article then traces the crisis through three phases, arguing that efforts by state managers reflect a deliberate attempt to depoliticize policy-making processes. Yet the selective intervention-to restore accumulation whilst withdrawing social spending-has only fuelled the politicization of segments of European society. This threatens to test the limits of depoliticization as a governing strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09557571.2013.819836
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735655000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1650143132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-5a93064e1f208a85b34b79d4fa5ad26a6836b45c944e57c8c3fbedef155209d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkbtOxDAQRS0EEsvjDygi0dBksWM7caoVrJaHtBLNItFZEz8gqyQOdiLYvych0FAA1TTn3pnRQeiM4DnBAl_inPOMZ2SeYELnguSCpntoRljGYsbyp300G5F4ZA7RUQhbPIAU5zN0vXkxUQsetHuPnI3KpjPPHrrSNYto1XvXGmgibWqnPKhdBI2OuiGiTdFFypehDCfowEIVzOnXPEaPN6vN8i5eP9zeL6_WseIcdzGHnOKUGWITLEDwgrIiyzWzwEEnKaTD0QXjKmfM8EwJRW1htLGE8wTnWtBjdDH1tt699iZ0si6DMlUFjXF9kCSjPB1WYfw3mnJMGCU0-QeaJBQTkY3o-Q9063rfDD8PFBkMpOJzN5so5V0I3ljZ-rIGv5MEy1GX_NYlR11y0jXEFlOsbKzzNbw5X2nZwa5y3npoVBkk_bXhA879mQ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1615756800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Macartney, Huw</creator><creatorcontrib>Macartney, Huw</creatorcontrib><description>Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those same institutions that regulate the adjustment process. Recent analyses have suggested that this failure of democracy will prove decisive; legitimacy for crisis management efforts requires a redemocratization of the European polity. Instead, drawing on an analysis of ordo- and neo-liberal traditions, the article explains how European integration was itself a response to the perceived threat of democratic demands at the domestic level. The body of the article then traces the crisis through three phases, arguing that efforts by state managers reflect a deliberate attempt to depoliticize policy-making processes. Yet the selective intervention-to restore accumulation whilst withdrawing social spending-has only fuelled the politicization of segments of European society. This threatens to test the limits of depoliticization as a governing strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-7571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-449X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2013.819836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Routledge</publisher><subject>Accession ; Competitiveness ; Crisis Intervention ; Crisis management ; Debt ; Democracy ; Depoliticization ; Economic conditions ; Economic Crises ; Economic crisis ; Europe ; European integration ; Legitimacy ; Management of crises ; Neoliberalism ; Policy Making ; Political behavior ; Public Debt ; Social costs ; Sovereign debt ; Threats</subject><ispartof>Cambridge review of international affairs, 2014-07, Vol.27 (3), p.401-423</ispartof><rights>2014 Centre of International Studies 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-5a93064e1f208a85b34b79d4fa5ad26a6836b45c944e57c8c3fbedef155209d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-5a93064e1f208a85b34b79d4fa5ad26a6836b45c944e57c8c3fbedef155209d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macartney, Huw</creatorcontrib><title>The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis</title><title>Cambridge review of international affairs</title><description>Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those same institutions that regulate the adjustment process. Recent analyses have suggested that this failure of democracy will prove decisive; legitimacy for crisis management efforts requires a redemocratization of the European polity. Instead, drawing on an analysis of ordo- and neo-liberal traditions, the article explains how European integration was itself a response to the perceived threat of democratic demands at the domestic level. The body of the article then traces the crisis through three phases, arguing that efforts by state managers reflect a deliberate attempt to depoliticize policy-making processes. Yet the selective intervention-to restore accumulation whilst withdrawing social spending-has only fuelled the politicization of segments of European society. This threatens to test the limits of depoliticization as a governing strategy.</description><subject>Accession</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Crisis Intervention</subject><subject>Crisis management</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Depoliticization</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic Crises</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European integration</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Management of crises</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Public Debt</subject><subject>Social costs</subject><subject>Sovereign debt</subject><subject>Threats</subject><issn>0955-7571</issn><issn>1474-449X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkbtOxDAQRS0EEsvjDygi0dBksWM7caoVrJaHtBLNItFZEz8gqyQOdiLYvych0FAA1TTn3pnRQeiM4DnBAl_inPOMZ2SeYELnguSCpntoRljGYsbyp300G5F4ZA7RUQhbPIAU5zN0vXkxUQsetHuPnI3KpjPPHrrSNYto1XvXGmgibWqnPKhdBI2OuiGiTdFFypehDCfowEIVzOnXPEaPN6vN8i5eP9zeL6_WseIcdzGHnOKUGWITLEDwgrIiyzWzwEEnKaTD0QXjKmfM8EwJRW1htLGE8wTnWtBjdDH1tt699iZ0si6DMlUFjXF9kCSjPB1WYfw3mnJMGCU0-QeaJBQTkY3o-Q9063rfDD8PFBkMpOJzN5so5V0I3ljZ-rIGv5MEy1GX_NYlR11y0jXEFlOsbKzzNbw5X2nZwa5y3npoVBkk_bXhA879mQ8</recordid><startdate>20140703</startdate><enddate>20140703</enddate><creator>Macartney, Huw</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140703</creationdate><title>The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis</title><author>Macartney, Huw</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-5a93064e1f208a85b34b79d4fa5ad26a6836b45c944e57c8c3fbedef155209d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accession</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Crisis Intervention</topic><topic>Crisis management</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Depoliticization</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic Crises</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European integration</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Management of crises</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Public Debt</topic><topic>Social costs</topic><topic>Sovereign debt</topic><topic>Threats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macartney, Huw</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Cambridge review of international affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macartney, Huw</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge review of international affairs</jtitle><date>2014-07-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>401-423</pages><issn>0955-7571</issn><eissn>1474-449X</eissn><abstract>Europe is facing both a political crisis of democracy and legitimacy and an economic crisis of debt and competitiveness. These crises seem to point in two distinct directions, growing social unrest over the Europeanized mechanisms of economic adjustment, and increasing efforts at strengthening those same institutions that regulate the adjustment process. Recent analyses have suggested that this failure of democracy will prove decisive; legitimacy for crisis management efforts requires a redemocratization of the European polity. Instead, drawing on an analysis of ordo- and neo-liberal traditions, the article explains how European integration was itself a response to the perceived threat of democratic demands at the domestic level. The body of the article then traces the crisis through three phases, arguing that efforts by state managers reflect a deliberate attempt to depoliticize policy-making processes. Yet the selective intervention-to restore accumulation whilst withdrawing social spending-has only fuelled the politicization of segments of European society. This threatens to test the limits of depoliticization as a governing strategy.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09557571.2013.819836</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0955-7571
ispartof Cambridge review of international affairs, 2014-07, Vol.27 (3), p.401-423
issn 0955-7571
1474-449X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735655000
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Accession
Competitiveness
Crisis Intervention
Crisis management
Debt
Democracy
Depoliticization
Economic conditions
Economic Crises
Economic crisis
Europe
European integration
Legitimacy
Management of crises
Neoliberalism
Policy Making
Political behavior
Public Debt
Social costs
Sovereign debt
Threats
title The paradox of integration? European democracy and the debt crisis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20paradox%20of%20integration?%20European%20democracy%20and%20the%20debt%20crisis&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20review%20of%20international%20affairs&rft.au=Macartney,%20Huw&rft.date=2014-07-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=401-423&rft.issn=0955-7571&rft.eissn=1474-449X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09557571.2013.819836&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1650143132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1615756800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true