Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments

Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political research quarterly 2014-09, Vol.67 (3), p.547-561
Hauptverfasser: Driscoll, Amanda, Nelson, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 561
container_issue 3
container_start_page 547
container_title Political research quarterly
container_volume 67
creator Driscoll, Amanda
Nelson, Michael J.
description Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider self-reported vote choice from a nationally representative survey following the 2011 Bolivian elections, in which 60 percent of votes cast were blank or spoiled. We estimate a multinomial logit model, finding that both blank and null voting were driven by political concerns, though null voting was more common among politically sophisticated individuals.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1065912914524634
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735646837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24371891</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1065912914524634</sage_id><sourcerecordid>24371891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e9bd759b27f387ffedd5906112e56212f6ed2fe3117e0a285073cf992da0e5593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFLHDEUxgepoNXeexECXjx0al4ySSYnsbKtCwsKtqW3Ic68rFlnk2ky26J_vVlWRARhT-_B-30f7-Mris9AvwIodQpUCg1MQyVYJXm1U-yD5nXJVPXnQ97zuVzf94qPKS0oBZbJ_aKbzn2IxrdIQiRXwxCSG13wZ-Rbb_w9Mb4jN0NwPXbkdxgxEefJLPwvp96GuDRr9gu5dPO7_oFchz6LW_eY4Yn_52LwS_RjOix2rekTfnqeB8Wv75OfF5fl7OrH9OJ8VraVlmOJ-rZTQt8yZXmtrMWuE5pKAIZCMmBWYscs8pwXqWG1oIq3VmvWGYpCaH5QnGx8hxj-rjCNzdKlFvucBMMqNaC4kJWsudoCZcBFrTjdAqW1YIoCz-jxG3QRVtHnzA3kB2spga0N6YZqY0gpom2G6JYmPjRAm3WZzdsys6TcSJKZ4yvT9_mjDb9IY4gv_qziCmoN_Alc3qZk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1559866120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Driscoll, Amanda ; Nelson, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Amanda ; Nelson, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider self-reported vote choice from a nationally representative survey following the 2011 Bolivian elections, in which 60 percent of votes cast were blank or spoiled. We estimate a multinomial logit model, finding that both blank and null voting were driven by political concerns, though null voting was more common among politically sophisticated individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-274X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1065912914524634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Apathy ; Ballots ; Bolivia ; Bolivians ; Democracy ; Development banks ; Election results ; Elections ; Hypotheses ; Ignorance ; Information ; Judicial elections ; Local elections ; Opinion Polls ; Political candidates ; Political parties ; Political protests ; Political representation ; Political research ; Political theory ; Politics ; Presidential elections ; Self reports ; Survey data ; Surveys ; Voter behavior ; Voters ; Voting ; Voting Behavior ; Voting behaviour</subject><ispartof>Political research quarterly, 2014-09, Vol.67 (3), p.547-561</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 The University of Utah</rights><rights>2014 University of Utah</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Sep 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e9bd759b27f387ffedd5906112e56212f6ed2fe3117e0a285073cf992da0e5593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e9bd759b27f387ffedd5906112e56212f6ed2fe3117e0a285073cf992da0e5593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24371891$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24371891$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,12826,21800,27846,27847,27905,27906,43602,43603,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments</title><title>Political research quarterly</title><description>Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider self-reported vote choice from a nationally representative survey following the 2011 Bolivian elections, in which 60 percent of votes cast were blank or spoiled. We estimate a multinomial logit model, finding that both blank and null voting were driven by political concerns, though null voting was more common among politically sophisticated individuals.</description><subject>Apathy</subject><subject>Ballots</subject><subject>Bolivia</subject><subject>Bolivians</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Development banks</subject><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Ignorance</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Judicial elections</subject><subject>Local elections</subject><subject>Opinion Polls</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Political research</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Self reports</subject><subject>Survey data</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><subject>Voting behaviour</subject><issn>1065-9129</issn><issn>1938-274X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFLHDEUxgepoNXeexECXjx0al4ySSYnsbKtCwsKtqW3Ic68rFlnk2ky26J_vVlWRARhT-_B-30f7-Mris9AvwIodQpUCg1MQyVYJXm1U-yD5nXJVPXnQ97zuVzf94qPKS0oBZbJ_aKbzn2IxrdIQiRXwxCSG13wZ-Rbb_w9Mb4jN0NwPXbkdxgxEefJLPwvp96GuDRr9gu5dPO7_oFchz6LW_eY4Yn_52LwS_RjOix2rekTfnqeB8Wv75OfF5fl7OrH9OJ8VraVlmOJ-rZTQt8yZXmtrMWuE5pKAIZCMmBWYscs8pwXqWG1oIq3VmvWGYpCaH5QnGx8hxj-rjCNzdKlFvucBMMqNaC4kJWsudoCZcBFrTjdAqW1YIoCz-jxG3QRVtHnzA3kB2spga0N6YZqY0gpom2G6JYmPjRAm3WZzdsys6TcSJKZ4yvT9_mjDb9IY4gv_qziCmoN_Alc3qZk</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Driscoll, Amanda</creator><creator>Nelson, Michael J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments</title><author>Driscoll, Amanda ; Nelson, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e9bd759b27f387ffedd5906112e56212f6ed2fe3117e0a285073cf992da0e5593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Apathy</topic><topic>Ballots</topic><topic>Bolivia</topic><topic>Bolivians</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Development banks</topic><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Ignorance</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Judicial elections</topic><topic>Local elections</topic><topic>Opinion Polls</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Political research</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Self reports</topic><topic>Survey data</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><topic>Voting behaviour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Driscoll, Amanda</au><au>Nelson, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments</atitle><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>547-561</pages><issn>1065-9129</issn><eissn>1938-274X</eissn><abstract>Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider self-reported vote choice from a nationally representative survey following the 2011 Bolivian elections, in which 60 percent of votes cast were blank or spoiled. We estimate a multinomial logit model, finding that both blank and null voting were driven by political concerns, though null voting was more common among politically sophisticated individuals.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1065912914524634</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1065-9129
ispartof Political research quarterly, 2014-09, Vol.67 (3), p.547-561
issn 1065-9129
1938-274X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735646837
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Apathy
Ballots
Bolivia
Bolivians
Democracy
Development banks
Election results
Elections
Hypotheses
Ignorance
Information
Judicial elections
Local elections
Opinion Polls
Political candidates
Political parties
Political protests
Political representation
Political research
Political theory
Politics
Presidential elections
Self reports
Survey data
Surveys
Voter behavior
Voters
Voting
Voting Behavior
Voting behaviour
title Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T09%3A25%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ignorance%20or%20Opposition?%20Blank%20and%20Spoiled%20Votes%20in%20Low-Information,%20Highly%20Politicized%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Political%20research%20quarterly&rft.au=Driscoll,%20Amanda&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=547-561&rft.issn=1065-9129&rft.eissn=1938-274X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1065912914524634&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24371891%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1559866120&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24371891&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1065912914524634&rfr_iscdi=true