In Defense of Value Pluralism in Public Administration

In Defense of Value Pluralism in Public Administration

A response to Overeem and Verhoef’s criticism of value pluralism, arguing that my value pluralist approach is useful in understanding the role that politics should play in how we think about, teach, and practice public administration.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Administration & society 2014-10, Vol.46 (8), p.1010-1019
1. Verfasser: Spicer, Michael W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Business
Criticism
Ethics
Management theory
Pluralism
Political behavior
Political philosophy
Politics
Public Administration
State Role
Studies
Values
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1019
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1010
container_title Administration & society
container_volume 46
creator Spicer, Michael W.
description A response to Overeem and Verhoef’s criticism of value pluralism, arguing that my value pluralist approach is useful in understanding the role that politics should play in how we think about, teach, and practice public administration.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0095399714550855
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735648780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0095399714550855</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3463402821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f0b08dbd941172325e8c769c0e00852308fca41acb6556f6a9e8590866c765f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkbtPwzAQxi0EEqWwM1piYQmc4_g1VuVVqRIdgDVyXBu5yqPYycB_j6MwoEoIbrnh-93pu_sQuiRwQ4gQtwCKUaUEKRgDydgRmhHG8owCVcdoNsrZqJ-isxh3kCopM8RXLb6zzrbR4s7hN10PFm_qIejaxwb7Fm-GqvYGL7aNb33sg-59156jE6fraC---xy9Pty_LJ-y9fPjarlYZ6YA2WcOKpDbaquK5DGnObPSCK4MWEgecwrSGV0QbSrOGHdcKyuZAsl5wpjL6RxdT3v3ofsYbOzLxkdj61q3thtiSQRlvJBCwj9RkX71N8rz5I0IGNGrA3TXDaFNNyeKUAAmCUkUTJQJXYzBunIffKPDZ0mgHOMpD-NJI9k0EvW7_bH0N_4Ln2qKug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1613005811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Defense of Value Pluralism in Public Administration</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Spicer, Michael W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spicer, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><description>A response to Overeem and Verhoef’s criticism of value pluralism, arguing that my value pluralist approach is useful in understanding the role that politics should play in how we think about, teach, and practice public administration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-3997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0095399714550855</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADSODM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Business ; Criticism ; Ethics ; Management theory ; Pluralism ; Political behavior ; Political philosophy ; Politics ; Public Administration ; State Role ; Studies ; Values</subject><ispartof>Administration &amp; society, 2014-10, Vol.46 (8), p.1010-1019</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f0b08dbd941172325e8c769c0e00852308fca41acb6556f6a9e8590866c765f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f0b08dbd941172325e8c769c0e00852308fca41acb6556f6a9e8590866c765f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0095399714550855$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0095399714550855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27844,27845,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spicer, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><title>In Defense of Value Pluralism in Public Administration</title><title>Administration &amp; society</title><description>A response to Overeem and Verhoef’s criticism of value pluralism, arguing that my value pluralist approach is useful in understanding the role that politics should play in how we think about, teach, and practice public administration.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Pluralism</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public Administration</subject><subject>State Role</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0095-3997</issn><issn>1552-3039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkbtPwzAQxi0EEqWwM1piYQmc4_g1VuVVqRIdgDVyXBu5yqPYycB_j6MwoEoIbrnh-93pu_sQuiRwQ4gQtwCKUaUEKRgDydgRmhHG8owCVcdoNsrZqJ-isxh3kCopM8RXLb6zzrbR4s7hN10PFm_qIejaxwb7Fm-GqvYGL7aNb33sg-59156jE6fraC---xy9Pty_LJ-y9fPjarlYZ6YA2WcOKpDbaquK5DGnObPSCK4MWEgecwrSGV0QbSrOGHdcKyuZAsl5wpjL6RxdT3v3ofsYbOzLxkdj61q3thtiSQRlvJBCwj9RkX71N8rz5I0IGNGrA3TXDaFNNyeKUAAmCUkUTJQJXYzBunIffKPDZ0mgHOMpD-NJI9k0EvW7_bH0N_4Ln2qKug</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Spicer, Michael W.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>In Defense of Value Pluralism in Public Administration</title><author>Spicer, Michael W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-f0b08dbd941172325e8c769c0e00852308fca41acb6556f6a9e8590866c765f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Pluralism</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public Administration</topic><topic>State Role</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spicer, Michael W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Administration &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spicer, Michael W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Defense of Value Pluralism in Public Administration</atitle><jtitle>Administration &amp; society</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1010</spage><epage>1019</epage><pages>1010-1019</pages><issn>0095-3997</issn><eissn>1552-3039</eissn><coden>ADSODM</coden><abstract>A response to Overeem and Verhoef’s criticism of value pluralism, arguing that my value pluralist approach is useful in understanding the role that politics should play in how we think about, teach, and practice public administration.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0095399714550855</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-3997
ispartof Administration & society, 2014-10, Vol.46 (8), p.1010-1019
issn 0095-3997
1552-3039
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735648780
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Business
Criticism
Ethics
Management theory
Pluralism
Political behavior
Political philosophy
Politics
Public Administration
State Role
Studies
Values
title In Defense of Value Pluralism in Public Administration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T11%3A22%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Defense%20of%20Value%20Pluralism%20in%20Public%20Administration&rft.jtitle=Administration%20&%20society&rft.au=Spicer,%20Michael%20W.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1010&rft.epage=1019&rft.pages=1010-1019&rft.issn=0095-3997&rft.eissn=1552-3039&rft.coden=ADSODM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0095399714550855&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3463402821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1613005811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0095399714550855&rfr_iscdi=true