Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments
Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political research quarterly 2014-09, Vol.67 (3), p.547-561 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 561 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 547 |
container_title | Political research quarterly |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Driscoll, Amanda Nelson, Michael J. |
description | Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider self-reported vote choice from a nationally representative survey following the 2011 Bolivian elections, in which 60 percent of votes cast were blank or spoiled. We estimate a multinomial logit model, finding that both blank and null voting were driven by political concerns, though null voting was more common among politically sophisticated individuals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1065912914524634 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735646837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24371891</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1065912914524634</sage_id><sourcerecordid>24371891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e9bd759b27f387ffedd5906112e56212f6ed2fe3117e0a285073cf992da0e5593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFLHDEUxgepoNXeexECXjx0al4ySSYnsbKtCwsKtqW3Ic68rFlnk2ky26J_vVlWRARhT-_B-30f7-Mris9AvwIodQpUCg1MQyVYJXm1U-yD5nXJVPXnQ97zuVzf94qPKS0oBZbJ_aKbzn2IxrdIQiRXwxCSG13wZ-Rbb_w9Mb4jN0NwPXbkdxgxEefJLPwvp96GuDRr9gu5dPO7_oFchz6LW_eY4Yn_52LwS_RjOix2rekTfnqeB8Wv75OfF5fl7OrH9OJ8VraVlmOJ-rZTQt8yZXmtrMWuE5pKAIZCMmBWYscs8pwXqWG1oIq3VmvWGYpCaH5QnGx8hxj-rjCNzdKlFvucBMMqNaC4kJWsudoCZcBFrTjdAqW1YIoCz-jxG3QRVtHnzA3kB2spga0N6YZqY0gpom2G6JYmPjRAm3WZzdsys6TcSJKZ4yvT9_mjDb9IY4gv_qziCmoN_Alc3qZk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1559866120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Driscoll, Amanda ; Nelson, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Amanda ; Nelson, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider self-reported vote choice from a nationally representative survey following the 2011 Bolivian elections, in which 60 percent of votes cast were blank or spoiled. We estimate a multinomial logit model, finding that both blank and null voting were driven by political concerns, though null voting was more common among politically sophisticated individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-274X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1065912914524634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Apathy ; Ballots ; Bolivia ; Bolivians ; Democracy ; Development banks ; Election results ; Elections ; Hypotheses ; Ignorance ; Information ; Judicial elections ; Local elections ; Opinion Polls ; Political candidates ; Political parties ; Political protests ; Political representation ; Political research ; Political theory ; Politics ; Presidential elections ; Self reports ; Survey data ; Surveys ; Voter behavior ; Voters ; Voting ; Voting Behavior ; Voting behaviour</subject><ispartof>Political research quarterly, 2014-09, Vol.67 (3), p.547-561</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 The University of Utah</rights><rights>2014 University of Utah</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Sep 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e9bd759b27f387ffedd5906112e56212f6ed2fe3117e0a285073cf992da0e5593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e9bd759b27f387ffedd5906112e56212f6ed2fe3117e0a285073cf992da0e5593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24371891$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24371891$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,12826,21800,27846,27847,27905,27906,43602,43603,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments</title><title>Political research quarterly</title><description>Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider self-reported vote choice from a nationally representative survey following the 2011 Bolivian elections, in which 60 percent of votes cast were blank or spoiled. We estimate a multinomial logit model, finding that both blank and null voting were driven by political concerns, though null voting was more common among politically sophisticated individuals.</description><subject>Apathy</subject><subject>Ballots</subject><subject>Bolivia</subject><subject>Bolivians</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Development banks</subject><subject>Election results</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Ignorance</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Judicial elections</subject><subject>Local elections</subject><subject>Opinion Polls</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Political research</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Self reports</subject><subject>Survey data</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><subject>Voting behaviour</subject><issn>1065-9129</issn><issn>1938-274X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFLHDEUxgepoNXeexECXjx0al4ySSYnsbKtCwsKtqW3Ic68rFlnk2ky26J_vVlWRARhT-_B-30f7-Mris9AvwIodQpUCg1MQyVYJXm1U-yD5nXJVPXnQ97zuVzf94qPKS0oBZbJ_aKbzn2IxrdIQiRXwxCSG13wZ-Rbb_w9Mb4jN0NwPXbkdxgxEefJLPwvp96GuDRr9gu5dPO7_oFchz6LW_eY4Yn_52LwS_RjOix2rekTfnqeB8Wv75OfF5fl7OrH9OJ8VraVlmOJ-rZTQt8yZXmtrMWuE5pKAIZCMmBWYscs8pwXqWG1oIq3VmvWGYpCaH5QnGx8hxj-rjCNzdKlFvucBMMqNaC4kJWsudoCZcBFrTjdAqW1YIoCz-jxG3QRVtHnzA3kB2spga0N6YZqY0gpom2G6JYmPjRAm3WZzdsys6TcSJKZ4yvT9_mjDb9IY4gv_qziCmoN_Alc3qZk</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Driscoll, Amanda</creator><creator>Nelson, Michael J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments</title><author>Driscoll, Amanda ; Nelson, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e9bd759b27f387ffedd5906112e56212f6ed2fe3117e0a285073cf992da0e5593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Apathy</topic><topic>Ballots</topic><topic>Bolivia</topic><topic>Bolivians</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Development banks</topic><topic>Election results</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Ignorance</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Judicial elections</topic><topic>Local elections</topic><topic>Opinion Polls</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Political research</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Self reports</topic><topic>Survey data</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><topic>Voting behaviour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Driscoll, Amanda</au><au>Nelson, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments</atitle><jtitle>Political research quarterly</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>547-561</pages><issn>1065-9129</issn><eissn>1938-274X</eissn><abstract>Voters often make the effort to go to the polls but effectively throw their vote away by leaving their ballot blank or intentionally spoiled. Typically construed as anomalous or errant, we argue that blank and spoiled ballots are empirically differentiable and politically informative. We consider self-reported vote choice from a nationally representative survey following the 2011 Bolivian elections, in which 60 percent of votes cast were blank or spoiled. We estimate a multinomial logit model, finding that both blank and null voting were driven by political concerns, though null voting was more common among politically sophisticated individuals.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1065912914524634</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1065-9129 |
ispartof | Political research quarterly, 2014-09, Vol.67 (3), p.547-561 |
issn | 1065-9129 1938-274X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735646837 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Apathy Ballots Bolivia Bolivians Democracy Development banks Election results Elections Hypotheses Ignorance Information Judicial elections Local elections Opinion Polls Political candidates Political parties Political protests Political representation Political research Political theory Politics Presidential elections Self reports Survey data Surveys Voter behavior Voters Voting Voting Behavior Voting behaviour |
title | Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T09%3A25%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ignorance%20or%20Opposition?%20Blank%20and%20Spoiled%20Votes%20in%20Low-Information,%20Highly%20Politicized%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Political%20research%20quarterly&rft.au=Driscoll,%20Amanda&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=547-561&rft.issn=1065-9129&rft.eissn=1938-274X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1065912914524634&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24371891%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1559866120&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24371891&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1065912914524634&rfr_iscdi=true |